Open Access: Third-party responses to injustice: a review on the preference for compensation

2020 ◽  
pp. 315-333
Author(s):  
Janne Van Doorn ◽  
Lieve Brouwers
Keyword(s):  
Open Access ◽  
Third Party

scholarly journals Next generation Open Access analytics: A case study

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Tim Lloyd ◽  
Sara Rouhi
Keyword(s):  
Open Access ◽  
Lessons Learned ◽  
Third Party ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Critical Component ◽  
Diverse Range ◽  
Innovative Project ◽  
Industry Standard ◽  
External Stakeholders

A critical component in the development of sustainable funding models for Open Access (OA) is the ability to communicate impact in ways that are meaningful to a diverse range of internal and external stakeholders, including institutional partners, funders, and authors. While traditional paywall publishers can take advantage of industry standard COUNTER reports to communicate usage to subscribing libraries, no similar standard exists for OA content. Instead, many organizations are stuck with proxy metrics like sessions and page views that struggle to discriminate between robotic access and genuine engagement. This paper presents the results of an innovative project that builds on existing COUNTER metrics to develop more flexible reporting. Reporting goals include surfacing third party engagement with OA content, the use of graphical report formats to improve accessibility, the ability to assemble custom data dashboards, and configurations that support the variant needs of diverse stakeholders. We’ll be sharing our understanding of who the stakeholders are, their differing needs for analytics, feedback on the reports shared, lessons learned, and areas for future research in this evolving area.

scholarly journals Correction to: Fiscal Policy, Multidimensional Poverty, and Equity in Uganda: A Child-Lens Analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jose Cuesta ◽  
Jon Jellema ◽  
Lucia Ferrone
Keyword(s):  
Fiscal Policy ◽  
Open Access ◽  
Multidimensional Poverty ◽  
Third Party ◽  
Copyright Holder ◽  
Internet Portal ◽  
Creative Commons ◽  
Credit Line ◽  
Statutory Regulation ◽  
Intended Use

The article ‘Fiscal Policy, Multidimensional Poverty, and Equity in Uganda: A Child-Lens Analysis’, written by Jose Cuesta, Jon Jellema and Lucia Ferrone was originally published electronically on the publisher’s internet portal on 18 of May 2021 without open access. With the author(s)’ decision to opt for Open Choice the copyright of the article changed on 14 of September 2021 to © The Author(s), 2021 and the article is forthwith distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0.

Open Access to Control on Quality of Service in Convergent Networks

2010 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 53-74
Author(s):  
Evelina Pencheva ◽  
Ivaylo Atanasov
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Service ◽  
Open Access ◽  
Service Management ◽  
Network Control ◽  
Third Party ◽  
Service Access ◽  
Qos Management ◽  
Application Programming ◽  
Open Service

This paper investigates the capabilities for open access to quality of service management in convergent networks. Based on the analysis of requirements for policy and charging control in Internet Protocol Multimedia Subsystem (IMS), functions for quality of service (QoS) management and charging that are available for third party applications are identified. The functionality of Open Service Access (OSA) and Parlay X interfaces is evaluated for support of dynamic QoS control, while an approach to development of OSA compliant application programming interfaces for QoS management in IMS networks is presented. The interface’s methods are mapped onto the messages of network control protocols such as Diameter and Session Initiation Protocol (SIP). Finally, aspects of interface implementation are discussed including behavior equivalence of state machines.

scholarly journals Correction to: The uniqueness of subjective ageing: convergent and discriminant validity

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Svenja M. Spuling ◽  
Verena Klusmann ◽  
Catherine E. Bowen ◽  
Anna E. Kornadt ◽  
Eva-Marie Kessler
Keyword(s):  
Open Access ◽  
Discriminant Validity ◽  
Third Party ◽  
Copyright Holder ◽  
Internet Portal ◽  
Creative Commons ◽  
Credit Line ◽  
Convergent And Discriminant Validity ◽  
Statutory Regulation ◽  
Intended Use

The article “The uniqueness of subjective ageing: convergent and discriminant validity”, written by Svenja M. Spuling, Verena Klusmann, Catherine E. Bowen, Anna E. Kornadt and Eva-Marie Kessler., was originally published electronically on the publisher’s internet portal on 09 October 2020 without open access. With the author(s)’ decision to opt for Open Choice the copyright of the article changed on 05 January 2021 to © The Author(s) 2021 and the article is forthwith distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0.

scholarly journals Correction to: Visible lattice points along curves

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kui Liu ◽  
Xianchang Meng
Keyword(s):  
Open Access ◽  
Lattice Points ◽  
Third Party ◽  
Copyright Holder ◽  
Internet Portal ◽  
Creative Commons ◽  
Link Type ◽  
Credit Line ◽  
Statutory Regulation ◽  
Intended Use

The article “Visible lattice points along curves”, written by Kui Liu and Xianchang Meng, was originally published electronically on the publisher’s internet portal on 27 July 2020 without open access. With the author(s)’ decision to opt for Open Choice the copyright of the article changed on 9 July 2021 to © The Author(s) 2020 and the article is forthwith distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0.

scholarly journals Correction to: Assessment of incentivizing effects for cancer care frameworks

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jörg Haier ◽  
Jonathan Sleeman ◽  
Jürgen Schäfers
Keyword(s):  
Open Access ◽  
Cancer Care ◽  
Third Party ◽  
Copyright Holder ◽  
Open Access Publication ◽  
Creative Commons ◽  
Link Type ◽  
Credit Line ◽  
Statutory Regulation ◽  
Intended Use

The article “Assessment of incentivizing effects for cancer care frameworks”, written by Jörg Haier, Jonathan Sleeman and Jürgen Schäfers, was originally published Online First without Open Access. After publication in volume 37, issue 4, page 447–450 the author decided to opt for Open Choice and to make the article an Open Access publication. Therefore, the copyright of the article has been changed to © The Author(s) 2020 and the article is forthwith distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0. Open access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.

scholarly journals Correction to: Conditional Action and Quantum Versions of Maxwell’s Demon

2021 ◽  
Vol 51 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Heinz-Jürgen Schmidt
Keyword(s):  
Open Access ◽  
Third Party ◽  
Copyright Holder ◽  
Maxwell’S Demon ◽  
Internet Portal ◽  
Creative Commons ◽  
Credit Line ◽  
Maxwell's Demon ◽  
Statutory Regulation ◽  
Intended Use

The article “Conditional Action and Quantum Versions of Maxwell’s Demon”, written by Heinz‑Jurgen Schmidt, was originally published electronically on the publisher’s internet portal on 30 September 2020 without open access. With the author(s)’ decision to opt for Open Choice the copyright of the article changed on 17 September 2021 to © The Author(s) 2020 and the article is forthwith distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0. The original article has been corrected.

scholarly journals Redaktörerna har ordet

2021 ◽  
Vol 58 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lena Sohl ◽  
Magnus Wennerhag
Keyword(s):  
Open Access ◽  
Welfare State ◽  
Peer Review ◽  
Third Party ◽  
Management Tool ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
State Bureaucracy ◽  
And Control

I det här numret av Sociologisk Forskning presenterar vi sex stycken forskningsartiklar. I artikeln ”Commitment and control. Teamwork as management tool in a welfare state bureaucracy” visar Kerstin Jacobsson och Katarina Hollertz hur teamwork fungerar som en subtil styrmekanism inom offentlig sektor. Artikeln utgår från en omfattande etnografisk studie av verksamheten vid Försäkringskassans lokalkontor och belyser hur normativ kontroll sprider sig i organisationen genom teamwork. I individuella intervjuer uttryckte däremot vissa handläggare en oro för att betraktas som för strikta. Författarna uppmärksammar det faktum att ingen kritik framfördes i de kollektiva arbetsprocesserna, vilket visar på en stark normativ kontroll inom verksamheten. I artikeln ”#Metoo. En kamp för socialt erkännande och rättvisa” gör Emma Engdahl, Maria Nyman och Hans Ekbrand en innehållsanalys av vittnesmål från 65 svenska #metoo-upprop. I vittnesmålen framkommer, menar författarna, fyra typer av social missaktning: fysiska och psykiska övergrepp, förnedring eller kränkning, rättsberövande och epistemisk orättvisa. I artikeln diskuteras sexuella trakasserier som ”manlig samhandling”, det vill säga att en man agerar inför en publik som ger bifall till förövaren. Författarna konstaterar att ”#Metoo-rörelsen lyckades skapa ett retoriskt rum där vittnesmål om denna typ av förnedringar eller kränkningar trots detta kunde uttryckas och bli förstådda”. Torbjörn Bildtgård, Marianne Winqvist och Peter Öberg utgår i artikeln ”The dyad is not enough. Third-party mediation as a precondition for cohesion in long-term step relationships” från retrospektiva livsloppsintervjer med äldre föräldrar som uppfostrat både biologiska barn och styvbarn. En av deras slutsatser är att forskningen om mellangenerationella relationer i åldrande styvfamiljer bör ta hänsyn till den särskilda roll som en ”tredje part” ofta spelar för hur dessa relationer utvecklas över tid.   Simon Härnbro, Marcus Herz och Magnus Dahlstedt analyserar i artikeln ”Social tjänst till salu. Om socialt arbete i upphandlingens tid” hur socialarbetare som utför upphandlade tjänster beskriver sitt arbete. Författarna visar att socialarbetarna ”beskriver både sig själva och klienterna som passiva i relation till upphandlingens logik”. En slutsats i artikeln är att upphandlingarna skapar ”en hierarki av olika former av socialt arbete”, där det kortsiktiga, specialiserade och avgränsade sociala arbetet är det som görs möjligt genom upphandlingarna, medan annat socialt arbete tenderar att ges lägre prioritet. Artikeln ”Dokumentationens roll för klientskapande processer i äldreinriktat socialt arbete. Spelar utlandsfödd bakgrund, kön och ålder någon roll?” av Anna Olaison, Maricel Knechtel, Sandra Torres och Emilia Forssell utgår från en analys av socialtjänstens akter. I texten diskuteras den betydelse bakgrund (inrikes eller utrikes född), kön och ålder har för både hur biståndshandläggare motiverar sina beslut och hur insatstyper fördelas till äldre personer. Författarna konstaterar: ”Det reser oundvikligen frågan om utrikesfödda och män i större utsträckning än inrikes födda och kvinnor får förlita sig på anhörigas informella insatser för att få sina omsorgsbehov tillgodosedda”. I artikeln ”Transnationalism, integration och etnisk organisering. En studie av svenska etniska organisationer i ljuset av civilsamhällets omvandling” uppmärksammar Olle Frödin och Axel Fredholm frågan om vilken roll transnationella aktiviteter spelar för dagens civilsamhälle. Analysen utgår från en totalundersökning av 52 riksförbund som fått bidrag från Myndigheten för ungdoms- och civilsamhällesfrågor (MUCF). Författarna menar att det går att det bland de etniska organisationerna i Sverige går att se en rad olika uttryck för en politisk transnationalisering som många gånger varierar beroende på migrantgruppernas förhållande till staten i ursprungslandet.   I numret finns även tre recensioner av fyra aktuella böcker. Håkan Thörn tar upp två nyutkomna böcker i sin recension: Sven-Axel Månssons och Svante Lundbergs Den politiska generationen. Kontinuitet och förändring 1968–2018 (2021) samt Kjell Östbergs Folk i rörelse. Vår demokratis historia (2021). Thörn lyfter fram att Kjell Östbergs bok ger en ”imponerande överblick” av den tidigare forskning som bedrivits ”om sociala rörelsers betydelse för det moderna svenska samhällsbygget”. Han menar att boken är starkast i skildrandet av ”mobiliseringen före rösträttsreformen”, medan den del som berör tiden efter 1945 är svagare. Sven-Axel Månssons och Svante Lundbergs bok beskriver Thörn som ”relativt unik” inom forskningen om sociala rörelser, eftersom den bygger på återkommande intervjuer med aktivister under en lång tidsperiod. Thörn menar att det blir tydligt att ”68-revolten faktiskt var paradigmatisk för den aktivism som följde under de följande fem decennierna” men ställer sig samtidigt frågande till varför författarna inte ägnar ”det dynamiska mötet mellan den politiska och kulturella revolten” större utrymme. Tomas Berglund beskriver antologin Klass i Sverige. Ojämlikheten, makten och politiken i det 21:a århundradet (2021) – med Daniel Suhonen, Göran Therborn och Jesper Weithz som redaktörer – som en ”imponerande kraftsamling” som kastar ljus på olika aspekter av klass och ojämlikhet. Berglund saknar emellertid begreppet exploatering i boken, det vill säga en diskussion om ”det överutnyttjande av kroppar, själar och livsmiljöer som präglar dagens kapitalistiska produktion”, något som redan Marx menade gav utrymme för såväl kamp som politik. Charlotta Holmström skriver i sin recension av Lena Gunnarssons Samtyckesdynamiker. Sex, våldtäkt och gråzonen däremellan (2020) att ”frågan om samtycke kan framstå som enkel och tydlig i den politiska debatten och i diskussionerna om lagstiftning” men att forskningen om samtycke och samtyckeskultur är mer komplex än så. Hon beskriver Lena Gunnarssons ansats som ”ambitiös” och menar att studiens styrka är ”rikedomen i det empiriska materialet” som studiens styrka men menar samtidigt att analyserna ibland inte är stringenta nog.   Vi vill även uppmana er att sända oss era artikelmanus, forskningsnotiser, förslag på recensioner och gärna idéer för framtida temanummer. Sociologisk Forskning publicerar bidrag på svenska och övriga skandinaviska språk samt på engelska. Sociologisk Forskning tillämpar anonymiserad kollegial granskning (double blind peer review) och alla artiklar publiceras med omedelbar öppen tillgång (open access) på tidskriftens hemsida.   Lena Sohl och Magnus Wennerhag Redaktörer för Sociologisk Forskning

scholarly journals Correction to: Interpretation and integration of “creating shared value” in Asia: implications for strategy research and practice

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca Chunghee Kim ◽  
Akira Saito ◽  
V. Mohan Avvari
Keyword(s):  
Open Access ◽  
Third Party ◽  
Shared Value ◽  
Copyright Holder ◽  
Strategy Research ◽  
Research And Practice ◽  
Creative Commons ◽  
Credit Line ◽  
Creating Shared Value ◽  
Statutory Regulation

The article “Interpretation and integration of “creating shared value” in Asia: implications for strategy research and practice”, written by Kim, R.C., Saito, A. & Avvari, V.M. was originally published Online First without Open Access. After publication in volume 19, issue 4, page 379–406 the author decided to opt for Open Choice and to make the article an Open Access publication. Therefore, the copyright of the article has been changed to © The Author(s) 2020 and the article is forthwith distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0.

scholarly journals Correction to: Participatory System Dynamics Modeling: Increasing Stakeholder Engagement and Precision to Improve Implementation Planning in Systems

2021 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 377-377
Author(s):  
Lindsey Zimmerman ◽  
David W. Lounsbury ◽  
Craig S. Rosen ◽  
Rachel Kimerling ◽  
Jodie A. Trafton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Open Access ◽  
System Dynamics ◽  
Stakeholder Engagement ◽  
Third Party ◽  
Copyright Holder ◽  
System Dynamics Modeling ◽  
Dynamics Modeling ◽  
Creative Commons ◽  
Credit Line ◽  
Implementation Planning

The article “Participatory System Dynamics Modeling: Increasing Stakeholder Engagement and Precision to Improve Implementation Planning in Systems”, written by “Lindsey Zimmerman, David W. Lounsbury, Craig S. Rosen, Rachel Kimerling, Jodie A. Trafton, Steven E. Lindley”, was originally published Online First without Open Access. After publication in volume 43, issue 6, pages 834–849 the author decided to opt for Open Choice and to make the article an Open Access publication. Therefore, the copyright of the article has been changed to © The Authors 2020 and the article is forthwith distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document