scholarly journals Towards One Health disease surveillance: The Southern African Centre for Infectious Disease Surveillance approach

Author(s):  
Esron D. Karimuribo ◽  
Kuya Sayalel ◽  
Eric Beda ◽  
Nick Short ◽  
Philemon Wambura ◽  
...  

Africa has the highest burden of infectious diseases in the world and yet the least capacity for its risk management. It has therefore become increasingly important to search for ‘fit-for- purpose’ approaches to infectious disease surveillance and thereby targeted disease control. The fact that the majority of human infectious diseases are originally of animal origin means we have to consider One Health (OH) approaches which require inter-sectoral collaboration for custom-made infectious disease surveillance in the endemic settings of Africa. A baseline survey was conducted to assess the current status and performance of human and animal health surveillance systems and subsequently a strategy towards OH surveillance system was developed. The strategy focused on assessing the combination of participatory epidemiological approaches and the deployment of mobile technologies to enhance the effectiveness of disease alerts and surveillance at the point of occurrence, which often lies in remote areas. We selected three study sites, namely the Ngorongoro, Kagera River basin and Zambezi River basin ecosystems. We have piloted and introduced the next-generation Android mobile phones running the EpiCollect application developed by Imperial College to aid geo-spatial and clinical data capture and transmission of this data from the field to the remote Information Technology (IT) servers at the research hubs for storage, analysis, feedback and reporting. We expect that the combination of participatory epidemiology and technology will significantly improve OH disease surveillance in southern Africa.

2012 ◽  
Vol 79 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric Beda

The dynamic nature of new information and/or knowledge is a big challenge for information systems. Early knowledge management systems focused entirely on technologies for storing, searching and retrieving data; these systems have proved a failure. Juirsica and Mylopoulos1 suggested that in order to build effective technologies for knowledge management, we need to further our understanding of how individuals, groups and organisations use knowledge. As the focus on knowledge management for organisations and consortia alike is moving towards a keen appreciation of how deeply knowledge is embedded in people’s experiences, there is a general realisation that knowledge cannot be stored or captured digitally. This puts more emphasis in creating enabling environments for interactions that stimulate knowledge sharing.Our work aims at developing an un-obtrusive intelligent system that glues together effective contemporary and traditional technologies to aid these interactions and manage the information captured. In addition this system will include tools to aid propagating a repository of scientific information relevant to surveillance of infectious diseases to complement knowledge shared and/or acts as a point of reference.This work is ongoing and based on experiences in developing a knowledge network management system for the Southern African Centre of Infectious Disease Surveillance (SACIDS), A One Health consortium of southern African academic and research institutions involved with infectious diseases of humans and animals in partnership with world-renowned centres of research in industrialised countries.


2013 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 19958 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark M. Rweyemamu ◽  
Peter Mmbuji ◽  
Esron Karimuribo ◽  
Janusz Paweska ◽  
Dominic Kambarage ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Kim A. Kayunze ◽  
Angwara D. Kiwara ◽  
Eligius Lyamuya ◽  
Dominic M. Kambarage ◽  
Jonathan Rushton ◽  
...  

One-health approaches have started being applied to health systems in some countries in controlling infectious diseases in order to reduce the burden of disease in humans, livestock and wild animals collaboratively. However, one wonders whether the problem of lingering and emerging zoonoses is more affected by health policies, low application of one-health approaches, or other factors. As part of efforts to answer this question, the Southern African Centre for Infectious Disease Surveillance (SACIDS) smart partnership of human health, animal health and socio-economic experts published, in April 2011, a conceptual framework to support One Health research for policy on emerging zoonoses. The main objective of this paper was to identify which factors really affect the burden of disease and how the burden could affect socio-economic well-being. Amongst other issues, the review of literature shows that the occurrence of infectious diseases in humans and animals is driven by many factors, the most important ones being the causative agents (viruses, bacteria, parasites, etc.) and the mediator conditions (social, cultural, economic or climatic) which facilitate the infection to occur and hold. Literature also shows that in many countries there is little collaboration between medical and veterinary services despite the shared underlying science and the increasing infectious disease threat. In view of these findings, a research to inform health policy must walk on two legs: a natural sciences leg and a social sciences one.


Author(s):  
Marie C. E. Hanin ◽  
Kevin Queenan ◽  
Sara Savic ◽  
Esron Karimuribo ◽  
Simon R. Rüegg ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 185 (21) ◽  
pp. 651-653
Author(s):  
Christopher Browne ◽  
Jolyon M. Medlock

Fleur Whitlock of the Animal Health Trust takes a look at equine infectious disease surveillance and the sources of information available.


2020 ◽  
Vol 186 (8) ◽  
pp. 241-243

Fleur Whitlock of the Animal Health Trust takes a look at equine infectious disease surveillance initiatives in action in the UK


2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alina Deshpande ◽  
Kristin Margevicius

Objective1. To develop a comprehensive model characterization frameworkto describe epidemiological models in an operational context.2. To apply the framework to characterize “operational” modelsfor specific infectious diseases and provide a web-based directory,the biosurveillance analytics resource directory (BARD) to the globalinfectious disease surveillance community.IntroductionEpidemiological modeling for infectious disease is useful fordisease management and routine implementation needs to befacilitated through better description of models in an operationalcontext. A standardized model characterization process that allowsselection or making manual comparisons of available models andtheir results is currently lacking. Los Alamos National Laboratory(LANL) has developed a comprehensive framework that can be usedto characterize an infectious disease model in an operational context.We offer this framework and an associated database to stakeholders ofthe infectious disease modeling field as a tool for standardizing modeldescription and facilitating the use of epidemiological models. Such aframework could help the understanding of diverse models by variousstakeholders with different preconceptions, backgrounds, expertise,and needs, and can foster greater use of epidemiological models astools in infectious disease surveillance.MethodsWe define, “operational” as the application of an epidemiologicalmodel to a real-world event for decision support and can be used byexperts and non-experts alike. The term “model” covers three majortypes, risk mapping, disease dynamics and anomaly detection.To develop a framework for characterizing epidemiological modelswe collected information via a three-step process: a literature searchof model characteristics, a review of current operational infectiousdisease epidemiological models, and subject matter expert (SME)panel consultation. We limited selection of operational models tofive infectious diseases: influenza, malaria, dengue, cholera andfoot-and-mouth disease (FMD). These diseases capture a varietyof transmission modes, represent high or potentially high epidemicor endemic burden, and are well represented in the literature. Wealso developed working criteria for what attributes can be used tocomprehensively describe an operational model including a model’sdocumentation, accessibility, and sustainability.To apply the model characterization framework, we built theBARD, which is publicly available (http://brd.bsvgateway.org).A document was also developed to describe the usability requirementsfor the BARD; potential users (and non-users) and use cases areformally described to explain the scope of use.Results1. Framework for model characterizationThe framework is divided into six major components (Figure 1):Model Purpose, Model Objective, Model Scope, Biosurveillance(BSV) goals, Conceptual Model and Model Utility; each of whichhas several sub-categories for characterizing each aspect of a model.2. Application to model characterizationModels for five infectious diseases—cholera, malaria, influenza,FMD and dengue were characterizedusing the framework and are included in the BARD database. Ourframework characterized disparate models in a streamlined fashion.Model information could be binned into the same categories, allowingeasy manual comparison and understanding of the models.3. Development of the BARDOur model characterization framework was implemented into anactionable tool which provides specific information about a modelthat has been systematically categorized. It allows manual categoryto-category comparison of multiple models for a single disease andwhile the tool does not rank models it provides model information ina format that allows a user to make a ranking or an assessment of theutility of the model.ConclusionsWith the model characterization framework we hope to encouragemodel developers to start describing the many features of their modelsusing a common format. We illustrate the application of the frameworkthrough the development of the BARD which is a scientific andnon-biased tool for selecting an appropriate epidemiological modelfor infectious disease surveillance. Epidemiological models are notnecessarily being developed with decision makers in mind. This gapbetween model developers and decision makers needs to be narrowedbefore modeling becomes routinely implemented in decision making.The characterization framework and the tool developed (BARD) area first step towards addressing this gap.Keywordsepidemiological models; database; decision support


2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 639-647 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janneke W Duijster ◽  
Simone D A Doreleijers ◽  
Eva Pilot ◽  
Wim van der Hoek ◽  
Geert Jan Kommer ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Syndromic surveillance can supplement conventional health surveillance by analyzing less-specific, near-real-time data for an indication of disease occurrence. Emergency medical call centre dispatch and ambulance data are examples of routinely and efficiently collected syndromic data that might assist in infectious disease surveillance. Scientific literature on the subject is scarce and an overview of results is lacking. Methods A scoping review including (i) review of the peer-reviewed literature, (ii) review of grey literature and (iii) interviews with key informants. Results Forty-four records were selected: 20 peer reviewed and 24 grey publications describing 44 studies and systems. Most publications focused on detecting respiratory illnesses or on outbreak detection at mass gatherings. Most used retrospective data; some described outcomes of temporary systems; only two described continuously active dispatch- and ambulance-based syndromic surveillance. Key informants interviewed valued dispatch- and ambulance-based syndromic surveillance as a potentially useful addition to infectious disease surveillance. Perceived benefits were its potential timeliness, standardization of data and clinical value of the data. Conclusions Various dispatch- and ambulance-based syndromic surveillance systems for infectious diseases have been reported, although only roughly half are documented in peer-reviewed literature and most concerned retrospective research instead of continuously active surveillance systems. Dispatch- and ambulance-based syndromic data were mostly assessed in relation to respiratory illnesses; reported use for other infectious disease syndromes is limited. They are perceived by experts in the field of emergency surveillance to achieve time gains in detection of infectious disease outbreaks and to provide a useful addition to traditional surveillance efforts.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document