Paranoid monuments, Eve Sedgwick, and queer remembrance

2021 ◽  
pp. 208-218
Author(s):  
Thomas Houlton
Keyword(s):  
2021 ◽  
pp. 204382062110445
Author(s):  
Valentina Carraro

I read Rossetto and Lo Presti's article, ‘Reimagining the National Map’, as an invitation to develop what I call, following Eve Sedgwick, a reparative study of national cartographies. In this commentary, I enthusiastically support their call but also argue for the need to move from an appreciation of maps’ fundamental instability to a more daring engagement with the normative dimension of national mapping. Like many scholars working from a post-representational perspective, Rossetto and Lo Presti associate the fundamental dynamism and contingency of maps with (potential) positive social change and, more specifically, the development of multicultural national imaginaries. I suggest that these associations deserve further scrutiny and argue that change and ‘everydayness’ may offer a starting point, but not a basis for progressive national mappings. Finally, drawing on the thought-provoking examples presented by Rossetto and Lo Presti, I reflect on what principles and practices could guide a progressive national cartography of Italy in 2021.


Author(s):  
Bogdan Popa

In this final chapter I reflect upon the possibilities unleashed by recent scholarship in queer political theory. First, I discuss the future of queer political thinking by insisting that the act of interpretation has to draw on how one becomes both irritated by and surprised by scholarly arguments. As an affective practice, irritation offers the incentive to challenge what is already known while the surprise opens up a new territory for investigation. Second, to enact my interpretative method, I critically engage with the work of Eve Sedgwick, Leo Bersani, José Esteban Muñoz, and Lauren Berlant to argue that queer practices can articulate an equality-oriented vision of politics.


2018 ◽  
pp. 1-20
Author(s):  
Susan Zieger

The introduction lays out the book’s terms, critical concerns, method, and historical and theoretical contexts. Explaining how printed ephemera transformed the texture of everyday middle- and working-class life throughout the nineteenth century, peaking in the 1860s and 1890s, it then shows how affect, itself an ephemeral human condition, registered the new social relations that mass media reorganized. The introduction explains the book’s engagement with theorists of media and mass media such as Walter Benjamin, Theodor Adorno and Marx Horkheimer, and Friedrich Kittler; and theorists of affect and mass culture such as Eve Sedgwick, Lauren Berlant, and Kathleen Stewart. It describes the cultural evidence the book assembles, such as temperance medals, cigarette cards, ink blot games, and novels; and describes each chapter.


2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 547-572
Author(s):  
Kimberly Kay Hoang

Engaging with the work of C. Wright Mills and Eve Sedgwick, in this article I theorize how homoerotic relations facilitate the flow of global capital into risky market economies. Drawing on interview data with more than 60 financial professionals managing foreign investments in Vietnam, I examine the co-constitution of gender and global capital by identifying three categories of deal brokers. System maintainers are men and women who accept that women’s bodies are necessary for male homosocial bonding between political and economic elites. System transformers are men and women who disrupt the status quo and develop alternative ways of deal brokering outside of erotic spaces. System defectors are those break the triangle altogether and work to create new markets.


PMLA ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 135 (5) ◽  
pp. 976-981
Author(s):  
Grace Lavery
Keyword(s):  

In a recent special issue of modernism/modernity entitled weak theory, a group of scholars debated, receptively but appropriately gently, the merits of “weak thought,” a notion that the editor Paul Saint-Amour derived from his readings of Eve Sedgwick, Wai Chee Dimock, and Gianni Vattimo—a mode of argument, and even intellection, designed to deflate expansive or overconfident epistemological and ontological claims. The issue occasioned a great deal of online dispute, then no fewer than four sets of responses from the various partisans and antagonists of “weak theory,” and eventually, in a final invaginating flourish, a set of responses to the responses by the initial authors (including me). In their response, Melanie Micir and Aarthi Vadde brought into the conversation a tweet by Jacquelyn Ardam: I've been watching the conversations around @MModernity's “Weak Theory” issue unfold from the sidelines and here is my take: sure is easy to claim weakness when you have tenure or TT job. The Q of weakness looks v different from the land of the contingent. (@jaxwendy)


Criticism ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 52 (2) ◽  
pp. 225-234 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Flatley
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Christel Stormhøj

The article examines queer as critique by performing a series of parallel readings of leading queer thinkers, including Judith Butler, Eve Sedgwick, and Michael Warner. Introducing two philosophical traditions and strategies of social critique, immanent and intervening critique, along with their criteria of what is right and good, I discuss how these scholars engage in these strategies and wrestle with their in-built problems within the orbit of the research foci and ambitions of queer studies. Queer critique aims at challenging dominant knowledges, social hierarchies and norms related to sex, sexuality, and gender by exposing the limits they impose on us, including the sufferings associated with them. The article closes with considering queer political visions and their normative underpinnings.


Author(s):  
Justin Thomas McDaniel

Of the top thirty tallest statues in the world, 26 are either Buddhas or Bodhisattvas. Buddhists, especially in the 20th century, have been built some of the largest spectacle attractions in global history. The history of these sites in Japan, China, Thailand, Burma, and other places are briefly described followed by the introduction to the contents and the arguments of the book. The book examines the very idea of Buddhist public culture, spectacle culture, and leisure culture, as well as argues that these sites reflect a growing Buddhist ecumenism and the power of affective encounters in teaching Buddhism. It asks the reader to question the very category of “religious” architecture and instead think of the Japanese category of misemono (spectacle attractions) as an unexplored Buddhist category. The theoretical work of Daniel Miller, Miriam Hansen, Johan Huizinga, Michael Taussig, Scott Page, Lauren Rabinovitz, Witold Rybczynski, E.H. Gombrich, Jürgen Habermas, Gregory Seigworth, Eve Sedgwick, Melissa Gregg, Gregory Levine, and others are consulted in developing a material culture approach to the study of modern Buddhist architecture.


Author(s):  
Isobel Roele

Critical approaches to international law scholarship are sometimes hide-bound by reality and dismissive of idealism. Such work resembles the hermeneutics of suspicion. Eve Sedgwick explained that such approaches can be paranoid, as attempts to exclude fantasy from scholarship merely drive it underground. This chapter draws on psychoanalyst Donald Winnicott’s concept of the transitional object to think about how objects could mediate between reality and fantasy in international law pedagogy. The chapter calls for a creative reinvigoration of the discipline in which international lawyers could share a ‘sample of dream potential’ without making claims on reality. Objects, like props in children’s plays, help us connect with one another in spontaneous ways that can surprise us into looking at the world differently. This enlivening of the creative and cultural life of our discipline is an act of self-care, not an attempt to change the world.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document