A Comparative Study of Fundamental and Technical Analysis on Private Sector Banks

All investment is the allocation of money to assets that are expected to yield some gain over a period of time. One of the best high risk and return investments was buying shares in stock exchange. Through these fundamental and technical analysis helps to reduce the risk. The fundamental analysis is used to understand the trend and growth of the economic, industry and company. For this analysis investor used many tools like EPS, PE ratio, Book value, ROE, etc. The technical analysis is used to understand price moment of the stocks and index. For this analysis investor used many tools like Trend, Support and Resistance, RSI, MACD, etc. From this study investors can able to understand and find low risk stocks in Nifty Private Bank. There is no analysis tools and strategy to find the risk free stock. This analysis helps to find the profitable stocks in Nifty Private Bank.

Download Full-text

Risk and Return of Retail Sukuk and Retail Bond in Indonesia Period 2008-2017 (Comparative Study)

AKSES: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis ◽

10.31942/akses.v15i1.3359 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 15 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Rahma Yudi Astuti ◽

Asad Arsya Brilliant Fani

Keyword(s):

Standard Deviation ◽

Comparative Study ◽

Stock Exchange ◽

Secondary Data ◽

Bond Market ◽

Bond Pricing ◽

Risk And Return ◽

Underlying Asset ◽

The Real ◽

The World

Sukuk and Bonds has differences and similarities. Fundamental differences between sukuk and bonds are first, underlying asset in every sukuk issuance, concept of profit loss sharing and the use of Islamic contracts. Whereas conducted research in practice of differences between sukuk and bonds are still an on-going discussion. This study aims to add the evidence in the discussion regarding whether there is differences between sukuk and bonds in the world of practice, provide investment preferences as well as educating investors in choosing sukuk or bonds as a sustainable and smooth instrument. The method used is Mann Whitney U-Test to test whether there is a different between yield to maturity (return) and standard deviation (risk) of both instruments. Using secondary data of Retail Sukuk (SR) and Retail Bonds (ORI) period 2008-2017 obtained from Indonesia Stock Exchange, Indonesia Bond Market Directory and Indonesia Bond Pricing Agency. The result shows that there is no significance difference of retail sukuk return and risk with retail bonds in Indonesia. Besides retail bonds are show higher return than retail sukuk because of higher coupon and longest mature date. While, retail sukuk is more stable rather than bonds as it backed up by the real underlying asset. Keywords: Retail Sukuk (SR), Retail Bonds (ORI), Yield to Maturity

Download Full-text

Behavioral finance: the analysis of investor behavior based on belief and feeling and the investor rationality towards LQ 45 stocks

Investment Management and Financial Innovations ◽

10.21511/imfi.15(1).2018.24 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 15 (1) ◽

pp. 292-298

Author(s):

Etty Indriani ◽

Cahyani Tunggal Sari

Keyword(s):

Regression Analysis ◽

High Risk ◽

Behavioral Finance ◽

Significant Relationship ◽

Stock Exchange ◽

Low Risk ◽

Investor Behavior ◽

Average Return ◽

High Return ◽

The Relationship

This research analyzes behavioral finance, especially the behavior of investors in Yogyakarta, Indonesia Region. The performance of investor behavior is examined based on the LQ 45 stocks return on Indonesia Stock Exchange and questionnaires that are spread out to five securities agents in Yogyakarta.The performance of LQ 45 stocks return is compared to the questionnaire analysis in the “Belief” part at the first and second stages. The first result shows that LQ 45 stocks are profitable. It can be seen from the average return of the stocks that it has positive value and is statistically identical with the LQ 45 index return. This result is in line with the investors’ opinion that LQ 45 stocks are profitable. The second result shows that most of LQ 45 stocks are profitable and give high return. But, this result is also contrary to the opinion of investors towards traditional finance paradigm that investors still believe “high risk – high return, low risk – low return”. Although most of LQ 45 stocks are considered as low risk stocks, many investors prefer to choose LQ 45 stocks. It means that the traditional finance paradigm has weakness. It is proven that investors sometimes act irrationally.The third and fourth stages of the study are aimed to analyze the relationship between feeling and belief towards frequency of transaction each day based on the questionnaire using regression analysis. The result shows that there is significant relationship between feeling and frequency of transaction each day.

Download Full-text

THE INFLUENCE OF USING FUNDAMENTAL AND TECHNICAL ANALYSIS ON SHARE PRICES

Ekspektra Jurnal Bisnis dan Manajemen ◽

10.25139/ekt.v5i2.4200 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 5 (2) ◽

pp. 103-111

Author(s):

Firdaus Gusti Redha romadi putra ◽

Eni Wuryani

Keyword(s):

Stock Prices ◽

Stock Price ◽

Stock Exchange ◽

Sample Selection ◽

Technical Analysis ◽

Share Price ◽

Return On Assets ◽

Book Value ◽

Share Prices ◽

Food And Beverage

This study aims to determine the effect of the variables contained in fundamental and technical analysis of stock prices. Variables used include Earning Per Share, Return On Assets, Book Value Per Share, Price to Book Value, Past Share Prices, Dup and Ddown. Sample selection uses saturated samples by using all food and beverage companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in the 2014-2018 period. The data analysis technique used is regression analysis using SPSS 23. The results of the study show that simultaneously all variables affect the stock price. Partially Earning Per Share, Price to Book Value, Past Share Prices, and Ddown have a significant effect on stock prices, while Return On Assets, Book Value Per Share, and Dup have no significant effect on stock prices.

Download Full-text

ROLE OF DOPPLER IN PRED ICTION OF PERINATAL OUTCOME: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF DOPPLER INDICES IN LOW RISK AND HIGH RISK PREGNANCIES

Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences ◽

10.14260/jemds/2015/1878 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 4 (75) ◽

pp. 13040-13048

Author(s):

Uma N ◽

Hemalatha Devi D ◽

Rajyalakshmi G ◽

Jotsna D

Keyword(s):

High Risk ◽

Comparative Study ◽

Perinatal Outcome ◽

Low Risk ◽

Doppler Indices

Download Full-text

Returns to Low Risk Investment Strategy

Applied Finance Letters ◽

10.24135/afl.v6i01.65 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 6 (01) ◽

pp. 2-15 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Shilpa Girish Peswani

Keyword(s):

High Risk ◽

Stock Exchange ◽

Risk Measures ◽

Risk Measure ◽

Investment Strategy ◽

Low Risk ◽

Total Risk ◽

Excess Returns ◽

Benchmark Portfolio ◽

The Difference

The paper studies the low risk anomaly in the Indian market using entire National Stock Exchange (NSE) as sample from January 2001 to June 2016. It provides evidence that low risk portfolio sorted for total risk, systematic risk as well as unsystematic risk individually for the large cap, mid cap, small cap and the entire NSE universe give higher returns to the investor as compared to high risk portfolio. The difference of returns from low risk portfolio versus high risk portfolio is positive as well as economically and statistically significant for all the risk measures. The results also prove that low risk portfolio investing strategy returns outperform the benchmark portfolio. Using either total volatility, idiosyncratic volatility or beta as a risk measure in stocks, the low risk portfolio gives higher returns even after controlling for the well-known size, value and momentum factors. The excess returns are the highest for low risk portfolio sorted for volatility of large cap stocks. Most of the low risk portfolios consists of growth and winner stocks. In conclusion, the low risk portfolio investment strategy is independent of size and gives positive excess returns as compared to high risk portfolio in the Indian stock market.

Download Full-text

Radiologic Evaluation of the Cement Mantle in the Femoral Shaft. A Comparative Study Using a Fast-Set or a Standard-Set Cement

Hip International ◽

10.1177/112070000701700403 ◽

2007 ◽

Vol 17 (4) ◽

pp. 205-211

Author(s):

X. Gallart ◽

F. Martínez ◽

S. García ◽

J. Riba ◽

A. Combalía ◽

...

Keyword(s):

High Risk ◽

Comparative Study ◽

Risk Group ◽

Setting Time ◽

Standard Setting ◽

Cement Mantle ◽

Low Risk ◽

Polymerization Temperature ◽

Radiologic Evaluation

Introduction At present a wide spectrum of cement types are available for cemented total hip arthroplasty (CTHA). All types have the same objective, i.e. to prolong the life of the implant for as long as possible. The purpose of this study was to compare the radiologic cement mantle of CTHA using cement with fast or standard setting characteristics. Method A prospective comparative study of patients who underwent CTHA was performed: the first group received fast setting cement (Cemex System Fast), the second group received standard setting cement (Cemex System). A radiologic evaluation of the cement mantle was done using Barrack's classification. In order to give the study clinical relevance we assembled Barrack's classification in two groups: 1) Low risk group (Types A and B); 2) High risk group (Types C and D). According to ISO 5833:2002, the international standard was used to perform physico-chemical (polymerization temperature, setting time) and mechanical testing (compression strength, bending strength and bending modulus). Results The fast setting cement showed a shorter setting time and a higher polymerization temperature. The mechanical performances of both cements met the ISO limits. At a mean follow-up of 23 months (11–37 months) no statistically significant radiological difference was found in the radiologic cement mantle between the two groups either in the post-operative X-ray evaluation (p=0.32) or in the last follow-up (p=0.72). Statistical evaluation was done comparing the two subgroups, i.e. low risk and high risk. Conclusions The use of fast or standard setting cement does not produce any difference in the quality of the radiologic cement mantle in the short-term. Both cements comply with ISO 5833 requirements.

Download Full-text

Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma: How Radical Lymphadenectomy Should be Performed?

Swiss Surgery ◽

10.1024/1023-9332.9.2.63 ◽

2003 ◽

Vol 9 (2) ◽

pp. 63-68

Author(s):

Schweizer ◽

Seifert ◽

Gemsenjäger

Keyword(s):

High Risk ◽

Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma ◽

Thyroid Carcinoma ◽

Low Risk ◽

Papillary Thyroid ◽

Sentinel Nodes ◽

Fand Sich ◽

Radical Lymphadenectomy ◽

N Status

Fragestellung: Die Bedeutung von Lymphknotenbefall bei papillärem Schilddrüsenkarzinom und die optimale Lymphknotenchirurgie werden kontrovers beurteilt. Methodik: Retrospektive Langzeitstudie eines Operateurs (n = 159), prospektive Dokumentation, Nachkontrolle 1-27 (x = 8) Jahre, Untersuchung mit Bezug auf Lymphknotenbefall. Resultate: Staging. Bei 42 Patienten wurde wegen makroskopischem Lymphknotenbefall (cN1) eine therapeutische Lymphadenektomie durchgeführt, mit pN1 Status bei 41 (98%) Patienten. Unter 117 Patienten ohne Anhalt für Lymphknotenbefall (cN0) fand sich okkulter Befall bei 5/29 (17%) Patienten mit elektiver (prophylaktischer) Lymphadenektomie, und bei 2/88 (2.3%) Patienten ohne Lymphadenektomie (metachroner Befall) (p < 0.005). Lymphknotenrezidive traten (1-5 Jahre nach kurativer Primärtherapie) bei 5/42 (12%) pN1 und bei 3/114 (2.6%) cN0, pN0 Tumoren auf (p = 0009). Das 20-Jahres-Überleben war bei TNM I + II (low risk) Patienten 100%, d.h. unabhängig vom N Status; pN1 vs. pN0, cN0 beeinflusste das Überleben ungünstig bei high risk (>= 45-jährige) Patienten (50% vs. 86%; p = 0.03). Diskussion: Der makroskopische intraoperative Lymphknotenbefund (cN) hat Bedeutung: - Befall ist meistens richtig positiv (pN1) und erfordert eine ausreichend radikale, d.h. systematische, kompartiment-orientierte Lymphadenektomie (Mikrodissektion) zur Verhütung von - kurablem oder gefährlichem - Rezidiv. - Okkulter Befall bei unauffälligen Lymphknoten führt selten zum klinischen Rezidiv und beeinflusst das Überleben nicht. Wir empfehlen eine weniger radikale (sampling), nur zentrale prophylaktische Lymphadenektomie, ohne Risiko von chirurgischer Morbidität. Ein empfindlicherer Nachweis von okkultem Befund (Immunhistochemie, Schnellschnitt von sampling Gewebe oder sentinel nodes) erscheint nicht rational. Bei pN0, cN0 Befund kommen Verzicht auf 131I Prophylaxe und eine weniger intensive Nachsorge in Frage.

Download Full-text