Common reasons patients are being referred from primary to secondary care, their journey and its impact on patient flow in the Emergency Department

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Abbasi A A ◽  
Ameh Victor

A longstanding issue common to all Emergency Departments (ED), worldwide, is that of crowding. In recent years, prior to the CoVid-19 pandemic this was a national problem with trolleys lined up in ED corridors and waiting rooms filled with acutely unwell patients who have only received basic triage and no other clinician assessment. Many solutions have been put forward such as the concept of “reverse queueing”, the use of urgent treatment centres [1-4] and the use of ambulatory areas, particularly for medical patients. A clearly recognized strategy in managing overcrowding in the emergency department is prehospital assessment and judicious use of secondary care by primary care colleagues. “Initial Assessment” and referral to the correct area of secondary care promotes good patient flow and directs the patient to an appropriate area of the hospital, avoiding the emergency department altogether. One of the busiest clinical specialty within most hospitals is General Medicine. This specialty generally receives twice (if not more) the referrals than any other specialties but often has the same level of staffing. We undertook an audit of a cohort of patient referred by their GPs to acute specialties over a 2-week period to see if there are lessons to be learnt in order ease pressure on the emergency department and acute medical take.

CJEM ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 96-105 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander K. Leung ◽  
Shawn D. Whatley ◽  
Dechang Gao ◽  
Marko Duic

AbstractObjectiveTo study the operational impact of process improvements on emergency department (ED) patient flow. The changes did not require any increase in resources or expenditures.MethodsThis was a 36-month pre- and post-intervention study to evaluate the effect of implementing process improvements at a community ED from January 2010 to December 2012. The intervention comprised streamlining triage by having patients accepted into internal waiting areas immediately after triage. Within the ED, parallel processes unfolded, and there was no restriction on when registration occurred or which health care provider a patient saw first. Flexible nursing ratios allowed nursing staff to redeploy and move to areas of highest demand. Last, demand-based physician scheduling was implemented. The main outcome was length of stay (LOS). Secondary outcomes included time to physician initial assessment (PIA), left-without-being-seen (LWBS) rates, and left-against-medical-advice (LAMA) rates. Segmented regression of interrupted time series analysis was performed to quantify the impact of the intervention, and whether it was sustained.ResultsPatients totalling 251,899 attended the ED during the study period. Daily patient volumes increased 17.3% during the post-intervention period. Post-intervention, mean LOS decreased by 0.64 hours (p<0.005). LOS for non-admitted Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale 2 (-0.58 hours, p<0.005), 3 (-0.75 hours, p<0.005), and 4 (-0.32 hours, p<0.005) patients also decreased. There were reductions in PIA (43.81 minutes, p<0.005), LWBS (35.2%, p<0.005), and LAMA (61.9%, p<0.005).ConclusionA combination of process improvements in the ED was associated with clinically significant reductions in LOS, PIA, LWBS, and LAMA for non-resuscitative patients.


Author(s):  
M S Osborne ◽  
E Bentley ◽  
A Farrow ◽  
J Chan ◽  
J Murphy

Abstract Objective As the novel coronavirus disease 2019 changed patient presentation, this study aimed to prospectively identify these changes in a single ENT centre. Design A seven-week prospective case series was conducted of urgently referred patients from primary care and accident and emergency department. Results There was a total of 133 referrals. Referral rates fell by 93 per cent over seven weeks, from a mean of 5.4 to 0.4 per day. Reductions were seen in referrals from both primary care (89 per cent) and the accident and emergency department (93 per cent). Presentations of otitis externa and epistaxis fell by 83 per cent, and presentations of glandular fever, tonsillitis and peritonsillar abscess fell by 67 per cent. Conclusion Coronavirus disease 2019 has greatly reduced the number of referrals into secondary care ENT. The cause for this reduction is likely to be due to patients’ increased perceived risk of the virus presence in a medical setting. The impact of this reduction is yet to be ascertained, but will likely result in a substantial increase in emergency pressures once the lockdown is lifted and the general public's perception of the coronavirus disease 2019 risk reduces.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 12
Author(s):  
Sekar Dwi Purnamasari ◽  
Denissa Faradita Aryani

<div class="WordSection1"><p class="AbstractContent"><strong>Objective:</strong> Early warning system (EWS) is a physiological scoring to observe the patient’s condition not only in hospital wards but also in Emergency Department (ED). At an overcrowded ER that have slow of patient flow, EWS is use as an early detection of patient’s deterioration by observing the vital signs. The purpose of this study was to identify the relationship between nurses’ knowledge of initial assessment and the application of EWS at emergency department.</p><p class="AbstractContent"><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a quantitative study that used descriptive correlative with cross-sectional design toward 70 emergency nurses.</p><p class="AbstractContent"><strong>Results:</strong> The result showed there was a relationship between nurses’ knowledge of initial assessment and the application of early warning system at emergency room <em>(p</em>=0 .001)<strong></strong></p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The higher the level of nurses’ knowledge, their behavior is better. It is recommended to maintain the use of EWS in ED that already good through training regularly (re-certification).</p><p class="AbstractContent"><strong> </strong></p><div><p class="Keywords"><strong>Keywords: </strong>Early warning system; emergency department; initial assessment; nurses’ knowledge.</p></div></div>


CJEM ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 18 (S1) ◽  
pp. S29-S30
Author(s):  
A. Leung ◽  
M. Duic ◽  
D. Gao ◽  
S. Whatley

Introduction: The objective was to study the operational impact of an intervention comprised of simultaneous process improvements to triage, patient inflow, and physician scheduling patterns on emergency department (ED) patient flow. The intervention did not require any increase in ED resources or expenditures. Methods: A 36-month pre-/post-intervention retrospective chart review at an urban community emergency department from January 2010 to December 2012. The ED process improvements started on June 6, 2011 and involved streamlining triage, parallel processing, flexible nurse-patient ratios, flexible exam spaces, and flexible physician scheduling. The main outcomes were ED length-of-stay (LOS). Secondary outcomes included time to physician-initial-assessment (PIA), left-without-being-seen (LWBS) rates, and left-against-medical-advice (LAMA) rates. Segmented regression of interrupted time series analysis was performed on Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) 2 to 5 patients to quantify the immediate impact of the intervention on the outcome levels, and whether there were changes in the trend between pre-intervention and post-intervention segments. Results: 251,899 patients attended the ED during the study period. Daily patient volumes increased 17.3% during the post-intervention period. Post-intervention, for CTAS 2-5 patients, there was a reduction in average LOS by 0.64 hours (p<0.001), and 90th-percentile LOS by 0.81 hours (p=0.024). When separated by acuity and disposition, there were reductions in LOS for non-admitted CTAS 2 (-0.58 hours, p <0.001), 3 (-0.75 hours, p <0.001), 4 (-0.32 hours, p=0.002), and 5 (-0.28 hours, p=0.008) patients. For secondary outcomes, there was a decrease in overall average PIA by 43.81 minutes (p<0.001), and 90th-percentile PIA by 91.39 minutes (p<0.001). LWBS and LAMA rates decreased by 35.2% (p<0.001) and 61.9% (p<0.001), respectively. Conclusion: A series of process improvements meant to optimize flow in the ED without the addition of resources was associated with clinically significant reductions in LOS, PIA, LWBS and LAMA rates for non-resuscitative patients.


BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. e044326
Author(s):  
Laureline Brunner ◽  
Marina Canepa Allen ◽  
Mary Malebranche ◽  
Catherine Hudon ◽  
Nicolas Senn ◽  
...  

ObjectivesMany interventions have been developed over the years to offer frequent users of the emergency department (FUEDs) better access to quality coordinated healthcare. Despite recognising the role primary care physicians (PCPs) play in FUEDs’ care, to date their perceptions of case management, the most studied intervention, have rarely been assessed. Furthermore, a gap regarding PCPs’ experience of caring for FUEDs persists. Thus, this study aimed to explore PCPs’ perceptions of the care provided to FUEDs in emergency and primary care settings, their views on the local case management team (CMT), and their suggestions to improve FUEDs’ care.DesignQualitative study using in-depth semistructured interviews and inductive thematic analysis.SettingCanton of Vaud, Switzerland.ParticipantsThirty PCPs participated, 16 in private practice (PP-PCPs) and 14 based at the Lausanne University Centre of General Medicine and Public Health (Unisanté—U-PCPs).ResultsU-PCPs and PP-PCPs thought that most FUEDs’ emergency department (ED) visits were legitimate, but questioned ED adequacy to meet FUEDs’ needs. Yet, both PCP groups reported encountering many challenges in FUEDs’ care themselves. In this context, PP-PCPs seemed more satisfied of the care they provided to FUEDs than U-PCPs. Generally, U-PCPs seemed to find more value in the CMT to help them care for FUEDs than PP-PCPs. To enhance FUEDs’ care, U-PCPs and PP-PCPs suggested enhancing collaboration with other healthcare providers. U-PCPs also wished to increase their availability, and some PP-PCPs considered outpatient clinics, larger group practices or medical centres most appropriate to handle FUEDs’ needs.ConclusionsThis study highlights the many challenges PCPs face in caring for FUEDs, that a CM intervention has the potential to mitigate, and provides ways forward in improving FUEDs’ care, including reinforced communication with the CMT and ED physicians, and structural changes to their own way of delivering care to FUEDs.


2021 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Ayaz A Abbasi ◽  
Shams Khan ◽  
Victor Ameh ◽  
Ilyas Muhammad

Background/Aims A long-standing issue common to most emergency departments worldwide is overcrowding, and the UK is no exception. Overcrowding can have many adverse consequences, such as increased medical errors, decreased quality of care and poor patient outcomes. This service evaluation aimed to review the number of patients referred to acute specialties by their GPs and to evaluate the impact of these referrals on the flow of patients in and out of the emergency department and acute medicine. Methods GP referral letters were collected at an emergency department in Greater Manchester, England, between 15 May 2019 and 28 May 2019. A proforma was used by a consultant in acute medicine and a consultant in emergency medicine to evaluate each letter. Result A total of 139 GP referrals were received by the emergency department, of which 43 were to general medicine and 96 to other specialties. Of the latter, 54 cases were directed to the emergency department, 20 were directed to a different specialty and 23 did not have a specialty clearly specified. The majority of referrals were for gastrointestinal conditions or abdominal pain, with the next largest category being chest infections. Most of these patients were eventually seen in the trust's ambulatory assessment area to relieve pressure on the emergency department. Conclusions Planned and specific use of urgent care centres and ambulatory assessment areas can help to relieve pressure on emergency departments, but appropriate intervention at the primary care level is also necessary to improve patient flow.


CJEM ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (S1) ◽  
pp. S21-S21
Author(s):  
A. Verma ◽  
I. Cheng ◽  
K. Pardhan ◽  
L. Notario ◽  
W. Thomas-Boaz ◽  
...  

Background: Increasing Emergency Department (ED) stretcher occupancy with admitted patients at our tertiary care hospital has contributed to long Physician Initial Assessment (PIA) times. As of Oct 2019, median PIA was 2.3 hours and 90th percentile PIA was 5.3 hours, with a consequent 71/74 PIA ranking compared to all Ontario EDs. Ambulatory zone (AZ) models are more commonly used in community EDs compared to tertiary level EDs. An interdisciplinary team trialled an AZ model for five days in our ED to improve PIA times. Aim Statement: We sought to decrease the median PIA for patients in our ED during the AZ trial period as compared to days with similar occupancy and volume. Measures & Design: The AZ was reserved for patients who could walk from a chair to stretcher. In this zone, ED rooms with stretchers were for patient assessment only; when waiting for results or receiving treatment, patients were moved into chairs. We removed nursing assignment ratios to increase patient flow. Our outcome measure was the median PIA for all patients in our ED. Our balancing measure was the 90th percentile PIA, which could increase if we negatively impacted patients who require stretchers. The median and 90th percentile PIA during the AZ trial were compared to similar occupancy and volume days without the AZ. Additional measures included ED Length of Stay (LOS) for non-admitted patients, and patients who leave without being seen (LWBS). Clinicians and patients provided qualitative feedback through surveys. Evaluation/Results: The median PIA during the AZ trial was 1.5 hours, compared to 2.1 hours during control days. Our balancing measure, the 90th percentile PIA was 3.7 hours, compared to 5.0 during control days. A run chart revealed both median and 90th percentile PIA during the trial were at their lowest points over the past 18 months. The number of LWBS patients decreased during the trial; EDLOS did not change. The majority of patients, nurses, and physicians felt the trial could be implemented permanently. Discussion/Impact: Although our highly specialized tertiary care hospital faces unique challenges and high occupancy pressures, a community-hospital style AZ model was successful in improving PIA. Shorter PIA times can improve other quality metrics, such as timeliness of analgesia and antibiotics. We are working to optimize the model based on feedback before we cycle another trial. Our findings suggest that other tertiary care EDs should consider similar AZ models.


2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-34 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sherry Leviner

Optimal patient flow minimizes waiting and is associated with quality healthcare. Emergency Department crowding is an indicator of poor patient flow and has been the focus of patient flow interventions. These interventions have failed to address interactions among components of the hospital. This has led to an incomplete understanding of why poor patient flow occurs and what is the best strategy for improving patient flow. The purpose of this article is to review the literature on the importance of good patient flow within hospitals and present a conceptual model of patient flow to guide research in this area.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document