scholarly journals Cryotherapy post-training reduces muscle damage markers in jiu-jitsu fighters

2012 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 629-638 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wagner Oliveira Costa Santos ◽  
Ciro José Brito ◽  
Elson Andrade Pinho Júnior ◽  
Charles Nardelli Valido ◽  
Edmar Lacerda Mendes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Muscle Damage ◽  
Muscle Damage Markers

Effect Of Ibuprofen On Performance, Muscle Damage Markers And Glomerular Filtration During 10 Km Race

2011 ◽  
Vol 43 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 778
Author(s):  
Eduardo R. Da Silva ◽  
Jorge P. Ribeiro ◽  
Clarice Luz ◽  
Ilza V. De Moraes ◽  
Jocelito B. Martins ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Glomerular Filtration ◽  
Muscle Damage ◽  
Muscle Damage Markers

scholarly journals Response Of Muscle Damage Markers After Acute Heavy Exercise In Different Ovarian Hormone Secretion

2018 ◽  
Vol 50 (5S) ◽  
pp. 350
Author(s):  
Akemi Sawai ◽  
Risa Mitsuhashi ◽  
Yuki Warashina ◽  
Alexander Zaboronok ◽  
Ryota Sone ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Muscle Damage ◽  
Hormone Secretion ◽  
Ovarian Hormone ◽  
Heavy Exercise ◽  
Muscle Damage Markers

Influence of different types of compression garments on exercise-induced muscle damage markers after a soccer match

2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diego Marqués-Jiménez ◽  
Julio Calleja-González ◽  
Iñaki Arratibel-Imaz ◽  
Anne Delextrat ◽  
Fernando Uriarte ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Muscle Damage ◽  
Compression Garments ◽  
Soccer Match ◽  
Different Types ◽  
Exercise Induced ◽  
Muscle Damage Markers

scholarly journals The repeated bout effect of traditional resistance exercises on running performance across 3 bouts

2017 ◽  
Vol 42 (9) ◽  
pp. 978-985 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenji Doma ◽  
Moritz Schumann ◽  
Anthony Scott Leicht ◽  
Brian Edward Heilbronn ◽  
Felipe Damas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Resistance Training ◽  
Muscle Damage ◽  
Muscle Soreness ◽  
Recovery Period ◽  
Repeated Bout Effect ◽  
Lower Body ◽  
Running Performance ◽  
The Third ◽  
Repeated Bout ◽  
Muscle Damage Markers

This study investigated the repeated bout effect of 3 typical lower body resistance-training sessions on maximal and submaximal effort running performance. Twelve resistance-untrained men (age, 24 ± 4 years; height, 1.81 ± 0.10 m; body mass, 79.3 ± 10.9 kg; peak oxygen uptake, 48.2 ± 6.5 mL·kg−1·min−1; 6-repetition maximum squat, 71.7 ± 12.2 kg) undertook 3 bouts of resistance-training sessions at 6-repetitions maximum. Countermovement jump (CMJ), lower-body range of motion (ROM), muscle soreness, and creatine kinase (CK) were examined prior to and immediately, 24 h (T24), and 48 h (T48) after each resistance-training bout. Submaximal (i.e., below anaerobic threshold (AT)) and maximal (i.e., above AT) running performances were also conducted at T24 and T48. Most indirect muscle damage markers (i.e., CMJ, ROM, and muscle soreness) and submaximal running performance were significantly improved (P < 0.05; 1.9%) following the third resistance-training bout compared with the second bout. Whilst maximal running performance was also improved following the third bout (P < 0.05; 9.8%) compared with other bouts, the measures were still reduced by 12%–20% versus baseline. However, the increase in CK was attenuated following the second bout (P < 0.05) with no further protection following the third bout (P > 0.05). In conclusion, the initial bout induced the greatest change in CK; however, at least 2 bouts were required to produce protective effects on other indirect muscle damage markers and submaximal running performance measures. This suggests that submaximal running sessions should be avoided for at least 48 h after resistance training until the third bout, although a greater recovery period may be required for maximal running sessions.

Age Comparisons of Inflammation and Muscle Damage Markers in Response to Low Intensity Resistance Exercise with Vascular Restriction in Men

2010 ◽  
Vol 42 ◽  
pp. 739-740
Author(s):  
SoJung Kim ◽  
Eonho Kim ◽  
Vanessa Sherk ◽  
Kaelin Young ◽  
Alina Joaca-Bine ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Resistance Exercise ◽  
Muscle Damage ◽  
Low Intensity ◽  
Muscle Damage Markers

scholarly journals Recovery After High-Intensity Intermittent Exercise in Elite Soccer Players Using VEINOPLUS Sport Technology for Blood-Flow Stimulation

2012 ◽  
Vol 47 (5) ◽  
pp. 498-506 ◽  
Author(s):  
François Bieuzen ◽  
Hervé Pournot ◽  
Rémy Roulland ◽  
Christophe Hausswirth
Keyword(s):  
Blood Flow ◽  
Muscle Damage ◽  
Maximal Voluntary Contraction ◽  
Electric Stimulation ◽  
Voluntary Contraction ◽  
Soccer Players ◽  
Anaerobic Performance ◽  
Countermovement Jump ◽  
Passive Recovery ◽  
Muscle Damage Markers

Context Electric muscle stimulation has been suggested to enhance recovery after exhaustive exercise by inducing an increase in blood flow to the stimulated area. Previous studies have failed to support this hypothesis. We hypothesized that the lack of effect shown in previous studies could be attributed to the technique or device used. Objective To investigate the effectiveness of a recovery intervention using an electric blood-flow stimulator on anaerobic performance and muscle damage in professional soccer players after intermittent, exhaustive exercise. Design Randomized controlled clinical trial. Setting National Institute of Sport, Expertise, and Performance (INSEP). Patients or Other Participants Twenty-six healthy professional male soccer players. Intervention(s) The athletes performed an intermittent fatiguing exercise followed by a 1-hour recovery period, either passive or using an electric blood-flow stimulator (VEINOPLUS). Participants were randomly assigned to a group before the experiment started. Main Outcome Measures(s) Performances during a 30-second all-out exercise test, maximal vertical countermovement jump, and maximal voluntary contraction of the knee extensor muscles were measured at rest, immediately after the exercise, and 1 hour and 24 hours later. Muscle enzymes indicating muscle damage (creatine kinase, lactate dehydrogenase) and hematologic profiles were analyzed before and 1 hour and 24 hours after the intermittent fatigue exercise. Results The electric-stimulation group had better 30-second all-out performances at 1 hour after exercise (P = .03) in comparison with the passive-recovery group. However, no differences were observed in muscle damage markers, maximal vertical countermovement jump, or maximal voluntary contraction between groups (P &gt; .05). Conclusions Compared with passive recovery, electric stimulation using this blood-flow stimulator improved anaerobic performance at 1 hour postintervention. No changes in muscle damage markers or maximal voluntary contraction were detected. These responses may be considered beneficial for athletes engaged in sports with successive rounds interspersed with short, passive recovery periods.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document