Critical Criteria of Women-Owned SMES Performance Using Multi-Attribute Decision Making (MADM) of Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP)

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-15
Author(s):  
Siti Fatimah Azzahra’ JOHAR ◽  
Umi Kartini RASHID ◽  
Edie Ezwan MOHD SAFIAN ◽  
Juzaimi NASUREDIN
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Gross Domestic Product ◽  
Social Structure ◽  
Analytical Hierarchy Process ◽  
Women Entrepreneurs ◽  
Gdp Growth ◽  
Developed Country ◽  
Multi Attribute Decision Making ◽  
Hierarchy Process ◽  
Competitive Economy

Faced with the vision that Malaysia will become a developing country by 2020, the Malaysian government is promoting the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) growth to be enhanced, while increasing the number of entrepreneurs in different sectors. Increasing the number of women entrepreneurs is one of the government's current initiatives in realizing the vision of being a well-developed country with a competitive economy, sustainable revenue, and stable social structure as a multiracial country.

scholarly journals Application of Multi-Attribute Decision-Making Methods for the Selection of Conveyor

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Satyam Fulzele ◽  
Satywan Khatke ◽  
Shubham Kadam ◽  
Avinash Kamble
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Analytical Hierarchy Process ◽  
Material Handling ◽  
Selection Process ◽  
Decision Makers ◽  
Variable Cost ◽  
Fixed Cost ◽  
Order Preference ◽  
Multi Attribute Decision Making ◽  
Hierarchy Process

Abstract In the present time of innovation, conveyor assume an exceptionally indispensable part and have huge significance for material handling in different enterprises. A conveyor is essentially utilized for moving any sort of material from one area to other. It is made with nearer precisions, hence the expense related with manufacturing is additionally high. In this manner, it should work with better productivity. The choice of the best conveyor is a crucial activity for designers. Designers need to recognize different variables that will influence the functionalities of the conveyor system to limit bottlenecks in the system. An efficient methodology should be accomplished for the conveyor selection. Subsequently, the current work aims to the selection process of the best option for conveyor by using four decision making methods such as analytical hierarchy process, technique of order preference by similarity to ideal solution, compromise ranking method and Deng’s similarity based method. The selection is done among four alternatives based on six attributes viz: fixed cost each hour, variable cost each hour, conveyor speed, product width, product weight and flexibility. The analytical hierarchy process is used to determine weights of the attributes based on relative importance of each attribute. It is also observed that A3 conveyor is best suitable conveyor. Hence the above proposed strategies help decision-makers to examine and choose the best conveyor by considering the rank obtained of the alternatives.

scholarly journals PRIORITISING SUSTAINABILITY FACTORS FOR AUSTRALIAN COMMUNITY BUILDINGS’ MANAGEMENT USING ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS (AHP)

2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pushpitha KALUTARA ◽  
Guomin ZHANG ◽  
Sujeeva SETUNGE ◽  
Ron WAKEFIELD
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Analytical Hierarchy Process ◽  
Australian Community ◽  
Multi Attribute Decision Making ◽  
Building Components ◽  
Community Buildings ◽  
Decision Making Model ◽  
Hierarchy Process ◽  
Pair Wise Comparison ◽  
Comparison Data

The essence of Australian community buildings’ sustainable management drives through a previously established decision-making structure with four sustainability aspects and accompanying 18 criteria. Informed decisions are supported with a decision-making model that generates sustainability impacts of building components based on this decision-making structure. Building components’ individual impacts can be assigned using a numbering scale incorporated with linguistic terms. However, similar importance given to each aspect or criterion is arguable when the combined effect is considered. Hence, they should be given different weightings and their combination with individual impacts will produce final sustainability impacts. For calculating weightings, the study uses Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), widely used technique in Multi Attribute Decision-Making (MADM). The study also conducted an industry-wide questionnaire across Australian local councils because pair-wise comparison data is essential for weighting calculation. This paper presents the survey data and analysis results that captured weightings of sustainability aspects and criteria.

scholarly journals GDSS MULTI KRITERIA PENENTUAN STRATEGI MARKETING TERBAIK PERGURUAN TINGGI

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 15
Author(s):  
Sumiyatun Sumiyatun
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Decision Support ◽  
Analytical Hierarchy Process ◽  
Group Decision ◽  
Group Decision Support ◽  
Ideal Solution ◽  
Group Decision Support System ◽  
Order Preference ◽  
Multi Attribute Decision Making ◽  
Hierarchy Process

Dunia  pendidikan  telah  mengalami  evolusi  secara  kontinyu.  Salah  satu faktor  pemicunya  adalah  kompetisi  antar  perguruan  tinggi  yang  semakin  ketat. Oleh karena itu pemasaran menjadi unsur yang strategis dalam menjaga eksistensi perguruan  tinggi. Dalam membuat keputusan pemilihan strategi marketing, terdapat beberapa kriteria yang perlu dipertimbangkan, diantaranya adalah biaya, waktu, tingkat pengaruh, capaian target dan lain sebagianya. Pada perguruan tinggi swasta pengambilan keputusan terkait strategi marketing tidak hanya ditentukan oleh bagian Humas saja, akan tetapi  harus meminta pertimbangan dari pihak manajemen dan yayasan pemilik perguruan tinggi. Berdasarkan  kompleknya permasalahan  yang  dihadapi,  diperlukan  sebuah  sistem pendukung  keputusan  kelompok  atau  Group  Decision  Support  System  (GDSS) dalam menentukan strategi marketing pergurauan tinggi.  Pada  penelitian  ini,  penulis  mengajukan  GDSS  menggunakan metode Analytical  Hierarchy Process (AHP) yang mendukung model Multi Attribute Decision Making (MADM) dan  Technique for  Order  Preference by  Similarity  to  Ideal  Solution  (TOPSIS)  sebagai  model  untuk  pengambilan keputusan. Penggunaan  GDSS  pada penelitian ini bertujuan  untuk  mengakomodir  penilaian  lebih  dari  satu  evaluator  dan meningkatkan  kualitas  keputusan.  Dengan  demikian  diharapkan  penilaian  yang dilakukan lebih obyektif, karena tidak dilakukan oleh satu pihak saja. Perangkat lunak yang dibangun dari hasil penelitian ini diharapkan  mempermudah dan mempercepat dalam menentukan strategi marketing perguruan tinggi.

Multi-Attribute Decision Making in Risk Analysis

2016 ◽  
pp. 246-290
Author(s):  
William P. Fox
Keyword(s):  
Risk Assessment ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Risk Analysis ◽  
Analytical Hierarchy Process ◽  
Data Envelopment ◽  
Ideal Solution ◽  
Order Preference ◽  
Multi Attribute Decision Making ◽  
Simple Additive Weighting ◽  
Hierarchy Process

Multi-Attribute Decision Making (MADM) is commonly used when we are comparing more than two courses of actions or alternatives based upon many selected criteria. This chapter presents methodologies to conduct MADM analysis for risk analysis and risk assessment across a variety of topics. These methodologies include Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), Simple Additive Weighting (SAW), Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), and the Technique of Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). The author describes each methodology, provide some strengths and limitations of each, discuss tips for sensitivity analysis, and provide two risk analysis examples to illustrate each method.

scholarly journals SISTEM LAYANAN PENGAJUAN KREDIT PADA BMT AL HIKMAH SEMESTA CABANG DAWE DENGAN METODE SAW

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-12
Author(s):  
Susilo Ery Wibowo ◽  
Endang Supriyati ◽  
Ratih Nindyasari
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Analytical Hierarchy Process ◽  
Multi Attribute Decision Making ◽  
Simple Additive Weighting ◽  
Hierarchy Process

BMT Alhikmah Semesta cabang Dawe merupakan koperasi simpan pinjam yang melayani pembiayaan syariah. Dalam proses pengajuan pinjaman hingga persetujuan pembiayaan masih dilakukan secara konvensional. Dengan berkembangnya sistem informasi yang terkomputerisasi, proses pengajuan dan proses analisa dapat lebih di efisienkan prosesnya. Yaitu dalam hal waktu proses pengajuan, proses analisa dan memilimalkan penggunaan kertas. Maka dari itu dibuat aplikasi Sistem Layanan Pengajuan Kredit Online. Ada beberapa metode yang dapat digunakan dalam menganalisa tingkat kelayakan pemohon dalam menerima pinjaman yaitu Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), Weighted Product (WP), Simple Additive Weighting (SAW). Metode yang digunakan dalam melakukan analisa pemohon adalah Simple Additive Weighting (SAW). Metode ini merupakan salah satu metode dari Multi-Attribute Decision Making (MADM). Konsep dasar metode SAW adalah mencari penjumlahan terbobot dari rating kinerja pada setiap alternatif pada setiap atribut. Metode ini membutuhkan proses normalisasi matrik keputusan ke suatu skala yang dapaat diperbandingkan dengan semua rating alternatif maupun kriteria yang ada. Sehingga metode SAW mampu menghasilkan analisa alternatif terbaik dari masing-masing kriteria yang dilakukan proses perhitungan. Dalam hal ini alternatif yang dicari adalah yang layak menerima kredit.

scholarly journals Analisis Sensitivitas AHP-SAW dan ROC-SAW dalam Pengambilan Keputusan Multikriteria

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 85
Author(s):  
I Gede Iwan Sudipa ◽  
Ida Ayu Dwi Puspitayani
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Analytical Hierarchy Process ◽  
Rank Order ◽  
Multi Attribute Decision Making ◽  
Simple Additive Weighting ◽  
Hierarchy Process

Beasiswa merupakan salah satu upaya yang dilakukan pemerintah dalam mendorong dan membantu potensi kemajuan pendidikan di negara Indonesia, salah satunya adalah beasiswa Peningkatan Prestasi Akademik(PPA) sehingga diperlukan seleksi penerima beasiswa untuk menentukan penerima beasiswa yang sesuai dengan kriteria penilaian. Permasalahan seleksi beasiswa termasuk kedalam permasalahan Multi Attribute Decision Making (MADM). Penelitian ini menganalisis masalah MADM yaitu pemberian beasiswa dengan menggunakan kombinasi metode Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), Simple Additive Weighting(SAW) dan model pemberian bobot Rank Order Centroid(ROC). Pengujian metode yang sesuai dilakukan dengan melakukan analisis sensitivitas untuk mengetahui kombinasi metode yang paling sensitif dalam menghasilkan perankingan akhir penerima beasiswa. Dari hasil pengujian analisis sensitivitas kombinasi ROC-SAW menghasilkan nilai sensitivitas terkecil dengan nilai 0.000144, dan dari 18 percobaan perubahan bobot yang dilakukan untuk mengetahui perubahan ranking hasil akhir didapatkan hasil bahwa metode AHP-SAW menghasilkan perubahan ranking dengan persentase 80,56% dari ranking awal, dan ROC-SAW menghasilkan perubahan ranking dengan persentase 90,83% dari ranking awal. Kata Kunci: Analisis Sensitivitas, AHP-SAW, ROC-SAW, Multikriteria 

scholarly journals PENDETEKSIAN DINI TINGKAT KEMANAN INFORMASI BERBASIS ISO 27001 : 2013 MENGGUNAKAN METODE AHP (ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS)

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 57-64
Author(s):  
Arini Arini
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Information Security ◽  
Analytical Hierarchy Process ◽  
British Standard Institution ◽  
International Electrotechnical Commission ◽  
Security Assessment ◽  
Scoring Method ◽  
Weighting Method ◽  
Hierarchy Process ◽  
Iso 27001

Information is one of the important assets for the survival of an organization / business, defense security and the integrity of the country, public trust between consumers, so that the availability, accuracy and integrity must be maintained, or commonly abbreviated as CIA (Confidentiality, Integrity & Availability). ISO 27001 is an information security standard published in October 2005 by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) and International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC). However, until now there has been no tool for companies in Indonesia to do a pre-assessment of the level of information security. Plus the lack of socialization of the rules and the lack of ISO 270001 expert in Indonesia, these are reason why the authors conducted this research. The author begins research by collecting data, by studying literature and interviewing experts to identify problems. After that, in its implementation, this research will be directed (knowledge acquisition) and reviewed directly by an ISO 27001 expert from The British Standard Institution of the United Kingdom (BSI) so that the results are more accurate. After that, the writer determines the weighting method (decision making), scoring method, system development method, and simulation method (testing). The results of the study are in the form of pre-assessment to evaluate the information security assessment index, which will be displayed according to indicators pioneered from ISO 27001: 2013 using AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process) decision-making methods, as well as web-based making it easier to review.

scholarly journals How to Improve Sharia Accountability for Sovereign Sukuk in Indonesia

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 53
Author(s):  
Erny Arianty
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Human Resources ◽  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Analytical Hierarchy Process ◽  
The Third ◽  
Contract Structure ◽  
Hierarchy Process ◽  
Level Of Importance

<pre><em>The</em><em> study entitled How to Improve Sharia Accountability for Sovereign Sukuk in Indonesia aims to analyze </em><em>the factor that has the highest level of importance</em><em> in realizing sharia accountability.</em> <em>The analysis of this research is conducted by applying</em><em>  </em><em>Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) approach </em><em>with a hierarchy structure consisting of the first level, namely objectives, sharia accountability for Sovereign Sukuk/Sovereign Sharia Securities (SBSN), then the second level is shariah accountability parameters, consist of structural contract (akad) SBSN, the use of SBSN funds by maqashid sharia, and SBSN accounting and financial reporting. Each criterion is determined by sub-criteria, which are the third level. The last level is the supporting factors for the realization of sharia accountability for SBSN. </em><em>The results showed that human resources competency factor had the highest importance </em><em>level in realizing the sharia accountability for the use of the contract structure (aqad) SBSN parameter, the supervisory function factor had the highest importance level for the parameters of using SBSN funds following the shariahmaqashid, and the decision making authority factor had the highest importance level for the parameters of accounting and financial reporting.  As for the results of the level of importance of the parameters, the parameter of the use of the contract structure has the highest importance level among other parameters. </em></pre>

scholarly journals Selection of the Best Lecturer in Management Forum Indonesia Chapter DKI Jakarta with Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Method

Webology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (Special Issue 04) ◽  
pp. 619-625
Author(s):  
Faroman Syarief ◽  
Rustam Effendi ◽  
Amrillah Azrin ◽  
Imam Suroso ◽  
Dhian Tyas Untari
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Community Service ◽  
Analytical Hierarchy Process ◽  
Scientific Development ◽  
Literature Study ◽  
Management Forum ◽  
Decision Making System ◽  
Hierarchy Process ◽  
Selection Of ◽  
Process Method

This study aims to be able to provide recommendations in the decision-making system related to the best lecturers at the Jakarta Chapter of the Indonesian Management Lecturer Forum. It is hoped that the research results can be used as input in the Best Lecturer decision making system with a more systematic system. This research was conducted through interviews, questionnaires and literature study related to the Lecturer profession. In the field, the assessment criteria are still rough, therefore this study must include all the criteria into the mechanism, rules, and codes. Analysis, each criterion is analyzed using the AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process) method in weighting. The cumulative results of the recapitulation of scores show that teaching is still a top priority in the implementation of the Tridaharma of Lecturers, after that the second priority is research, then community service and finally support in the form of participation in supporting activities and scientific development.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document