scholarly journals A COMPARISON OF EFFICACY OF INTRADERMAL TRANEXAMIC ACID WITH TOPICAL 20% AZELAIC ACID IN THE TREATMENT OF MELASMA

2021 ◽  
Vol 71 (2) ◽  
pp. 494-97
Author(s):  
Sayyida Komal ◽  
Asher Ahmed Mashhood ◽  
Muhammad Farooq ◽  
Nida Qayyum
Keyword(s):  
Tranexamic Acid ◽  
Azelaic Acid ◽  
Poor Response ◽  
Severity Index ◽  
Index Score ◽  
Military Hospital ◽  
Severity Index Score ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B

Objective: To compare the efficacy of Intradermal Tranexamic acid and topical 20% Azelaic acid cream in the treatment of melasma. Study Design: Comparative prospective study. Place and Duration of Study: Dermatology department, Combined Military Hospital Peshawar, from Sep 2018 to Mar 2019. Methodology: A total of 116 female patients, at the outpatient department of dermatology at Combined Military Hospital Peshawar, were randomly assigned into two groups; group A (intradermal tranexamic acid) and group B (topical azelaic acid) by lottery method. Patients in group A received intradermal injection, while the participants of group B received topical azelaic acid only, fortnightly for 6 weeks. Melasma area severity index score was calculated for each patient in both groups at the start and at the end of the treatment. Results: The mean Melasma area severity index score in group A (intradermal tranexamic acid) before and at 6 weeks of treatment was 7.10 ± 2.94 and 5.27 ± 2.44, respectively. The mean Melasma area severity index score in group B (topical azelaic acid) before and at 6 weeks of treatment was 7.56 ± 2.57 and 5.76 ± 2.89, respectively. Efficacy of intradermal tranexamic acid, as poor response, good response and excellent response was 27.6%, 41.4% and 31% respectively. While, efficacy of topical azelaic acid group as poor response, good response and excellent response was 62.1%, 20.7% and 17.2% respectively. The difference was statistically significant, (p=0.001). Conclusion: It can be concluded that intradermal tranexamic acid is more effective as compared to topical 20% azelaic acid in..................

Comparing the Effectiveness of Oral Formulation of Tranexamic Acid in Treating Melasma versus Topical Treatmentlike Kojic Acid

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. 1372-1375
Author(s):  
M. Sheikh ◽  
R. Majeed ◽  
W. Iqbal
Keyword(s):  
Tranexamic Acid ◽  
Topical Treatment ◽  
Kojic Acid ◽  
Severity Index ◽  
Oral Formulation ◽  
Effective Treatment Modality ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B ◽  
Index Comparison

Aim: To compare the efficacy and safety of oral tranexamic acid with topical kojic acid in treatment of melasma. Method: This study was an interventional, randomized control trial done in Department of Dermatology Akhtar Saeed Trust Hospital Lahore from January 2020 till June 2020. 40 patients with moderate to severe melasma were enrolled for this study. These were divided into two groups A and B. In group A 20 patients were given oral tranexamic acid along with topical treatment and in group B, 20 patients were treated only with topical treatment. Oral tranexamic acid was given in dosage of 250 mg twice a day for 3 months and then follow-up was done at 8th and 12th wks. The evaluation of effectiveness of treatment was done with MASI(Melasma Area Severity Index). Comparison was done in the mean of the MASI scores obtained in both groups. Result: In both groups female patients were more in number. The mean age of patients in group A was 29.75 years & in group B it was 32.55 years. MASI scoring was done in both groups at baseline and at 8th& 12th wks. There was a significant decrease in this score in group A patients with oral tranexamic acid (12.08±2.8 vs 9.1±2.2 at 8th wk. andvs 8.2±2.0 at 12thwk.; P <0.05for both). Whereas in group B patients the decrease in mean MASI score was significant at 8thwk.& insignificant at 12th wk. (12.6±2.9 vs 10.9±2.4at 8th wk. and vs 10.3±2.4at 12th wk.; p<0.05 for former but p>0.05 for later). Conclusion: Oral tranexamic acid is a safe and effective treatment modality for treating moderate to severe melasma. Keywords: Melasma, oral tranexamic acid

scholarly journals Comparative Study of Combination of Oral Tranexamic Acid with Modified Kligman’s Formula Versus Oral Tranexamic Acid with Azelaic Acid 15% in the Treatment of Melasma

2021 ◽  
pp. 412-418
Author(s):  
Riddhima Singh ◽  
Praveen Maheshwari
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Tranexamic Acid ◽  
Azelaic Acid ◽  
Severity Index ◽  
Fluocinolone Acetonide ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Early Results ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Background: Melasma refers to acquired hyper-pigmentary condition effecting skin. Owing to its multifactorial causation and chronicity, there is an increased need for new multimodality therapies to treat melasma more effectively and to prevent the side effects seen with the conventional modalities of treatment. Objectives: Compare efficacy of combining oral Tranexamic Acid and Azelaic Acid 15% with that of Oral Tranexamic Acid (TA) and Modified Kligman’s Formula. Also, to record any adverse effects of combining these agents. Methods: Patients having Melasma who will be coming to Dermatology OPD, AVBRH, Sawangi, Wardha, will be enrolled after considering the various inclusion and exclusion criteria. A detailed history will be asked, which will be followed by a cutaneous examination that includes the calculation of MASI (Melasma Area and Severity Index). One Group (A) - participants will receive - Oral 500 mg Tranexamic acid OD plus Modified Kligman’s Formula (fluocinolone acetonide 0.01%, tretinoin 0.05%, and hydroquinone 2%) cream one time at night only. Second Group (B)- participants will receive -  Oral 500 mg Tranexamic Acid OD plus Azelaic Acid 15% gel once daily at night only. Both groups will also receive Broad-spectrum sunscreen SPF-30 daily (3 hourly). Patients will be called for regular follow up at 4 weeks and 8 weeks (for early results). Clinical photos will be clicked at every follow-up visit and MASI score shall be doocumented. Expected Results: To analyze efficacy of combining Oral TA along with Azelaic Acid 15% and if it provides better results, we can avoid the undesirable side effects that are seen on prescribing the Modified Klingman’s Formula, in Melasma patients. Conclusion: This study will help us in analyzing efficacy of combining Oral TA with Azelaic Acid 15%, therefore will provide a newer treatment modality with lesser side effects and maybe better results than the gold standard- Modified Klingman’s Formula.

scholarly journals Treatment of Melasma Cases by Oral Tranexamic Acid: A Randomized Control Trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 148-151
Author(s):  
ATM Rezaul Karim ◽  
Shayesta Parvin Sadeque ◽  
Afreen Ferdous ◽  
Md Abdul Latif Khan ◽  
Md Habibur Rahman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tranexamic Acid ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Armed Forces ◽  
Severity Index ◽  
Military Hospital ◽  
Medical College ◽  
Treatment Measures ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Novel Concept

Introduction: Melasma is a great challengefor a dermatologist as its treatment is unsatisfactory and recurrence is high.Treatment of melasma using oral tranexamic acid is a novel concept. Objectives: To compare the efficacy of oral tranexamic acid with routine topical therapies for the treatment of melasma. Materials and Methods: This prospective, interventional, randomized controlled trial was conducted among 130 melasma patients in the Department of Dermatology, Combined Military Hospital, Cumilla from June 2016 to June 2017. The patients were divided into two groups consisting of 65 patients each. The first group (Group A) was given routine treatment measures and oral Tranexamic Acid while the second group (Group B) was treated only with routine topical measures. Capsule Tranexamic Acid was prescribed at a dose of 250 mg twice a day for three months and cases were followed during the course of treatment. The response was evaluated on the basis of Melasma Assessment Severity Index (MASI). Results: Astatistically significant decrease in the mean Melasma Assessment Severity Index from baseline to 8th and 12th weeks was observed among group A patents (11.08±2.91 vs 8.95±2.08 at week 8 and vs. 7.84±2.44 at week 12; (p<0.05 for both). While among group B patients the decrease in mean score was significant at 8 weeks and insignificant at 12 weeks follow up (11.60±3.40 vs 9.9±2.61 at 8 weeks and vs. 9.26±3 at 12 weeks; p<0.05 for former but p>0.05 for later). Conclusion: Oral Tranexamic acid provides rapid and sustained improvement in the treatment of melasma. Journal of Armed Forces Medical College Bangladesh Vol.14 (2) 2018: 148-151

scholarly journals Oral Tranexamic Acid for the Treatment of Melasma

2014 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 40-43 ◽  
Author(s):  
D Karn ◽  
S KC ◽  
A Amatya ◽  
EA Razouria ◽  
M Timalsina
Keyword(s):  
Tranexamic Acid ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Severity Index ◽  
Sustained Improvement ◽  
Treatment Measures ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Novel Concept ◽  
High Treatment

Background Melasma poses a great challenge as its treatment is unsatisfactory and recurrence is high. Treatment of melasma using tranexamic acid (oral, topical or intralesional) is a novel concept. Objective To compare the efficacy of oral tranexamic acid with routine topical therapies for the treatment of melasma. Methods It is a prospective, interventional, randomized controlled trial conducted among 260 melasma patients. Patients were divided into two groups consisting of 130 patients each. First group (Group A) was given routine treatment measures and oral Tranexamic Acid while second group (Group B) was treated only with routine topical measures. Capsule Tranexamic Acid was prescribed at a dose of 250 mg twice a day for three months and cases were followed for three months. Response was evaluated on the basis of Melasma Assessment Severity Index (MASI). Mean scores between the two groups were then compared. Results Statistically significant decrease in the mean Melasma Assessment Severity Index from baseline to 8 and 12 weeks was observed among group A patients (11.08±2.91 vs 8.95±2.08 at week 8 and vs. 7.84±2.44 at week 12; p<0.05 for both). While among group B patients the decrease in mean score was significant at 8 weeks and insignificant at 12 weeks follow up (11.60±3.40 vs 9.9±2.61 at 8 weeks and vs. 9.26±3 at 12 weeks; p<0.05 for former but p>0.05 for later). Conclusion Addition of oral tranexamic acid provides rapid and sustained improvement in the treatment of melasma. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/kumj.v10i4.10993 Kathmandu Univ Med J 2012;10(4):40-43

scholarly journals INTRAVENOUS REGIONAL ANESTHESIA (BIERS BLOCK);

2012 ◽  
Vol 19 (05) ◽  
pp. 710-714
Author(s):  
Muhammad ASGHER ◽  
ASIM GHAURI ◽  
MUHAMMAD ABDULLAH ◽  
Tariq Abassi
Keyword(s):  
Regional Anaesthesia ◽  
Military Hospital ◽  
P Value ◽  
Complete Evaluation ◽  
Intravenous Regional Anesthesia ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B ◽  
Intravenous Regional Anaesthesia

Objective: To compare the analgesic effects of combination of 0.5% Lidocaine plus Ketorolac in intravenous regionalanaesthesia technique with those of Lidocaine (0.5%) alone to prevent post operative pain after intravenous regional anaesthesia (Biersblock). Study design: Randomized Control Trial. Place and duration of study: The study was carried out at Department of Anaesthesiology,Intensive Care and pain management, Combined Military hospital, Rawalpindi from July 2008 to February 2009. Patients and Methods: Thestudy was conducted after complete evaluation of risk / benefit ratio to the patients. On the basis of random number method the patients weredivided into two equal groups (group A and group B). The number of patients in each group was 75. Group A was assigned Lidocaine in a dose of200mg 40ml of 0.5% solution and group B was assigned injection Ketorolac 30mg added to Lidocaine in a dose of 200mg 40ml of 0.5% solution.The patients were kept in post anaesthesia care unit for two hours and pain intensity was measured by visual analogue scale(VAS) on 15,30minutes,1hour, 1.5 and at 2 hours after the cuff deflation. The analgesic efficacy recorded on the basis of visual analog scale of two groups, wascompared using student’s t - test. p value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: In group A 33 males and 42 femaleswere enrolled for the study while in group B there were 38 males and 37 females. The mean age of the patients in group A was 34.31 ± 6.03years while in group B was 32.99 ± 6.08 years. Patients were also classified according to ASA classification in which 87 patients were classifiedas ASA – I and 63 patients as ASA – II. Group B which received Ketorolac in addition to Lidocaine for Bier’s block had low visual analogue scoresas compared to group A which received only Lidocaine for Bier’s block. P values obtained after the comparison of the mean VAS of two groupsat 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 1 hour, 1.5 hours and 2 hours were all less than 0.05 (0.002 for 15 minutes, 0.004 for 30 minutes, 0.001 for 1 hour,0.004 for 1.5 hours and 0.001 for 2 hours). Conclusions: Ketorolac improves the postoperative analgesia markedly when used with Lidocainein intravenous regional anaesthesia.

scholarly journals Short Practical Regimen of Acupuncture for Melasma: A Prospective Cohort Study in a Tertiary Hospital in Thailand

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thanan Supasiri ◽  
Nuntida Salakshna ◽  
Krit Pongpirul
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Severity Index ◽  
Tertiary Hospital ◽  
Optimal Number ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B

Background: Acupuncture shows benefits for patients with melasma, although no optimal number of sessions have been determined.Methods: The prospective observational study was conducted in melasma patients who were treated with acupuncture procedures two times a week and were evaluated after the 5th and the 10th sessions of acupuncture, with a 1-week follow-up after the last session. Participants Groups A and B received five and 10 acupuncture sessions, respectively. Melasma was assessed by using the melanin index (MI), melasma area and severity index (MASI), patient-reported improvement scores, and acupuncture-related adverse events.Results: Out of 113 participants, 67 received five sessions of acupuncture treatment while 39 received 10 sessions. At 1 week after five sessions of acupuncture in Group A, the mean MI decreased by 28.7 (95% CI −38.5 to −18.8, p &lt; 0.001), whereas the median MASI decreased by 3.4 (95% CI −6.9 to −1.2, p &lt; 0.001) points. At 1 week after ten sessions of acupuncture in Group B, the mean MI decreased by 31.3 (95% CI −45 to −17.6, p &lt; 0.001), whereas the median MASI decreased by 5.4 (95%CI −9.9 to −3, p &lt; 0.001) points. The first five sessions of acupuncture had a higher incremental effect than the last five sessions, although there was no statistically significant difference. Twenty-nine participants reported minor side effects. Group B had a risk ratio (RR) of having adverse events 1.8 times (95% CI 1.0–3.4, p = 0.05) compared with Group A.Conclusion: Short acupuncture regimens of 5–10 sessions in melasma seem to be effective and practical with minor side effects.

scholarly journals Intraarticular vs Intravenous Tranexamic Acid in Reduction of Blood Loss in Primary Total Knee Replacement

2016 ◽  
Vol 50 (2) ◽  
pp. 64-68
Author(s):  
Arunkumar Vijay ◽  
Jambu Nageswaran ◽  
Senthil Loganathan ◽  
Samuel Chittaranjan Bedford
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Total Knee Replacement ◽  
Tranexamic Acid ◽  
Knee Replacement ◽  
Primary Total Knee Replacement ◽  
Group A ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B ◽  
Primary Total Knee

ABSTRACT Aim To study the efficacy of topical intraarticular vs intravenous tranexamic acid (TXA) in reducing blood loss following primary total knee replacement (TKR). Materials and methods A phase 3, single center, double blind and randomized controlled study was conducted in the Department of Orthopedics, Sri Ramachandra University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu. A prospective study of 100 patients lasted from July 2013 to July 2015. Results Postoperative transfusion rates were zero in both the groups (intraarticular and intravenous). The mean 48-hour drain collected is 285.6 ml in group A (intraarticular), while it is 325.8 ml in group B (intravenous); the mean drop in hemoglobin is 1.7 gm/dl in group A (intraarticular) while it is 2.4 gm/dl in group B (intravenous). Conclusion This study shows that topical intraarticular administration of TXA has better efficacy than intravenous TXA in controlling postoperative blood loss following primary uncomplicated TKR with no significant complications. How to cite this article Vijay A, Nageswaran J, Loganathan S, Bedford SC. Intraarticular vs Intravenous Tranexamic Acid in Reduction of Blood Loss in Primary Total Knee Replacement. J Postgrad Med Edu Res 2016;50(2):64-68.

scholarly journals Comparison of 4% Topical Hydroquinone versus Combination of Oral Tranexamic Acid and 4% Topical Hydroquinone in the Treatment of Epidermal Melasma

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (10) ◽  
pp. 3406-3409
Author(s):  
Sarah Riaz ◽  
Najia Ahmed ◽  
Ayesha Anwar ◽  
Moizza Tahir ◽  
Farrah Yousaf ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tranexamic Acid ◽  
Topical Therapy ◽  
Military Hospital ◽  
Ethical Review ◽  
P Value ◽  
Treatment Groups ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Better Than

Objective: comparison of efficacy of topical 4% hydroquinone monotherapy with combination of oral tranexamic acid and topical 4% hydroquinone in the treatment of epidermal melasma Study design: Quasi experimental study Study period and place: Dermatology OPD, Pak Emirates Military Hospital Rawalpindi from July 2018 to January 2019. Methodology: Total 80 patients presenting with epidermal melasma were selected from outdoor patient department after applying the inclusion criteria and consent was taken from selected patients. Study was started after getting permission from hospital ethical review board. Two treatment groups were made after dividing patients by using alternate method. Treatment with topical 4% hydroquinone alone was started for group A patients and combination of capsule tranexamic acid (250 mg two times a day) along with topical 4% hydroquinone were started for group B patients for the next 6 months. Evaluation of patients through detailed history, clinical and wood’s light examination before starting therapy and after of 24 weeks of treatment was done for both groups. Efficacy of treatment was assessed via Modified MASI score. Results: Hydroquinone monotherapy was effective in 21 (52.5%) patients among group A while in group B patients, combination treatment i.e. oral tranexamic acid and topical hydroquinone, was effective in 31 (77.5%) patients (p value= 0.01). Conclusion: Effectiveness of Hydroquinone 4% topical therapy combined with oral tranexamic acid for epidermal melasma is better than topical 4% hydroquinone alone. Key words: Epidermal melasma, oral tranexamic acid, topical 4% hydroquinone.

scholarly journals COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF TACROLIMUS 0.03% OINTMENT VS OLOPATADINE 0.2% EYE DROPS IN THE TREATMENT OF VERNAL KERATOCONJUNCTIVITIS

2021 ◽  
Vol 71 (1) ◽  
pp. 34-39
Author(s):  
Hassan Sajjad Rathore ◽  
Shahzad Saeed ◽  
Ahsan Mukhtar ◽  
Umar Ijaz ◽  
Asad Habib ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Subjective Symptom ◽  
Military Hospital ◽  
Vernal Keratoconjunctivitis ◽  
Eye Drops ◽  
Subjective Symptoms ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Group A ◽  
Objective Sign ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B

Objective: To compare the efficacy of tacrolimus 0.03% ointment to olopatadine 0.2% eye drops in the treatment of vernal keratoconjunctivitis. Study Design: Prospective cross-sectional study. Place and Duration of Study: Eye Department Combined Military Hospital Quetta, from Feb to Jul 2019. Methodology: A total of 69 patients with active vernal keratoconjunctivitis (VKC) were included in this study.Thirty six (52.17%) patients were randomized in tacrolimus group and 33 (47.83%) in olopatadine group B.Baseline values of the subjective symptom score (SSS) and the objective sign score (OSS) were noted. Patientswere reviewed on weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12 and the scores at each visit were summed. These scores were used forcomparison between groups. Results: At the start of the study, the mean subjective symptoms score and objective sign score of group A was 9.0 ± 2.04 and 3.93 ± 1.93 respectively, while that of group B was 8.88 ± 2.18 and 4.36 ± 1.90 respectively. At the end of 12-weeks, the mean subjective symptoms score and objective sign score of group A reduced to 0.11 ± 0.32 and 0.08 ± 0.28 respectively, while that of group B reduced to 1.70 ± 0.77 and 0.64 ± 0.55 respectively. Total improvement of scores (as a percentage of baselines) among tacrolimus group was 98.3% and olopatadine group was 83%. Conclusion: Although both 0.03% tacrolimus and 0.2% olopatadine were effective in improving the signs andsymptoms of VKC, 0.03% tacrolimus was significantly superior.

scholarly journals A Comparative Study of Topical 3% Tranexamic Acid and 35% Glycolic Acid in Melasma and Review of Literature

2021 ◽  
pp. 238-246
Author(s):  
S. Soundarya ◽  
N. Devanand ◽  
Vaishnavi Sabapathi ◽  
Jayakar Thomas
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Tranexamic Acid ◽  
Glycolic Acid ◽  
Acid Group ◽  
Mean Value ◽  
Entire Study ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Acid Gel ◽  
Group B

Aim: To compare the efficacy and safety of topical 3% tranexamic acid gel vs 35% glycolic acid peel in the treatment of melasma over face. Materials and Methods: This is an open labelled, Randomised Controlled Trial(RCT) conducted on 60 patients. Patients were randomly divided equally into 2 groups – Group A and Group B. Patients of Group A  used topical 3% tranexamic acid gel twice a day and Group B patients were treated with 35% glycolic acid peel with a contact period of 5 minutes once in every 2 weeks. Patients were assessed every month for a period of 3 months and recurrence was assessed for the next consecutive 3 months following the treatment. Patients were asked to use a broad spectrum sunscreen before sun exposure during the entire study. Assessment of reduction in pigmentation was made by MASI score, subjective and objective valuation (blind observer) and photographic comparison. Safety profile was assessed by the side effects. Results: The mean value of Melasma Area and Severity Index(MASI) score for glycolic acid group at baseline was 14.41 which reduced to 7.05 at end of 3rd month. In tranexamic acid group, the mean value of MASI score at baseline was 14.58 which reduced to 5.96 at the end of 3rd month. The mean percentage of improvement in MASI score in glycolic acid group 52% whereas in tranexamic acid group it is 61%.  The side effects were minimal in this study. Side effects were more in glycolic acid group than tranexamic acid group.  A total of 8 patients had recurrence during follow up. In glycolic acid group, 5 patients had recurrence whereas in tranexamic acid group, only 3 patients had recurrence. The percentage of recurrence in glycolic acid group is 16.7 % whereas in glycolic acid group it is 10.7%. Conclusion: Tranexamic acid is a novel emerging therapy for melasma. In this study it has been found that topical 3% tranexamic acid is equally efficacious as 35% glycolic acid peel with minimal side effects in the treatment of melasma.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document