A comparative study between combined spinal anesthesia with bilateral thoracic paravertebral block and general anesthesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy

2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (1) ◽  
pp. 77
Author(s):  
EmanH Abd El-Wahab Abu Shanab ◽  
MohamadG Ayaad ◽  
AhmedA El-Dabe ◽  
SanaaM El-Nomany
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
General Anesthesia ◽  
Spinal Anesthesia ◽  
Paravertebral Block ◽  
Thoracic Paravertebral Block

scholarly journals Spinal Versus General Anesthesia for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 ◽  
pp. 55-58
Author(s):  
SMA Taher ◽  
Jamil Raihan ◽  
M Abu Zahid ◽  
AK Azad ◽  
MI Alam ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
General Anesthesia ◽  
Spinal Anesthesia ◽  
Regional Anesthesia ◽  
Gold Standard ◽  
Randomised Trial ◽  
Gall Stone ◽  
Chronic Obstructive ◽  
First Time ◽  
Symptomatic Gall Stone

Laparascopic Cholecystectomy under regional anesthesia alone has been reported only with severe chronic obstructive airway disease1,2. In a randomised trial, epidural with general anesthesia have been found to be more effective in lessening postoperative pain compare with general anesthesia alone3. Regional anesthesia has been successfully used for laparascopic cholecystectomy in patient. Hamad and Ibrahim El-Khatter4 used spinal anesthesia for laparoscopic for the first time. We performing Laparascopic Cholecystectomy with carbondioxide pneumoperitoneum under spinal anesthesia alone of healthy patients with symptomatic gall stone disease5. We design a control randomized trial to compare spinal anesthesthesia with the Gold standard general anesthesia for elective Laparascopic Cholecystectomy in healty patients.TAJ 2012; 25: 55-58

scholarly journals Comparison of Postoperative Events between Spinal Anesthesia and General Anesthesia in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xian-Xue Wang ◽  
Quan Zhou ◽  
Dao-Bo Pan ◽  
Hui-Wei Deng ◽  
Ai-Guo Zhou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
General Anesthesia ◽  
Spinal Anesthesia ◽  
Postoperative Nausea ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Postoperative Nausea And Vomiting ◽  
Nausea And Vomiting ◽  
Urine Retention ◽  
Anesthesia Group

Background. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is usually carried out under general anesthesia. There were a few studies which have found spinal anesthesia as a safe alternative. We aimed to evaluate the postoperative events between spinal anesthesia and general anesthesia in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Methods. We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library (from inception to January 2016) for eligible studies. The primary outcome was the visual analogue scale score. Secondary outcomes included postoperative nausea and vomiting and urine retention 24 hours postoperatively. We calculated pooled risk ratios and 95% confidence interval using random- or fixed-effects models.Results. Eight trials involving 723 patients were listed. Meta-analysis showed that patients in spinal anesthesia groups have lower visual analogue scale score 24 hours postoperatively. There were significant decreases in the occurrence of postoperative nausea and vomiting in spinal anesthesia group when compared with general anesthesia group (odds ratios: 0.38, 95% confidence interval: 0.19–0.76;P=0.006) with heterogeneity accepted (I2=13%;P=0.33), while urine retention rate was increased in patients with spinal anesthesia (odds ratios: 4.95, 95% confidence interval: 1.24–19.71;P=0.02) without any heterogeneity (I2=0%;P=0.98).Conclusions. Spinal anesthesia may be associated with less postoperative pain and postoperative nausea and vomiting compared with general anesthesia.

scholarly journals General versus Spinal Anesthesia During Caesarean Section; A Narrative Review

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zahid Hussain Khan ◽  
Negar Eftekhar ◽  
Rafah Sabah Barrak
Keyword(s):  
Family History ◽  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
General Anesthesia ◽  
Medical History ◽  
Spinal Anesthesia ◽  
Narrative Review ◽  
Included Patient

This research is a method review type, comparative study between the effects of General anesthesia versus those of spinal anesthesia during caesarean section on the newborns and the mother undergoing cesarean section. The variables considered in the study included patient family history, patient medical history, status of patient during pregnancy, age of patient, and emergency or planned cesarean. Both general and spinal methods of anesthesia had differing results in multiple aspects and effects both during and after the surgery. However, pros of spinal anesthesia topped those of general anesthesia and is therefore the more favorable method of anesthesia.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document