scholarly journals Anaesthetic and Surgical Experience from Joint Replacement Therapy in a Teaching Hospital in Makurdi, Nigeria

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-51
Author(s):  
B E Edem ◽  
O O Oku ◽  
M E Efu ◽  
D D Mue ◽  
I C Elachi
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Replacement Therapy ◽  
Avascular Necrosis ◽  
Teaching Hospital ◽  
Joint Replacement ◽  
Regional Anaesthesia ◽  
Estimated Blood Loss ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Duration Of Surgery

Joint replacement therapy (JRT) commonly performed in advanced countries is being introduced in some developing countries. The objective of this study was to assess anaesthesia used and the outcome of the first 17 cases performed at a young teaching hospital in Nigeria. This was a cross-sectional descriptive study of patients for JRT at Benue State University Teaching Hospital, Makurdi, Nigeria from 23/6/2014 to 31/8/2016. Data analyzed from the anaesthetic/surgical records included age, sex, ethnicity, ASA classification, Ficat and Arlet classification of avascular necrosis, Gardens classification of fracture neck of femur, indication/type of surgery, packed cell volume (PCV), anaesthesia type, estimated blood loss, transfusions, duration of surgery and hospital stay, post-operative PCV, pain management, complications and surgical outcome. Results were summarised as means, median and percentages using SPSS version 21.0 for Windows®. One-way test of ANOVA was used for statistical significance (p= 0.05). Seventeen patients aged 27-90 years (mean 54.71±19.69). Indications were femoral neck fracture (47%), chronic osteoarthritis (35%), avascular necrosis (18%). The commonest procedure was hemiarthroplasty (41%), total hip replacement (35%), and total knee (24%). All were under regional anaesthesia with spinal (53%) and combined spinal-epidural (47%). Multimodal post-operative analgesia was used. There was no significant difference between pre and post-operative PCV (t = 0.708, p=0.05). Mean duration of hospital stay was 19.44±9.61 days. The outcome was good in all. JRT can be established in a new center with proper planning. Regional anaesthesia with multimodal analgesia is recommended. With relevant surgical skill, patient outcome is good.

scholarly journals Anaesthetic and Surgical Experience from Joint Replacement Therapy in a Teaching Hospital in Makurdi, Nigeria

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-51
Author(s):  
B E Edem ◽  
O O Oku ◽  
M E Efu ◽  
D D Mue ◽  
I C Elachi
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Replacement Therapy ◽  
Avascular Necrosis ◽  
Teaching Hospital ◽  
Joint Replacement ◽  
Regional Anaesthesia ◽  
Estimated Blood Loss ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Duration Of Surgery

Joint replacement therapy (JRT) commonly performed in advanced countries is being introduced in some developing countries. The objective of this study was to assess anaesthesia used and the outcome of the first 17 cases performed at a young teaching hospital in Nigeria. This was a cross-sectional descriptive study of patients for JRT at Benue State University Teaching Hospital, Makurdi, Nigeria from 23/6/2014 to 31/8/2016. Data analyzed from the anaesthetic/surgical records included age, sex, ethnicity, ASA classification, Ficat and Arlet classification of avascular necrosis, Gardens classification of fracture neck of femur, indication/type of surgery, packed cell volume (PCV), anaesthesia type, estimated blood loss, transfusions, duration of surgery and hospital stay, post-operative PCV, pain management, complications and surgical outcome. Results were summarised as means, median and percentages using SPSS version 21.0 for Windows®. One-way test of ANOVA was used for statistical significance (p= 0.05). Seventeen patients aged 27-90 years (mean 54.71±19.69). Indications were femoral neck fracture (47%), chronic osteoarthritis (35%), avascular necrosis (18%). The commonest procedure was hemiarthroplasty (41%), total hip replacement (35%), and total knee (24%). All were under regional anaesthesia with spinal (53%) and combined spinal-epidural (47%). Multimodal post-operative analgesia was used. There was no significant difference between pre and post-operative PCV (t = 0.708, p=0.05). Mean duration of hospital stay was 19.44±9.61 days. The outcome was good in all. JRT can be established in a new center with proper planning. Regional anaesthesia with multimodal analgesia is recommended. With relevant surgical skill, patient outcome is good.

scholarly journals Anaesthetic and Surgical Experience from Joint Replacement Therapy in a Teaching Hospital in Makurdi, Nigeria

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-51
Author(s):  
B E Edem ◽  
O O Oku ◽  
M E Efu ◽  
D D Mue ◽  
I C Elachi
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Replacement Therapy ◽  
Avascular Necrosis ◽  
Teaching Hospital ◽  
Joint Replacement ◽  
Regional Anaesthesia ◽  
Estimated Blood Loss ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Duration Of Surgery

Joint replacement therapy (JRT) commonly performed in advanced countries is being introduced in some developing countries. The objective of this study was to assess anaesthesia used and the outcome of the first 17 cases performed at a young teaching hospital in Nigeria. This was a cross-sectional descriptive study of patients for JRT at Benue State University Teaching Hospital, Makurdi, Nigeria from 23/6/2014 to 31/8/2016. Data analyzed from the anaesthetic/surgical records included age, sex, ethnicity, ASA classification, Ficat and Arlet classification of avascular necrosis, Gardens classification of fracture neck of femur, indication/type of surgery, packed cell volume (PCV), anaesthesia type, estimated blood loss, transfusions, duration of surgery and hospital stay, post-operative PCV, pain management, complications and surgical outcome. Results were summarised as means, median and percentages using SPSS version 21.0 for Windows®. One-way test of ANOVA was used for statistical significance (p= 0.05). Seventeen patients aged 27-90 years (mean 54.71±19.69). Indications were femoral neck fracture (47%), chronic osteoarthritis (35%), avascular necrosis (18%). The commonest procedure was hemiarthroplasty (41%), total hip replacement (35%), and total knee (24%). All were under regional anaesthesia with spinal (53%) and combined spinal-epidural (47%). Multimodal post-operative analgesia was used. There was no significant difference between pre and post-operative PCV (t = 0.708, p=0.05). Mean duration of hospital stay was 19.44±9.61 days. The outcome was good in all. JRT can be established in a new center with proper planning. Regional anaesthesia with multimodal analgesia is recommended. With relevant surgical skill, patient outcome is good.

scholarly journals Is Obesity a Risk Factor for Spinal Surgeries? A Retrospective Study in a Specialized Orthopedic Spine Center

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-42
Author(s):  
Hasan Ghandhari ◽  
◽  
Ebrahim Ameri ◽  
Mohsen Motalebi ◽  
Mohamad-Mahdi Azizi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Obese Group ◽  
Obese Patients ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Duration Of Surgery

Background: Various studies have shown the effects of morbid obesity on the adverse consequences of various surgeries, especially postoperative infections. However, some studies have shown that the complications of spinal surgery in obese and non-obese patients are not significantly different. Objectives: This study investigated and compared the duration of surgery, length of hospital stay, and complications after common spinal surgeries by orthopedic spine fellowship in obese and non-obese patients in a specialized spine center in Iran. Methods: All patients who underwent decompression with or without lumbar fusion were included in this retrospective study. These patients were classified into two groups: non-obese (BMI <30 kg/m2) and obese (BMI ≥30 kg/m2). The data related to type and levels of surgery, 30-day hospital complications, length of hospital stay, rate of postoperative wound infection, blood loss, and need for transfusion were all extracted and compared between the two groups. Results: A total of 148 patients (74%) were in the non-obese group and 52 patients (26%) in the obese group. The number of patients that need packed cells was significantly higher in the obese group (51.8% vs 32.6%) (P=0.01). Otherwise, there were not a significant difference between type of treatment (fusion or only decompression) (P=0.78), interbody fusion (P=0.26), osteotomy (P=0.56), duration of surgery (P=0.25), length of hospital stay (P=0.72), mean amount of blood loss (P=0.09), and postoperative complications (P=0.68) between the two groups. Conclusion: Our results suggest that duration of surgery, length of hospital stay, and postoperative complications are not associated with the BMI of the patients.

scholarly journals Non Descent Vaginal Hysterectomy: A Rational Surgical Approach

KYAMC Journal ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 637-641
Author(s):  
Arifa Akter Zahan ◽  
Kh Shahnewaz ◽  
Ummay Salma
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Vaginal Hysterectomy ◽  
Average Duration ◽  
Uterine Prolapse ◽  
Rational Approach ◽  
Medical College ◽  
Gynecological Disorders ◽  
Estimated Blood Loss ◽  
Duration Of Surgery

Aims: To evaluate the rational approach of non-descent vaginal hysterectomy in advancing gynaecology practice.Study Design: Retrospective study and period from 1st July 2013 to 31st June 2014. Setting Kumudini Women's Medical College & Hospital, Mirzapur, Tangail.Patients: All selective patients requiring hysterectomy for benign gynecological disorders who did not have any uterine prolapse were recruited for this study. In bigger size uterus morcellation techniques like bisection, debulking, myomectomy, slicing, or combination of these were used to remove the uterus.Main outcome measures: Data regarding indication, age, parity, uterine size, estimated blood loss, length of operation, complication and hospital stay were recorded.Results: A total of 50 cases were selected for non-descent vaginal hysterectomy all of them successfully underwent non-descent vaginal hysterectomy. Commonest age group was (41-45 years) i.e. 46%. All patients were parous. Uterus size was less then 8 wks 21 cases, 8wks to 12 wks in 27 cases, more then 12 wks 02 cases. Commonest indication was DUB of uterus (44%). Mean duration of surgery was 50.5 minutes. Mean blood loss was 100ml. Blood transfusion was required in four cases. Average duration of hospital stay was 3.1 days. Complications were minimal which included UTI and Vault infection.Conclusions: NDVH is safe feasible and patient friendly. We suggest that our modern gynecologist will be more expertise and familiar to this procedure in near future.KYAMC Journal Vol. 6, No.-2, Jan 2016, Page 637-641

scholarly journals Nondrainage after Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Calculous Cholecystitis Does Not Increase the Postoperative Morbidity

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianguo Qiu ◽  
Ming Li
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Postoperative Recovery ◽  
End Points ◽  
Acute Calculous Cholecystitis ◽  
Vas Score ◽  
Estimated Blood Loss ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Calculous Cholecystitis

Background. It is now established that prophylactic drainage is not needed after laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) for chronic calculous cholecystitis. However, the benefit of drains versus their potential harm for acute calculous cholecystitis (ACC) following laparoscopic LC has been questioned. Therefore, we conducted a comparative study to assess the need for drainage.Methods. Between January 2014 and October 2016, 212 patients with ACC undergoing LC undergo either drainage (n= 106) or no drainage (n= 106). The primary end points were the number of patients with postoperative drain-related complications, early and late Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score, and hospital stay. Secondary end points included estimated blood loss, postoperative recovery, analgesia requirement, and cosmetic satisfaction result.Results. There was no bile duct injury and mortality in both groups. The overall complication rate was 12.5% with no significant difference between those with or without drainage (P=0.16). Normal activity resumption was significantly faster and the postoperative hospital stay was slightly shorter in the nondrainage group (P=0.03 andP= 0.04, respectively). The early VAS score in the drainage group was significantly higher (p<0.05). There were no significant differences between the two groups in postoperative hematology test, late VAS score, and patient satisfaction of cosmetic outcome.Conclusion. Routine drainage for patients with ACC after LC may not be justified with similar drain-related complications compared with nondrainage group.

scholarly journals Effect of anaesthesia on the perioperative outcomes of pelvi-acetabular fracture surgeries in the apex trauma centre of a developing country–a retrospective analysis

2015 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Naveen Yadav ◽  
Suma Rabab Ahmad ◽  
Nisha Saini ◽  
Babita Gupta ◽  
Chhavi Sawhney ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
General Anaesthesia ◽  
Acetabular Fracture ◽  
Regional Anaesthesia ◽  
Trauma Centre ◽  
Intraoperative Blood Loss ◽  
Duration Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Duration Of Surgery

Abstract Background Regional anaesthesia has been proposed to reduce intraoperative blood loss, duration of hospital stay and in-hospital complications with improved postoperative pain control. General anaesthesia is advantageous for prolonged surgeries. We hypothesized that combined regional and general anaesthesia would offer advantages of both in pelvi-acetabular fracture surgeries. Methods We identified 71 patients who underwent open reduction and internal fixation of pelvi-acetabular fractures from May 2012 to 2013 in our trauma centre. We excluded patients with incomplete records (n = 4) and other injuries operated along (n = 8). Hence, 59 patients were divided into three groups: G group (general anaesthesia), R group (regional anaesthesia) and GR group (combined regional and general anaesthesia). Main outcome measurements studied were intraoperative blood loss, duration of hospital stay, duration of surgery and intraoperative and postoperative complications. Results No differences were obtained in between the groups in terms of age, gender, Injury Severity Score, number of comorbidities, or duration from injury to surgery. No significant differences were found between the three groups for intraoperative blood loss, days of hospital stay and duration of surgery. Intraoperative and postoperative complications were also comparable between the groups (p &gt; 0.05). Conclusions There is no specific significant advantage of the technique of anaesthesia on the observed perioperative complications in pelvi-acetabular fracture surgeries.

Open cystectomy is still alive and well: Outcomes from a single-centre 6-year review

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 239-245
Author(s):  
Alexios Dosis ◽  
Blessing Dhliwayo ◽  
Patrick Jones ◽  
Iva Kovacevic ◽  
Jonathan Yee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Radical Cystectomy ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Categorical Variables ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Intraoperative Blood Loss ◽  
Single Centre ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Duration Of Surgery

Objectives: To compare perioperative and oncological outcomes between open and laparoscopic radical cystectomy in a single-centre setting. Materials and methods: This study was a retrospective cohort (level 2b evidence) non-randomised review of 228 radical cystectomies that were performed between January 2010 and February 2016. Primary outcome measures were operative time, complications, blood loss and length of hospital stay. Statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS v21.0. Quantitative values were compared with Student’s t-test; categorical variables with the chi-square test. Statistical significance was considered a result of an alpha value less than 0.05. A Kaplan–Meier survival analysis was also conducted. Results: Intraoperative blood loss was lower in laparoscopic surgery (855±673 vs. 716±570 mL, P=0.15), which had a significant impact on transfusion rates ( P=0.02). Operative times were lower in open surgery (339±52.9 vs. 353.1±67.1 minutes, P=0.10), while hospital stay was lower in the laparoscopic group (14.2±11.2 vs. 16.0±13.6 days, P=0.28). Five-year survival rates were superior for patients who underwent an open procedure but were not statistically significant ( P=0.10). Conclusion: This is, so far, the largest cohort to compare laparoscopic and open radical cystectomy. The laparoscopic approach can reduce the need for transfusion; however, there was no statistically significant difference in complication rates, duration of surgery, length of hospital stay or intraoperative blood loss, survival and margin positivity. Level of evidence: Not applicable for this multicentre audit.

scholarly journals Desarda’s versus Lichtenstein technique of inguinal hernia repair

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 92
Author(s):  
Obaid Syed
Keyword(s):  
Inguinal Hernia ◽  
Hernia Repair ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Complication Rate ◽  
Mesh Repair ◽  
Post Operative Pain ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Duration Of Surgery ◽  
Operative Complications ◽  
The Mean

Background: Ideal method for modern hernia surgery should be simple, cost effective, safe, tension free and permanent. The Lichtenstein operation to a great extent achieves this entire goal. The Lichtenstein mesh repair is associated with complications, postoperative dysfunction and high cost composite meshes. Desarda's technique, became a new surgical option for tissue-based inguinal hernia repair. The present study was designed to evaluate and compare the effectiveness and complications of the Desarda’s repair with Lichtenstein tension-free mesh repair for treatment of inguinal hernia in a developing country.Methods: 200 patients with unilateral, primary, reducible inguinal hernia were selected. Included patients were randomly divided into two groups. Studied parameters were Duration of surgery, intra operative complications, post-operative Pain, Duration of hospital stay, return to normal activities, post-operative complications and recurrences.Results: There were a total of 100 patients each group. There was no statistically significant difference in duration of surgery and complication rate between the two groups. Difference in mean VAS was not statistically significant. The mean hospital stay in Desarda’s technique was 2.5 days while it was 2.6 days in Lichtenstein’s group. The mean time to return to basic physical activity in the Desarda’s technique was 12.6 days while it was 13.3 days in the Lichtenstein’s group. There were no recurrences in either group. Chronic inguinal pain (>1month) was more frequent in Lichtenstein’s group.Conclusions: There is no significant difference in duration of surgery, intra operative complication rate, post-operative pain, complications and recurrence, between Desarda’s technique and Lichtenstein’s technique. However chronic inguinal pain is less in Desarda’s technique. Desarda’s repair must be considered in young patients (<30 years). Its long-term efficacy needs to be studied with larger, prospective double-blind randomized trials, with longer follow-up.

scholarly journals Early same-admission laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute mild biliary pancreatitis: a retrospective study

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
yunxiao lyu ◽  
Yunxiao Cheng ◽  
Bin Wang
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Optimal Time ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Biliary Pancreatitis ◽  
Group I ◽  
Estimated Blood Loss ◽  
Conversion To Open Cholecystectomy ◽  
Duration Of Surgery ◽  
Group Ii

Abstract Background As the standard procedure for the surgical treatment for gallbladder stones, we investigated the controversy surrounding the optimal time for laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) for acute mild biliary pancreatitis.Methods This retrospective study included medical records of all patients who were admitted with a diagnosis of acute mild biliary pancreatitis at Dongyang People’s Hospital from July 2011 to June 2018. Main outcomes included perioperative characteristics, length of hospital stay, complications, morbidity, and mortality.Results A total of 119 patients were divided into an early LC group (Group I; 52 patients) and a control group (Group II; 67 patients). The mean age was 60.5 years (range, 30–79 years). Conversion to open cholecystectomy (COC) was performed in 17 patients (6 patients in Group I and 11 patients in Group II, P=0.62). There were no significant differences in terms of estimated blood loss and duration of surgery (P=0.08 and P=0.64, respectively). Bile duct injury (BDI) occurred in one patient from each group. The overall hospital stays in Group I were significantly less than in Group II (10.86±3.21 vs 13.29±4.51, P=0.001). Compared with postoperative bile leakage (P=0.72) and postoperative morbidity (P=0.97) and mortality, there were no significant differences between the groups.Conclusions Early LC during the same admission is safe for acute mild biliary pancreatitis and has the advantage of shortening overall hospital stay. There was no significant increase in COC, BDI, and complications.

Reduced Pain, Shorter Hospital Stay And Early Return To Work In Pcnl: Comparative Study On Outcome Of Pcnl Versus Open Surgery In The Treatment Of Large Renal Calculi

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-20
Author(s):  
Syed Al Fasani ◽  
Akm Zamanul Islam Bhuiyan
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Return To Work ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Open Surgery ◽  
Renal Calculi ◽  
Postoperative Hospital Stay ◽  
P Value ◽  
Early Return ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Duration Of Surgery

Objective: To compare the outcome of PCNL & open surgery in the treatment of large renal calculi by assesing the amount of analgesia required to relief pain, mean hospital stay, & convalescence period. Materials & Methods: : This comparative study in during 80 patients diagnosed with kidney stone disease admitted in the NIKDU during the period of Jan’ to Dec’2009. They were divided conveniently into two groups. Intervention was done in the formPCNL(40) and open surgery (40). Clinical outcome like, duration of surgery, postoperative hospital stay,doses of narcotic analgesia required to relief pain and convalescence periodwere reviewed. In complete follow up 9 patients were missed in PCNL group resulting in 31 patients. There was no significant difference in preoperative variables such as age,sex, stone size in cm, stone number- single/multiple and stag horn Stone. Results : There were statistically significant difference in the parameters between the groups,( PCNL vs open surgery [mean ± SD]): duration of operation (min), 97.90 ± 24.89 vs 136.62 ± 23.54, postoperative hospital stay (days) ,4.77 ± 3.98 vs 9.55 ± 3.65, mean time return to work (days) , 3.09 ± 1.21vs 6.25 ± 1.53, ( p value is <0.001). The amount of analgesia required to relief pain was significantly reduced in PCNL vs open procedure ( no patient required > 2 doses vs 27 patient required 3 or >3 doses ), p value is <0.001. Conclusion: PCNL is relatively safe & better treatment option than open surgery in the treatment of large renal calculi. It has reduced pain, shorter hospital stay and more rapid return to work. Bangladesh Journal of Urology, Vol. 16, No. 1, Jan 2013 p.16-20

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document