scholarly journals EFFECTIVE THERAPEUTIC INTERVENTIONS TO PROMOTE RECOVERY FROM FIRST PSYCHOTIC EPISODE AND MINIMIZE ITS RELAPSE: A QUALITATIVE STUDY FROM PAKISTAN

2021 ◽  
Vol 71 (5) ◽  
pp. 1624-29
Author(s):  
Rehana Khalil ◽  
Zahid Naeem ◽  
Nazia Jameel ◽  
Uroosa Talib

Objective: To explore effective therapeutic strategies to promote recovery from first episode of psychosis and minimize its relapse. Study Design: Qualitative study. Place and Duration of Study: Karwan-e-Hayat Psychiatric Care and Rehabilitation Center, Karachi, from Mar to Jun 2019. Methodology: Seventeen participants were recruited through purposive sampling and data was collected through in-depth interviews. Qualitative thematic content analysis was done through generation of a coding scheme. Results: Almost half i.e., 8 (47%) had experience of 10 years, while 7 (41%) had 15 years’ experience, and 2 (12%) had 30 years’ experience as psychiatrists. Analysis of the interview transcripts revealed three main themes related to psychiatrists’ views on interventions for first episode of psychosis to prevent relapse: (1) duration of first episode of psychosis (2) compliance and rate of recovery after first episode (3) effective interventions for first episode psychosis. Conclusion: The effective interventions to promote recovery from first psychosis episode and minimize its relapse included multiple combinations of integrated stage-specific approaches necessitating antipsychotics (pharmacological) and psychosocial support (non-pharmacological).

2017 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. S271-S272
Author(s):  
S. Malta Vacas ◽  
R. Carvalho ◽  
M.J. Heitor

IntroductionMuch research on psychosis has focused on early detection and the development of effective interventions. However, the effectiveness of any intervention depends on the willingness of the patient to engage with an intervention in a sustained manner. Disengagement from treatment by patients with serious mental illness is a major concern of mental health services.ObjectivesThis study aims to examine the prevalence of disengagement in a longitudinal cohort of first episode psychosis (FEP) patients.MethodsRetrospective naturalistic 2 years follow-up study of FEP patients aged 18 to 35 admitted into the department of psychiatry of the Beatriz Angelo's hospital from 2012 to 2014. Data on socio-demographics, clinical characteristics, appointments and medication adherence and readmissions were collected.ResultsBetween 2012 and 2014 were admitted 56 patients with a FEP into the department of psychiatry of the Beatriz Angelo's hospital. The great majority of the patients (67.9%) disengaged from the treatment, both appointments and medication. Of those, 13.2% did not attend any appointment, 26.3% attended between one and three appointments and 60.5% attended at least 3 appointments before disengaged. About 23% were readmitted between the 2 years follow up period, 15.4% were readmitted more than once.ConclusionsThe evidence reviewed indicates that approximately 30% of individuals with FEP disengage from services. Continuity of care is of particular importance with FEP, given evidence suggesting that long-term care can improve symptoms and functioning and reduces relapse risk.Disclosure of interestThe authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.


2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (12) ◽  
pp. e240088
Author(s):  
Peter M Haddad ◽  
Majid Al Abdulla ◽  
Javed Latoo ◽  
Yousaf Iqbal

A 30-year-old man with no significant previous or family psychiatric history became severely anxious about his health after a positive COVID-19 test. Physical symptoms of COVID-19 were mild, with no evidence of hypoxia or pneumonia, throughout his illness. He was admitted to a quarantine facility. He remained highly anxious, and 1 week later, he developed paranoid delusions and auditory hallucinations (his first psychotic episode). He was treated with lorazepam 1 mg four times a day, mirtazapine 30 mg nocte and risperidone 1 mg two times a day. His psychotic symptoms lasted 1 week. He stopped psychiatric medication after 4 weeks and had remained well when reviewed 3 months later. A Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders fifth edition diagnosis of brief psychotic disorder with marked stressor (brief reactive psychosis) was made. Anxiety about his health and social isolation appeared the main aetiological factors but an inflammatory component cannot be excluded. The case highlights that first episode psychosis can be associated with mild COVID-19.


2010 ◽  
Vol 40 (10) ◽  
pp. 1585-1597 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. K. Anderson ◽  
R. Fuhrer ◽  
A. K. Malla

BackgroundAlthough there is agreement on the association between delay in treatment of psychosis and outcome, less is known regarding the pathways to care of patients suffering from a first psychotic episode. Pathways are complex, involve a diverse range of contacts, and are likely to influence delay in treatment. We conducted a systematic review on the nature and determinants of the pathway to care of patients experiencing a first psychotic episode.MethodWe searched four databases (Medline, HealthStar, EMBASE, PsycINFO) to identify articles published between 1985 and 2009. We manually searched reference lists and relevant journals and used forward citation searching to identify additional articles. Studies were included if they used an observational design to assess the pathways to care of patients with first-episode psychosis (FEP).ResultsIncluded studies (n=30) explored the first contact in the pathway and/or the referral source that led to treatment. In 13 of 21 studies, the first contact for the largest proportion of patients was a physician. However, in nine of 22 studies, the referral source for the greatest proportion of patients was emergency services. We did not find consistent results across the studies that explored the sex, socio-economic, and/or ethnic determinants of the pathway, or the impact of the pathway to care on treatment delay.ConclusionsAdditional research is needed to understand the help-seeking behavior of patients experiencing a first-episode of psychosis, service response to such contacts, and the determinants of the pathways to mental health care, to inform the provision of mental health services.


2002 ◽  
Vol 181 (S43) ◽  
pp. s50-s57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paola Dazzan ◽  
Robin M. Murray

BackgroundNeurological soft signs (NSS) are minor neurological signs indicating non-specific cerebral dysfunction. Their presence has been documented extensively in schizophrenia but not during the first psychotic episode.AimsTo review studies that have specifically investigated NSS at the time of the first psychotic episode.MethodA review of studies investigating neurological function in first-episode psychosis, using a clinical examination.ResultsPatients with first-episode psychosis show an excess of NSS, particularly in the areas of motor coordination and sequencing, sensory integration and in developmental reflexes. Furthermore, NSS may be associated with a specific laterality pattern.ConclusionsMore studies on first-onset schizophrenia are needed, evaluating both sensory and motor neurological domains (scoring separately for the two sides of the body), integrating this knowledge with neuroimaging findings and clarifying the role of NSS as markers of cognitive dysfunction.


1998 ◽  
Vol 43 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4S-6S
Author(s):  
Angelo Fallu ◽  
Lili Kopala ◽  
Ashok Malla ◽  
Lilian Thorpe

Objective: To review and discuss the issues and challenges involved in the treatment of first-episode psychosis in young patients, including choice of appropriate antipsychotic agents and adjunctive medications, dosing regimens, and biopsychosocial interventions. Methods: The case of a young man in his late teens with a history of substance abuse who experienced an acute dystonic reaction to treatment for his first psychotic episode is presented and discussed. Results: Each contributing author provides an evaluation of the intervention strategies presented in the patient's history and factors that influenced the treatment outcomes. Conclusions: The successful management of young patients with psychosis must go beyond the control of positive symptoms. A comprehensive psychosocial and psychoeducational approach combined with a well-tolerated treatment regimen can help the patient achieve positive outcomes.


2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick D. McGorry ◽  
John Cocks ◽  
Paddy Power ◽  
Peter Burnett ◽  
Susy Harrigan ◽  
...  

Patients experiencing a first psychotic episode have high rates of extrapyramidal symptoms (EPSs) when treated with the doses of neuroleptics used in multiepisode or chronic schizophrenia. There is some evidence that lower doses may be equally, if not more, effective but less toxic in this population. Here, we report the results of a biphasic open label trial designed to assess the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of low-dose (2–4 mg/day) risperidone treatment in a group of 96 first-episode nonaffective psychosis patients. At the end of the trial, 62% of patients met the response criteria although approximately 80% had achieved a response at some time during the study. Reports of EPS remained low, and there were no dystonic reactions. We conclude that even at a dose of 2 mg/day, risperidone was highly effective in reducing acute symptomatology in a real world sample of young first-episode psychosis patients.


CNS Spectrums ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 12 (S15) ◽  
pp. 1-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter F. Buckley ◽  
Christoph U. Correll ◽  
Alexander L. Miller

AbstractPatients experiencing a first psychotic episode or early stages of psychosis present with key diagnostic issues for clinicians. At the time of first-episode psychosis presentation, it is crucial that clinicians select the most effective treatment option as immediate intervention offers the best chance for containing the illness. Functional impairment occurs most rapidly at the early stage of illness, and such impairment can influence the patient's future prognosis, alter the level of necessary treatment, and affect morbidity. Although research has shown a decrease in brain gray matter as well as signs of functional impairment in those who develop psychosis, many of these patients remain untreated for extended periods of time and do not visit a clinician due to fear of stigma, a failure to recognize the problem, or complexities of their care system. Prior studies have shown that untreated psychosis results in worse outcome for patients compared to psychosis that is treated earlier in the course of illness. There is a range of treatment options for psychosis, including use of first-generation or second-generation antipsychotic medication. Clinicians should note that both medication types are associated with certain side effects, such as tardive dyskinesia and weight gain, respectively. For all antipsychotics, doses should be lower for patients with a first psychotic episode than for patients with chronic psychosis. Finally, clinicians must consider that patients may present with various comorbidities, such as substance abuse, that also may affect treatment.This expert roundtable supplement will address the diagnosis and treatment selection for first-episode psychosis as well as comorbidities related to the condition. The use of first- or second-generation antipsychotics for psychosis treatment, dosing guidelines, and the antipsychotic side-effect profile will also be addressed.


2016 ◽  
Vol 33 (S1) ◽  
pp. s235-s235
Author(s):  
B. Moura ◽  
T. Mendes ◽  
F. Antunes ◽  
R. Barandas ◽  
M. Croca ◽  
...  

IntroductionCognitive deficits are a core feature of the first psychotic episode patients and could be an obstacle to functional ability. Cognitive stimulation could be a promising method to surpass neuropsychological deficits.Objectives–to implement an online training protocol to stable first psychotic episode outpatients;–to assess adherence to the intervention;–to measure neurocognitive, psychopathological and functional outcomes pre- and post-training.AimsTo investigate the feasibility of an online-based resource for cognitive stimulation (COGWEB®) and explore possible benefits in different domains.MethodsFifteen patients were enrolled from the Early Psychosis Intervention Program (PROFIP) at the Department of Psychiatry of Santa Maria Hospital, Lisbon. The training consisted on 30-40-minute online sessions performed every weekday during 6 months at home. Assessments were performed at baseline and after program completion and included: psychopathological scores; personal and social functioning scores; Clinical Global Impression and a neuropsychological battery.ResultsEvery participant had some kind of impairment on baseline. Mean training time was 36 h. Six patients left the program before completion (half of them because they got employed). The program showed overall good feasibility and safety with no reported significant psychiatric occurrences or hospitalizations. Results regarding final neuropsychological, psychopathological and functioning showed a tendency for stability or improvement on an individual case analysis.ConclusionsOur results show that cognitive training using an online-based stimulation software is a feasible intervention for first-episode psychosis patients with possible benefits for this population. However, results should be analyzed very carefully because of different participant trajectories and of study limitations.Disclosure of interestThe authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.


2020 ◽  
Vol 46 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S246-S246
Author(s):  
Erna van‘t Hag

Abstract Background When achieving remission after a first psychotic episode using antipsychotic medication, international guidelines generally recommend continuation of use for >1 year. However, patients often have a strong wish to stop earlier due to side-effects, affecting everyday functioning. Recently, guidelines have been questioned as one Dutch study found that more patients achieved long-term functional remission after early discontinuation. Yet, this finding has not yet been replicated. Psychiatrists, patients and family are unsure which regime to follow: to continue or not to continue? Methods In total 512 participants will be included who achieved remission after first-episode psychosis and use antipsychotic medication. Recruitment takes place at 24 Dutch sites. HAMLETT is a multicenter pragmatic single-blind randomized controlled trial with two conditions (1:1): maintenance treatment versus discontinuation/dose reduction of antipsychotic medication. Main research question: Is long-term general functioning better if patients reduce/discontinue antipsychotic medication at an early stage (3–6 months after remission of their first psychotic episode), than when they continue medication >1 year? General functioning is measured in two ways: with the WHO-DAS interview and with Ecological Momentary Assessments (EMA). EMA is a structured diary method in which individuals are asked in daily life to report on their current thoughts, feelings and symptoms, as well as the context (e.g. location, company, activity) and the appraisal of the context (e.g. stress). Diaries are completed via a smartphone diary app maximally 10 times daily at semi-random moments, over eight consecutive days. Momentary positive/negative affect, self-esteem, subjective well-being, paranoia, hallucinations, sleep, and frequency, type and appraisal of social company and activities are assessed on a 1–7 scale. At baseline and after 6 months, 1, 2, 3 and 4 years follow-up, patients of both arms will perform EMA. This results in an intensive time series of psychopathology, subjective well-being and social functioning in relation to antipsychotic medication and a range of contextual influences. Results The study is active and currently recruiting patients (since September 2017), At present 194 patients have been included, 20% participated in EMA measurements. Results of the interim analysis and preliminary of EMA data will be presented. Discussion The HAMLETT study investigates the effects of maintenance treatment versus discontinuation/dose reduction of antipsychotic medication after remission of first episode psychosis on personal and social functioning, psychotic symptom severity, health-related quality of life and cognitive functioning. The HAMLETT study will offer evidence to guide patients and clinicians when evaluating optimal treatment duration for psychotic disorders. Using different types of outcome measures will provide a more in-depth analysis of effects of continuation/ discontinuation on functioning.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document