scholarly journals Detection of a climatological short break in the polar night jet in early winter and its relation to cooling over Siberia

2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (17) ◽  
pp. 12639-12661 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuta Ando ◽  
Koji Yamazaki ◽  
Yoshihiro Tachibana ◽  
Masayo Ogi ◽  
Jinro Ukita
Keyword(s):  
Lower Stratosphere ◽  
Heat Capacities ◽  
Planetary Waves ◽  
Early Winter ◽  
Polar Night ◽  
Dynamical Balance ◽  
Seasonal March

Abstract. The polar night jet (PNJ) is a strong stratospheric westerly circumpolar wind at around 65∘ N in winter, and the strength of the climatological PNJ is widely recognized to increase from October through late December. Remarkably, the climatological PNJ temporarily stops increasing during late November. We examined this “short break” in terms of the atmospheric dynamical balance and the climatological seasonal march. We found that it results from an increase in the upward propagation of climatological planetary waves from the troposphere to the stratosphere in late November, which coincides with a maximum of the climatological Eliassen–Palm (EP) flux convergence in the lower stratosphere. The upward propagation of planetary waves at 100 hPa, which is strongest over Siberia, is related to the climatological strengthening of the tropospheric trough over Siberia. We suggest that longitudinally asymmetric forcing by land–sea heating contrasts caused by their different heat capacities can account for the strengthening of the trough.

scholarly journals Detection of a climatological short break in the Polar Night Jet in early winter and its relation to cooling over Siberia

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuta Ando ◽  
Koji Yamazaki ◽  
Yoshihiro Tachibana ◽  
Masayo Ogi ◽  
Jinro Ukita
Keyword(s):  
Lower Stratosphere ◽  
Heat Capacities ◽  
Planetary Waves ◽  
Early Winter ◽  
Polar Night ◽  
Dynamical Balance

Abstract. The Polar Night Jet (PNJ) is a strong stratospheric westerly circumpolar wind at around 65° N in winter, and the strength of the climatological PNJ is widely recognized to increase monotonically from October through late December. Remarkably, the climatological PNJ temporarily stops increasing during late November. We examined this short break in terms of the atmospheric dynamical balance and found that it results from an increase in the upward propagation of climatological planetary waves from the troposphere to the stratosphere in late November, which coincides with a maximum of the climatological Eliassen–Palm flux convergence in the lower stratosphere. The upward propagation of planetary waves at 100 hPa, which is strongest over Siberia, is related to the climatological strengthening of the tropospheric trough over Siberia. We suggest that longitudinally asymmetric forcing by land–sea heating contrasts caused by their different heat capacities can account for the strengthening of the trough.

scholarly journals Influence of Early Winter Upward Wave Activity Flux on Midwinter Circulation in the Stratosphere and Troposphere

2004 ◽  
Vol 17 (22) ◽  
pp. 4443-4452 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexei Karpetchko ◽  
Grigory Nikulin
Keyword(s):  
Heat Flux ◽  
Reanalysis Data ◽  
Wave Activity ◽  
Heat Fluxes ◽  
Early Winter ◽  
Polar Night ◽  
Wave Refraction ◽  
Eddy Heat Flux ◽  
Wave Flux

Abstract Using NCEP–NCAR reanalysis data the authors show that the November–December averaged stratospheric eddy heat flux is strongly anticorrelated with the January–February averaged eddy heat flux in the midlatitude stratosphere and troposphere. This finding further emphasizes differences between early and midwinter stratospheric wave flux behavior, which has recently been found in long-term variations. Analysis suggests that the intraseasonal anticorrelation of stratospheric heat fluxes results from changes in the upward wave propagation in the troposphere. Stronger (weaker) upward wave fluxes in early winter lead to weaker (stronger) upward wave fluxes from the troposphere during midwinter. Also, enhanced equatorward wave refraction during midwinter (due to the stronger polar night jet) is associated with weak heat flux in the early winter. It is suggested that the effect of enhanced midwinter upward wave flux from the troposphere in the years with weak early winter heat flux overcompensates the effect of increased equatorward wave refraction in midwinter, leading to a net increase of midwinter upward wave fluxes into the stratosphere.

scholarly journals Polar processing in a split vortex: early winter Arctic ozone loss in 2012/13

2015 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 4973-5029 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. L. Manney ◽  
Z. D. Lawrence ◽  
M. L. Santee ◽  
N. J. Livesey ◽  
A. Lambert ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nitric Acid ◽  
Lower Stratosphere ◽  
Polar Vortex ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Early Winter ◽  
Sudden Stratospheric Warming ◽  
Ozone Loss ◽  
Chlorine Monoxide ◽  
Polar Stratospheric Cloud ◽  
Vortex Split

Abstract. A sudden stratospheric warming (SSW) in early January 2013 caused the polar vortex to split. After the lower stratospheric vortex split on 8 January, the two offspring vortices – one over Canada and the other over Siberia – remained intact, well-confined, and largely at latitudes that received sunlight until they reunited at the end of January. As the SSW began, temperatures abruptly rose above chlorine activation thresholds throughout the lower stratosphere. The vortex was very disturbed prior to the SSW, and was exposed to much more sunlight than usual in December 2012 and January 2013. Aura Microwave Limb Sounder (MLS) nitric acid (HNO3) data and observations from CALIPSO (Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observations) indicate extensive polar stratospheric cloud (PSC) activity, with evidence of PSCs containing solid nitric acid trihydrate particles during much of December 2012. Consistent with the sunlight exposure and PSC activity, MLS observations show that chlorine monoxide (ClO) became enhanced early in December. Despite the cessation of PSC activity with the onset of the SSW, enhanced vortex ClO persisted until mid-February, indicating lingering chlorine activation. The smaller Canadian offspring vortex had lower temperatures, lower HNO3, lower hydrogen chloride (HCl), and higher ClO in late January than the Siberian vortex. Chlorine deactivation began later in the Canadian than in the Siberian vortex. HNO3 remained depressed within the vortices after temperatures rose above the PSC existence threshold, and passive transport calculations indicate vortex-averaged denitrification of about 4 ppbv; the resulting low HNO3 values persisted until the vortex dissipated in mid-February. Consistent with the strong chlorine activation and exposure to sunlight, MLS measurements show rapid ozone loss commencing in mid-December and continuing through January. Lagrangian transport estimates suggest ~ 0.7–0.8 ppmv (parts per million by volume) vortex-averaged chemical ozone loss by late January near 500 K (~ 21 km), with substantial loss occurring from ~ 450 to 550 K. The surface area of PSCs in December 2012 was larger than that in any other December observed by CALIPSO. As a result of denitrification, HNO3 abundances in 2012/13 were among the lowest in the MLS record for the Arctic. ClO enhancement was much greater in December 2012 through mid-January 2013 than that at the corresponding time in any other Arctic winter observed by MLS. Furthermore, reformation of HCl appeared to play a greater role in chlorine deactivation than in more typical Arctic winters. Ozone loss in December 2012 and January 2013 was larger than any previously observed in those months. This pattern of exceptional early winter polar processing and ozone loss resulted from the unique combination of dynamical conditions associated with the early January 2013 SSW, namely unusually low temperatures in December 2012 and offspring vortices that remained well-confined and largely in sunlit regions for about a month after the vortex split.

Manifestation of the Pacific Decadal Oscillation in the stationary planetary waves activity

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daria Sobaeva ◽  
Yulia Zyulyaeva ◽  
Sergey Gulev
Keyword(s):  
Pacific Decadal Oscillation ◽  
North American ◽  
Lower Stratosphere ◽  
El Nino ◽  
Planetary Waves ◽  
Positive Phase ◽  
Negative Phase ◽  
Middle Troposphere ◽  
The Pacific ◽  
The Tropics

<p>Strong quasi-decadal oscillations of the stratospheric polar vortex (SPV) intensity are in phase with the Pacific decadal oscillation (PDO). A stronger SPV is observed during the positive phase of the PDO, and during the negative phase, the intensity of the SPV is below the mean climate values. The SPV intensity anomalies, formed by the planetary waves and zonal mean flow interaction, lead to the weakening/intensification of the vortex.</p><p>This research aimed to obtain the differences in the characteristics and the spatial propagation pattern of the planetary waves in the middle troposphere and lower stratosphere during different PDO phases. We analyzed composite periods of years when the PDO index has extremely high and low values. Two periods were constructed for both positive and negative phases, the first consisting of years with El-Nino/La-Nina events and the second without prominent sea surface temperature anomalies in the tropics. </p><p>During the wintertime in the Northern Hemisphere (December-February), wave 2 with two ridges (Siberian and North American Highs) and two troughs (Icelandic and Aleutian Lows) dominates in the middle troposphere, along with wave 1 dominating in the lower stratosphere. In the middle troposphere, at the positive phase ​​of the PDO, the amplitude of wave 2 is higher than in years with negative values of the PDO index. The differences in the Aleutian Low and the North American High intensity between the two phases are significant at the 97.5% level. In the lower stratosphere, the wave amplitude is lower at the negative phase ​​of the PDO, but we can also talk about a slight shift of the wave phase to the east. The regions of the heavy rains in the tropics during El-Nino events are the planetary waves source. They propagate from low to high latitudes, which results in modifying the characteristics and locations of the intensification of the stationary planetary waves in mid-latitudes.</p>

scholarly journals Anomalous quasi-stationary planetary waves over the Antarctic region in 1988 and 2002

2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. 1101-1108 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. V. Grytsai ◽  
O. M. Evtushevsky ◽  
G. P. Milinevsky
Keyword(s):  
Lower Stratosphere ◽  
Polar Vortex ◽  
Amplitude Distribution ◽  
Stationary Wave ◽  
Planetary Waves ◽  
Late Winter ◽  
Stratospheric Polar Vortex ◽  
Latitudinal Position ◽  
The Antarctic ◽  
Peak Value

Abstract. Anomalies in the Antarctic total ozone and amplitudes of the quasi-stationary planetary waves in the lower stratosphere temperature during the winter and spring of 1988 and 2002 have been compared. Westward displacement of the quasi-stationary wave (QSW) extremes by 50°–70° relative to the preceding years of the strong stratospheric polar vortex in 1987 and 2001, respectively, was observed. A dependence of the quasi-stationary wave ridge and trough positions on the strength of the westerly zonal wind in the lower stratosphere is shown. Comparison of the QSW amplitude in the lower stratosphere temperature in July and August shows that the amplitude distribution with latitude in August could be considered as a possible indication of the future anomalous warming in Antarctic spring. In August 2002, the QSW amplitude of 10 K at the edge region of the polar vortex (60° S–65° S) preceded the major warming in September, whereas in August 1988, the highest 7 K amplitude at 55° S preceded the large warming in the next months. These results suggest that the peak value of the lower stratosphere temperature QSW amplitude and the peak latitudinal position in late winter can influence the southern polar vortex strength in spring.

scholarly journals Climatic variability of the mean flow and stationary planetary waves in the NCEP/NCAR reanalysis data

2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. 1233-1241 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Yu. Kanukhina ◽  
E. V. Suvorova ◽  
L. A. Nechaeva ◽  
E. K. Skrygina ◽  
A. I. Pogoreltsev
Keyword(s):  
Lower Stratosphere ◽  
Climatic Variability ◽  
Reanalysis Data ◽  
Planetary Waves ◽  
Lower Atmosphere ◽  
Wave Number ◽  
Mean Flow ◽  
The Mean ◽  
The 1960S ◽  
Environmental Prediction

Abstract. NCEP/NCAR (National Center for Environmental Prediction – National Center for Atmospheric Research) data have been used to estimate the long-term variability of the mean flow, temperature, and Stationary Planetary Waves (SPW) in the troposphere and lower stratosphere. The results obtained show noticeable climatic variabilities in the intensity and position of the tropospheric jets that are caused by temperature changes in the lower atmosphere. As a result, we can expect that this variability of the mean flow will cause the changes in the SPW propagation conditions. The simulation of the SPW with zonal wave number m=1 (SPW1), performed with a linearized model using the mean flow distributions typical for the 1960s and for the beginning of 21st century, supports this assumption and shows that during the last 40 years the amplitude of the SPW1 in the stratosphere and mesosphere increased substantially. The analysis of the SPW amplitudes extracted from the geopotential height and zonal wind NCEP/NCAR data supports the results of simulation and shows that during the last years there exists an increase in the SPW1 activity in the lower stratosphere. These changes in the amplitudes are accompanied by increased interannual variability of the SPW1, as well. Analysis of the SPW2 activity shows that changes in its amplitude have a different sign in the northern winter hemisphere and at low latitudes in the southern summer hemisphere. The value of the SPW2 variability differs latitudinally and can be explained by nonlinear interference of the primary wave propagation from below and from secondary SPW2.

scholarly journals Does the coupling of the mesospheric semiannual oscillation with the quasi-biennial oscillation provide predictability of Antarctic sudden stratospheric warmings?

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Viktoria J. Nordström ◽  
Annika Seppälä
Keyword(s):  
Lower Stratosphere ◽  
Reanalysis Data ◽  
Stratospheric Warming ◽  
Early Winter ◽  
Sudden Stratospheric Warming ◽  
Quasi Biennial Oscillation ◽  
Westerly Winds ◽  
Low Latitudes ◽  
Biennial Oscillation ◽  
Semiannual Oscillation

Abstract. During September 2019 there was a sudden stratospheric warming over Antarctica, which brought disruption to the usually stable winter vortex. The mesospheric winds reversed and temperatures in the stratosphere rose by over 50 K. Whilst this was only the second SSW in the Southern Hemisphere (SH), the other having occurred in 2002, its Northern counterpart experiences about six per decade. Currently, an amplification of atmospheric waves during winter is thought to trigger SSWs. However, our understanding remains incomplete, especially in regards to its occurrence in the SH. Here, we investigate the interaction of two equatorial atmospheric modes, the Quasi Biennial Oscillation (QBO) and the Semiannual Oscillation (SAO) during the SH winters of 2019 and 2002. Using MERRA-2 reanalysis data we find that the two modes interact at low latitudes during their easterly phases in the early winter, forming a zero wind line that stretches from the lower stratosphere into the mesosphere. This influences the meridional wave guide, resulting in easterly momentum being deposited in the mesosphere throughout the polar winter, reducing the magnitude of the westerly winds. As the winter progresses these features descend into the stratosphere, until SSW conditions are reached. We find similar behaviour in two other years leading to delayed dynamical disruptions later in the spring. The timing and magnitude of the SAO and the extent of the upper stratospheric easterly QBO signal, that results in the SAO-QBO interaction, was found to be unique in these years, when compared to the years with a similar QBO phase. We propose that this early winter behaviour may be a key physical process in decelerating the mesospheric winds which may precondition the Southern atmosphere for a SSW. Thus the early winter equatorial upper stratosphere-mesosphere together with the polar mesosphere may provide critical early clues to an imminent SH SSW.

scholarly journals Interannual Variation of Upper Stratospheric Ozone in the Northern Midlatitudes in Early Winter Caused by Planetary Waves

2019 ◽  
Vol 124 (24) ◽  
pp. 14347-14361
Author(s):  
H. Ohyama ◽  
T. Sugita ◽  
H. Akiyoshi ◽  
T. Nagahama ◽  
A. Mizuno
Keyword(s):  
Interannual Variation ◽  
Stratospheric Ozone ◽  
Planetary Waves ◽  
Early Winter

SAO-QBO Coupling before the 2019 and 2002 Southern Sudden Stratospheric Warmings

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Viktoria Nordström ◽  
Annika Seppälä
Keyword(s):  
Lower Stratosphere ◽  
Reanalysis Data ◽  
Stratospheric Warming ◽  
Early Winter ◽  
Sudden Stratospheric Warming ◽  
Quasi Biennial Oscillation ◽  
Westerly Winds ◽  
Low Latitudes ◽  
Biennial Oscillation ◽  
Semiannual Oscillation

<p>During September 2019 there was a sudden stratospheric warming over Antarctica, which brought disruption to the usually stable winter vortex. The mesospheric winds reversed and temperatures in the stratosphere rose by over 50~K. Whilst this was only the second SSW in the Southern Hemisphere (SH), the other having occurred in 2002, its Northern counterpart experiences about six per decade. Currently, an amplification of atmospheric waves during winter is thought to trigger SSWs. Our understanding, however, remains incomplete, especially with regards to its occurrence in the SH. Here, we investigate the interaction of two equatorial atmospheric modes, the Quasi Biennial Oscillation (QBO) and the Semiannual Oscillation (SAO) during the SH winters of 2019 and 2002. Using MERRA-2 reanalysis data we find that the two modes interact at low latitudes during their easterly phases in the early winter, forming a zero wind line that stretches from the lower stratosphere into the mesosphere. This influences the meridional wave guide, resulting in easterly momentum being deposited in the mesosphere throughout the polar winter, reducing the magnitude of the westerly winds. As the winter progresses these features descend into the stratosphere, until SSW conditions are reached. We find similar behaviour in two other years leading to delayed dynamical disruptions later in the spring. The timing and magnitude of the SAO and the extent of the upper stratospheric easterly QBO signal, that results in the SAO-QBO interaction, was found to be unique in these years, when compared to the years with a similar QBO phase. We propose that this early winter behaviour may be a key physical process in decelerating the mesospheric winds which may precondition the Southern atmosphere for a SSW. Thus the early winter equatorial upper stratosphere-mesosphere together with the polar mesosphere may provide critical early clues to an imminent SH SSW.</p>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document