scholarly journals Retrospective Evaluation of Patients Diagnosed with Stage I-II Supradiaphragmatic Presentation Hodgkin’s Lymphoma: Treatment Effect and Late-side Effect

2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 166-171
Author(s):  
Tanju Berber
2003 ◽  
Vol 57 (5) ◽  
pp. 1374-1381 ◽  
Author(s):  
David C Hodgson ◽  
Richard W Tsang ◽  
Melania Pintilie ◽  
Alex Sun ◽  
Woodrow Wells ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 82 (8) ◽  
pp. 2510-2516 ◽  
Author(s):  
AC Lambrechts ◽  
PE Hupkes ◽  
LC Dorssers ◽  
MB van't Veer

Abstract Stage I and II follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) is clinically defined as a localized disease. To study the possibility that this disease is in fact disseminated, we used the sensitive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method using translocation (14;18) as marker. Samples from 21 patients who were clinically diagnosed with stage I or II follicular NHL were analyzed for the presence of t(14;18)-positive cells using PCR. We analyzed (1) the diagnostic lymph node biopsy and (2) the peripheral blood or bone marrow samples from these patients. Translocation (14;18) cells were detected in the diagnostic lymph node biopsies of 12 patients. In 9 of these patients, t(14;18)-positive cells were detected in peripheral blood and/or bone marrow samples at diagnosis and/or after therapy. Thus, in 75% of the follicular NHL patients carrying the t(14;18) as a marker for lymphoma cells, t(14;18)- positive cells were detected in peripheral blood and bone marrow at diagnosis and after therapy. Our results show that t(14;18)-positive cells can be detected in the circulation of patients with stage I and II follicular NHL, indicating that, although diagnosed as localized, the disease is disseminated.


2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (19) ◽  
pp. 3128-3135 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evert M. Noordijk ◽  
Patrice Carde ◽  
Noëlle Dupouy ◽  
Anton Hagenbeek ◽  
Augustinus D.G. Krol ◽  
...  

Purpose In early-stage Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL), subtotal nodal irradiation (STNI) and combined chemotherapy/radiotherapy produce high disease control rates but also considerable late toxicity. The aim of this study was to reduce this toxicity using a combination of low-intensity chemotherapy and involved-field radiotherapy (IF-RT) without jeopardizing disease control. Patients and Methods Patients with stage I or II HL were stratified into two groups, favorable and unfavorable, based on the following four prognostic factors: age, symptoms, number of involved areas, and mediastinal-thoracic ratio. The experimental therapy consisted of six cycles of epirubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and prednisone (EBVP) followed by IF-RT. It was randomly compared, in favorable patients, to STNI and, in unfavorable patients, to six cycles of mechlorethamine, vincristine, procarbazine, prednisone, doxorubicin, bleomycin, and vinblastine (MOPP/ABV hybrid) and IF-RT. Results Median follow-up time of the 722 patients included was 9 years. In 333 favorable patients, the 10-year event-free survival rates (EFS) were 88% in the EBVP arm and 78% in the STNI arm (P = .0113), with similar 10-year overall survival (OS) rates (92% v 92%, respectively; P = .79). In 389 unfavorable patients, the 10-year EFS rate was 88% in the MOPP/ABV arm compared with 68% in the EBVP arm (P < .001), leading to 10-year OS rates of 87% and 79%, respectively (P = .0175). Conclusion A treatment strategy for early-stage HL based on prognostic factors leads to high OS rates in both favorable and unfavorable patients. In favorable patients, the combination of EBVP and IF-RT can replace STNI as standard treatment. In unfavorable patients, EBVP is significantly less efficient than MOPP/ABV.


Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 4719-4719
Author(s):  
Norma Tartas ◽  
Marta Zerga ◽  
Graciela Alfonso ◽  
María P. Amoroso Copello ◽  
Isabel Santos ◽  
...  

Abstract Patients with stage I-II A non bulky Hodgkin’s lymphoma (HL) are successfully treated with 2–4 cycles of ABVD plus IF radiotherapy (RT). Although the negative impact in DFS and OS of B symptoms and bulky disease(X) is widely accepted, other risk factors such as number of lymph node regions involved or extensive spleen involvement have also been reported. What is the best treatment for such patients? Is radiotherapy necessary? We report here our experience with protocol HD 98 in 62 patients, with stage I–II HL. Since January 98 we have included 30 individuals without risk factors and 32 with one of the following risk factors: B symptoms (n:11), X (n:9), extensive spleen involvement (n:1) and involvement of more than two lymph node regions (n:11). Other patient characteristics were: age: x 31yrs (15–69), sex: females 31, males :31. Ann Arbor stage IA :11, IB :1, IIA: 36, IIB :14. Histologic subtypes were: LP: 4, NS: 42, MC: 15, lymphocyte rich :1. Patients with favourable features received 4 cycles of ABVD plus IFRT, those with unfavourable factors received 6–8 cycles of ABVD plus RT in areas of bulky or residual disease. Results: 59/61 evaluable patients obtained CR or CRu. Two patients were considered primary resistant. Three patients relapsed at 7, 13 and 30 months after completion of treatment. Autologus bone marrow transplant was performed in four patients. The two primary resistant patients relapsed after the transplant and died with proggressive disease. Those patients transplanted in a chemosensitive relapse are currently in CR. With a median follow up of 46m (13–84) 96.7% of the patients are alive, in CR. Conclusions: In our experience patients with unfavourable stages I–II HL are succesfully treated with 6–8 cycles of ABVD. In such patients RT might only be necessary in areas of bulky or residual disease.


Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 1557-1557
Author(s):  
Simonetta Viviani ◽  
Arabella Mazzocchi ◽  
Valeria Bonfante ◽  
Rosalba Miceli ◽  
Davide Dalu ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 1557 Poster Board I-580 Introduction The CC thymus and activation related chemokine TARC, a protein highly expressed by Reed-Sternberg cells and in the microenvironment of Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) involved lymph nodes, as well as detectable in the serum of HL patients (pts), has been reported to have prognostic value in retrospective analysis. The aim of our study was to prospectively investigate the association among PET-2 results and TARC serum levels (T) in HL and the prognostic role of T in disease relapse or progression. Patients and Methods Between November 2006 and June 2009, T was measured by ELISA in 73 pts: 50 newly diagnosed untreated pts (Group U) and 23 pts relapsing or progressing after first line CT±RT (Group S). Group U pts received stage-directed therapy consisting in 4 ABVD cycles followed by IFRT for stage I-II A, and 6-8 ABVD cycles ± RT on bulky sites of disease for stage II B, III-IV. Group S pts received cytoreductive CT with Ifosfamide-containing regimens followed by HDBEAM+ASCT. T evaluation was repeated after each CT cycle, at the end of treatment and during follow-up. Results Main pts characteristics were as follows: males/females: 32/41; age<45/≥45yrs: 59/16; Nodular Sclerosis (NS) histology/other: 54/73; stage I+II/III+IV: 46/27; B symptoms: 37; bulky disease: 35; nodal/extra±nodal involvement: 49/24; >3/≤3 involved sites: 34/39; IPS>2/≤2: 8/65. Basal T (T0) (median, IQ range) was significantly higher in Group U vs S (23540, 6528-50710 vs 1448, 735-8278; Mann-Whitney test P=0.002); T0 values >536 were observed in 43 (86%) Group U pts and 18 (78%) Group S pts (536 was the 95th centile of T distribution in a group of 40 independent healthy subjects). Pts with NS, bulky disease and extranodal involvement had significantly higher T0 levels than their counterparts. After 2 CT cycles, T (T2) was significantly lower than T0 in Group U (Wilcoxon paired sample test P<0.001), but not in Group S pts (p=0.090); T2 values >536 were observed in 18 (36%) Group U pts and 14 (61%) Group S pts. PET-2 scan was positive in 20 pts (27%) (Group U: 18%, Group S: 48%); PET- 2 was positive in 19/61 pts (31%) with T0 >536 and in 1/12 pts (8%) with T0 ≤ 536; in 17/32 (53%) pts with T2 >536 and in 2/35 (6%) pts with T2 ≤ 536. The chance of having a positive PET-2 was similar in pts with T0 >536 and T2 ≤ 536 compared with pts with T0 ≤ 536 (OR: 1.1; 95% CI: 0.9-13.5), whereas it was 13-fold greater in pts with both T0 and T2 >536 (OR: 12.6; 95% CI 1.4-110). Median follow-up was 18 months (interquartile range: 13-25 months); 13 (18%) pts had relapse or progression (7 Group U, 6 Group S), 24-months progression-free survival (PFS) was 83.4% in Group U and 60.6% in Group S. PFS was 100% vs 78.6% vs 59.4% in pts with T0 ≤ 536, T0 >536 and T2 ≤ 563, and both T0 and T2 >536, respectively. Conclusions Our study confirms that HL pts have increased serum TARC values at baseline compared with healthy subjects; moreover T0 combined with values observed after 2 cycles of CT may have a role in predicting PET-2 results and disease outcome. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 2812-2812 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle A. Fanale ◽  
Chao-Ming Lai ◽  
Peter McLaughlin ◽  
Jorge Romaguera ◽  
Luis Fayad ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 2812 Introduction: Nodular lymphocyte predominant Hodgkin's lymphoma (NLPHL) constitutes 5% of Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) diagnoses. Recently gene expression profiling has shown significant overlap between NLPHL, T-cell-rich B cell lymphoma (TCRBCL), and classical HL (Brune, V et al, J Exp Med, 2008). NLPHL patients also have an approximate 7% risk of transformation at 10 years to diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and TCRBCL (Al-Mansour, M et al, JCO, 2010). Data from multiple groups (Nogova, L et al, Ann Onc, 2005, Chen, RC et al, JCO, 2010, Wirth, A et al, Cancer, 2005) support extended progression-free survivals (PFS) for stage IA/IIA patients treated with radiation alone. While chemotherapy is generally recommended for patients with stage IB/IIB or III/IV disease, there is lack of guidelines on whether classical HL-directed regimens, such as ABVD (doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine), or B-cell lymphoma-directed regimens, such as R-CHOP (rituximab, cychlophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone) should be used. Given the similarities between NLPHL and indolent CD20+ B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), our group started using the R-CHOP regimen for patients with NLPHL requiring systemic therapy. In order to examine the potential efficacy of this approach, we conducted a retrospective analysis of treatment outcomes in patients who received R-CHOP versus other regimens treated at UT MDACC from 1995 to 2010. Results: 83 patients were referred. 6 patients were found to have NLPHL with transformation to DLBCL or TCRBCL. 3 had alternative diagnoses. 11 lacked full immunophenotyping to confirm diagnosis. 63 patients had confirmed diagnoses of NLPHL (39 stage I/II and 24 stage III/IV). 52 NLPHL patients were evaluable (10 did not complete full treatment planning or were lost to follow-up and 1 is currently completing therapy). 7 patients had extranodal disease (thyroid, breast, lung, liver, bone marrow/cortex) and 8 had spleen involvement. Overall their median age at diagnosis was 40, male:female ratio was 2.5, and median follow-up is 46 months (range 8–149 months). 6 patients had relapse of NLPHL, 2 patients had transformation at a median of 39 months (1 to DLBCL, 1 to TCRBCL), 4 patients died (1 from acute myelogenous leukemia with deletion 7, 1 from DLBCL, 2 from unrelated causes while in remission), and 2 patients underwent autologous stem cell transplant (1 for relapsed NLPHL in 3rd complete remission and 1 for transformation to TCRBCL). Therapies for stage I/II NLPHL included: surgical excision alone (2 patients with stage IA disease declined radiation treatment), subtotal nodal irradiation (STNI), mantle field radiation, involved field radiation (IFRT), rituximab (R) alone and plus IFRT, ABVD plus STNI, R-ABVD, COPP (cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, prednisone) plus IFRT, and R-CHOP alone and plus IFRT. Therapies for stage III/IV included: mantle field radiation (1 patient who declined chemotherapy), NOVP (mitoxantrone, vincristine, vinblastine, prednisone) plus mantle field radiation, ABVD, R-ABVD, R-CHOP alone and plus IFRT. A total of 15 patients received R-CHOP alone (4 stage I/II, 11 stage III/IV) and 5 patients received R-CHOP plus IFRT (4 stage I/II, 1 stage III/IV). Response to R-CHOP as assessed by CT scan criteria was 100% overall response rate (ORR) with 90% complete remissions (CR). No R-CHOP patients have had relapses or transformation with a median follow-up of 42 months (range 8–111 months). One patient treated with R-CHOP died of unrelated causes while in remission. However, with other therapies 19% have relapsed after median remissions of 38 months (range 4 to 72 months). R-CHOP when compared to other treatments has a trend towards improved PFS (Figures 1, 2, and 3). Survival rates for NLPHL patients at 5 years with 95% confidence intervals are: R-CHOP: PFS 0.95 (0.86, 1), OS (overall survival) 0.95 (0.86, 1) and other therapies: PFS 0.71 (0.55, 0.92), OS 0.91 (0.8, 1). Conclusions: Our data demonstrates that RCHOP is an effective regimen for the treatment of patients with NLPHL. A prospective evaluation of R-CHOP as a front-line treatment of NLPHL is under consideration. Disclosures: Fanale: Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Millenium: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Given the CD20 positivity of nodular lymphocyte predominant Hodgkin lymphoma (NLPHL) rituximab has been evaluated previously for relapsed NLPHL and was shown to be efficacious. Rituximab however is not FDA approved for NLPHL. This is a retrospective study that evaluates the use of R-CHOP and other therapies for NLPHL. Current NCCN guidelines support consideration of R-CHOP for NLPHL treatment, and given the rarity of the disease there is no one defined preferred chemotherapy regimen. This information will be disclosed to the audience. Fayad:Genentech: Research Funding. Rodriguez:Genentech: Research Funding. Shah:Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Millenium: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Younes:Genentech: Honoraria, Research Funding; SBIO: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria, Research Funding.


2001 ◽  
Vol 41 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 353-358 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Rueda ◽  
Isabel Sevilla ◽  
Josep Gumá ◽  
Nuria Ribelles ◽  
JosÉ Miramón ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document