scholarly journals Reliability and validity of the modified Japanese version of the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS)

2007 ◽  
Vol 77 (6) ◽  
pp. 547-552 ◽  
Author(s):  
Moritoshi Kido ◽  
Tsuneo Shimazaki
Keyword(s):  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Japanese Version ◽  
The South ◽  
South Oaks Gambling Screen

Reliability and validity of the English version of the South Oaks Gambling Screen in a multiracial Asian community sample in Singapore

2012 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 275-293 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edimansyah Abdin ◽  
Mythily Subramaniam ◽  
Janhavi Ajit Vaingankar ◽  
Siow Ann Chong
Keyword(s):  
Community Sample ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
English Version ◽  
The South ◽  
South Oaks Gambling Screen ◽  
Asian Community

Further Validity of the Japanese Version of the Ten Item Personality Inventory (TIPI-J)

2014 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 236-244 ◽  
Author(s):  
Atsushi Oshio ◽  
Shingo Abe ◽  
Pino Cutrone ◽  
Samuel D. Gosling
Keyword(s):  
Big Five ◽  
Content Validity ◽  
Structural Equation ◽  
English Language ◽  
Full Range ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Japanese Version ◽  
Personality Inventory ◽  
Equation Modeling ◽  
Big Five Personality

The Ten Item Personality Inventory (TIPI; Gosling, Rentfrow, & Swann, 2003 ) is a widely used very brief measure of the Big Five personality dimensions. Oshio, Abe, and Cutrone (2012) have developed a Japanese version of the TIPI (TIPI-J), which demonstrated acceptable levels of reliability and validity. Until now, all studies examining the validity of the TIPI-J have been conducted in the Japanese language; this reliance on a single language raises concerns about the instrument’s content validity because the instrument could demonstrate reliability (e.g., retest) and some forms of validity (e.g., convergent) but still not capture the full range of the dimensions as originally conceptualized in English. Therefore, to test the content validity of the Japanese TIPI with respect to the original Big Five formulation, we examine the convergence between scores on the TIPI-J and scores on the English-language Big Five Inventory (i.e., the BFI-E), an instrument specifically designed to optimize Big Five content coverage. Two-hundred and twenty-eight Japanese undergraduate students, who were all learning English, completed the two instruments. The results of correlation analyses and structural equation modeling demonstrate the theorized congruence between the TIPI-J and the BFI-E, supporting the content validity of the TIPI-J.

Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Caregiving Interface Work Scale in employed Japanese family caregivers

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mariko Sakka ◽  
Sachiko Kita ◽  
Iori Sato ◽  
Takafumi Soejima ◽  
Hisashi Eguchi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Family Caregivers ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Japanese Version ◽  
Japanese Family

Reliability and validity of Japanese version of Unified Multiple System Atrophy Rating Scale

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ayaka Chikada ◽  
Jun Mitsui ◽  
Takashi Matsukawa ◽  
Hiroyuki Ishiura ◽  
Tatsushi Toda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple System Atrophy ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Japanese Version

scholarly journals Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Ocular Surface Disease Index for dry eye disease

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (11) ◽  
pp. e033940 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akie Midorikawa-Inomata ◽  
Takenori Inomata ◽  
Shuko Nojiri ◽  
Masahiro Nakamura ◽  
Masao Iwagami ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Internal Consistency ◽  
Dry Eye ◽  
Ocular Surface ◽  
Discriminant Validity ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Japanese Version ◽  
Disease Index ◽  
Eye Disease ◽  
Ocular Surface Disease Index ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

ObjectivesThe Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire is widely used to evaluate subjective symptoms of dry eye disease (DED) as a primary diagnostic criterion. This study aimed to develop a Japanese version of the OSDI (J-OSDI) and assess its reliability and validity.Design and settingHospital-based cross-sectional observational study.ParticipantsA total of 209 patients recruited from the Department of Ophthalmology at Juntendo University Hospital.MethodsWe translated and culturally adapted the OSDI into Japanese. The J-OSDI was then assessed for internal consistency, reliability and validity. We also evaluated the optimal cut-off value to suspect DED using an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) analysis.Primary outcome measuresInternal consistency, test–retest reliability and discriminant validity of the J-OSDI as well as the optimal cut-off value to suspect DED.ResultsOf the participants, 152 had DED and 57 did not. The J-OSDI total score showed good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha=0.884), test–retest reliability (interclass correlation coefficient=0.910) and discriminant validity by known-group comparisons (non-DED, 19.4±16.0; DED, 37.7±22.2; p<0.001). Factor validity was used to confirm three subscales within the J-OSDI according to the original version of the questionnaire. Concurrent validity was assessed by Pearson correlation analysis, and the J-OSDI total score showed a strong positive correlation with the Dry Eye-Related Quality-of-Life Score (γ=0.829). The optimal cut-off value of the J-OSDI total score was 36.3 (AUC=0.744).ConclusionsThe J-OSDI was developed and validated in terms of reliability and validity as an effective tool for DED assessment and monitoring in the Japanese population.

Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Survey Work–Home Interaction – NijmeGen, the SWING (SWING-J)

2018 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 267-283 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyoko Shimada ◽  
Akihito Shimazu ◽  
Sabine A. E. Geurts ◽  
Norito Kawakami
Keyword(s):  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Japanese Version

scholarly journals Reliability, Validity, and Cut Scores of the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS) for Chinese

2009 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 145-158 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine So-kum Tang ◽  
Anise M. S. Wu ◽  
Joe Y. C. Tang ◽  
Elsie C. W. Yan
Keyword(s):  
Cut Scores ◽  
The South ◽  
South Oaks Gambling Screen
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document