Comparison of the Perception on Health Information Privacy Protection for Electronic Health Record among Patients, Healthcare Providers and Administration Groups

2007 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 197 ◽  
Author(s):  
Inyoung Choi ◽  
Jiyoung Lee ◽  
Soon Choy ◽  
Sukil Kim
Keyword(s):  
Electronic Health Record ◽  
Health Information ◽  
Privacy Protection ◽  
Healthcare Providers ◽  
Information Privacy ◽  
Health Record ◽  
Health Information Privacy ◽  
Electronic Health

scholarly journals Search Functionality Within the Electronic Health Record and Health Information Exchange Databases

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brandon Gregory ◽  
Jordan Hill ◽  
Titus Schleyer
Keyword(s):  
Electronic Health Record ◽  
Health Information ◽  
Patient Information ◽  
Information Exchange ◽  
Health Information Exchange ◽  
Healthcare Delivery ◽  
Healthcare Providers ◽  
Health Record ◽  
Search Function ◽  
Electronic Health

Background and Hypothesis:  In the US today, over 95% of healthcare institutions operate using the electronic health record (EHR). While proven to be a substantial improvement to medical practice, the substantial amount of retained information within those records has made searching the EHR for relevant material difficult and too time consuming. We hypothesize that by providing a search function within the EHR with added capability of collaborative filtration, physicians will be better able to retrieve important patient information and thus provide more efficient care.     Project Methods:   Emergency Department physicians of Sidney & Lois Eskenazi Hospital and Indiana University Health Hospital were recruited to partake in this study based on their use and familiarity of the EHR Cerner and/or Health Information Exchange (HIE) CareWeb Search function. Participants filled out a pre-interview, Likert-scale questionnaire to determine their general impressions of search functions and the frequency with which they were used. Additional insight was obtained during an interview focusing on participants’ previous experiences searching within the EHR/HIE. Participants were then shown a mock-up of potential collaborative filtering integration into CareWeb in order to collect opinions regarding the feature’s usability/practicality, display/format, and a number of suggested terms.    Results:   From the pilot study, current challenges that limit clinician search function use include limited time in clinician workflow, information overload, and inaccurate results. Clinicians are more likely to conduct searches when treating patients who have limited medical history, complex histories, known recent visitations, and/or who have been seen at other institutions. Participants demonstrated interest in a collaborative filtration search feature; they expressed a preference to have the feature recommend five related search terms.    Potential Impact:   The data from this study aims to refine the way healthcare providers search within the EHR/HIE. This will allow healthcare providers to more efficiently extract relevant patient information for improved healthcare delivery and proficient clinician workflow. 

scholarly journals The 21 Century Cures Act and Multi-User Electronic Health Record Access: Potential Pitfalls of Information Release (Preprint)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simone Arvisais-Anhalt ◽  
May Lau ◽  
Christoph U. Lehmann ◽  
A Jay Holmgren ◽  
Richard J. Medford ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Electronic Health Record ◽  
Health Information ◽  
Healthcare Providers ◽  
Pediatric Care ◽  
Health Record ◽  
Institutional Practices ◽  
Final Rule ◽  
Electronic Health ◽  
A Minor ◽  
Electronic Health Information

UNSTRUCTURED While the Office of The National Coordinator for Health Information Technology’s (ONC) Information Blocking Provision of the Cures Act Final Rule is an important step forward in providing patients free and unfettered access to their electronic health information (EHI), in the contexts of multi-user electronic health record (EHR) access and proxy access concerns emerged over the potential for harm in adolescent care contexts. We describe how the provision could erode the trust and the willingness of patients (both adolescent and older patients alike) to seek care. The rules’ preventing harm exception does not apply to situations where the patient is a minor and the healthcare provider wishes to restrict a parent’s or guadian’s access to the minor’s EHI to avoid violating the minor’s confidentiality and potentially harming patient-clinician trust. This may violate government-developed principles in the design and implementation of EHRs for pediatric care. Creating legally acceptable workarounds by means such as duplicate “shadow charting” will be burdensome (and prohibitive) for healthcare providers. Under the privacy exception, patients have the opportunity to request information not be shared; however, depending upon institutional practices, providers and patients may have limited awareness of this exception. Notably, the privacy exception states that providers cannot “improperly encourage or induce a patient’s request to block information”. Fearing being found in violation of the information-blocking provisions, providers may feel unable to guide patients navigating releasing their EHI in the multi-use/proxy access setting. ONC should provide more detailed guidance on their website and targeted outreach to providers and their specialty organizations who care for adolescents and other individuals affected by the Cures Act, and researchers should carefully monitor charting habits in these multi-user/proxy access situations.

scholarly journals Enhancing patient privacy protection under Hong Kong’s Electronic Health Record Sharing System

2020 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 4-30
Author(s):  
Rebecca Yoke Chan Ong ◽  
Sandy Sabapathy
Keyword(s):  
Electronic Health Record ◽  
Privacy Protection ◽  
Data Privacy ◽  
Healthcare Providers ◽  
Personal Data ◽  
Personal Health ◽  
Health Record ◽  
Patient Privacy ◽  
Electronic Health ◽  
The Individual

While it is true that the expanded use of health information and electronic health records (eHRs) can help deliver better healthcare, there remains the need to reconcile citizens’ legitimate concerns for privacy protection and confidentiality in the use of their personal health data, and the potential for violation of their privacy. Under the Hong Kong’s Electronic Health Record Sharing System (eHRSS), the eHR of the individual patient can be accessed and shared between healthcare providers for healthcare-related purposes. Although the Electronic Health Record Sharing System Ordinance (Cap 625) (the ‘eHRSSO’) and the Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance (Cap 486) (the ‘PD(P)O’) provide protection for personal data and patients’ privacy, the eHRSS has come under greater scrutiny given the rise in data breaches experienced globally and in Hong Kong. The article’s objective is twofold. It first examines the eHRSS specifically with regard to some of the more pertinent provisions of the eHRSSO and the PD(P)O, to critically evaluate the extent to which these provisions ensure and protect patient privacy. Thence it offers suggestions and recommendations as to how protection for patient privacy can be enhanced and, indeed, altogether better ensured.

Electronic Health Records Implementation in Jordan: Perceptions of Healthcare Providers and Determinant Factors (Preprint)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tamadur Shudayfat ◽  
Çağdaş Akyürek ◽  
Noha Al-Shdayfat ◽  
Hatem Alsaqqa
Keyword(s):  
Electronic Health Records ◽  
Electronic Health Record ◽  
Technology Acceptance ◽  
Technology Acceptance Model ◽  
Healthcare Providers ◽  
Health Record ◽  
Health Records ◽  
Context Factors ◽  
Electronic Health ◽  
Acceptance Model

BACKGROUND Acceptance of Electronic Health Record systems is considered an essential factor for an effective implementation among the Healthcare providers. In an attempt to understand the healthcare providers’ perceptions on the Electronic Health Record systems implementation and evaluate the factors influencing healthcare providers’ acceptance of Electronic Health Records, the current research examines the effects of individual (user) context factors, and organizational context factors, using Technology Acceptance Model. OBJECTIVE The current research examines the effects of individual (user) context factors, and organizational context factors, using Technology Acceptance Model. METHODS A quantitative cross-sectional survey design was used, in which 319 healthcare providers from five public hospital participated in the present study. Data was collected using a self-administered questionnaire, which was based on the Technology Acceptance Model. RESULTS Jordanian healthcare providers demonstrated positive perceptions of the usefulness and ease of use of Electronic Health Record systems, and subsequently, they accepted the technology. The results indicated that they had a significant effect on the perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use of Electronic Health Record, which in turn was related to positive attitudes towards Electronic Health Record systems as well as the intention to use them. CONCLUSIONS User attributes, organizational competency, management support and training and education are essential variables in predicting healthcare provider’s acceptance toward Electronic Health records. These findings should be considered by healthcare organizations administration to introduce effective system to other healthcare organizations.

Ethics of Electronic Health Record Systems

2020 ◽  
pp. 1467-1484
Author(s):  
Brian J. Galli
Keyword(s):  
Electronic Health Record ◽  
Ethical Issues ◽  
Healthcare Providers ◽  
Meaningful Use ◽  
Health Record ◽  
Ethical Implications ◽  
Incentive Programs ◽  
Time Period ◽  
Electronic Health ◽  
The Government

This article describes how healthcare and IT are combatting the ethical implications of electronic health records (EHRs) in order to make them adopted by over 90% of small practices. There is a lack of trust in EHRs and uneasiness about what they will accomplish. Furthermore, security concerns have become more prevalent as a result of increased hacker activity. The objective of this article is to analyze these ethical issues in an effort to eliminate them as a hinderance to EHR implementation. As of now, 98% of all hospitals use EHRs. Between 2009 and 2015, the government allocated money and resources for incentive programs to get EHRs into every healthcare providers' office. During this time period, over $800 million dollars facilitated EHR implementation. Using this as a tool EHRs negative perception can be revitalized and combated with the meaningful use program. This article will highlight the ethical implications of EHRs and suggest ways in which to avoid them to make EHRs available in every healthcare provider.

Users' Satisfaction with the Electronic Health Record (EHR) in the Kingdom of Bahrain

2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 29-51
Author(s):  
Aysha Ebrahim Abdulla ◽  
Shurooq Yousif Ahmed ◽  
Maryam Abdulrahman Alnoaimi ◽  
Hayat Ali
Keyword(s):  
Service Quality ◽  
Electronic Health Record ◽  
Online Survey ◽  
Healthcare Providers ◽  
Health Sector ◽  
Public Hospitals ◽  
Health Record ◽  
Record System ◽  
Substantial Impact ◽  
Electronic Health

Today, many hospitals seek to adopt the latest and most sophisticated technologies in order to raise the service quality and users' satisfaction. The Electronic Health Record (EHR) had a substantial impact on the health sector and has enhanced the efficiency and effectiveness of healthcare providers. The purpose of this research is to examine the factors that affect users' satisfaction with the current Health Record System in the Kingdom of Bahrain. A research model was built based on three popular models of users' satisfaction toward information systems. Toward achieving the research objective, a quantitative approach was followed to collect data from an online survey. Accordingly, 152 responses were collected from the users of EHR in public hospitals and health centres in Bahrain. The results of the survey were analyzed using SPSS and SmartPLS 3.0. It was concluded that the most effective factors in the users' satisfaction with EHR were directly service quality and technical support, with system and information quality indirectly through trust.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document