scholarly journals Comparative Evaluation of the Shear Bond Strength and Debonding Properties of a Conventional Composite and Flowable Composites used for Orthodontic Bracket Bonding

2013 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 6-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
BM Shivalinga ◽  
S Pradeep ◽  
Ravi Shanthraj ◽  
H Jyothi Kiran
Keyword(s):  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Bond Strength ◽  
Comparative Evaluation ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Orthodontic Bracket ◽  
Group Iii ◽  
Flowable Composite ◽  
Group I ◽  
Adhesive Remnant Index ◽  
Flowable Composites

ABSTRACT Aim To evaluate and compare shear bond strength (SBS) and debonding characters of the Transbond XT (BisGMA-based composite), Esthet-X flow (flowable composite), Filtek Z-350 (flowable composite). Materials and methods A total of 90 human premolars were divided into group I, Transbond XT (n = 30); group II, Esthet-X flow (n = 30) and group III, Filtek Z-350 (n = 30), the preadjusted edgewise stainless steel premolar brackets were bonded to evaluate the shear bond and debonding properties. Results The results of the statistical analysis comparing the three groups indicated no statistically significant differences between the groups. In general, the SBS with groups I and III exhibited similar bond strength with 11.58 ± 1.3 MPa and 11.07 ± 1.0 MPa respectively. Groups III exhibited least bond strength of 10.7 ± 2 MPa. In modified adhesive remnant index (ARI) the majority of bond failures occurred at enamel-adhesive interface or cohesive type failure in all the three groups. Groups II and III showed increased frequency of score 2, 4 and 5 compared to group I which showed increased frequency of score 0 and 1. Conclusion When considering the SBS and ARI scores obtained, flowable composites can be effectively applied to orthodontic bracket bonding. How to cite this article Pradeep S, Shanthraj R, Kiran HJ, Shivalinga BM. Comparative Evaluation of the Shear Bond Strength and Debonding Properties of a Conventional Composite and Flowable Composites used for Orthodontic Bracket Bonding. World J Dent 2013;4(1):6-16.

scholarly journals Use of Flowable Composites for Orthodontic Bracket Bonding

2008 ◽  
Vol 78 (6) ◽  
pp. 1105-1109 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dong-Bum Ryou ◽  
Hyo-Sang Park ◽  
Kyo-Han Kim ◽  
Tae-Yub Kwon
Keyword(s):  
Flexural Strength ◽  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Orthodontic Bracket ◽  
Bonding System ◽  
Adhesive Remnant Index ◽  
Human Enamel ◽  
Orthodontic Bonding ◽  
Flowable Composites ◽  
Bonding Characteristics

Abstract Objective: To test the bonding characteristics of four flowable composites for orthodontic bracket bonding. Materials and Methods: Metal brackets were bonded to acid-etched human enamel using four flowable composites (Grandio Flow, GF; UniFil Flow, UF; UniFil LoFlo Plus, UL; and DenFil Flow, DF), an orthodontic bonding system (Transbond XT, TX), and a restorative composite (Filtek Z250, FZ). After 24 hours of storage in water at 37°C, a shear bond strength (SBS) test was performed. After debonding, the adhesive remnant index (ARI) was assessed. In addition, the flow and flexural strength of the materials were examined. Results: The SBS for the flowable composites ranged between 7.2 and 8.3 MPa, and TX showed a significantly higher value (mean 10.9 MPa). The flowable composites also demonstrated a significantly superior flowability, yet inferior flexural strength (except for DF) than TX and FZ. Two flowable composites (GF and UL) produced significantly higher ARI scores than TX and FZ, which represented a larger resin remnant on the enamel surfaces after debonding. Conclusion: When considering the SBS and ARI scores obtained in this study, flowable composites with no intermediate bonding resin could be conveniently applied for orthodontic bracket bonding.

scholarly journals Evaluation of Self-Etching Adhesive and Er:YAG Laser Conditioning on the Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rosalía Contreras-Bulnes ◽  
Rogelio J. Scougall-Vilchis ◽  
Laura E. Rodríguez-Vilchis ◽  
Claudia Centeno-Pedraza ◽  
Oscar F. Olea-Mejía ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Color Change ◽  
Er:Yag Laser ◽  
Surface Preparation ◽  
Mean Value ◽  
Orthodontic Bracket ◽  
Laser Conditioning ◽  
Group I ◽  
Adhesive Remnant Index

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the shear bond strength, the adhesive remnant index scores, and etch surface of teeth prepared for orthodontic bracket bonding with self-etching primer and Er:YAG laser conditioning. One hundred and twenty bovine incisors were randomly divided into four groups. In Group I (Control), the teeth were conditioned with 35% phosphoric acid for 15 seconds. In Group II the teeth were conditioned with Transbond Plus SEP (5 sec); III and IV were irradiated with the Er:YAG 150 mJ (11.0 J/cm2), 150 mJ (19.1 J/cm2), respectively, at 7–12 Hz with water spray. After surface preparation, upper central incisor stainless steel brackets were bonded with Transbond Plus Color Change Adhesive. The teeth were stored in water at 37°C for 24 hours and shear bond strengths were measured, and adhesive remnant index (ARI) was determined. The conditioned surface was observed under a scanning electron microscope. One-way ANOVA and chi-square test were used. Group I showed the significantly highest values of bond strength with a mean value of 8.2 megapascals (MPa). The lesser amount of adhesive remnant was found in Group III. The results of this study suggest that Er:YAG laser irradiation could not be an option for enamel conditioning.

scholarly journals A comparative study on effect of different methods of recycling orthodontic brackets on shear bond strength

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Purna Prasad Khanal ◽  
Basanta Kumar Shrestha ◽  
Rajiv Yadav ◽  
Sanjay Prasad Gupta
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Group Iv ◽  
Orthodontic Brackets ◽  
Ultrasonic Cleaning ◽  
Group Iii ◽  
Group I ◽  
Adhesive Remnant Index ◽  
Group Ii

Abstract Background: Recycling the old or debonded bracket is one possible alternative to the replacement with new bracket. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the effect of different methods of recycling stainless steel orthodontic brackets on shear bond strength.Methods: One hundred twenty human premolars extracted for orthodontic purpose were randomly divided into four groups. Standard MBT (0.022”) brackets, (Leone co., Sesto, Florentine, Florence, Italy) were bonded on buccal surface of all samples with light cured adhesive primer Orthosol (Enlight, Ormco corp., USA) using LED curing unit for 10 seconds. Group I was assigned as control and the brackets of Group II, Group III and Group IV were subjected to recycling by flaming (Gas microtorch: RS Pro, Nozzle, MT 790) ,flaming with sandblasting (Bio-Art sandblaster; Rua Teotônio Vilela, Brazil) and flaming with ultrasonic cleaning (Ultrasonic cleaning unit ,Confident dental equipments Ltd, India) respectively. The recycled brackets were rebonded and final debonding of all brackets was done with universal testing machine (AG-IC/100 KN, Shimadzu, Japan) at a crosshead speed of 0.5mm/min and shear bond strength (MPa) was determined. The adhesive remnant index was evaluated by stereomicroscope at 10X magnification (Olympus corp., Japan). Results: The highest shear bond strength was obtained with Group I (10.35 ± 0.46 MPa), followed by Group III (9.36 ± 0.55 MPa), Group IV (5.97 ± 0.66 MPa) and the least value was obtained with Group II (4.30 ± 0.55 Mpa). Significant differences among the groups were detected by analysis of variance. Tukey post hoc multiple comparison test showed that the shear bond strength of each group was significantly different from one another (p < 0.001). The Chi-square showed statistically significant differences in the adhesive remnant index of the 4 groups (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Shear bond strength of new brackets was significantly higher than that of the recycled brackets. Among recycled brackets, flaming with sandblasting provided adequate shear bond strength, flaming with ultrasonic cleaning provided borderline value for clinical use while flaming alone led to significantly lower value.

Analysis of surface conditioning methods on core-veneer bond strength of CAD/CAM zirconia restorations

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Anip K. Roy ◽  
Govind N. Prasad ◽  
Tushar V. Bhagat ◽  
Saurabh Chaturvedi ◽  
Vishwanath Gurumurthy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Electron Microscope ◽  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Group Iv ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Group Iii ◽  
Surface Conditioning ◽  
Group I ◽  
Alumina Particles ◽  
Scanning Electron

BACKGROUND: The increased strength of zirconia has resulted in its widespread application in clinical dentistry. Nevertheless, the fracture of veneering porcelains remains one of the key reasons of failure. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare and analyze the influence of surface conditioning methods on the core-veneer bond strength of zirconia restorations. METHODS: Thirty specimens of zirconia core with sizes 10 × 5 × 5 mm were layered with porcelain of sizes 5 × 3 × 3 mm. On the basis of different surface conditioning methods, four groups were made: Group I: abrasion with airborne alumina particles of 110 μm size, Group II: sandblasting with silica coated alumina particles of 50 μm in size, Group III (modified group): alteration with a coating of zirconia powder prior to sintering, and Group IV (control group): metal core specimens. The shear force of all specimens was tested using a universal testing machine with a 0.5 mm/min crosshead speed. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey’s post hoc pair wise comparison (p= 0.05) were performed to analyze the shear bond strength. A scanning electron microscope was used to assess the fractured specimens. RESULTS: A statistically significant difference was noted between the groups. The mean value of shear bond strength was 40.25 MPa for Group I, 41.93 MPa for Group II, 48.08 MPa for Group III and 47.01 MPa for Group IV. CONCLUSIONS: The modified zirconia group and control group demonstrated a significantly higher mean bond strength than that of Group I, where airborne particle abrasion was used. The scanning electron microscope showed that cohesive fracture in the porcelain veneers was the main problem of failure in altered zirconia. The modified zirconia specimens in Group III demonstrated significantly improved values of shear bond strength.

scholarly journals Assessment of shear bond strength of brackets bonded by direct and indirect techniques: an in vitro study

2012 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roberto Hideo Shimizu ◽  
Karlos Giovani Grando ◽  
Isabela Almeida Shimizu ◽  
Augusto Ricardo Andriguetto ◽  
Ana Cláudia Moreira Melo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Adhesive System ◽  
Vitro Study ◽  
Group Iii ◽  
Indirect Bonding ◽  
Group I ◽  
Group Ii

OBJECTIVE: This in vitro study was designed to evaluate the shear bond strength (SBS) of orthodontic metal brackets bonded by direct and indirect techniques. METHODS: Thirty healthy human maxillary premolar teeth were used. The teeth were divided into three groups of 10 teeth each: Group I - indirect bonding with SondhiTM Rapid-Set system (3M/Unitek), Group II - indirect bonding with TransbondTM XT adhesive system (3M/Unitek) and Group III - direct bonding with TransbondTM XT adhesive system (3M/Unitek). After bonding and obtaining the specimens for the study, the specimens were subjected to SBS testing in a universal testing machine (Emic, model DL-500). The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was applied to ascertain that the data had a normal distribution and the Bartlett test to check whether there was homogeneity of variance. One-factor analysis of variance was performed and, subsequently, Tukey's test for paired means. A 5% significance level was adopted. RESULTS: The results of Group I were 67.6 (N) and 5.9 (MPa); Group II, 68.9 (N) and 6.1 (MPa) and Group III (control), 92.5 (N) and 8.1 (MPa). CONCLUSION: It can therefore be concluded that the means for Group III were significantly higher compared with Groups I and II in both Newton (N) and Megapascal (MPa) values. The means attained by the indirect bonding technique used in Groups I and II, however, exhibited no statistically significant differences.

scholarly journals Difference in Bonding Strength of RMGIC according to Type of Hemostatic Agent in Primary Tooth

2021 ◽  
Vol 48 (4) ◽  
pp. 460-466
Author(s):  
Seolah Back ◽  
Joonhaeng Lee ◽  
Jongbin Kim ◽  
Miran Han ◽  
Jong Soo Kim
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Aluminum Chloride ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Ferric Sulfate ◽  
Aluminium Chloride ◽  
Hemostatic Agent ◽  
Primary Tooth ◽  
Group Iii ◽  
Group I ◽  
Group Ii

The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of the hemostatic agent containing aluminum chloride with hemostatic agent containing ferric sulfate on the shear bond strength of resin-modified glass ionomer cement(RMGIC) to dentin in primary tooth. Twenty extracted non-carious human primary teeth were collected in this study. The specimens were cut to expose dentin and polished. The specimens were randomly seperated into 3 groups for treatment; group I: polyacrylic acid(PAA), RMGIC; group II: aluminum chloride, PAA, RMGIC; group III: ferric sulfate, PAA, RMGIC Ten specimens from each group were subjected to shear bond strength test. The mean shear bond strength of each group was as follows: 10.07 ± 1.83 MPa in Group I, 7.62 ± 0.78 MPA in group II, 5.23 ± 0.78 MPa in group III. There were significant differences among all groups(p < 0.001). In conclusion, both aluminum chloride hemostatic agent and ferric sulfate hemostatic agent decreased the shear bond strength of RMGIC to dentin. And ferric sulfate hemostatic agent decreased the shear bond strength of RMGIC more than the aluminium chloride hemostatic agent.

scholarly journals The Influence of Resin Infiltration Pretreatment on Orthodontic Bonding to Demineralized Human Enamel

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
pp. 3619
Author(s):  
Marina Simunovic Anicic ◽  
Cecilia Goracci ◽  
Jelena Juloski ◽  
Ivana Miletic ◽  
Senka Mestrovic
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Present Report ◽  
Group Iv ◽  
Group Iii ◽  
Low Viscosity ◽  
Initial Caries ◽  
Group I ◽  
Demineralized Enamel ◽  
The Difference

Prior research reveal that low-viscosity resin is able to significantly penetrate initial caries lesions, which leads to their stabilization. The objective of the present report is to assess the shear bond strength (SBS) of orthodontic brackets bonded with different adhesives to demineralized enamel treated with a low-viscosity resin infiltrant. It also aims to compare the achieved bond strengths to those achieved in relation to sound enamel (SE). A total of 48 newly extracted third molars were collected, distributed in four groups (n=12), covered with a nail varnish, with 4 x 4 mm of uncoated area, immersed in Buskes demineralizing solution (14 days, 37 °C) or remained untreated. Group I: SE + Transbond XT; Group II: demineralized enamel (DE) + ICON + Transbond XT; Group III: DE + ICON + Scotchbond Universal; Group IV: DE + ICON + Assure PLUS. SBS was quantified in megapascals (MPa) and statistically analyzed (ANOVA, p ≤ 0.05). The mode of failure was assessed microscopically (10 x magnification). The highest SBS detected was in Group IV, and the difference was statistically significant (F = 14.37; p = 0.000). Treatment with a resin infiltrant on DE does not impair the shear bond strength when compared to SE, although it does produce a significantly higher strength when combined with Assure PLUS.

scholarly journals Shear bond strength of bulk-fill and nano-restorative materials to dentin

2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (01) ◽  
pp. 040-045 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hakan Colak ◽  
Ertugrul Ercan ◽  
Mehmet Mustafa Hamidi
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Clinical Success ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Group Iv ◽  
Composite Resins ◽  
Group Iii ◽  
Bonding System ◽  
Group I ◽  
Significant Difference

ABSTRACT Objectives: Bulk-fill composite materials are being developed for preparation depths of up to 4 mm in an effort to simplify and improve the placement of direct composite posterior restorations. The aim of our study was to compare shear-bond strength of bulk-fill and conventional posterior composite resins. Materials and Methods: In this study, 60 caries free extracted human molars were used and sectioned parallel to occlusal surface to expose midcoronal dentin. The specimens were randomly divided into four groups. Total-etch dentine bonding system (Adper Scotchbond 1XT, 3M ESPE) was applied to dentin surface in all the groups to reduce variability in results. Then, dentine surfaces covered by following materials. Group I: SonicFill Bulk-Fill, Group II: Tetric EvoCeram (TBF), Group III: Herculite XRV Ultra, and Group IV: TBF Bulk-Fill, 2 mm × 3 mm cylindrical restorations were prepared by using application apparatus. Shear bond testing was measured by using a universal testing machine. Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney U-tests were performed to evaluate the data. Results: The highest value was observed in Group III (14.42 ± 4.34) and the lowest value was observed in Group IV (11.16 ± 2.76) and there is a statistically significant difference between these groups (P = 0.046). However, there is no statistically significant difference between the values of other groups. In this study, Group III was showed higher strength values. Conclusion: There is a need for future studies about long-term bond strength and clinical success of these adhesive and bulk-fill systems.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document