scholarly journals Why do shareholders require corporate environmental disclosure?

2010 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 437-446 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charl De Villiers ◽  
Chris Van Staden

We do a survey of individual shareholders' corporate environmental disclosure needs. We find that South African shareholders require companies to disclose the following specific environmental information:•    Environmental risks and impacts,•    Environmental policy,•    Measurable environmental targets,•    Performance against targets,•    Environmental costs disclosed separately, and•    An independent environmental audit report.Shareholders prefer this information in a separate section of the annual report and on company websites. Shareholders want such disclosure to be prescribed by law and/or stock exchange rules. The most popular reason why they want environmental information disclosed, is to hold companies accountable for their environmental stewardship. A high percentage of shareholders also indicate that they want disclosure, because they are concerned about climate change. These findings imply that legislators and standard setters may have to consider changing disclosure laws and standards.

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Iwan Setiadi ◽  
Yumniati Agustina

This study aims to examine the effect of environmental disclosures on firm value by using profitability as a moderating variable. The research sample is all companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. The sampling technique used in this study was purposive sampling, which consisted of 143 companies. The analysis of this study uses moderated regression analysis. The results of this study indicate that environmental disclosure has a positive and significant effect on firm value. Proability strengthens the influence of environmental disclosures on firm value. The more environmental information disclosed by the company, the higher the trust of stakeholders in the company, so as to encourage stakeholders to help and cooperate with companies in earning profits, the increase in profits encourages an increase in the value of the company itself. Keywords: environmental disclosure, profitability, firm value


2015 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 42-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefano Fontana ◽  
Eugenio D'Amico ◽  
Daniela Coluccia ◽  
Silvia Solimene

Purpose – This study aims to verify the presence, evolution and determinants of voluntary environmental disclosure from companies listed on the Milan Stock Exchange. The authors examined documentation of listed firms from 2006 and 2009. These years immediately precede and follow Italian legislative decree n. 32/2007, which introduced (albeit on a voluntary basis) disclosure of environment-related company information. Design/methodology/approach – The authors’ approach utilizes multivariate regression analysis. The disclosure index of the years 2006 and 2009 represents the dependent variable. Independent variables include firm size, business industry, public shareholders, legislation and environmental performance. Findings – The results show positive effects on environmental disclosure related to legislative decree n. 32, the presence of government shareholdings in firms’ ownership structure, business industry and firm size. The interrelation between firm size and environmental performance shows that large companies give more information only if they produce more environmental pollution, to legitimize themselves to stakeholders. Research limitations/implications – Despite the authors’ contributions concerning environmental information described in the Introduction, they must express two limitations of their analysis. First, the sample analyzed is quite small (only 44 firms). Second, carbon dioxide emissions was chosen as an indicator of atmospheric pollution, yet emissions information has not been provided by Italian firms (even those that are listed on the Milan Stock Exchange), despite being accepted internationally as a measure of environmental performance in business. In addition, in Italy, there is no database ranking firms on corporate social responsibility (CSR). Practical implications – There are many reasons behind the weak or even negative roles of managers regarding social and environmental disclosure. These reasons include a dearth of resources, the profit imperative, lack of legal requirements, insufficient knowledge or awareness, poor performance and fear of bad publicity. What seems to be a real obstacle is the lack of knowledge about non-financial disclosure – in particular, how to gauge, produce and release information when it comes to a firm’s interaction with environment and society, and this void causes low levels of disclosure and even the absence of such action. Some of the reasons for non-disclosure might be attributed to a lack of awareness and knowledge among corporate managers regarding CSR reporting, in general, and disclosure on eco-justice issues, in particular. Originality/value – The first contribution of this work is to realize, for the first time, a specific analysis on Italian firms’ environmental disclosures. Moreover, the study extends this analysis to all entities’ informative documents. This paper also allows an examination of effects of new legislation that encourages environmental information in a corporation’s financial annual report. Finally, this is the first paper to conduct quantitative analysis on firms in the Italian financial market concerning environmental disclosure, as well as regression analysis to identify determinants of firms’ disclosure.


Author(s):  
Muttanachai Suttipun ◽  
Patricia Stanton

This study investigated the extent and content of environmental information disclosure provided in the annual reports of companies listed on the Stock Exchange of Thailand (SET), and tested whether there were any relationships between the amount of environmental disclosure and a number of company characteristics used in previous studies conducted in more developed countries. By using a simple sampling method, 75 listed companies were selected for inclusion in the study based on their 2007 annual reports. The findings indicate that 62 companies (83%) provided environmental information in their annual reports. Companies in the resources industry group made the most disclosure of environmental information, while the least disclosure was made by companies in the agricultural and food industries group. The most common location of environmental reporting in annual reports was under the topic of corporate governance. The most common themes of disclosures were environmental policy, environmental activities, and waste management. There was a positive relationship between the amount of environmental disclosures and size of company.


2018 ◽  
pp. 67-102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luca Fornaciari ◽  
Caterina Pesci

In this study, we examine the effects of voluntary disclosure on the market value of Italian-listed companies adopting GRI guidelines, interpreting our results in the light of both stakeholder theory and legitimacy theory. From a methodological viewpoint, an index is used to measure the level of disclosure of human resources and environmental information. We consider a sample of firms listed on the Milan Stock Exchange for an eleven-year period (2004-2014). The period chosen gave us the opportunity to assess the value-relevance of environmental and social information before and during the Global Financial Crisis. We supplement the previous literature on the topic of the relationship between social and environmental disclosure and value-relevance by arguing that sustainability tools have to be evaluated, remembering that they express a notion of value in the long term and provide information to a large number of stakeholders. Our findings show that environmental information is only value-relevant during the crisis period, when the shareholder perspective comes more into line with other stakeholder perspectives because they are seeking a middle-to-long run notion of value. Finally, we find that a high level of GRI information disclosure is positively evaluated by investors; this result is important also because it was obtained in the Italian market which is largely considered inefficient, and thus it supports the urgent need to provide high-quality information in each type of market.


2018 ◽  
Vol 68 ◽  
pp. 03015
Author(s):  
Luk Luk Fuadah ◽  
Kencana Dewi ◽  
Anton Arisman

The study aim is to examine the effect from board size, board independende, audit committee, woman on board to firm value through environmental disclosure as a mediating variable. Agency theory and stakeholder theory use in this study. The sample in this study is all mining companies listing on the Indonesian Stock Exchange. Data is the 2013-2017 from the annual report. The result shows board size and board independence to environmental disclosure not significant. However, the audit committee, woman on board effect to environmental disclosure shows significant results. This is similar to the relationship between environmental disclosure and firm value shows a positive and significant result. The limitation in this study is just use sample from mining companies, and also only use annual report Future research can do this study use other type companies such as banking sector, manufacturing sector and use other report such as sustainability reporting.


Author(s):  
Shuibin Gu ◽  
Regina Naa Amua Dodoo

This paper attempts to find the impact of firm performance on annual report readability. This study consists of 15 listed firms on the Ghana Stock Exchange within the period 2008 to 2017. The study applies the Gunning Fog Index to measure annual report readability and measures Firm Performance using Return on Assets (ROA) by applying the fixed and random effect method. Per the Hausman test, the random effect method was accepted; the result stated that firm performance positively relates to annual report readability. In addition, the study finds out that corporate governance exerted a negative influence on the readability of the annual report. Finally, the study adopts F-MOLS to test Robustness. Regulators can consider improving and writing plain disclosure laws to improve annual report readability.


2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-68
Author(s):  
Shuibin Gu ◽  
◽  
Regina Naa Amua Dodoo ◽  

This paper attempts to find the impact of firm performance on annual report readability. This study consists of 15 listed firms on the Ghana Stock Exchange within the period 2008 to 2017. The study applies Gunning Fog Index to measure annual report readability and measures Firm Performance using Return on Assets (ROA) by applying the fixed and random effect method. Per the Hausman test, the random effect method was accepted; the result stated that firm performance positively relates to annual report readability. In addition, the study finds out that corporate governance exerted a negative influence on the readability of the annual report. Finally, the study adopts F-MOLS to test Robustness. Regulators can consider improving and writing plain disclosure laws to improve annual report readability.


2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 123-138
Author(s):  
Mas Findi Mulya Saputra

This study aims to determine the effect of environmental performance and environmental costs on financial performance with environmental disclosure as an intervening variable. The population in this study are mining companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) in 2014-2018. By using purposive sampling technique obtained 45 sample companies and analyzed using multiple linear regression. The results of this study indicate that (1) environmental performance has a positive effect on financial performance (2) environmental costs have no positive effect on financial performance (3) environmental disclosure has no positive effect on financial performance. (4) Environmental Performance has a positive effect on Environmental Disclosure. (5) Environmental Costs have no positive effect on Environmental Disclosure. (6) Environmental Performance against Financial Performance is mediated by Environmental Disclosures. (7) Environmental Costs to Financial Performance are not mediated by Environmental Disclosures.


Author(s):  
Adelia Puspita Purwanto ◽  
Paskah Ika Nugroho

This study evaluates the influence of environmental performance, profitability, firm size, and leverage on environmental disclosure. This research is replicated from Dewi and Yasa’s research on 2017, with some modifications. The population collected from the annual report and/or sustainability report of consumer goods industry and mining companies listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) and PROPER or Program Penilaian Peringkat Kinerja Perusahaan in 2017 until 2018. The technique of take the sample was purposive sampling and the total of 56 data was being the samples in this study. The result of the statistical tests prove that profitability and firm size have positively associate and influence to environmental disclosure. Meanwhile, environmental performance and leverage were insignificantly influence to environmental disclosure. This research also found that some of the companies that being tested still have less awareness in exposing their environmental disclosure.


2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 77-101
Author(s):  
Fransiskus Eduardus DAROMES

The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of environmental performance on firm value both directly and through environmental disclosure. Population used is the whole company listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange period 2014-2018. Number of samples are 10 firms each year, were selected by purposive sampling method and using secondary data, i.e. the annual report, PROPER and sustainability report. The analytical methods used are path analysis and hypotesis mediation analysed by using sobel test. Statistical test shows that environmental performance has positive and significant effect on environmental disclosure. Environmental performance and environmental disclosure have positive and significant effect on firm value. This research also shows environmental disclosure mediates the effect of environmental performance on firm value


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document