scholarly journals Intake, Energy Expenditure and Methane Emissions of Grazing Dairy Cows at Two Pre-Grazing Herbage Masses

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (03) ◽  
pp. 440-457
Author(s):  
Cecilia Loza ◽  
José Gere ◽  
María Soledad Orcasberro ◽  
Alberto Casal ◽  
Mariana Carriquiry ◽  
...  
2015 ◽  
Vol 175 ◽  
pp. 37-46 ◽  
Author(s):  
Camila Muñoz ◽  
Sara Hube ◽  
Jorge M. Morales ◽  
Tianhai Yan ◽  
Emilio M. Ungerfeld

Animals ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 280
Author(s):  
Tommy M. Boland ◽  
Karina M. Pierce ◽  
Alan K. Kelly ◽  
David A. Kenny ◽  
Mary B. Lynch ◽  
...  

The authors wish to make a change to the published paper [...]


2014 ◽  
Vol 97 (11) ◽  
pp. 7043-7053 ◽  
Author(s):  
H.P. Jiao ◽  
A.J. Dale ◽  
A.F. Carson ◽  
S. Murray ◽  
A.W. Gordon ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 99 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. 192-193
Author(s):  
Andre F Brito ◽  
Kleves V Almeida

Abstract Grazing systems perform multiple ecosystem services including food production, climate regulation, nutrient cycling, and erosion control. Ruminants can also express their natural behaviors on pasture, with recent research revealing that dairy cows were more motivated to go outside for grazing than stay indoors consuming fresh TMR offered immediately after the afternoon milking. In addition, consumers often associate grazing systems with “healthier and happier cows” and are willing to pay premiums for “grass-fed” dairy products. However, milk production and nutrient utilization generally decrease in pasture-based compared with confinement systems, which may reduce farm profitability depending on milk pay prices. It should be noted that there is limited research reporting milk N efficiency (milk N/N intake) or methane emissions in confined versus grazing dairy cows using data collected from the same experiments. Therefore, our overarching objective was to build data sets to compare nutrient utilization in dairy cows under confinement or grazing management where milk N efficiency or methane emissions or both were reported in the same study. Dietary strategies to mitigate methane emissions in grazing dairy systems such as the use of high-quality forages (e.g., brassicas, perennial ryegrass), concentrate and seaweed supplementation, and forage species and management will be explored. For instance, Jersey cows grazing forage canola offered at 40% of the total DM emitted 31% less methane than those kept indoors and fed TMR (419 vs. 289 g/d, respectively) in an experiment conducted at the University of New Hampshire. Methane yield and methane intensity also decreased (P < 0.001) by 29.3% and 23.4%, respectively, in the same study. Irish researchers reported that methane production (-37%), yield (-11.5%), and intensity (-13%) decreased significantly in Holstein-Friesian cows offered perennial ryegrass herbage versus TMR. Data from whole-farm models comparing confinement and grazing systems will be presented and discussed.


2012 ◽  
Vol 95 (11) ◽  
pp. 6582-6590 ◽  
Author(s):  
B.F. O’Neill ◽  
M.H. Deighton ◽  
B.M. O’Loughlin ◽  
N. Galvin ◽  
M. O’Donovan ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
J D Rowntree ◽  
K M Pierce ◽  
F Buckley ◽  
K J Petrie ◽  
J J Callan ◽  
...  

Genes ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 456
Author(s):  
Hewa Bahithige Pavithra Chathurangi Ariyarathne ◽  
Martin Correa-Luna ◽  
Hugh Thomas Blair ◽  
Dorian John Garrick ◽  
Nicolas Lopez-Villalobos

The objective of this study was to identify genomic regions associated with milk fat percentage (FP), crude protein percentage (CPP), urea concentration (MU) and efficiency of crude protein utilization (ECPU: ratio between crude protein yield in milk and dietary crude protein intake) using grazing, mixed-breed, dairy cows in New Zealand. Phenotypes from 634 Holstein Friesian, Jersey or crossbred cows were obtained from two herds at Massey University. A subset of 490 of these cows was genotyped using Bovine Illumina 50K SNP-chips. Two genome-wise association approaches were used, a single-locus model fitted to data from 490 cows and a single-step Bayes C model fitted to data from all 634 cows. The single-locus analysis was performed with the Efficient Mixed-Model Association eXpedited model as implemented in the SVS package. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) with genome-wide association p-values ≤ 1.11 × 10−6 were considered as putative quantitative trait loci (QTL). The Bayes C analysis was performed with the JWAS package and 1-Mb genomic windows containing SNPs that explained > 0.37% of the genetic variance were considered as putative QTL. Candidate genes within 100 kb from the identified SNPs in single-locus GWAS or the 1-Mb windows were identified using gene ontology, as implemented in the Ensembl Genome Browser. The genes detected in association with FP (MGST1, DGAT1, CEBPD, SLC52A2, GPAT4, and ACOX3) and CPP (DGAT1, CSN1S1, GOSR2, HERC6, and IGF1R) were identified as candidates. Gene ontology revealed six novel candidate genes (GMDS, E2F7, SIAH1, SLC24A4, LGMN, and ASS1) significantly associated with MU whose functions were in protein catabolism, urea cycle, ion transportation and N excretion. One novel candidate gene was identified in association with ECPU (MAP3K1) that is involved in post-transcriptional modification of proteins. The findings should be validated using a larger population of New Zealand grazing dairy cows.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document