scholarly journals Myringoplasty and the factors that affect its success- a case based review

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (9) ◽  
pp. 214-223
Author(s):  
Natalia Kyrtata ◽  
Shadaba Ahmed

Myringoplasty is the surgical treatment for the repair of tympanic membrane (TM) perforations. It is indicated for treatment of recurrent ear discharge, improving conductive hearing loss, and preventing future infections, especially in high risk groups. In this case-based review, the normal anatomy and physiology of the ear is described, followed by the way conductive and sensorineural hearing loss are differentiated through a detailed history, examination and investigations, including audiometry and tympanometry. The anatomy of the TM is explored and the causes, presentation and diagnosis of TM perforations, which are a cause of conductive hearing loss, are described This review focuses on how myringoplasty is used to repair TM perforations, and what factors affect its success, relating the findings to four patients who have undergone myringoplasty. The underlay technique is used more frequently, yielding better results with fewer side-effects, especially for posterior perforations, whereas overlay is shown to be better for anterior perforations due to a better view of the TM, but has higher risks for graft lateralisation and blunting. Over-underlay is similar to underlay in success, but can only be applied where the handle of malleus is intact. TM repair was shown to be independent of age, sex and timing of antibiotic administration, although chronic perforations take longer to heal. The effect of size on the surgical outcome is debatable, with different studies showing opposite results. Side-effects, alternative treatment options and potential biases in the studies are discussed, as well as the limitations of the information obtained from the cases. The conclusion is that there is no “one-fits-all” procedure or graft that is suitable for the repair of all TM perforations, and each patient should be assessed on an individual basis, taking into consideration their own needs and wishes.

Author(s):  
K. Santhanakrishnan ◽  
G. Gandhi ◽  
K. Pradheep

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> COM causes considerable morbidity with ear discharge, conductive hearing loss and complications. Myringostapediopexy and myringoplationpexyis a surgical procedure which intends improve the hearing and quality of the life.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> The  study was conducted in the department of ENT, SMVMCH, Puducherry from April 2017 to April 2018. A detailed history taking thorough clinical examination done for these patients. PTA was done before the procedure, post operatively at 3<sup>rd</sup> month. Hearing improvement analysed using different parameters like type of graft used, hearing gain and graft uptake. The data collected was tabulated and subjected to statistical analysis.  </p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> Myringostapediopexy better hearing gain than myingoplatinopexy. Myringostapediopexy mean hearing gain 19.53 dB, myringoplatinopexy 12.59 dB.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Conclusions:</strong> This study compared the hearing outcomes of Myringostapediopexy and myringoplatinopexy with respect to hearing gain. Myringostapediopexy better hearing gain than myringoplatinopexy due to presence of stapes supra-structure.</p>


2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (7) ◽  
pp. 858-864 ◽  
Author(s):  
Piotr H. Skarzynski ◽  
Anna Ratuszniak ◽  
Kamila Osinska ◽  
Magdalena Koziel ◽  
Bartlomiej Krol ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 130 (S3) ◽  
pp. S188-S188
Author(s):  
Pieter Kemp ◽  
Jiska van Stralen ◽  
Pim de Graaf ◽  
Erwin Berkhout ◽  
Jan Wolff ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 36 (5) ◽  
pp. 826-833 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rik C. Nelissen ◽  
Emmanuel A. M. Mylanus ◽  
Cor W. R. J. Cremers ◽  
Myrthe K. S. Hol ◽  
Ad F. M. Snik

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (12) ◽  
pp. 030006052097228
Author(s):  
Yujie Liu ◽  
Ran Ren ◽  
Shouqin Zhao

The Bonebridge and Vibrant Soundbridge systems are semi-implanted hearing devices, which have been widely applied in patients with congenital conductive hearing loss. However, comparison between these two hearing devices is rare, especially in the same patient. We report a 23-year-old man who underwent successive implantation of Vibrant Soundbridge and Bonebridge devices in the same ear because of dysfunction of the Vibrant Soundbridge. We provide insight on the patient’s experience and compare the audiological and subjective outcomes of satisfaction.


1980 ◽  
Vol 73 (3) ◽  
pp. 335-338 ◽  
Author(s):  
FRED H. BESS ◽  
G. W. MILLER ◽  
MICHAEL E. GLASSCOCK ◽  
GENE W. BRATT

2005 ◽  
Vol 114 (3) ◽  
pp. 242-246
Author(s):  
Joni K. Doherty ◽  
Dennis R. Maceri

Proteus syndrome (PS) is a rare hamartomatous disorder characterized by mosaic overgrowth of multiple tissues that manifests early in life and is progressive. The presence of unilateral external auditory canal exostoses in a patient who is not a swimmer or surfer is suggestive of PS. However, hearing loss is not a typical feature. Here, we describe exostoses and ossicular discontinuity with conductive hearing loss in a patient with PS. The treatment consisted of canalplasty and ossicular chain reconstruction. A postoperative reduction was demonstrated in the patient's air-bone gap, from 21 dB to 13 dB for the pure tone average (four frequencies) and from 41 dB to 15 dB in the high-frequency range (6,000 to 8,000 Hz). Causes of ossicular discontinuity are discussed. Routine annual audiometric and otolaryngological evaluation should be considered in all patients with temporal bone inyolvement of PS.


2006 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 466-468 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anita Jeyakumar ◽  
Todd M. Brickman ◽  
Kim Murray ◽  
Paul Dutcher

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document