Cognitive Interviewing in Practice: Think-Aloud, Verbal Probing, and Other Techniques

2011 ◽  
pp. 42-65 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Cognitive Interviewing ◽  
Think Aloud

scholarly journals Think aloud: using cognitive interviewing to validate the PISA assessment of student self-efficacy in mathematics

2016 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Pepper ◽  
Jeremy Hodgen ◽  
Katri Lamesoo ◽  
Pille Kõiv ◽  
Jos Tolboom
Keyword(s):  
Self Efficacy ◽  
Cognitive Interviewing ◽  
Think Aloud

Reflections on the Cognitive Interviewing Reporting Framework

Methodology ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 123-128 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gordon Willis ◽  
Hennie Boeije
Keyword(s):  
Research Design ◽  
Cognitive Testing ◽  
Level Of Detail ◽  
Cognitive Interviewing ◽  
Research Groups ◽  
Research Project ◽  
Reporting Framework ◽  
Full Explanation ◽  
Key Steps

Based on the experiences of three research groups using and evaluating the Cognitive Interviewing Reporting Framework (CIRF), we draw conclusions about the utility of the CIRF as a guide to creating cognitive testing reports. Authors generally found the CIRF checklist to be usable, and that it led to a more complete description of key steps involved. However, despite the explicit direction by the CIRF to include a full explanation of major steps and features (e.g., research objectives and research design), the three cognitive testing reports tended to simply state what was done, without further justification. Authors varied in their judgments concerning whether the CIRF requires the appropriate level of detail. Overall, we believe that current cognitive interviewing practice will benefit from including, within cognitive testing reports, the 10 categories of information specified by the CIRF. Future use of the CIRF may serve to direct the overall research project from the start, and to further the goal of evaluation of specific cognitive interviewing procedures.

Evaluating the Cognitive Interviewing Reporting Framework (CIRF) by Rewriting a Dutch Pretesting Report of a European Health Survey Questionnaire *The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the policies of Statistics Netherlands.

Methodology ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 104-112 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel Vis-Visschers ◽  
Vivian Meertens
Keyword(s):  
Health Survey ◽  
Cognitive Interviewing ◽  
Survey Questionnaire ◽  
Reporting Framework ◽  
Research Designs ◽  
European Health ◽  
Original Report ◽  
Minimal Standard ◽  
Exhaustive List

We used the Cognitive Interviewing Reporting Framework (CIRF) to restructure the report of a pretest on a European health survey questionnaire. This pretest was conducted by the Questionnaire Laboratory of Statistics Netherlands, and the original report was written according to a standard Statistics Netherlands format for pretesting reports. This article contains the rewritten report with highlights from the case study. The authors reflect on the process of rewriting and the usefulness of the CIRF. We conclude that expanded use of the CIRF as a reporting format for articles on cognitive pretests would enhance international comparability, completeness, and uniformity of research designs, terminology, and reporting. A limitation of the CIRF is that it does not provide an exhaustive list of items that could be included in a report, but it is more a “minimal standard”: that is a report on how a cognitive pretest was conducted should at least contain a description of the CIRF items.

Are Subjective Reports of Conscious Recollection Valid? Evidence from Think Aloud Protocols

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey K. Boman ◽  
David P. McCabe ◽  
Amanda E. Sensenig ◽  
Matthew G. Rhodes ◽  
Meghan T. Lee
Keyword(s):  
Think Aloud ◽  
Think Aloud Protocols ◽  
Conscious Recollection ◽  
Valid Evidence ◽  
Subjective Reports

Proses Berpikir Logis Siswa Sekolah Dasar Bertipe Kecerdasan Logis Matematis dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika

2014 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Liska Yanti Pane ◽  
Kamid Kamid ◽  
Asrial Asrial
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Learning Process ◽  
Qualitative Method ◽  
Logical Thinking ◽  
Think Aloud ◽  
Process Data ◽  
Thinking Process ◽  
Problem Solving Process ◽  
Problem Solving Strategy ◽  
Solving Strategy

This research aims to describe logical thinking process of a logical-mathematical intelligence student. We employ qualitative method to disclose the subject’s learning process. Data are collected by interview and modified think aloud methods. The results show that subject has capability to find and organize problems and data correctly. Subject describes conditions that are needed to do the steps of problem solving strategy. The steps are done systematically until the end of problem solving process.

Proses Berpikir Kreatif Siswa Tipe Linguistik dalamPemecahan Masalah Biologi

2014 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Imelda Aisah Sarip ◽  
Kamid Kamid ◽  
Bambang Hariyadi
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Data Collection ◽  
Creative Thinking ◽  
Research Data ◽  
Think Aloud ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Thinking Process ◽  
Problem Solving Process ◽  
The Given

The aim of this research is to describe creative thinking process of linguistic type student in biology problem solving. This research is conducted to linguistic intelligence type of subject at SMPN 6 Kota Jambi. SL the subject was selected based on the aim of the research. Data collection is conducted by interview and a modified think aloud method. Data is analyzed based on creative thinking process purposed by Polya.The result of this research shows that SL could find and arrange the given problems and collect data correctly and appropriately. The problem solving steps is done systematically to the end of problem solving process. The last steps problem solving, SL does checking while doing scratching to make sure that the written answers meet her need.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document