UNSTABLE ANGINA PECTORIS OR UNSTABLE CORONARY SYNDROMES?

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 944-977
Author(s):  
N.P. Mitkovskaya ◽  
◽  
O.V. Laskina ◽  
Patrick Teefy ◽  
◽  
...  

Unstable angina pectoris (UA) is a variant of acute coronary syndrome without ST segment elevation (NSTEACS), which is characterized by the absence of biochemical criteria for myocardial damage, a change in the clinical picture of angina pectoris (an increase in the functional class of angina pectoris, the appearance of resting angina and a high probability of transformation of the process into myocardial infarction (MI). UA and the developed MI without ST segment elevation (NSTEMI) are not accompanied by the appearance of a pathological Q wave and are characterized by a general complex pathogenesis associated with progressive atherosclerosis, a non-occlusive thrombus in the area of erosion or rupture of an atherosclerotic plaque, vasospasm, coronary microcirculatory dysfunction or other causes of imbalance between oxygen intake and oxygen consumption resulting in myocardial ischemia, and are distinguished by increased levels of myocardial necrosis in the blood in case of NSTEMI. It is difficult to differentiate UA and NSTEMI in the first hours of the development of the process when a decision is made on reperfusion technologies and drug therapy without laboratory, and in some cases, additional examination with visualization of the probable new loss of viable myocardium, therefore, the diagnosis and management of these two clinical conditions are usually considered in the same clinical recommendations. A fairly common point of view that the risk of death in UA is significantly lower and the patient is less in need of an intensive strategy than with verified NSTEMI, is controversial given the likely cases of sudden cardiac death of ischemic genesis at the prehospital stage and the difficulties of differential diagnosis of these clinical states. The factors contributing to diagnostic errors include severity of the patient's condition, a variety of clinical atypical manifestations and pathophysiological mechanisms of myocardial ischemia, the presence of comorbid pathology. The article discusses various mechanisms of the development of myocardial ischemia, diagnostic and therapeutic invasive and non-invasive technologies that improve the prognosis of patients with UA. The optimal management tactics of NSTEACS includes early diagnosis and risk stratification, emergency hospitalization, monitoring, the use of non-invasive and invasive strategies, including coronary angiography and revascularization, as well as emergency and long-term treatment aimed at preventing acute cardiovascular events taking into account the age, gender differences and comorbid pathology. A differentiated approach to the administration of emergency therapy is the key to improving the prognosis of this high-risk category of patients. Due to the lack of the possibility of using revascularizing technologies in patients with obstructive coronary disease, non-pharmacological technologies that positively affect microcirculation processes are likely to be used: exposure of the patient’s blood to an alternating magnetic field (extracorporeal autohemomagnetotherapy) or to ultraviolet optical radiation (ultraviolet blood modification). In view of the difficulty in identifying the mechanism of myocardial ischemia in each individual patient with UA and a high likelihood of combination of various pathophysiological factors, myocardium rescue should be in the focus of therapeutic intervention, which dictates the validity and utility of all the recommended and available methods of pharmacological and non-pharmacological therapy and revascularization to reduce the effects of myocardial ischemia.

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (8) ◽  
pp. 682-688
Author(s):  
Enna Berkah Sari ◽  
Nizam Zikri Akbar ◽  
Herman Hariman

Background: Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) is a major cardiovascular problem because it causes high hospital admissions and mortality rates. Acute Coronary Syndrome is divided into 3 (three), namely: unstable angina pectoris (UAP), myocardial infarction without ST segment elevation (NSTEMI), and myocardial infarction with ST segment elevation (STEMI). In addition to changes in biomarkers of heart injury, the platelet index (IPF = immature platelet fraction) will also change the level difference between STEMI with NSTEMI/UAP. Objective: To determine the differences in IPF levels of ACS patients with STEMI and NSTEMI/UAP Method: Observational analytic with cross sectional approach. The subjects of this study were 80 patients who came to the emergency installation of integrated heart center Emergency Room Haji Adam Malik Hospital Medan from May 2019 to September 2019 and was diagnosed with ACS (STEMI or NSTEMI/UAP). The sample in the study was the patient's venous blood and put it in an EDTA tube, then immediately checked the IPF value/level using the automatic hematology analyzer. Patients with heart failure or patients with thrombocytopenia were not included in this study. Results: In this study, the demographic characteristics of the ACS patients based on gender were male 77.5% STEMI and 87.5% NSTEMI/UAP while women 22.5% STEMI and 12.5% ​​NSTEMI/UAP. The results of the STEMI patient's IPF levels Compared with NSTEMI/UAP, the median is 6.2 (3.5-16.8) VS 2.9 (0.7-12) with a p-value of 0.0001. Conclusion: The characteristics of ACS patients based on the results of sex were that there were more men with NSTEMI/UAP than those with STEMI. There was a significant difference in the IPF levels of STEMI with NSTEMI/UAP. Keywords: Immature Platelet Fraction (IPF), Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS), ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI), Non ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (NSTEMI), Unstable Angina Pectoris (UAP).


2005 ◽  
Vol 83 (1) ◽  
pp. 98-103 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shamir R Mehta ◽  
John W Eikelboom ◽  
Catherine Demers ◽  
Aldo P Maggioni ◽  
Patrick J Commerford ◽  
...  

There are limited data regarding the incidence and clinical significance of congestive heart failure (CHF) in patients with non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (ACS). The objectives of this study were to examine the incidence, predictors, and clinical outcomes in patients with ACS without ST elevation who develop CHF. We studied patients with unstable angina or non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) randomized to hirudin or unfractionated heparin in the Organisation to Assess Strategies for Ischemic Syndromes (OASIS-2) trial. The diagnosis of CHF was based on a combination of clinical and radiographic features. Patients were followed for 6 months. Of 10 141 randomized patients, 501 (4.9%) developed CHF within the first week and 643 (6.3%) during 6 months of followup. Independent predictors for the development of CHF were older age, female sex, diabetes, prior MI, prior CHF, and NSTEMI at presentation. Compared with patients who did not develop CHF, patients who developed CHF were at increased risk of death (odds ratio (OR) 3.4, 95% CI 2.7–4.3), new MI (OR 2.8, 95% CI 2.2–3.6), and the need for intra-aortic balloon pump insertion (OR 5.4, 95% CI 3.5–8.4) at 7 days and 6 months. There was no increase in use of cardiac catheterization (OR 0.8, 95% CI 0.7–1.0) or revascularization (OR 0.9, 95% CI 0.7–1.1) in patients who developed CHF. CHF is a common complication in patients presenting with non-ST segment elevation ACS and is strongly associated with adverse clinical outcomes including new MI and death. Despite this worse prognosis, patients with ACS developing CHF are less likely to be referred for invasive management.Key words: unstable angina, acute coronary syndrome, congestive heart failure, prognosis.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document