scholarly journals Social Determinants of Health: Considerations for Athletic Health Care

Author(s):  
Kelsey J. Picha ◽  
Cailee E. Welch Bacon ◽  
Clinton Normore ◽  
Alison R. Snyder Valier

ABSTRACT Health disparities are prevalent issues in the United States and a frequent topic of conversation in the public health realm. Causes of health disparities include social inequities and social determinants of health. Although social determinants of health have been suggested to contribute more to individual and population health than the health care provided, this concept in athletic health care has received little attention. Therefore, the purpose of this article is to describe social determinants of health, present examples of social determinants, and discuss awareness of actionable steps for the athletic training profession to be more culturally proficient. By increasing awareness of and acknowledging social determinants of health, athletic trainers will be positioned to improve patient outcomes more readily and contribute to ongoing conversations at the policy level of health care.

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 321-330
Author(s):  
Rhianna Freiburger ◽  
Kelsey J. Picha ◽  
Cailee E. Welch Bacon ◽  
Alison R. Snyder Valier

Context Social determinants of health (SDH) are reportedly more important in determining a patient's health status than the actual health care services provided. Given their role and unique clinical practice environment, athletic trainers will encounter patients who are influenced by SDH. It is important to educate future generations of athletic trainers on the importance of SDH to promote positive patient outcomes. Objective To detail a strategy for implementing concepts of SDH into athletic training education programs. Background A purposeful educational strategy that incorporates didactic concepts and clinical practice application of SDH for athletic training students is important to produce a deeper understanding of the role these factors play in populational health. Description Delivery methods such as presentation modules and learning activities are presented. Clinical Advantage(s) Integrating SDH through a tailored activity exposes students to the concepts of SDH and promotes observation and use in clinical practice. Awareness and recognition of how SDH support delivery of patient-centered care may promote patient and population health outcomes. Conclusion(s) The inclusion of SDH into athletic training education using lecture, observational learning, and reflective techniques can expose students to SDH in clinical practice and promote whole-person health care.


2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 961-961
Author(s):  
Sojeong Lee ◽  
Victoria Rizzo

Abstract The visible impact of the SDoHs on health and behavioral health as well as health disparities among minority populations is heightened due to COVID-19. One group about which little is known in relation to SDoHs is the older Korean immigrant population in the U.S. To examine the impact of SDoHs on the health, mental health, and health care utilization, a systematic review of studies focused on SDoHs for this population was conducted. Using multiple indexing terms, databases were searched for articles published in English between January 1, 2011 and December 2020. Articles were included in the search if they examined social determinants of health of older Korean immigrants defined as foreign-born Koreans aged 60 or older who live in the United States regardless of citizenship or legal immigration status. A total of 1090 articles were identified in the search. A review of abstracts for inclusion criteria resulted in 118 articles for review. Seventy-one articles were excluded during the review process. A total of 47 articles met inclusion criteria and were evaluated. The review revealed that SDoHs, including education level, financial resources, access to health insurance, level of acculturation and level of social support, influenced cognitive status, depressive symptoms, health status and quality of life. These findings validate the need for interventions to address the social care needs of older Korean immigrants and can be used to identify the role of social workers in addressing the SDoHs that result in health disparities for older Korean immigrants.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rana Malek ◽  
Elizabeth Lamos

Abstract Background: In June 2018, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) revised the common program requirements and identified a core requirement “to understand the social determinants of health (SDH) of the populations they serve and incorporate them in the design and implementation of the program curriculum, with the ultimate goal of addressing these needs and health disparities.1” Trainees must “demonstrate an awareness of and responsiveness to the larger context and system of health care, including the SDH, as well as the ability to call effectively on other resources to provide optimal health care.” While Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) teaching hospitals comprise 5% of the total US hospitals, they provide 40% of charity care in the US. In this setting, trainees need to be aware of the challenges faced by the communities they serve. SDH are increasingly recognized for their importance in the care of patients with diabetes and explain the health disparities in diabetes that exist throughout the US. Endocrinology fellows and the faculty teaching them must therefore demonstrate knowledge of SDH and health disparities. Methods: We investigated the knowledge gaps in SDH in an urban academic endocrinology fellowship. All fellows and faculty members completed a 10-question survey that assessed knowledge, confidence, and motivation to learn about SDH. Six fellows and 10 faculty members completed the survey. Results: While 60% of faculty and 83% fellows reported having an understanding of SDH, no fellows or faculty could correctly identify all 6 SDH. When asked about their confidence level in identifying SDH, 20% of faculty had low confidence, 70% were confident, and 10% were very confident. For fellows, 50% reported low confidence, 33% were confident, and 17% were very confident. There was lower confidence level in fellows and faculty when addressing SDH—with half the faculty feeling not confident or only somewhat confident. Fellows had lower confidence levels with addressing SDH, with 83% reporting low confidence. However, motivation was high amongst fellows and faculty to learn more about SDH—83% of fellows and 70% of faculty were very motivated to learn more about SDH. Conclusion: The ACGME has made knowledge of SDH a common program requirement of all training programs. A needs assessment of SDH in an urban endocrinology fellowship program identified knowledge and confidence gaps about SDH, but a high motivation to learn by both fellows and faculty. While trainees and faculty often learn “on the job” about SDH and health disparities, this study reveals that formal curricular activities must be incorporated into endocrinology fellowship programs to meet the ACGME common program requirements. 1. ACGME “Common Program Requirements.” https://www.acgme.org/What-We-Do/Accreditation/Common-Program-Requirements.


2021 ◽  
pp. e1-e3
Author(s):  
Renuka Tipirneni

Racial disparities in COVID-19 outcomes have called renewed attention to addressing systemic racism and health inequities in the United States. The drivers of these inequities have been debated but include social determinants of health (SDOH) such as poverty, employment in low-wage but essential worker occupations, crowded housing, and lack of access to regular medical care.1 For those in the public health community, the importance of addressing both upstream and midstream SDOH to achieve health equity has been long recognized and discussed. (Am J Public Health. Published online ahead of print January 28, 2021: e1–e3. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2020.306085 )


2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (5) ◽  
pp. 1055-1068
Author(s):  
Andy Sharma

Summary Public health scholars and policy-makers are concerned that the United States continues to experience unmanageable health care costs while struggling with issues surrounding access and equity. To addresses these and other key issues, the National Academy of Medicine held a public symposium, Vital Directions for Health and Health Care: A National Conversation during September 2016, with the goal of identifying clear priorities for high-value health care and improved well-being. One important area was addressing social determinants of health. This article contributes to this objective by investigating the impact of wealth on older Black women’s health. Employing the 2008/2010 waves of the RAND Health and Retirement Study on a sample of 906 older Black women, this panel study examined self-assessed health ratings of very good/good/fair/poor within a relaxed random effects framework, thereby controlling for both (i) observed and (ii) unobserved individual-level heterogeneity. This analysis did not find a statistically significant association with wealth despite a difference of approximately $75 000 in its valuation from very good to poor health. This also occurred after wealth was (i) readjusted for outliers and (ii) reformulated as negative, no change or positive change from 2008. This finding suggests that wealth may not play as integral a role. However, the outcome was significant for earnings and education, particularly higher levels of education. Scholars should further this inquiry to better understand how earnings/education/wealth operate as social determinants of health for minority populations.


2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nancy E. Adler ◽  
◽  
David M. Cutler ◽  
Jonathan E. Fielding ◽  
Sandro Galea ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 63 (6) ◽  
pp. 771-776
Author(s):  
Élan C Burton ◽  
Delancy HS Bennett ◽  
Linda M Burton

Social determinants of health (SDH) describe how a person’s education, economic status, and overall environment affect their health outcomes. In the United States, a long history of resource inequities has existed, particularly for those from ethnic minority backgrounds. The following is a literature review of SDH from a historical context, current state, and through the lens of the COVID-19 pandemic.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document