Projecting the cost, utilization, and patient care impact of prescribing extended release non-abuse-deterrent opioids to chronic pain patients

2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 291 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mihran Ara Yenikomshian, MBA ◽  
Alan G. White, PhD ◽  
Louis P. Garrison, PhD ◽  
Gary M. Oderda, PharmD, MPH ◽  
Joseph E. Biskupiak, PhD, MBA ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Resource Utilization ◽  
Extended Release ◽  
Healthcare Resource ◽  
Healthcare Resource Utilization ◽  
Abuse Liability ◽  
Commercial Population ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Cost Utilization ◽  
The Cost

Objectives: To estimate healthcare resource utilization, associated costs, and number needed to harm (NNH) from a physician's decision to prescribe extended-release (ER) non-abuse-deterrent opioids (non-ADO) as compared to ER ADOs in a chronic pain population.Design: A 12-month probabilistic simulation model was developed to estimate the reduction of misuse and/or abuse from a physician's prescribing decisions for 10,000 patients. Model inputs included probabilities for opioid misuse and/ or abuse-related events, opioid discontinuation, and switching from ADO to non- ADO. Estimated reductions in abuse associated with ADOs were obtained from positive subjective measures using human abuse liability studies. The model was run separately for commercial, Medicare, Medicaid, and Veterans Administration (VA) populations. The difference in healthcare resource utilization and associated costs (2015 USD) between the ADO and non-ADO simulations was calculated. NNH for non-ADO was also calculated.Results: Misuse and/or abuse-related events for patients prescribed ER non-ADOs ranged from 223−1,410 and associated costs ranged from $20−$98 per patient for commercial and Medicare populations, respectively. Prescribing ER ADOs were associated with 87, 289, 264, and 417 fewer misuse and/or abuse−related events, saving $8, $35, $21, and $29 per patient in commercial, VA, Medicaid, and Medicare populations, respectively. NNH ranged from 185 in the commercial population to 40 in the Medicare population. Results were sensitive to decreases in the probability of misuse and/or abuse events but showed reductions.Conclusions: A physician's decision to prescribe ER ADOs could lead to large reductions in misuse and/or abuse-related events and associated costs across many patient populations.

scholarly journals Impact of Oxycodone HCl Extended-release Formulary Restrictions on Extended-release Opioid Market Share, Healthcare Resource Utilization and Costs in Commercial and Medicare Plans

10.36469/9800 ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 75-88
Author(s):  
Rolin L. Wade ◽  
Chi-Chang Chen ◽  
Ajita P. De ◽  
Jaren C. Howard
Keyword(s):  
Resource Utilization ◽  
Market Share ◽  
Extended Release ◽  
Healthcare Resource ◽  
Office Visit ◽  
The United States ◽  
Healthcare Resource Utilization ◽  
Unintended Consequences ◽  
Health Plans ◽  
The Impact

Background: Previous research demonstrated that utilization management (UM) such as prior authorization (PA) or non-formulary (NF) restrictions may reduce pharmacy costs when designed and applied appropriately to certain drug classes. However, such access barriers may also have unintended consequences. Few studies systemically analyzed the impact of major UM strategies to extended-release (ER) opioids on different types of health plans. Objective: This study evaluated, from payer perspective, the impact of formulary restrictions (PA, NF, or step therapy [ST]) for branded oxycodone HCl extended release (OER) on market share, and healthcare resource utilization/costs in ER opioids patients for multiple types of health plans in the United States. Methods: This retrospective, longitudinal case-control study analyzed prescription and outpatient medical claims data (2012 to 2015) for adult ER opioid patients from US plans (commercial,/Medicare, national/regional) that instituted OER PA, NF, or ST. Patients from each restricted plan (cases) were matched to patients in an unrestricted plan (controls) on key patient characteristics. ER opioid market share and healthcare resource utilization/costs for both cases and controls were evaluated for the 6-month period before and after the formulary restriction dates. A difference-in-differences (DiD) approach was utilized to evaluate change in the total per patient per month (PPPM) healthcare utilization and costs. Results: The study comprised 1622 (national commercial PA), 2020 (regional commercial PA), 34 703 (national commercial ST), and 4372 (national Medicare NF) cases and equivalent number of controls. OER market share decreased after the formulary restrictions, with the national Medicare NF plan showing the greatest decrease (9.2%). DiD analyses indicated that PPPM office visit change in the PA and NF plans were non-significant (decreased by 0.1 and 0.2, P>0.05), but significant in the ST plan (increased by 0.1, P=0.0001). For most plans, no significant total monthly cost change was observed; PPPM costs decreased by $48.74 and $59.87 in ST and regional PA plans and increased by $37.90 in national NF plans (all P>0.05). Conclusions: This study observed that despite reducing the market share of OER, OER formulary restrictions had negligible impact on overall ER opioid utilization, and did not result in substantial pharmacy/medical cost savings.

scholarly journals Using a Physician Survey to Estimate the Economic Burden of Fibromyalgia in China

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wesley Furnback ◽  
Feifei Chen ◽  
Jim Li ◽  
Bruce CM Wang ◽  
Dongfeng Liang
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Resource Utilization ◽  
Economic Burden ◽  
Economic Model ◽  
Healthcare Resource ◽  
Healthcare Resource Utilization ◽  
Physician Survey ◽  
Physician Visits ◽  
Blood Tests ◽  
Illness Model

Abstract Background: Fibromyalgia (FM) is a chronic pain disorder with a global prevalence estimated to be between 2 and 3%. In addition to the chronic pain incurred by patients, FM is commonly associated with comorbidities and complications such as depression, anxiety, and sleep disturbances. This study estimates the economic burden of patients with FM in China using a physician survey. Methods: A burden of illness model was constructed using a micro-costing approach to estimate the direct cost associated with FM patients in China. FM-related comorbidities of anxiety, depression, and sleep disturbance were included in the model. Treatment utilization and costs for FM and FM-related comorbidities were included as well as FM-related healthcare resource utilization (physician visits, hospitalizations, blood tests, and radiologic tests). FM treatments included nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, pregabalin, duloxetine, amitriptyline, tramadol, Chinese medicine, physiotherapy, and acupuncture. The model leveraged the results of a physician survey, which targeted 6 rheumatologists and pain experts each with 5-10 FM patients per month in China. All costs are presented in Renminbi (¥) using spot exchange rates as of May 1, 2020.Results: From the physician survey, the prevalence rate of FM in China was estimated to be 2.8% with 75.8% as female. The economic model estimated the annual per patient direct medical cost of FM to be ¥17,377. Within these costs, FM-medication and treatment costs (¥11,216), healthcare resource utilization (¥4,297), and costs for medications treating FM-related comorbidities (¥1,863) were the highest contributors. Healthcare resource utilization costs were driven by physician visits (¥2,787) followed by radiographic tests (¥808), blood tests (¥508), and hospitalizations (¥194). Conclusion: The prevalence and gender distribution of FM patients in China is similar to those of other countries. The economic model estimates patients with fibromyalgia in China to incur significant economic costs.

Association of obesity with healthcare resource utilization and costs in a commercial population

2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (7) ◽  
pp. 1335-1343 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pravin S. Kamble ◽  
Jennifer Hayden ◽  
Jenna Collins ◽  
Raymond A. Harvey ◽  
Brandon Suehs ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Resource Utilization ◽  
Healthcare Resource ◽  
Healthcare Resource Utilization ◽  
Commercial Population

scholarly journals Longer Delay From Chronic Pain to Spinal Cord Stimulation Results in Higher Healthcare Resource Utilization

2016 ◽  
Vol 19 (5) ◽  
pp. 469-476 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shivanand P. Lad ◽  
Frank W. Petraglia ◽  
Alexander R. Kent ◽  
Steven Cook ◽  
Kelly R. Murphy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Resource Utilization ◽  
Spinal Cord Stimulation ◽  
Healthcare Resource ◽  
Healthcare Resource Utilization

scholarly journals Real-World Healthcare Resource Utilization in Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Lymphoma: Differences between Patients Treated with Ibrutinib or Bendamustine + Rituximab

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3548-3548
Author(s):  
Debra Irwin ◽  
Lu Zhang ◽  
Kathleen Wilson ◽  
Gerard Hoehn ◽  
Erika Szabo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Healthcare Utilization ◽  
Resource Utilization ◽  
Real World ◽  
Index Date ◽  
Healthcare Resource ◽  
Healthcare Resource Utilization ◽  
Similar Proportion ◽  
First Line ◽  
The Difference

Abstract OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to examine the real-world differences in healthcare resource utilization in chronic lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL) patients treated with either first-line ibrutinib monotherapy (IM) or first-line bendamustine + rituximab (BR) therapy using U.S. administrative claims data. METHODS: The MarketScan® Research Databases were used to identify patients aged 18 years or older with commercial or Medicare supplemental insurance plans based on their first prescription (index date) of either IM or BR therapy between 02/01/2014 and 08/30/2017. Patients were required to be diagnosed with CLL and be treatment naïve, as well as be continuously enrolled (CE) for 6 months prior to and at least 30 days following the index date. All-cause and CLL-related healthcare resource utilization (e.g., inpatient admission (IP) and emergency room (ER) visits) were evaluated during a 12-month follow-up period from the index date among the subset of patients with 12 months of continuous enrollment and were reported per-patient per-month (PPPM). Statistical differences in the distribution of IP and ER visits between the IM versus BR therapy groups were estimated using chi-squared test for categorical variables and t-test for continuous variables. RESULTS: A total of 1,886 CLL patients were identified, with 1,157 patients in the IM cohort and 729 patients in the BR cohort. The IM cohort was significantly older (mean = 69.3 years; SD = 11.6) then the BR cohort (mean age = 66.4 years; SD = 9.8). There was a similar proportion of females (IM = 36%; BR = 32%), and no significant difference in the National Cancer Institute Comorbidity Index score was observed between the two cohorts (IM=0.9 vs BR=0.8, p=0.34). The results of the comparisons between the two groups with 12 months of follow-up (IM = 589; BR = 436) are provided in Table 1. For all-cause healthcare utilization, the proportion of patients experiencing at least one IP admission and the PPPM number of admissions was significantly higher in the IM cohort compared to the BR cohort. The proportion of patients with at least one ER visit was higher in the IM than in the BR cohort, but the difference was not statistically significant. However, the PPPM number of ER visits was significantly higher in the IM cohort. A similar pattern was found for the CLL-related healthcare utilization variables with two exceptions. First, the average length of stay (ALOS) per CLL-related IP admission was significantly longer for the IM than BR cohort; whereas, ALOS per all-cause IP admission was longer for the IM cohort, but the difference was not significantly different. Second, while patients in the IM cohort experienced more CLL-related ER visits, they were not significantly higher in the IM cohort than in the BR cohort. Conclusions: The current study examined differences in healthcare utilization during a 12 month period among CLL-patients initially treated in a front-line setting with either ibrutinib or BR combination therapy. Results indicated that not only did more ibrutinib patients experience an IP admission and ER visits, both all-cause and CLL-related, but they also experienced more repeat admissions and ER visits. These real-world findings highlight the importance of considering the healthcare resource utilization of CLL patients which may be associated with their first-line therapy. Disclosures Irwin: Teva: Consultancy. Zhang:Teva: Consultancy. Wilson:Teva: Consultancy. Hoehn:Teva: Employment. Szabo:Teva: Employment. Tang:Teva: Employment.

scholarly journals Real-world healthcare resource utilization and costs of weekly versus every-2-week cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chris P Pescott ◽  
Emmanuelle Boutmy ◽  
Michael Batech ◽  
Philippe Ronga ◽  
Francois-Xavier Lamy
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Resource Utilization ◽  
Healthcare Costs ◽  
Healthcare Resource ◽  
Weighted Average ◽  
Healthcare Resource Utilization ◽  
Weighted Mean ◽  
Inverse Probability ◽  
The Difference

Aim: To compare healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and healthcare costs (HC) for every-2-week (Q2W) versus weekly (Q1W) cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Patients & methods: Patients with mCRC receiving cetuximab plus chemotherapy in a line-agnostic setting. Cohort study of patients with mCRC treated with cetuximab and chemotherapy in IBM MarketScan. Analyses were weighted by inverse probability of treatment based on propensity score. Results: HRU was numerically lower with the Q2W versus Q1W regimen (weighted mean, 8.1 vs 9.5 encounters per-patient-per-month). The weighted average of HC was $17,653 and $16,469 per-patient-per-month for the Q2W and Q1W regimens, respectively; the difference between regimens decreased when restricting to CRC-related claims. Conclusion: HRU was lower and HC were similar between the Q2W and Q1W regimens.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document