Types of actual compositions in civil proceedings and administrative proceedings and their significance in determining the subject of evidence in the case

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dmitry Vladimirovich Volkov ◽  
Elena Aleksandrovna Nakhova
Keyword(s):  
Civil Proceedings ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Administrative Proceedings

SYSTEM OF MAIN PROCEEDINGS FOR THE PROTECTION OF PUBLIC LEGAL INTERESTS: WHAT SHOULD IT BE LIKE

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 66-83
Author(s):  
S.A. BURMISTROVA
Keyword(s):  
Public Law ◽  
Power Relationship ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Current State ◽  
Legal Relationship ◽  
Civil Proceedings ◽  
The Subject ◽  
State Of Affairs ◽  
Administrative Proceedings ◽  
Broad Understanding

According to modern Russian procedural legislation, the protection of public legal interests is carried out in civil and administrative proceedings. In administrative proceedings, interests that are implemented in a public-law power relationship are protected; in civil proceedings, interests that are implemented in a public legal relationship based on equality of the parties are protected. The author believes that all public legal interests are united in that their implementation is significant for the whole society, its part, and an indefinite circle of people. This feature gives rise to the specifics of not only the implementation, but also the protection of public legal interests. The current state of Affairs in which some publicly-legal interests defended in administrative proceedings and the other in civil law, the author believes is wrong, because it may lead to inadequate protection and the violation of such interests in the application of procedures, not taking into account the peculiarities of the subject of protection. Based on a broad understanding of administrative proceedings as proceedings for the protection of public legal interests, with the exception of those that receive protection in constitutional and criminal proceedings, the author puts forward the thesis that in administrative proceedings there should be proceedings designed to consider disputes that are not related to legal relations. Thus, it is justified that administrative proceedings should have special administrative and administrative claim proceedings.

scholarly journals The role of judges' assessment of legally significant circumstances in civil and administrative proceedings: on the example of Kaliningrad Oblast

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-17
Author(s):  
Valentin Valentinovich Balanovskii
Keyword(s):  
Mathematical Methods ◽  
Legal Proceedings ◽  
Civil Proceedings ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Kaliningrad Region ◽  
Administrative Proceedings ◽  
Court Of First Instance ◽  
Empirical Material

The main purpose of the article is to demonstrate on the matter of empirical material the importance of judges’ assessment of legally significant circumstances of the case for Russian civil and administrative proceedings. The subject of the research is the norms of the current procedural Russian legislation, the texts of the appellate rulings on cancellation of the decisions of the courts of first instance in civil and administrative cases of the Kaliningrad region, which entered into force in the period from 01.01.2017 to 31.12.2020, and the data of judicial statistics of the Judicial Department at the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation for 2017-2019. The author uses sociological and mathematical methods, as well as methods of content analysis of the texts of appeal rulings on the cancellation of decisions of the courts of first instance in civil and administrative cases. The novelty of the study is due to the fact that nobody has previously collected and analyzed statistical data on specific grounds for the complete cancellation of decisions of the courts of first instance in appeal order in civil and administrative cases in the Kaliningrad region. As a result of the analysis of specific empirical material, the author establishes that the judges' assessment of legally significant circumstances plays a key role for contemporary Russian legal proceedings. This is especially true for civil proceedings. This conclusion follows from the fact that every 25th decision of the court of first instance in civil proceedings is subject to complete cancellation. In 80% of such cases, the court's incorrect assessment of the legally significant circumstances of the case is the only or one of several grounds for cancellation.

scholarly journals Principles of legal proceedings in the Code of administrative proceedings and in the Civil procedure code

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 139-147
Author(s):  
Lydia A. Terekhova
Keyword(s):  
Characteristic Feature ◽  
Civil Procedure ◽  
Independent System ◽  
Legal Proceedings ◽  
Administrative Procedure ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
Civil Proceedings ◽  
Rules Of Evidence ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Administrative Proceedings

The subject. The system of principles of legal proceedings is one of the indicators of the independence of the type of legal proceedings. The article analyzes the general and distinctive features of the principles enshrined in the Russian Civil Procedure Сode and the Code of Administrative Procedure. The purpose of the article is confirmation or confutation of the hypothesis that there is no independent system of principles of administrative proceedings that differs from the system of principles of civil proceedings. The methodology of the study includes the formal legal method, analysis, synthesis. The main results. All of the principles enshrined in the Code of Administrative Procedure are also enshrined in the Civil Procedure Code except some minor characteristics. So, the active role of the court, involving a number of exceptions to the usual rules of evidence, was also characteristic of the regulation of the consideration of cases arising from public legal relations in the Code of Civil Procedure. The court’s active actions to determine the subject of evidence, to recover evidence are general rules of evidence for all types of proceedings. These rules existed both before the adoption of the Code of Administrative Procedure and after it. But the specifics of the execution of judicial acts adopted in cases of administrative proceedings require special attention. A characteristic feature in the consideration and resolution of most administrative cases is the immediate execution of decisions enshrined directly in the Code of Administrative Procedure. Such a rule can be considered as a priority of immediate execution, which is a characteristic feature of administrative proceedings. The author doubts about the need for normative consolidation of the principles, as well as the need for a special list of principles of administrative legal proceedings in separate article of the procedural code. Conclusons. The absence of an independent system of administrative procedural principles confirms the thesis that administrative proceedings cannot be considered an independent branch of law separated from civil proceedings law. However, the priority of immediate execution of a court decision is a characteristic feature (perhaps even a principle) of administrative proceedings.

The grounds and conditions of securing a claim in administrative proceedings

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yara Olena ◽  
◽  
Kravchuk O.V. ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Subject Matter ◽  
Direct Connection ◽  
Individual Rights ◽  
Administrative Procedure ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
Legal Provisions ◽  
Legal Science ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Administrative Proceedings

The article examines the grounds and conditions of securing a claim in administrative proceedings. By analyzing the legal provisions, law enforcement (judicial) practice in connection with the acquisitions of legal science, the grounds and conditions of securing a claim in administrative proceedings are highlighted. Attention is focused on problematic issues that arise when courts check the grounds for securing a claim and compliance with the terms of securing a claim. In particular, attention is drawn to the fact that securing an administrative claim on the grounds of obvious signs of illegality of the decision, action or inaction of the subject of power is virtually inapplicable due to reservations about the inadmissibility of resolving the dispute on the merits. It is concluded that an administrative lawsuit can be secured if there is at least one of the grounds specified in part one of Article 150 of the Code of Administrative Procedure of Ukraine and compliance with the conditions of proportionality, adequacy of measures to ensure administrative lawsuit, direct connection with the subject matter and legal the defendant's conduct in the dispute. Emphasis is placed on the fact that the freedom of discretion (discretion) of the court in the application of measures to ensure an administrative claim is unconditional, but not unlimited and controlled by the requirement to properly justify the relevant procedural action. Keywords: administrative court, administrative claim, administrative proceedings, securing the claim, principles of administrative proceedings, protection of individual rights and freedoms, grounds for securing the claim, conditions for securing the claim

scholarly journals Domniemania i fikcje prawne w ogólnym postępowaniu administracyjnym. Wybrane zagadnienia

2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 125
Author(s):  
Maciej Podleśny
Keyword(s):  
Subject Matter ◽  
Administrative Procedure ◽  
Objective Truth ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Administrative Proceedings ◽  
Legal Fictions ◽  
The Impact

<p class="Standard">The subject of the article was to discuss the institutions of presumptions and legal fictions applicable in the general administrative procedure. Due to the complexity of the problem, the author has attempted to only analyse selected issues relating to the subject matter hereof. The study identifies situations in which the discussed institutions are established, describes their substance, function and the objective for which they were introduced. The impact presumptions and legal fictions on the validity of objective truth in the course of administrative proceedings have been demonstrated and the values underlying their introduction to the Code of Administrative Procedure have been discussed.</p>

scholarly journals Opunomoćenici u upravnom sporu

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-85
Author(s):  
Marko Šikić ◽  
Mateja Held
Keyword(s):  
Subject Matter ◽  
Civil Procedure ◽  
Civil Proceedings ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Administrative Courts

Amendments to the Act on Administrative Disputes 2014 added paragraph 2 to the Article 21. It refers to the proper application of the provisions of the Civil Procedure Act in administrative disputes. The Croatian administrative courts have taken a restrictive approach in interpreting that provision, which excludes certain categories of persons from representing complainants and interested parties. The paper problematizes the concept of the authorised representatives in administrative disputes and emphasizes expertise and quality as important features of the representation in general, including the authorised representatives in administrative disputes. The comparative arrangements of European systems in the subject matter are also analysed. It is argued that when interpreting the representation provisions, it is necessary to consider the particularities of the administrative dispute, but also the formulation of the provision, which undoubtedly leaves room for interpretation, as it refers to the “appropriate” application of the provision governing representation in civil proceedings.

Directions of development of administrative courts’ jurisprudence in real property cases in 2020: Selected Aspects (Part I)

2021 ◽  
Vol I (I) ◽  
pp. 109-133
Author(s):  
Anna Dalkowska ◽  
Karol Rzęsiewicz
Keyword(s):  
Public Administration ◽  
Judicial Review ◽  
Capital City ◽  
Official Journal ◽  
Real Property ◽  
Judicial Decisions ◽  
The Status ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Administrative Courts ◽  
Administrative Proceedings

Jurisprudence of administrative courts on various aspects of real property law is extensive and multi- faceted. The main bulk of cases concerns real properties which are subject to the reprivatisation process that, in the absence of final solutions to re-privatisation predicaments and the multi-faceted effects of the Decree of 26 October 1945 on the Ownership and Use of Land Within the Boundaries of the Capital City of Warszawa, hereinafter referred to as the “Warsaw Decree” (promulgated in the official journal “Dziennik Ustaw” of 21 November 1945, No 50, item 279), which remains in force for over seventy years, are often the subject of judicial review of administrative decisions. Administrative court rulings play a significant role in real property cases and set the directions for future decisions by public administration bodies. The analysis of judicial rulings in real property cases will be limited to selected problems, which, given differing interpretations, are the cause of discrepancies in judicial decisions in administrative courts. This paper, which is the first part of the study, covers jurisprudence on the premise of death of a party during administrative proceedings, which has an impact on the potential invalidity of a decision and its ex tunc effects as well as the status of a party in real property proceedings.

NEW CLASSIFICATION OF PRINCIPLES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Тимур Султанович Габазов ◽  
Амир Ахметович Мужахаев ◽  
Аминат Аслановна Солтамурадова
Keyword(s):  
Civil Procedure ◽  
New Classification ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
Civil Proceedings ◽  
Key Factor ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Right

В представленной статье кратко раскрывается смысл понятия такого явления, как принцип гражданского процессуального права, а также дана классификация принципов, уже существующих и утвердившихся в теории гражданского процесса. Авторы работы предприняли попытку разработать новую классификацию принципов гражданского судопроизводства, отличную от общепринятой, в которой ключевым фактором выступает субъект, которому эти принципы адресованы по своему содержанию. По результатам проведенного исследования выделены субъекты, которым адресованы действия этих принципов: адресованные только суду; адресованные только лицам, участвующим в деле; - адресованные всем субъектам гражданского судопроизводства в целом (общие). Можно вполне обосновано сказать, что новая классификация принципов гражданского процесса, в зависимости от субъекта имеет право на существование. The presented article briefly reveals the meaning of the concept of such a phenomenon as the principle of civil procedural law, and also gives a classification of the principles that already exist and are established in the theory of civil procedure. The authors of the work attempted to develop a new classification of the principles of civil proceedings, different from the generally accepted one, in which the key factor is the subject to whom these principles are addressed in their content. According to the results of the study, the subjects to whom the actions of these principles are addressed: addressed only to the court; addressed only to persons participating in the case; - addressed to all subjects of civil proceedings in general (general). It can be reasonably said that the new classification of the principles of civil procedure, depending on the subject, has the right to exist.

28 USC § 1782—looking for consensus

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 331-345
Author(s):  
David J Stute
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Federal Court ◽  
The United States ◽  
Federal Courts ◽  
The Other ◽  
Court Decisions ◽  
Arbitral Tribunal ◽  
Civil Proceedings ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Definition Of

Abstract Since the 1948 enactment of 28 USC § 1782 in the United States, no consensus has emerged as to the availability of federal court discovery to parties in private foreign or international arbitral proceedings. This year, within months of one another, six federal courts have issued rulings that are widely inconsistent on the availability of section 1782 discovery. The courts have ruled that a proceeding before a private international arbitral tribunal is eligible for section 1782 discovery; that, categorically, no such discovery is available; that the definition of private arbitral tribunal applies to CIETAC; and that discovery is available by virtue of a party’s parallel pursuit of discovery through foreign civil proceedings. As these cases demonstrate, recent US court decisions have brought no predictability, let alone certainty, to the subject. Congress, on the other hand, could and should amend the statute so as to include private tribunals in the scope of section 1782. This article discusses the case law’s state of disarray; proposes a legislative solution; considers the proposed amendment’s merits; and advocates for Congress to act.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document