scholarly journals Decision to Return to Sport After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction, Part I: A Qualitative Investigation of Psychosocial Factors

2018 ◽  
Vol 53 (5) ◽  
pp. 452-463 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie P. Burland ◽  
Jenny Toonstra ◽  
Jennifer L. Werner ◽  
Carl G. Mattacola ◽  
Dana M. Howell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Psychosocial Factors ◽  
Biopsychosocial Model ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Strong Support ◽  
Return To Sport ◽  
Acl Injury ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Context:  Return-to-sport criteria after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury are often based on “satisfactory” functional and patient-reported outcomes. However, an individual's decision to return to sport is likely multifactorial; psychological and physical readiness to return may not be synonymous. Objective:  To determine the psychosocial factors that influence the decision to return to sport in athletes 1 year post–ACL reconstruction (ACLR). Design:  Qualitative study. Setting:  Academic medical center. Patients or Other Participants:  Twelve participants (6 males, 6 females) were purposefully chosen from a large cohort. Participants were a minimum of 1-year postsurgery and had been active in competitive athletics preinjury. Data Collection and Analysis:  Data were collected via semistructured interviews. Qualitative analysis using a descriptive phenomenologic process, horizontalization, was used to derive categories and themes that represented the data. The dynamic-biopsychosocial model was used as a theoretical framework to guide this study. Results:  Six predominant themes emerged that described the participants' experiences after ACLR: (1) hesitation and lack of confidence led to self-limiting tendencies, (2) awareness was heightened after ACLR, (3) expectations and assumptions about the recovery process influenced the decision to return to sport after ACLR, (4) coming to terms with ACL injury led to a reprioritization, (5) athletic participation helped reinforce intrinsic personal characteristics, and (6) having a strong support system both in and out of rehabilitation was a key factor in building a patient's confidence. We placed themes into components of the dynamic-biopsychosocial model to better understand how they influenced the return to sport. Conclusions:  After ACLR, the decision to return to sport was largely influenced by psychosocial factors. Factors including hesitancy, lack of confidence, and fear of reinjury are directly related to knee function and have the potential to be addressed in the rehabilitation setting. Other factors, such as changes in priorities or expectations, may be independent of physical function but remain relevant to the patient-clinician relationship and should be considered during postoperative rehabilitation.

Assessing Physical Activity After ACL Injury: Moving Beyond Return to Sport

2021 ◽  
pp. 194173812110253
Author(s):  
Christopher Kuenze ◽  
Katherine Collins ◽  
Karin Allor Pfeiffer ◽  
Caroline Lisee
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Young Patients ◽  
Return To Sport ◽  
Acl Injury ◽  
Noncommunicable Diseases ◽  
Successful Recovery ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Context: Return to sport is widely utilized by sports medicine researchers and clinicians as a primary outcome of interest for successful recovery when working with young patients who have undergone anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR). While return-to-sport outcomes are effective at tracking progress post-ACLR, they are limited because they do not necessarily capture physical activity (PA) engagement, which is important to maintain knee joint health and reduce the risk of noncommunicable diseases. Therefore, there is a critical need (1) to describe current PA participation and measurement recommendations; (2) to appraise common PA measurement approaches, including patient-reported outcomes and device-based methodologies; and (3) to provide clinical recommendations for future evaluation. Evidence Acquisition: Reports of patient-reported or device-based PA in patients with ACL injury were acquired and summarized based on a PubMed search (2000 through July 2020). Search terms included physical activity OR activity AND anterior cruciate ligament OR ACL. Study Design: Clinical review. Level of Evidence: Level 5. Results: We highlight that (1) individuals with ACLR are 2.36 times less likely to meet the US Department of Health and Human Services PA recommendations even when reporting successful return to sport, (2) common patient-reported PA assessments have significant limitations in the data that can be derived, and (3) alternative patient-reported and device-based assessments may provide improved assessment of PA in this patient population. Conclusion: Clinicians and researchers have relied on return to sport status or self-reported PA participation via surveys. These approaches are not consistent with current recommendations for PA assessment and do not allow for comparison with contemporary PA recommendations or guidelines. Return to sport, patient-reported outcome measures, and device-based assessment approaches should be used in complementary manners to comprehensively assess PA participation after ACLR. However, appropriate techniques should be used when assessing PA in adult and adolescent populations.

scholarly journals The Incidence of Second Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury in Young Athletes is Not Influenced by Time to Return to Sport

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (4_suppl3) ◽  
pp. 2325967120S0018
Author(s):  
Christin M. Zwolski ◽  
Laura C. Schmitt ◽  
Staci Thomas ◽  
Mark V. Paterno
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Injury Risk ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Return To Sport ◽  
Acl Injury ◽  
International Knee Documentation Committee ◽  
Ligament Injury ◽  
Young Athletes ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Background: Incidence of second anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury among the population of young athletes is reported to be as high as 30%. Time between ACL reconstruction (ACLR) and return to sport (RTS) has been considered as a factor in second injury risk. Hypothesis/Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of time between ACLR and RTS on incidence of 2nd ACL injury. The tested hypothesis was that incidence of 2nd ACL injury among young athletes would not be influenced by time to RTS or patient-reported function following primary ACLR. Methods: 188 participants (mean age=16.8±3.0 years; 124 females) underwent ACLR, completed rehabilitation, and were medically cleared to RTS. Subjects were enrolled in the study within 4 weeks of their medical clearance to RTS. At this time, each subject completed the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Survey, the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and was grouped into an early RTS group (<6 months post-operative (PO)) (n=19), an average RTS group (6-9 months PO)(n=106), and a late RTS group (≥9 months PO)(n=63). Subjects were then tracked for 24 months to record the incidence of a second ACL injury to either the involved limb or contralateral limb. One-way ANOVA was used to identify differences in demographics and patient-reported outcomes among the groups. Crude incidence of 2nd ACL injury was identified within each group and chi-squared analyses were used to determine the difference in proportion of 2nd ACL injuries between groups. Results: No significant differences in age (p=0.40), height (p=0.65) or weight (p=0.92) existed among the groups. At time of RTS, no differences between the early RTS, average RTS and late RTS groups were seen in patient-reported function on the IKDC (84.9±10.8, 90.5±9.5, 88.7±10.9; p= 0.08) and all KOOS subscales (p=0.05-0.41). With respect to 2nd ACL injury, there were no group differences (p=0.716) in the proportion of patients within each group who suffered a 2nd ACL injury within 24 months of RTS date (26.3% (5/19) of patients in the early RTS group, 18.9% (20/106) in the average RTS group and 22.2% (14/63) in the late RTS group). Conclusion: In accordance with our hypothesis, length of time between ACLR and RTS had no influence on incidence of second ACL injury among a population of young athletes after ACLR. Furthermore, patient-reported function at time of RTS was similar among groups, regardless of time between ACLR and RTS.

scholarly journals Rehabilitation and Return to Sport Assessment after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: Quantifying Joint Kinematics during Complex High-Speed Tasks through Wearable Sensors

Sensors ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (7) ◽  
pp. 2331
Author(s):  
Stefano Di Paolo ◽  
Nicola Francesco Lopomo ◽  
Francesco Della Villa ◽  
Gabriele Paolini ◽  
Giulio Figari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Excellent Agreement ◽  
High Speed ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Wearable Sensors ◽  
Return To Sport ◽  
Acl Injury ◽  
Wearable Sensor ◽  
Anterior Cruciate ◽  
Full Body

The aim of the present study was to quantify joint kinematics through a wearable sensor system in multidirectional high-speed complex movements used in a protocol for rehabilitation and return to sport assessment after Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) injury, and to validate it against a gold standard optoelectronic marker-based system. Thirty-four healthy athletes were evaluated through a full-body wearable sensor (MTw Awinda, Xsens) and a marker-based optoelectronic (Vicon Nexus, Vicon) system during the execution of three tasks: drop jump, forward sprint, and 90° change of direction. Clinically relevant joint angles of lower limbs and trunk were compared through Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r), and the Coefficient of Multiple Correlation (CMC). An excellent agreement (r > 0.94, CMC > 0.96) was found for knee and hip sagittal plane kinematics in all the movements. A fair-to-excellent agreement was found for frontal (r 0.55–0.96, CMC 0.63–0.96) and transverse (r 0.45–0.84, CMC 0.59–0.90) plane kinematics. Movement complexity slightly affected the agreement between the systems. The system based on wearable sensors showed fair-to-excellent concurrent validity in the evaluation of the specific joint parameters commonly used in rehabilitation and return to sport assessment after ACL injury for complex movements. The ACL professionals could benefit from full-body wearable technology in the on-field rehabilitation of athletes.

Timeline for Maximal Subjective Outcome Improvement After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

2018 ◽  
Vol 47 (10) ◽  
pp. 2501-2509 ◽  
Author(s):  
Avinesh Agarwalla ◽  
Richard N. Puzzitiello ◽  
Joseph N. Liu ◽  
Gregory L. Cvetanovich ◽  
Anirudh K. Gowd ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Clinical Significance ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Return To Sport ◽  
Pubmed Database ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Clinically Significant ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Background: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears are one of the most common traumatic knee injuries experienced by athletes. Return to sport is considered the pinnacle endpoint among patients receiving ACL reconstruction. However, at the time of return to sport, patients may not be participating at their previous levels of function, as defined by clinical metrics. Purpose: To establish when patients perceive maximal subjective medical improvement according to patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Study Design: Systematic review. Methods: A systematic review of the PubMed database was conducted to identify studies that reported sequential PROMs up to a minimum of 2 years after ACL reconstruction. Pooled analysis was conducted for PROMs at follow-up points of 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years. Clinically significant improvement was determined between pairs of intervals with the minimal clinically important difference. Results: This review contains 30 studies including 2253 patients who underwent ACL reconstruction. Clinically significant improvement in the KOOS (Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score) was seen up to 1 year after ACL reconstruction, but no clinical significance was noted from 1 to 2 years. Clinically significant improvement in the IKDC (International Knee Documentation Committee) and Lysholm questionnaires was seen up to 6 months postoperatively, but no clinical significance was noted beyond that. Conclusion: After ACL reconstruction, maximal subjective medical improvement is established 1 year postoperatively, with no further perceived clinical improvement beyond this time point according to current PROMs. The KOOS may be a more responsive metric to subjective improvements in this patient cohort than other patient-reported outcomes, such as the IKDC and Lysholm. Clinical Relevance: After ACL reconstruction, patients perceive interval subjective improvements until 1 year postoperatively.

Psychological Readiness to Return to Sport Is Associated With Second Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries

2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (4) ◽  
pp. 857-862 ◽  
Author(s):  
April L. McPherson ◽  
Julian A. Feller ◽  
Timothy E. Hewett ◽  
Kate E. Webster
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Characteristic Curve ◽  
Return To Sport ◽  
Acl Injury ◽  
Short Version ◽  
Cutoff Score ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Younger Patients ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Background: Psychological responses after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury and ACL reconstruction (ACLR) have been identified as predictors of return to sport but have not been investigated in relation to further injury. Purpose/Hypothesis: To determine whether psychological readiness to return to sport is associated with second ACL injury. It was hypothesized a priori that at both preoperative and 12-month postoperative time points, patients who sustained a second ACL injury would have lower psychological readiness than patients who did not have a second injury. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: Patients who had a primary ACLR procedure between June 2014 and June 2016 completed the ACL–Return to Sport after Injury (ACL-RSI) (short version) scale before their ACLR and repeated the scale at 12 months after surgery to assess psychological readiness to return to sport. Patients were followed for a minimum of 2 years (range, 2-4 years) after surgery to determine further injury. The primary outcome was the relationship between ACL-RSI scores and the incidence of second ACL injury. Results: In 329 patients who returned to sport after ACLR, 52 (16%) sustained a second ACL injury. No difference in psychological readiness was observed at the preoperative time point, but patients who sustained a second injury trended toward lower psychological readiness at 12 months compared with noninjured patients (60.9 vs 67.2 points; P = .11). Younger (≤20 years) patients with injury had significantly lower psychological readiness to return to sport than young noninjured patients (60.8 vs 71.5 points; P = .02), but no difference was found in older patients (60.9 vs 64.6 points; P = .58). In younger patients, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed a cutoff score of 76.7 points with 90% sensitivity to identify younger patients who sustained a second ACL injury. Conclusion: Younger patients with lower psychological readiness are at higher risk for a second ACL injury after return to sport.

How Is Psychological Outcome Related to Knee Function and Return to Sport Among Adolescent Athletes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction?

2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (7) ◽  
pp. 1567-1575 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susanne Beischer ◽  
Eric Hamrin Senorski ◽  
Christoffer Thomeé ◽  
Kristian Samuelsson ◽  
Roland Thomeé
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Self Efficacy ◽  
Muscle Function ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Return To Sport ◽  
Adolescent Athletes ◽  
Psychological Outcome ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Background: Adult patients who succeed in returning to their preinjury levels of sport after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction have been characterized by a more positive psychological response. It is not known whether this relationship is valid for adolescent athletes. Purpose: To investigate psychological readiness to return to sport, knee-related self-efficacy, and motivation among adolescent (15-20 years old) and adult (21-30 years old) athletes after ACL reconstruction. A further aim was to compare athletes (15-30 years old) who had recovered their muscle function and returned to sport with athletes who had not. Study Design: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Data were extracted from a rehabilitation-specific register 8 and 12 months after ACL reconstruction. Athletes previously involved in knee-strenuous sport who had undergone primary ACL reconstruction were included. Data comprised psychological patient-reported outcomes and results from 5 tests of muscle function. Comparisons were performed between age groups, between athletes who had and had not recovered their muscle function, and between patients who had returned to sport and not. Results: In all, 384 (50% females) and 271 athletes (52% females) were included at the 8- and 12- month follow-ups, respectively. Enhanced self-efficacy was reported at both follow-ups by adolescents and by athletes who had recovered their muscle function. Athletes who had recovered their muscle function reported higher ( P = .0007) motivation to achieve their goals. Subgroup analyses on patient sex revealed findings similar to those in the main analyses for females but not for males. Moreover, adolescent and adult athletes who had returned to sport reported significantly higher levels on the Knee Self-Efficacy Scale and the ACL–Return to Sport After Injury scale at both follow-ups. Conclusion: Adolescent athletes, especially females, perceived enhanced self-efficacy, had a higher return-to-sport rate, and were more motivated to reach their goals after ACL reconstruction compared with adults. Regardless of age, athletes who had returned to sport and athletes with more symmetrical muscle function had a stronger psychological profile.

scholarly journals Clinical Tests Can Be Used to Screen for Second Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury in Younger Patients Who Return to Sport

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (8) ◽  
pp. 232596711986300 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kate E. Webster ◽  
Julian A. Feller
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Return To Sport ◽  
Knee Laxity ◽  
Acl Injury ◽  
Anterior Knee Laxity ◽  
Anterior Cruciate ◽  
Clinical Measures ◽  
Anterior Knee

Background: Younger athletes have high rates of second anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury. Return-to-sport criteria have been proposed to enable athletes to make a safe return, but they frequently lack validation. It is unclear whether commonly recorded clinical measures can help to identify high-risk athletes. Purpose: To explore the association between commonly recorded clinical outcome measures and second ACL injury in a young, active patient group. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: Included in this study were 329 athletes (200 males, 129 females) younger than 20 years at the time of first primary ACL reconstruction surgery who had subsequently returned to sport participation. Clinical examination included range of knee motion (passive flexion and extension deficits), instrumented anterior knee laxity, and single- and triple-crossover hop for distance. Patients also completed the subjective International Knee Documentation Committee form. All measures were collected prospectively at a 12-month postoperative clinical review. Patients were evaluated for a minimum 3 years to determine the incidence of subsequent ACL injury. Results: A total of 95 patients (29%) sustained a second ACL injury following clinical assessment and return to sport. There were 50 graft ruptures and 45 contralateral ACL injuries. Patients with a flexion deficit of 5° had over 2 times the odds of sustaining a graft rupture (odds ratio, 2.3; P < .05), and patients with a side-to-side difference in anterior knee laxity of 3 mm or greater had over 2 times the odds of sustaining a contralateral ACL injury (odds ratio, 2.4; P < .05). Overall, 29% (94 of 329) of patients met the threshold for satisfactory function on all 6 clinical measures; these patients had a 33% reduction in the risk of sustaining a second ACL injury ( P = .05) as compared with those who did not meet all clinical thresholds. Conclusion: Clinical measures of knee flexion and stability may have utility to screen for and identify patients who are at greater risk for a second ACL injury in an already high-risk group (ie, age and activity level).

scholarly journals A Comparison of Psychological Readiness and Patient-Reported Function Between Sexes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher Kuenze ◽  
David Robert Bell ◽  
Terry L. Grindstaff ◽  
Caroline Michele Lisee ◽  
Thomas Birchmeier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Young Men ◽  
Return To Sport ◽  
Men And Women ◽  
Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Ikdc Score ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Context Postoperative functional and return-to-sport outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) differ by sex. However, whether sex disparities are observed in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS) before return to sport after ACLR is unclear. Objectives To compare common PROMS between young men and women who had not yet returned to sport after ACLR. Design Cross-sectional study. Setting University laboratory. Main Outcome Measure(s) Forty-five young men (age = 18.7 ± 2.7 years, time since surgery = 6.8 ± 1.4 months) and 45 matched for age (±1 year) and time since surgery (±1 month; age = 18.8 ± 2.8 years, time since surgery = 6.9 ± 1.4 months) with ACLR participated. Participants completed the Tegner Activity Scale, ACL Return to Sport After Injury scale, Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Evaluation Score, and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). The PROMS were compared between men and women using Mann-Whitney U tests. Odds ratios were calculated to evaluate the odds of a male reporting a PROM value above the previously established normative value as compared with a female. Results Sex differences were present for the IKDC score (P = .01) and KOOS Pain score (P = .04) but not for the Tegner activity level (P = .22), ACL Return to Sport after Injury scale score (P = .78), Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia score (P = .64), or other KOOS subscales (P values = .40 to .52). The odds of reporting values above normative levels differed only for the IKDC score (odds ratio = 2.72, 95% confidence level = 1.16, 6.38). Conclusions After ACLR, young men and women reported similar levels of knee-related function, fear of movement, and readiness for return to sport and were equally likely to meet clinically meaningful normative values before return to sport. Overreliance on patient reports or objective functional outcomes in evaluating patient progress and readiness for return to sport after ACLR may limit clinicians in their ability to comprehensively evaluate and develop individualized interventional approaches that optimize patient outcomes.

ACL reconstruction in the professional or elite athlete: state of the art

2021 ◽  
pp. jisakos-2020-000456
Author(s):  
Rafael A Buerba ◽  
Stefano Zaffagnini ◽  
Ryosuke Kuroda ◽  
Volker Musahl
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Elite Athlete ◽  
State Of The Art ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Return To Sport ◽  
Acl Injury ◽  
Peak Performance ◽  
Acl Injuries ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries are on the rise at all levels of sport, including elite athletics. ACL injury can have implications on the athlete’s sport longevity, as well as other long-term consequences, such as the development of future knee osteoarthritis. In the elite athlete, ACL injury can also have ramifications in terms of contract/scholastic obligations, sponsorships and revenue-generating potential. Although the goal of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is to return any athlete to the same preinjury level of sport, management of ACL injuries in the elite athlete come with the additional challenge of returning him or her to an extremely high level of physical performance. Despite outcome studies after ACLR in elite athletes showing a high return-to-sport rate, these studies also show that very few athletes are able to return to sport at the same level of performance. They also show that those athletes who undergo ACLR have careers that are more short-lived in comparison to those without injury. Thus, returning an elite athlete to ‘near peak’ performance may not be good enough for the athletic demands of elite-level sports. A possible explanation for the variability in outcomes is the great diversity seen in the management of ACL injuries in the elite athlete in terms of rehabilitation, graft choices, portal drilling and reconstruction techniques. Recently, the advent of anatomical, individualised ACLR has shown improved results in ACLR outcomes. However, larger-scale studies with long-term follow-ups are needed to better understand the outcomes of modern ACLR techniques—particularly with the rise of quadriceps tendon as an autograft choice and the addition of lateral extra-articular tenodesis procedures. The purpose of this article was thus to provide an up-to-date state-of-the-art review in the management of ACL injuries in the elite athlete.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document