scholarly journals How do resident stem cells repair the damaged myocardium?

2015 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 182 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emiko Hayashi
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Deepa Bhartiya

AbstractLife-long tissue homeostasis of adult tissues is supposedly maintained by the resident stem cells. These stem cells are quiescent in nature and rarely divide to self-renew and give rise to tissue-specific “progenitors” (lineage-restricted and tissue-committed) which divide rapidly and differentiate into tissue-specific cell types. However, it has proved difficult to isolate these quiescent stem cells as a physical entity. Recent single-cell RNAseq studies on several adult tissues including ovary, prostate, and cardiac tissues have not been able to detect stem cells. Thus, it has been postulated that adult cells dedifferentiate to stem-like state to ensure regeneration and can be defined as cells capable to replace lost cells through mitosis. This idea challenges basic paradigm of development biology regarding plasticity that a cell enters point of no return once it initiates differentiation. The underlying reason for this dilemma is that we are putting stem cells and somatic cells together while processing for various studies. Stem cells and adult mature cell types are distinct entities; stem cells are quiescent, small in size, and with minimal organelles whereas the mature cells are metabolically active and have multiple organelles lying in abundant cytoplasm. As a result, they do not pellet down together when centrifuged at 100–350g. At this speed, mature cells get collected but stem cells remain buoyant and can be pelleted by centrifuging at 1000g. Thus, inability to detect stem cells in recently published single-cell RNAseq studies is because the stem cells were unknowingly discarded while processing and were never subjected to RNAseq. This needs to be kept in mind before proposing to redefine adult stem cells.


2009 ◽  
Vol 284 (1) ◽  
pp. 80-85 ◽  
Author(s):  
Severin Pinilla ◽  
Eckhard Alt ◽  
F.J. Abdul Khalek ◽  
Constantin Jotzu ◽  
Fabian Muehlberg ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 123 (6) ◽  
pp. 686-699 ◽  
Author(s):  
Subba Rao Mekala ◽  
Philipp Wörsdörfer ◽  
Jochen Bauer ◽  
Olga Stoll ◽  
Nicole Wagner ◽  
...  

Rationale: Regeneration of lost cardiomyocytes is a fundamental unresolved problem leading to heart failure. Despite several strategies developed from intensive studies performed in the past decades, endogenous regeneration of heart tissue is still limited and presents a big challenge that needs to be overcome to serve as a successful therapeutic option for myocardial infarction. Objective: One of the essential prerequisites for cardiac regeneration is the identification of endogenous cardiomyocyte progenitors and their niche that can be targeted by new therapeutic approaches. In this context, we hypothesized that the vascular wall, which was shown to harbor different types of stem and progenitor cells, might serve as a source for cardiac progenitors. Methods and Results: We describe generation of spontaneously beating mouse aortic wall-derived cardiomyocytes without any genetic manipulation. Using aortic wall-derived cells (AoCs) of WT (wild type), αMHC (α-myosin heavy chain), and Flk1 (fetal liver kinase 1)-reporter mice and magnetic bead-associated cell sorting sorting of Flk1 + AoCs from GFP (green fluorescent protein) mice, we identified Flk1 + CD (cluster of differentiation) 34 + Sca-1 (stem cell antigen-1)-CD44 − AoCs as the population that gives rise to aortic wall-derived cardiomyocytes. This AoC subpopulation delivered also endothelial cells and macrophages with a particular accumulation within the aortic wall-derived cardiomyocyte containing colonies. In vivo, cardiomyocyte differentiation capacity was studied by implantation of fluorescently labeled AoCs into chick embryonic heart. These cells acquired cardiomyocyte-like phenotype as shown by αSRA (α-sarcomeric actinin) expression. Furthermore, coronary adventitial Flk1 + and CD34 + cells proliferated, migrated into the myocardium after mouse myocardial infarction, and expressed Isl-1 + (insulin gene enhancer protein-1) indicative of cardiovascular progenitor potential. Conclusions: Our data suggest Flk1 + CD34 + vascular adventitia-resident stem cells, including those of coronary adventitia, as a novel endogenous source for generating cardiomyocytes. This process is essentially supported by endothelial cells and macrophages. In summary, the therapeutic manipulation of coronary adventitia-resident cardiac stem and their supportive cells may open new avenues for promoting cardiac regeneration and repair after myocardial infarction and for preventing heart failure.


2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (10) ◽  
pp. 2917 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diletta Overi ◽  
Guido Carpino ◽  
Vincenzo Cardinale ◽  
Antonio Franchitto ◽  
Samira Safarikia ◽  
...  

Two distinct stem/progenitor cell populations of biliary origin have been identified in the adult liver and biliary tree. Hepatic Stem/progenitor Cells (HpSCs) are bipotent progenitor cells located within the canals of Hering and can be differentiated into mature hepatocytes and cholangiocytes; Biliary Tree Stem/progenitor Cells (BTSCs) are multipotent stem cells located within the peribiliary glands of large intrahepatic and extrahepatic bile ducts and able to differentiate into hepatic and pancreatic lineages. HpSCs and BTSCs are endowed in a specialized niche constituted by supporting cells and extracellular matrix compounds. The actual contribution of these stem cell niches to liver and biliary tree homeostatic regeneration is marginal; this is due to the high replicative capabilities and plasticity of mature parenchymal cells (i.e., hepatocytes and cholangiocytes). However, the study of human liver and biliary diseases disclosed how these stem cell niches are involved in the regenerative response after extensive and/or chronic injuries, with the activation of specific signaling pathways. The present review summarizes the contribution of stem/progenitor cell niches in human liver diseases, underlining mechanisms of activation and clinical implications, including fibrogenesis and disease progression.


2012 ◽  
Vol 153 (4) ◽  
pp. 535-539 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. V. Sukhacheva ◽  
Yu. A. Chudinovskikh ◽  
M. V. Eremeeva ◽  
M. V. Samsonova ◽  
A. L. Chernyaev ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Alex Balduino ◽  
Maria Eugenia Leite Duarte ◽  
Russell S. Taichman

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document