account was developed from an analysis of the various elements to be accounted for. The logic that prevailed in the selection of the order of presentation of charges was based on the distinction be­ tween the major economic and financial operations usually con­ ducted by the firm. First, production operations necessitate the purchase of material, the payment of wages to employees and of taxes to the state, and the incurring of various operating expenses. Next, a category was created to register financial charges resulting from the firm’s financing policy. Finally, a category was devoted to the cost of permanent productive means related to the period: depreciation of fixed assets. On the revenue side of the trading account, resources coming from the sale of production or pur­ chased goods were shown first, since they result from the primary activity of the firm. Next, sales revenues from two secondary sources were shown in separate categories. Production by the firm of its own fixed assets, which was considered revenue since it represented a transfer of charges to the balance sheet, also ap­ peared under a separate heading. Finally, a category was allocated to revenues from financial operations such as interest and divi­ dends. Aside from financial accounting provisions, the plan con­ tained an important section on cost accounting. As mentioned earlier in the case of the CNOF Plan, to maximize both the stan­ dardization of financial accounting and the flexibility and adapt­ ability of the cost accounting system, the plan reserved a separate class for cost accounts, number 9. Separation of cost accounting also favored the progressive introduction of cost accounting, with­ out delaying the application of the financial accounting section of the plan. The role assigned to cost accounting by the plan was threefold, including the periodic determination of: 1. The cost of manufactured or purchased products; 2. Inventories, using the perpetual inventory method; 3. The results of operations by each branch or subdivision of the firm's activities In the general plan, a main structure for industrial accounting was prescribed, leaving the problem of application to particular cases to company plans. Two measures ensured the flexibility and adaptability of the plan. First of all, the use of the decimal system meant that any account could be subdivided by adding extra digits to the account number. Secondly, the free accounts left in the general plan could be used to fill specific needs. 294

2014 ◽  
pp. 350-350

Comparison of the 1947 Plan with the 1942 Plan and the CNOF Plan To facilitate the adoption of the plan, the Committee for the Normalization of Accounting did not want to upset accounting traditions unduly. Since the 1942 Plan had already been intro­ duced in some companies, it seemed natural that the committee base its work on that plan, and try to improve upon it. The com­ mittee benefited from companies’ experience with the 1942 Plan, and took into account the criticisms that had been expressed of the earlier plan. The 1947 Plan was a major advance over the 1942 Plan. First, to number the first class, the zero was dropped and replaced by the number one to facilitate the use of accounting machines. The zero was used thereafter for statistical accounts. Second, separate classes were created for fixed assets and third-party accounts (short-term receivables and payables). Third, class number 2 of the 1942 Plan, which contained the regularization and engage­ ment accounts, was abolished, and the accounts reallocated to other classes. Fourth, purchases now appeared in class 6 instead of class 3, which was reserved for inventories, and the cumber­ some accounts for purchases added to inventory were eliminated. Lastly, accounts were classified in the same order on the balance sheet and in the chart of accounts. The separation of cost accounting from financial accounting, a feature of the CNOF Plan, was retained, together with the impu­ tation of both expenses and revenues in the cost accounts. As in the CNOF Plan, contra-accounts were placed in the same catego­ ries as the accounts they corrected, and accounts that had the same function in the firm were designated by the same number of digits. The rational classification used in the CNOF Plan was adopted for the balance sheet. However, the committee did not retain the classification into ordres and categories found in the CNOF Plan, since the flexibility of decimal coding was preferred. This meant that, as in the 1942 Plan, the balances of the 1947 chart's classes were meaningless. Applicability of the 1947 Plan The Superior Council for Accounting, created by a January 1947 decree, was to supervise the application of the 1947 Plan. The conditions under which it was to operate were to be specified 295

2014 ◽  
pp. 351-351

separate double-entry system. Separation of cost accounting from financial accounting was believed to be essential. The reasons that were given then for this separation seem still valid today in view of the maintenance of the same practice in the 1982 Accounting Plan. The most important justifications were the following: 1. It facilitated the establishment and further modification of the cost accounting system; 2. In cases where there were modifications in production or in the company structure, the cost accounts could be adapted without modifying the plan for financial ac­ counting, thus preserving the inter-firm comparability of the financial information, as well as its comparability over time; 3. Charges included in product prices could differ from ex­ penditures registered in financial accounting; 4. The use of contra-accounts allowed complete freedom in cost accounting; the transformation of data for the compu­ tation of product prices and the determination of results of operations could thus be done freely without altering the original accounts [CNOF, 1947, pp. 32-34, 99]. The CNOF Plan was very well designed; however, to preserve the recent tradition introduced by the 1942 Plan, only some of its features were retained in the 1947 Plan. The influence of the CNOF Plan and of the 1942 Plan on the 1947 Plan will be consid­ ered after introducing the latter. THE 1947 ACCOUNTING PLAN As the first official plan drafted after the Liberation, the 1947 Plan constituted the real beginning of accounting normalization in France. It was initially designed for industrial and commercial undertakings, but with the intention of adapting the plan to all sectors of the economy. The ultimate goal of the Committee for the Normalization of Accounting was to create a system that would allow the summation of the accounts of all economic units, thereby facilitating the preparation of national accounts. The Committee was headed by its vice-president, Turpin, who was secretary of the Central Committee for Prices. The secretary of the Committee was Pujol, a state economic expert and former secretary of the adaptation committee for the 1942 Plan. Among the sub-committees that were formed to work on specific topics, the three most important ones were the sub-committee on prin­ ciples, definitions and rules, headed by Fourastie and Lauzel; the

2014 ◽  
pp. 344-344

Models for the balance sheet, the trading account and the profit and loss account; 8. A section on cost accounting, including a description of the system adopted, terminology, rules for computing product costs, an explanation of the perpetual inventory method and the procedure for the classification of expenses into fixed and variable categories; 9. Statistical accounts necessary to analyze the company's situation and establish a national accounting system (see point 4 in the previous section). General Features of the 1947 Plan The plan offered a simple, logical and flexible structure, while introducing the most advanced cost accounting techniques of the time (the homogeneous sections method described earlier). Termi­ nology and presentation were largely borrowed from the account­ ing tradition. The chart of accounts (see Appendix) classes were chosen in accordance with the two traditional objectives of finan­ cial accounting: the determination of the firm’s situation and the analysis of the year's results. The plan used the decimal system to number accounts and classes of accounts. The main classes of the plan were as follows: Balance 1. Permanent capital (capital, reserves, liabili-sheet ties); accounts 2. Fixed assets and investments; 3. Stocks; 4. Third-party accounts (receivables and payables); 5. Financial accounts (short-teim loans and borrowing, short-term investments, cash); Operating 6. Expenses, classified by type; accounts 7. Revenues, classified by type; 8. Profit and Loss accounts; 9. Cost accounting accounts; 10. Statistical accounts. This structure made it easy to prepare the balance sheet which was established from the accounts of the first five classes. Unlike the 1942 Plan, the order of appearance of the accounts on the balance sheet was the same as in the chart of accounts. Ac­ counts were first classified according to the duration of use or realizability for assets (short or long-term) and according to the

2014 ◽  
pp. 346-346

suits of operations. The ordres were linked together either by double-entry or by the use of contra-accounts. The plan's double­ entry systems were as follows [CNOF, 1946]: Financial accounting Ordre 1 — Operating accounts (revenues and expenses) (accounting elements seen as causes) Ordre 2 — Balance sheet accounts (assets and liabilities) (effect of transactions on the company's position) Managerial accounting Ordre 3 — Cost accounts and sales accounts (transactions classified as to purpose) Ordre 4 — Imputation or contra-accounts Budgetary accounting Ordre 5 — Budgeted operations Ordre 6 — Budgeted liquidities Ordre 7 and 8 were left open, in case other accounting systems were developed in the future. Ordre 9 was devoted to commit­ ments and transitory accounts, such as purchases and sales in cash, and internal transfers. In financial statements, transitory ac­ counts were to be replaced by the ordre to which they were related (1 or 2), and commitments were to be listed at the end of the balance sheet. Each ordre was further divided into categories, each having its own specific meaning. For example, the categories found in ordre 1 were charges and revenues that are included in the gross profit margin, operating charges and revenues, investment-related charges and revenues, administrative charges, miscellaneous rev­ enues and financial charges. These categories were further grouped to provide the following summary accounts: the gross profit margin, results of operations, net revenue from investments, net administrative charges and financial charges. The classifica­ tion adopted in that ordre was based first on the economic func­ tion of the transactions and second on their nature. Another ex­ ample of the breakdown of an ordre into categories is provided by ordre 2. In the latter, assets were divided, according to their eco­ nomic function in the company and their degree of liquidity, into fixed assets, investments, short-term assets (inventories and short­ term investments), receivables and liquid assets (cash and cash equivalents). Ordre 3 and 4 were devoted to cost accounting, constituting a 287

2014 ◽  
pp. 343-343

1987 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 41-57
Author(s):  
Robert C. Elmore

The purpose of this paper is to examine the financial accounting records of a Mississippi timber company and its subsidiaries in light of the dynamic tax environment of the period 1905 to 1925. The financial accounting records and correspondence with the Commissioner of Internal Revenue indicate deficiencies in the following areas: asset valuation, a lack of a cost accounting system to adequately value inventories, and the depletion and depreciation deduction. The demands of the new tax laws were often in conflict with the accounting practices of this period of time forcing changes in accounting practice.


of the information given to the shareholders, precautions to take for upward appraisal of capital assets, choice of an investment, and dividend policy. In order to raise enough capital for its business, the Company had to inform a growing number of shareholders, which soon became inconsistent with the managers’ freedom to deal with ac­ counting information according to their own needs. The resoultion of this problem led to the distinction between standard­ ized financial accounting for external and management account­ ing for internal use. As it became more and more efficient and advanced, the accounting system led to its own splitting. CONCLUSION Compared to most of the firms, Saint-Gobain had to face very early (in the first half of the 19th century) the problems raised by the setting up of a management accounting system. However, it was not until 1820, 155 years after its creation, that it adopted double entry bookkeeping which included the calculation of costs. This evolution is mainly due to the spreading of the Industrial Revolution in France, which was responsible for the abolition of privileges and the growth of competition in the field of glass pro­ duction. During the period 1820-1880, the cost accounting system had been gradually improved, without any regular outside coercion, according to the needs of the management alone. This leads to two conclusions and two research questions. In 1880, the accounting system facilitated the reckoning of full costs with methods and procedures that are still in use (alloca­ tion of the overhead with the use of activity center accounts, up-to-date transfer pricing methods, analysis of the relationship be­ tween depreciation, dividends and investments, etc ). This full cost method is now over one hundred years old. The development and the mastering of that cost accounting system were absolutely necessary to start the next stage, that is to say the use of those costs to prepare estimates of costs and investments. That stage took place over four decades (1890 to 1930) and led to real budget control towards the end of the Second World War. It should be recognized that the accounting systems of a given period can be very different from one another, which is particu­ larly true in the 19th century, therefore research should look at the variables on which the accounting system of each firm depends. Among the internal ones, the size of the firm, the culture of its

2014 ◽  
pp. 267-267

ters or direct labor hours). This method allowed cost prices to be determined at each successive stage of the production process. The addition of the charges incurred at one level of production to the previous charges provided the cost of the product at that par­ ticular production level. However, since the method did not pro­ vide the original breakdown of the various cost components, com­ ponents had to be recomputed on a separate schedule. The homo­ geneous sections method was adopted in the plan for cost compu­ tations because it allowed precise calculations, and afforded great possibilities of application to various situations. Another characteristic related to product costing introduced in the French Plan was the use of mirror or contra-accounts which allowed product costs to be computed without altering expense accounts. In fact, charges were debited to the appropriate cost accounts by crediting contra-accounts, which preserved the infor­ mation registered in financial accounting’s expense accounts while ensuring the identity of the information carried from financial accounts to cost accounts. Second, the rational classification (discussed in the next sec­ tion) which had developed in France in the 1920s [CNOF, 1946, p. 46] and which, by the 1940s, had been widely adopted by the majority of French enterprises for their balance sheets [CNOF, 1946, p. 23] inspired the 1942 Plan's standard balance sheet. How­ ever, the rational classification was not retained for the 1942 Plan’s chart of accounts since it was inspired by the German chart. The 1942 Plan was mainly criticized for its lack of logic and its complexity, and for being overly oriented toward the determi­ nation of financial results for external purposes, and of product costs for internal and external pricing of products. Not enough attention was paid to the role of accounting in the daily manage­ ment of operations [Brunet, 1951, pp. 252-253]. The other major criticism addressed to the Plan concerned the duality of the operations account and the profit and loss ac­ count, stemming from the possibility of classifying expenses either by nature or by function depending on whether the cost classes (5, 6 and 7) were used or not. This situation deprived national ac­ countants of valuable information needed in the preparation of national accounts [Brunet, 1951, p. 2521. As will be seen in a later section, this criticism was taken into account in the drafting of the 1947 Plan. An official adaptation of the 1942 Plan was only produced for the aeronautic industry. However, Brunet [1951, p. 254] mentions that a number of major companies also adopted the general plan,

2014 ◽  
pp. 341-341

2010 ◽  
Vol 439-440 ◽  
pp. 1277-1280
Author(s):  
Hong Jun Guan

With the development of information technology, as the basis of economic accounting of the companies, it is possible for team cost accounting to be provided with various of basic data collection, data processing and sharing of such data. First of all, the related technology is introduced, then combined with the production process of C4 workshop, it described the analysis result and scheme. In this process, obtaining dynamic data from production equipment is the first step, then according to different devices and various requirements of product cost accounting, calculate the cost for each team, and finally realize the need for assessment of the teams.


2020 ◽  
pp. 18-24
Author(s):  
Yuliia SHOSTAK

The article deals with the importance of accounting for costs for the activity of manufacturing enterprises, examines the organization of cost accounting. The purpose of the paper is to investigate the organization of accounting for production costs, as well as to identify specific ways of its further improvement. It is established that there is a need to differentiate the costs of operating activities with their further detail. The importance of cost detailing by species, which provides accuracy and reliability of cost data, contributes to their efficient management. The basic prerequisites for rational organization of cost accounting have been formed and the directions for increasing the level of management of expenditure implementation have been determined. Based on the primary cost accounting documents, the required amounts are calculated by displaying them with the relevant invoices. Formation of information on production costs is carried out on accounts 23 «Production», 91 «General production costs», 92 «Administrative expenses», as well as on account 90 «Cost of sales». The debit of these accounts accounts for the costs, the loan – their debiting. It is also determined that accounting for production costs is one of the most important elements of enterprise accounting. It is because of this improvement in accounting that much attention must be paid to this area. In improving the accounting method for the cost segment, we offer improvements in three ways: 1. developed a fragment of the Work plan of analytical accounts for synthetic accounts 91 «General production costs», 92 «Administrative expenses», 2. Improvement of the method of «accounting and double entry» of conducting standard accounting transactions using the proposed analytics, 3. The Balance Sheet and Reporting method has been improved by improving Form No. 2 «Financial Statements (Income Statement)» by introducing additional lines. Part of the proposed analytical accounts to the accounts 91 and 92 is indicated in Accounting provisions (standards) 16 «Expenses», however, in the Plan of accounts this analytics is not spelled out, supplementing them and grouping them, we offer second and third order subaccounts for the expense accounts 91 and 92 The existence of these subaccounts will be advisable, since it allows a clear division of production costs for each cost item, thanks to such detailing it will be possible to improve their management system, which in turn will allow to make cost reductions for specific items. Thus, through the above suggestions for improving the cost accounting method, these elements of the reporting form become more comprehensive and understandable, and also improve the quality of accounting.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document