Does environmental performance affect companies’ environmental disclosure?

2015 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 42-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefano Fontana ◽  
Eugenio D'Amico ◽  
Daniela Coluccia ◽  
Silvia Solimene

Purpose – This study aims to verify the presence, evolution and determinants of voluntary environmental disclosure from companies listed on the Milan Stock Exchange. The authors examined documentation of listed firms from 2006 and 2009. These years immediately precede and follow Italian legislative decree n. 32/2007, which introduced (albeit on a voluntary basis) disclosure of environment-related company information. Design/methodology/approach – The authors’ approach utilizes multivariate regression analysis. The disclosure index of the years 2006 and 2009 represents the dependent variable. Independent variables include firm size, business industry, public shareholders, legislation and environmental performance. Findings – The results show positive effects on environmental disclosure related to legislative decree n. 32, the presence of government shareholdings in firms’ ownership structure, business industry and firm size. The interrelation between firm size and environmental performance shows that large companies give more information only if they produce more environmental pollution, to legitimize themselves to stakeholders. Research limitations/implications – Despite the authors’ contributions concerning environmental information described in the Introduction, they must express two limitations of their analysis. First, the sample analyzed is quite small (only 44 firms). Second, carbon dioxide emissions was chosen as an indicator of atmospheric pollution, yet emissions information has not been provided by Italian firms (even those that are listed on the Milan Stock Exchange), despite being accepted internationally as a measure of environmental performance in business. In addition, in Italy, there is no database ranking firms on corporate social responsibility (CSR). Practical implications – There are many reasons behind the weak or even negative roles of managers regarding social and environmental disclosure. These reasons include a dearth of resources, the profit imperative, lack of legal requirements, insufficient knowledge or awareness, poor performance and fear of bad publicity. What seems to be a real obstacle is the lack of knowledge about non-financial disclosure – in particular, how to gauge, produce and release information when it comes to a firm’s interaction with environment and society, and this void causes low levels of disclosure and even the absence of such action. Some of the reasons for non-disclosure might be attributed to a lack of awareness and knowledge among corporate managers regarding CSR reporting, in general, and disclosure on eco-justice issues, in particular. Originality/value – The first contribution of this work is to realize, for the first time, a specific analysis on Italian firms’ environmental disclosures. Moreover, the study extends this analysis to all entities’ informative documents. This paper also allows an examination of effects of new legislation that encourages environmental information in a corporation’s financial annual report. Finally, this is the first paper to conduct quantitative analysis on firms in the Italian financial market concerning environmental disclosure, as well as regression analysis to identify determinants of firms’ disclosure.

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Iwan Setiadi ◽  
Yumniati Agustina

This study aims to examine the effect of environmental disclosures on firm value by using profitability as a moderating variable. The research sample is all companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. The sampling technique used in this study was purposive sampling, which consisted of 143 companies. The analysis of this study uses moderated regression analysis. The results of this study indicate that environmental disclosure has a positive and significant effect on firm value. Proability strengthens the influence of environmental disclosures on firm value. The more environmental information disclosed by the company, the higher the trust of stakeholders in the company, so as to encourage stakeholders to help and cooperate with companies in earning profits, the increase in profits encourages an increase in the value of the company itself. Keywords: environmental disclosure, profitability, firm value


2018 ◽  
Vol 38 (9) ◽  
pp. 1815-1835 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annachiara Longoni ◽  
Raffaella Cagliano

Purpose Little empirical work has been done on the effects of inclusive environmental disclosure and green supply chain management (GSCM) on firm outcomes. The literature on environmental disclosure suggests that it is a useful practice to improve a firm’s reputation and its financial performance and also to establish a dialogue with stakeholders improving environmental performance. Recent conceptual contributions in the supply chain management literature state that stakeholder expectations and informational needs increasingly concern firm supply chains. Thus, the authors propose that positive effects of inclusive environmental disclosure practices are enhanced in presence of GSCM practices. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach To test these relationships a combination of primary data on environmental disclosure practices, GSCM practices and environmental performance, and secondary data on financial performance was used. A series of hierarchical regression models were performed to test the disclosure-outcome relationships and the moderation of GSCM practices. Findings Results provide empirical support for the impact of inclusive environmental disclosure practices on financial performance but no support for the impact on environmental performance. Specifically, the more inclusive the environmental disclosure practices the greater and positive is the impact on financial performance in presence of GSCM practices. Originality/value This study provides empirical evidence of the joint effects of inclusive environmental disclosure and GSCM practices on environmental and financial performance. Doing so, it reinforces the recent conceptual foundation that firms should align and leverage on supply chain management for disclosure practice effectiveness.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Erlangga Suryarahman ◽  
Huda Trihatmoko

<p class="JurnalASSETSABSTRAK"><strong>ABSTRACT</strong></p><p>This study aims to obtain empirical evidence about the influence of environmental performance, board size of commissioners, independent commissioners, and the board of commissioners meetings on environmental disclosure. The sample of this study was 81 mining companies participating in PROPER which were listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange during the 2014-2018 period. Environmental disclosure was assessed with GRI-4 guidelines and data were analyzed using multiple linear regression analysis. The results of this study indicate that environmental performance and independent commissioners have no effect on environmental disclosure, on the other hand, the board size of commissioners and the board of commissioners meeting have an effect on environmental disclosure.</p><p class="JurnalASSETSABSTRAK"><strong><em>ABSTRAK</em></strong><em></em></p><p>Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memperoleh bukti secara empiris mengenai pengaruh kinerja lingkungan, ukuran dewan komisaris, komisaris independen dan rapat dewan komisaris terhadap pengungkapan lingkungan. Sampel penelitian ini sebanyak 81 perusahaan pertambangan peserta PROPER yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia selama periode 2014-2018. Pengungkapan lingkungan dinilai dengan pedoman GRI-4 dan data dianalisis menggunakan analisis regresi linier berganda. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa kinerja lingkungan dan komisaris independen tidak berpengaruh terhadap pengungkapan lingkungan, disisi lain ukuran dewan komisaris dan rapat dewan komisaris berpengaruh terhadap pengungkapan lingkungan.</p>


2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 183-195
Author(s):  
Oluwamayowa Olalekan Iredele

Purpose The purpose of this study is to measure the current level of corporate environmental reporting (CER) in the developing economy of Nigeria. This is with a view to drive the effort of firms towards improving on the present practice. An attempt is made to also determine the extent to which the level of CER differs on account of firm characteristics. Design/methodology/approach The study used data for the top 40 companies on the Nigerian stock exchange as of 31 December 2017 based on market capitalization. The annual reports, company website and sustainability reports were the major sources of data. The paper used descriptive statistics and one-way analysis of variance to analyse data. Findings Despite the attempt to explore multiple sources in obtaining environmental information, empirical evidence from the present study confirms that the level of environmental reporting is low; most companies report environmental issues through the website. It further found an association between CER and firm size. Practical implications The findings will be of interest to policymakers and regulators on the need to regulate environmental reporting. Thus, motivating firms towards better environmental performance in Nigeria. Originality/value The paper extends environmental reporting research in Nigeria beyond the use of annual reports. It captured environmental information reported through the website and sustainability reports. It provides information on the current status in terms of quality and content of information reported. Finally, it found that firm size is a contingent factor for CER in Nigeria.


Author(s):  
Tiya Mahawyahrti ◽  
Gusti Nyoman Budiasih

This study aims at finding the empirical evidence of the effect of asymmetry information, leverage, and firm size on earning management. This research uses agency theory and positive accounting theory to explain the effect of asymmetry information, leverage, and firm size on earning management. This study was conducted on companies listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange during the period of 2009-2013. The samples were selected by purposive sampling method. The number of selected samples were 39 companies. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to analyze the data. Based on the data analysis, the study proves that the asymmetry information has positive effects on earning management, leverage has positive effects on earning management and firm size has negative effects on earning management.


Author(s):  
Adelia Puspita Purwanto ◽  
Paskah Ika Nugroho

This study evaluates the influence of environmental performance, profitability, firm size, and leverage on environmental disclosure. This research is replicated from Dewi and Yasa’s research on 2017, with some modifications. The population collected from the annual report and/or sustainability report of consumer goods industry and mining companies listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) and PROPER or Program Penilaian Peringkat Kinerja Perusahaan in 2017 until 2018. The technique of take the sample was purposive sampling and the total of 56 data was being the samples in this study. The result of the statistical tests prove that profitability and firm size have positively associate and influence to environmental disclosure. Meanwhile, environmental performance and leverage were insignificantly influence to environmental disclosure. This research also found that some of the companies that being tested still have less awareness in exposing their environmental disclosure.


2017 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 425-444 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abeer Hassan ◽  
Xin Guo

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to assess whether European companies issue standalone environmental reports in an attempt to gain and maintain legitimacy with relevant stakeholders. This is achieved by creating and empirically testing a model of the relationships between corporate reporting format, industry membership, environmental disclosure, and environmental performance. Design/methodology/approach Data are collected from 100 large European companies in carbon and non-carbon-intensive industries. Hypothesis testing is conducted via structure equation modeling. Findings Evidence exists that companies which disclose environmental information in standalone environmental reports tend to provide higher levels of environmental information than companies which combine financial and environmental disclosure in annual reports. The findings support greenwashing as a new perspective of legitimacy theory: companies in carbon-intensive industry use standalone environmental reports to pose as good corporate citizens even when they are not. Research limitations/implications The sample companies are large European companies and this could limit the generalizability of research findings. The authors call for longitudinal studies examining how the relationship between reporting format and environmental disclosure changes. Practical implications This paper suggests that reporting format be considered a proactive, strategic communication-driven activity rather than a decision that managers passively make in response to external scrutiny. Originality/value The paper contributes to the literature by adding to the scarce evidence of the relationship between reporting format and environmental disclosure. Greenwashing as a new perspective of legitimacy theory is used to develop research hypotheses.


2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 147-171
Author(s):  
Melvin Julianto ◽  
Julianti Sjarief

The purpose of this study is to analyze the effect of environmental performance, earnings management, firm size, and profitability to environmental disclosure. This study uses descriptive analysis and multiple linear regression analysis to examine the relationship between independent and dependent variable on 42 manufacuture companies listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange period 2011-2013. Environmental performance is measured using PROPER; earnings management is measured using discretionary accrual model Kothari et al. (2005); firm size measured using Log10 of total assets; profitability is measured using ratio of profit margin; environmental disclosure measured using  Patten (2002) environmental disclosure item. This study found that environmental performance and firm size have impact on environmental disclosure. However earnings management and profitability have no impact on environmental disclosure.


2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dendi Purnama

This study aims to analyze the effect of profitability, leverage, company size, and environmental performance to environmental disclosure. The population in this study are all manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange from 2014 until 2016. The sample in this study were 71 companies for 3 years. The method of analysis used in this study is multiple regression analysis.The results show that profitability and leverage have no effect on environmental disclosure, while firm size and environmental performance have positive effect on environmental disclosure. Taken together, the variables of profitability, leverage, firm size and environmental performance have significant effect on environmental disclosure.��Keywords: Profitability; Leverage; Size; Environmental Performance; Environmental Disclosure


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document