scholarly journals Shadow Banking, Interest Rate Marketization and Bank Risk-Taking: An Empirical Study of the 40 Commercial Banks in China

2017 ◽  
Vol 06 (01) ◽  
pp. 27-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing Luo
Keyword(s):  
Interest Rate ◽  
Empirical Study ◽  
Risk Taking ◽  
Commercial Banks ◽  
Bank Risk ◽  
Shadow Banking ◽  
Interest Rate Marketization

scholarly journals Loan Loss Provision and Risk-Taking Behavior of Commercial Banks in Pakistan: A Dynamic GMM Approach

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (19) ◽  
pp. 5209 ◽  
Author(s):  
Changjun Zheng ◽  
Shumaila Meer Perhiar ◽  
Naeem Gul Gilal ◽  
Faheem Gul Gilal
Keyword(s):  
Interest Rate ◽  
Credit Risk ◽  
Risk Taking ◽  
Commercial Banks ◽  
Capital Adequacy ◽  
Bank Risk ◽  
Loan Loss ◽  
Loan Loss Provision ◽  
Capital Adequacy Ratio ◽  
Risk Taking Behavior

The paper analyzes the determinants of the loan loss provision (LLP) of 22 commercial banks in Pakistan from 2010 to 2017. The motive of the research is that LLP is a measure of credit risk as a proxy for bank risk-taking behavior profits and banks’ sustainability. Especially after the occurrence of a global financial crisis. The quantitative research method of data collection from Bureau Van Dijk’s BankFocus portal and the World Bank’s World Development Indicators. Other than considering specific bank variables such as capital adequacy ratio, return on average equity, and government securities, the effects of macroeconomic variable inflation and lending interest rates are explicitly studied. The model of pooled ordinary least squares (POLS), fixed effect (FE), panel corrected standard error (PCSE), and panel data estimation in the form of a general method of moments (GMM) two-step system is used to find the risk-taking behavior of banks in Pakistan. The results obtained by the use of inflation (INF) as an instrumental variable of LLP are highly dependable with a negative impact on loan loss provision. Lending interest rate (LIR) has a positive and significant relationship with LLP and contribute in the study of macroeconomic variables for bank risk-taking, excessive amount of interest rate was not beneficial for banks to earn profits especially during the economic crises. Return on average equity (ROAE) significantly moderates LLP with a negative interaction and helped the bank with profitable operations and save bank from solvency. Capital adequacy ratio (CAR) and government securities (GOV) are insignificant to LLP. The result is robust by measure of endogeneity, and highlights the important role of commercial banks’ sustainability to explain risk-taking behavior in Pakistan with the intention to increase profits after the occurrence of financial crises. The study further contributes to future research on managerial policy and decision making. In summary, the paper on loan loss provision has the capacity to forecast commercial banks’ credit risk for risk-taking in an emerging country.

scholarly journals Challenges and measures faced by commercial banks under interest rate liberalization

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
pp. 63-68
Author(s):  
Jiuding Li ◽  
Youchuan Cui
Keyword(s):  
Interest Rate ◽  
Commercial Banks ◽  
Debt Management ◽  
Rate System ◽  
Interest Rate Liberalization ◽  
Interest Rate Marketization ◽  
Management Concepts ◽  
New Business ◽  
Market Instability ◽  
And Control

the maturity of interest rate marketization marks the transformation of China's interest rate system from the traditional interest rate model to the new one.As an important participant in the reform of interest rate marketization, commercial banks are faced with many challenges, such as the decline of profit level, the substantial increase of operational risk, the increase of financial market instability, and the increase of liquidity risk.They should actively explore new business and management concepts, adopt measures to improve the prices of financial products and derivatives, introduce risk management and control mechanism, develop bank's intermediate business, and promote the development of bank's intermediate business In order to ensure the healthy and stable development of commercial banks, we should take positive measures such as strengthening the ability of debt management, reasonably dealing with the challenge of interest rate marketization.

scholarly journals The Impact of Interest Rate Marketization on Commercial Banks

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 176
Author(s):  
Yulin He
Keyword(s):  
Interest Rate ◽  
Financial Institutions ◽  
Commercial Banks ◽  
Supply And Demand ◽  
System Reform ◽  
Analysis Process ◽  
Interest Rate Marketization ◽  
Rate Transmission ◽  
The Interest Rate ◽  
The Impact

<p>Interest rate marketization means that the interest rate level of financial institutions operating and financing in the money market is determined by market supply and demand. It includes interest rate determination, interest rate transmission, interest rate structure and marketization of interest rate management. At present, there are still many deficiencies and defects in the traditional interest rate management system. The reform of interest rate marketization is the focus of China’s financial system reform. Therefore, we should not only be brave in innovation, but also carefully study and analyze. In the analysis process, this paper focuses on the impact of interest rate marketization on commercial banks, and puts forward some countermeasures.</p>

scholarly journals Interest Rate Liberalization and Commercial Banks Profitability: Evidence from China

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 90
Author(s):  
Lai Ying
Keyword(s):  
Interest Rate ◽  
Empirical Study ◽  
Interest Rates ◽  
Commercial Banks ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Key Factors ◽  
Interest Rate Liberalization ◽  
Production Growth ◽  
The Future ◽  
The Impact

Enhanced profitability is an important guarantee to improve the well-being of people and better exert the functions of commercial banks in promoting economic, social and production growth on the premise of the existence and development of commercial banks. Interest rate liberalization is one of the key factors which can affect the profitability of commercial banks. An empirical study is thus carried out on 16 Commercial banks (from 2007 to 2018) to analyze the impact of interest rate liberalization on the profitability of commercial banks. We draw main conclusions from this study: (1) the progress of interest rate liberalization has improved the profitability of banks. (2) This kind of impact is inverted U-shaped, that is, with the advancement of interest rate liberalization, the impact will be reversed in the future. (3) For banks of different sizes, the impact is different. Specifically, small and medium-sized banks are more sensitive to the liberalization of interest rates, while for larger banks, the impact is not strong.

Capital regulation and ownership structure on bank risk

2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-56 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aysa Siddika ◽  
Razali Haron
Keyword(s):  
Maximum Likelihood ◽  
Ownership Structure ◽  
Risk Taking ◽  
Commercial Banks ◽  
Dynamic Panel Data ◽  
Bank Risk ◽  
Capital Regulation ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Global Banking ◽  
The Impact

Purpose This paper aims to examine the impact of capital regulation, ownership structure and the degree of ownership concentration on the risk of commercial banks. Design/methodology/approach This study uses a sample of 565 commercial banks from 52 countries over the period of 2011-2015. A dynamic panel data model estimation using the maximum likelihood with structural equation modelling (SEM) was followed considering the panel nature of this study. Findings The study found that the increase of capital ratio decreases bank risk and the regulatory pressure increases the risk-taking of the bank. No statistically significant relationship between banks’ ownership structure and risk-taking was found. The concentration of ownership was found negatively associated with bank risk. Finally, the study found that in the long term, bank increases the capital level that decreases the default risk. Originality/value This study presents an empirical analysis on the global banking system focusing on the Basel Committee member and non-member countries that reflect the implementation of Basel II and Basel III. Therefore, it helps fill the gap in the banking literature on the effect of recent changes in the capital regulation on bank risk. Maximum likelihood with SEM addresses the issue of endogeneity, efficiency and time-invariant variables. Moreover, this study measures the risk by different proxy variables that address total, default and liquidity risks of the banks. Examining from a different perspective of risk makes the study more robust.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document