Magnetic Resonance Neurography of Tunnels—Part II: Lower Extremity Nerves

2012 ◽  
pp. 73-73 ◽  
Author(s):  
Avneesh Chhabra ◽  
Gustav Andreisek ◽  
Majid Chalian
2021 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily M. Johnson ◽  
Daehyun Yoon ◽  
Sandip Biswal ◽  
Catherine Curtin ◽  
Paige Fox ◽  
...  

Patients with persistent complex limb pain represent a substantial diagnostic challenge. Physical exam, and tests such as nerve conduction, are often normal even though the patient suffers from severe pain. In 2015, we initiated a team-based approach to evaluate such patients. The approach included physicians from several specialties (Anesthesiology/Pain Medicine, Radiology, Plastic Surgery, Neurosurgery) combined with the use of advanced imaging with Magnetic Resonance Neurography (MRN). This preliminary case series discusses MRN findings identified in patients with previously difficult-to-diagnose peripheral limb pain and describes how this combination of approaches influenced our diagnosis and treatment plans. We extracted demographics, patient characteristics, presenting features, diagnostic tests performed, treatments provided, referral diagnosis and the diagnosis after interdisciplinary team evaluation from patient charts. We evaluated MRN and electrodiagnostic studies (EDX) ability to identify injured nerves. We compared abnormal findings from these diagnostics to patient reported outcome after ultrasound-guided nerve block. A total of 58 patients, 17 males and 41 females, were identified. The majority of patients presented with lower extremity pain (75%) and had prior surgery (43%). The most commonly identified abnormality on MRN was nerve signal alteration on fluid sensitive sequences, followed by caliber change and impingement. Comparing the outcome of diagnostic nerve blocks with abnormal nerve findings on MRN or EDX, we found that MRN had a sensitivity of 67% and specificity of 100% while for EDX it was 45 and 0%, respectively. After interdisciplinary discussion and imaging review, a more specific diagnosis was produced in 78% of evaluated cases opening up additional treatment pathways such as nerve-targeted surgery, which was performed in 36% cases. This descriptive case series demonstrates that a majority of patients evaluated by our team for complex limb pain were women with lower extremity pain resulting from surgery. In addition, an interdisciplinary team evaluation and the use of the moderately sensitive but highly specific MRN imaging modality resulted in a change in diagnosis for a majority of patients with complex limb pain. Future studies investigating patient outcomes after diagnosis change are currently underway based on the findings of this preliminary study.


Neurosurgery ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. 750-756 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles Kuntz ◽  
Lindsey Blake ◽  
Gavin Britz ◽  
Aaron Filler ◽  
Cecil E. Hayes ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 132 (6) ◽  
pp. 1925-1929 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Kollmer ◽  
Paul Preisser ◽  
Martin Bendszus ◽  
Henrich Kele

Diagnosis of spontaneous fascicular nerve torsions is difficult and often delayed until surgical exploration is performed. This case series raises awareness of peripheral nerve torsions and will facilitate an earlier diagnosis by using nerve ultrasound (NUS) and magnetic resonance neurography (MRN). Four patients with previously ambiguous upper-extremity mononeuropathies underwent NUS and 3T MRN. Neuroimaging detected proximal torsions of the anterior and posterior interosseous nerve fascicles within median or radial nerve trunks in all patients. In NUS, most cases presented with a thickening of affected nerve fascicles, followed by an abrupt caliber decrease, leading to the pathognomonic sausage-like configuration. MRN showed T2-weighted hyperintense signal alterations of fascicles at and distal to the torsion site, and directly visualized the distorted nerves. Three patients had favorable outcomes after being transferred to emergency surgical intervention, while 1 patient with existing chronic muscle atrophy was no longer eligible for surgery. NUS and MRN are complementary diagnostic methods, and both can detect nerve torsions on a fascicular level. Neuroimaging is indispensable for diagnosing fascicular nerve torsions, and should be applied in all unclear cases of mononeuropathy to determine the diagnosis and if necessary, to guide surgical therapies, as only timely interventions enable favorable outcomes.


2021 ◽  
Vol 355 ◽  
pp. 109108
Author(s):  
Manish Anand ◽  
Jed A. Diekfuss ◽  
Alexis B. Slutsky-Ganesh ◽  
Dustin R. Grooms ◽  
Scott Bonnette ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 49 (4) ◽  
pp. 030006052110065
Author(s):  
Tae Uk Kim ◽  
Min Cheol Chang

Neuralgic amyotrophy (NA) is markedly underdiagnosed in clinical practice, and its actual incidence rate is about 1 per 1000 per year. In the current article, we provide an overview of essential information about NA, including the etiology, clinical manifestations, diagnostic investigations, differential diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis. The causes of NA are multifactorial and include immunological, mechanical, or genetic factors. Typical clinical findings are a sudden onset of pain in the shoulder region, followed by patchy flaccid paralysis of muscles in the shoulder and/or arm. A diagnosis of NA is based on a patient’s clinical history and physical examination. Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and high-resolution magnetic resonance neurography are useful for confirming the diagnosis and choosing the appropriate treatment. However, before a diagnosis of NA is confirmed, other disorders with similar symptoms, such as cervical radiculopathy or rotator cuff tear, need to be ruled out. The prognosis of NA depends on the degree of axonal damage. In conclusion, many patients with motor weakness and pain are encountered in clinical practice, and some of these patients will exhibit NA. It is important that clinicians understand the key features of this disorder to avoid misdiagnosis.


Author(s):  
Sophie C. Queler ◽  
Ek Tsoon Tan ◽  
Christian Geannette ◽  
Martin Prince ◽  
Darryl B. Sneag

1996 ◽  
Vol 85 (2) ◽  
pp. 299-309 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aaron G. Filler ◽  
Michel Kliot ◽  
Franklyn A. Howe ◽  
Cecil E. Hayes ◽  
Dawn E. Saunders ◽  
...  

✓ Currently, diagnosis and management of disorders involving nerves are generally undertaken without images of the nerves themselves. The authors evaluated whether direct nerve images obtained using the new technique of magnetic resonance (MR) neurography could be used to make clinically important diagnostic distinctions that cannot be readily accomplished using existing methods. The authors obtained T2-weighted fast spin—echo fat-suppressed (chemical shift selection or inversion recovery) and T1-weighted images with planes parallel or transverse to the long axis of nerves using standard or phased-array coils in healthy volunteers and referred patients in 242 sessions. Longitudinal and cross-sectional fascicular images readily distinguished perineural from intraneural masses, thus predicting both resectability and requirement for intraoperative electrophysiological monitoring. Fascicle pattern and longitudinal anatomy firmly identified nerves and thus improved the safety of image-guided procedures. In severe trauma, MR neurography identified nerve discontinuity at the fascicular level preoperatively, thus verifying the need for surgical repair. Direct images readily demonstrated increased diameter in injured nerves and showed the linear extent and time course of image hyperintensity associated with nerve injury. These findings confirm and precisely localize focal nerve compressions, thus avoiding some exploratory surgery and allowing for smaller targeted exposures when surgery is indicated. Direct nerve imaging can demonstrate nerve continuity, distinguish intraneural from perineural masses, and localize nerve compressions prior to surgical exploration. Magnetic resonance neurography can add clinically useful diagnostic information in many situations in which physical examinations, electrodiagnostic tests, and existing image techniques are inconclusive.


2017 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 269-278 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric Weissman ◽  
Ethan Boothe ◽  
Vibhor Wadhwa ◽  
Kelly Scott ◽  
Avneesh Chhabra

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document