scholarly journals Validation of aerosol backscatter profiles from Raman lidar and ceilometer using balloon-borne measurements

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simone Brunamonti ◽  
Giovanni Martucci ◽  
Gonzague Romanens ◽  
Yann Poltera ◽  
Frank G. Wienhold ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
In Situ Measurements ◽  
Spatial And Temporal Variability ◽  
Free Troposphere ◽  
Raman Lidar ◽  
Backscatter Coefficient ◽  
Custom Made ◽  
Standard Deviations ◽  
Aerosol Backscatter ◽  
Good Agreement

Abstract. Remote sensing measurements by light detection and ranging (lidar) instruments are fundamental for the monitoring of altitude-resolved aerosol optical properties. Here, we validate vertical profiles of aerosol backscatter coefficient (βaer) measured by two independent lidar systems using co-located balloon-borne measurements performed by Compact Optical Backscatter Aerosol Detector (COBALD) sondes. COBALD provides high-precision in-situ measurements of βaer at two wavelengths (455 and 940 nm). The two analyzed lidar systems are the research Raman Lidar for Meteorological Observations (RALMO) and the commercial CHM15K ceilometer (Lufft, Germany). We consider in total 17 RALMO and 31 CHM15K profiles, co-located with simultaneous COBALD soundings performed throughout the years 2014–2019 at the MeteoSwiss observatory of Payerne (Switzerland). The RALMO (355 nm) and CHM15K (1064 nm) measurements are converted to respectively 455 nm and 940 nm using the Angstrom exponent profiles retrieved from COBALD data. To account for the different receiver field of view (FOV) angles between the two lidars (0.01–0.02°) and COBALD (6°), we derive a custom-made correction using Mie-theory scattering simulations. Our analysis shows that both RALMO and CHM15K achieve a good agreement with COBALD measurements in the boundary layer and free troposphere, up to 6 km altitude, and including fine structures in the aerosol’s vertical distribution. For altitudes below 2 km, the mean ± standard deviation difference in βaer is + 6 % ± 40 % (+ 0.005 ± 0.319 Mm−1 sr−1) for RALMO – COBALD at 455 nm, and + 13 % ± 51 % (+ 0.038 ± 0.207 Mm−1 sr−1) for CHM15K – COBALD at 940 nm. The large standard deviations can be at least partly attributed to atmospheric variability effects, associated with the balloon’s horizontal drift with altitude (away from the lidar beam) and the different integration times of the two techniques. Combined with the high spatial and temporal variability of atmospheric aerosols, these effects often lead to a slight altitude displacement between aerosol backscatter features that are seen by both techniques. For altitudes between 2–6 km, the absolute standard deviations of both RALMO and CHM15K decrease (below 0.13 and 0.16 Mm−1sr−1, respectively), while their corresponding relative deviations increase (often exceeding 100 % COBALD of the signal). This is due to the low aerosol content (i.e. low absolute backscattered signal) in the free troposphere, and the vertically decreasing signal-to-noise ratio of the lidar measurements (especially CHM15K). Overall, we conclude that the βaer profiles measured by the RALMO and CHM15K lidar systems are in good agreement with in-situ measurements by COBALD sondes up to 6 km altitude.

scholarly journals Validation of aerosol backscatter profiles from Raman lidar and ceilometer using balloon-borne measurements

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 2267-2285
Author(s):  
Simone Brunamonti ◽  
Giovanni Martucci ◽  
Gonzague Romanens ◽  
Yann Poltera ◽  
Frank G. Wienhold ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Remote Sensing ◽  
In Situ Measurements ◽  
Aerosol Size Distribution ◽  
Spatial And Temporal Variability ◽  
Raman Lidar ◽  
Backscatter Coefficient ◽  
Custom Made ◽  
Aerosol Backscatter ◽  
Good Agreement

Abstract. Remote-sensing measurements by light detection and ranging (lidar) instruments are fundamental for the monitoring of altitude-resolved aerosol optical properties. Here we validate vertical profiles of aerosol backscatter coefficient (βaer) measured by two independent lidar systems using co-located balloon-borne measurements performed by Compact Optical Backscatter Aerosol Detector (COBALD) sondes. COBALD provides high-precision in situ measurements of βaer at two wavelengths (455 and 940 nm). The two analyzed lidar systems are the research Raman Lidar for Meteorological Observations (RALMO) and the commercial CHM15K ceilometer (Lufft, Germany). We consider in total 17 RALMO and 31 CHM15K profiles, co-located with simultaneous COBALD soundings performed throughout the years 2014–2019 at the MeteoSwiss observatory of Payerne (Switzerland). The RALMO (355 nm) and CHM15K (1064 nm) measurements are converted to 455 and 940 nm, respectively, using the Ångström exponent profiles retrieved from COBALD data. To account for the different receiver field-of-view (FOV) angles between the two lidars (0.01–0.02∘) and COBALD (6∘), we derive a custom-made correction using Mie-theory scattering simulations. Our analysis shows that both lidar instruments achieve on average a good agreement with COBALD measurements in the boundary layer and free troposphere, up to 6 km altitude. For medium-high-aerosol-content measurements at altitudes below 3 km, the mean ± standard deviation difference in βaer calculated from all considered soundings is −2 % ± 37 % (−0.018 ± 0.237 Mm−1 sr−1 at 455 nm) for RALMO−COBALD and +5 % ± 43 % (+0.009 ± 0.185 Mm−1 sr−1 at 940 mm) for CHM15K−COBALD. Above 3 km altitude, absolute deviations generally decrease, while relative deviations increase due to the prevalence of air masses with low aerosol content. Uncertainties related to the FOV correction and spatial- and temporal-variability effects (associated with the balloon's drift with altitude and different integration times) contribute to the large standard deviations observed at low altitudes. The lack of information on the aerosol size distribution and the high atmospheric variability prevent an accurate quantification of these effects. Nevertheless, the excellent agreement observed in individual profiles, including fine and complex structures in the βaer vertical distribution, shows that under optimal conditions, the discrepancies with the in situ measurements are typically comparable to the estimated statistical uncertainties in the remote-sensing measurements. Therefore, we conclude that βaer profiles measured by the RALMO and CHM15K lidar systems are in good agreement with in situ measurements by COBALD sondes up to 6 km altitude.

scholarly journals Multiscale observations of NH<sub>3</sub> around Toronto, Canada

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 905-921
Author(s):  
Shoma Yamanouchi ◽  
Camille Viatte ◽  
Kimberly Strong ◽  
Erik Lutsch ◽  
Dylan B. A. Jones ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Temporal Variability ◽  
Grid Point ◽  
Regional Scale ◽  
Model Performance ◽  
In Situ Measurements ◽  
Coefficient Of Determination ◽  
Spatial And Temporal Variability ◽  
Predictive Capacity ◽  
Total Column

Abstract. Ammonia (NH3) is a major source of nitrates in the atmosphere and a major source of fine particulate matter. As such, there have been increasing efforts to measure the atmospheric abundance of NH3 and its spatial and temporal variability. In this study, long-term measurements of NH3 derived from multiscale datasets are examined. These NH3 datasets include 16 years of total column measurements using Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, 3 years of surface in situ measurements, and 10 years of total column measurements from the Infrared Atmospheric Sounding Interferometer (IASI). The datasets were used to quantify NH3 temporal variability over Toronto, Canada. The multiscale datasets were also compared to assess the representativeness of the FTIR measurements. All three time series showed positive trends in NH3 over Toronto: 3.34 ± 0.89 %/yr from 2002 to 2018 in the FTIR columns, 8.88 ± 5.08 %/yr from 2013 to 2017 in the surface in situ data, and 8.38 ± 1.54 %/yr from 2008 to 2018 in the IASI columns. To assess the representative scale of the FTIR NH3 columns, correlations between the datasets were examined. The best correlation between FTIR and IASI was obtained with coincidence criteria of ≤25 km and ≤20 min, with r=0.73 and a slope of 1.14 ± 0.06. Additionally, FTIR column and in situ measurements were standardized and correlated. Comparison of 24 d averages and monthly averages resulted in correlation coefficients of r=0.72 and r=0.75, respectively, although correlation without averaging to reduce high-frequency variability led to a poorer correlation, with r=0.39. The GEOS-Chem model, run at 2∘ × 2.5∘ resolution, was compared to FTIR and IASI to assess model performance and investigate the correlation of observational data and model output, both with local column measurements (FTIR) and measurements on a regional scale (IASI). Comparisons on a regional scale (a domain spanning 35 to 53∘ N and 93.75 to 63.75∘ W) resulted in r=0.57 and thus a coefficient of determination, which is indicative of the predictive capacity of the model, of r2=0.33, but comparing a single model grid point against the FTIR resulted in a poorer correlation, with r2=0.13, indicating that a finer spatial resolution is needed for modeling NH3.

Two months of measurements with an autonomous thermodynamic Raman lidar in Lindenberg

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diego Lange Vega ◽  
Andreas Behrendt ◽  
Volker Wulfmeyer
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Water Vapor ◽  
Inversion Layer ◽  
Measurement Range ◽  
High Accuracy ◽  
Free Troposphere ◽  
Raman Lidar ◽  
Backscatter Coefficient ◽  
Geophysical Research ◽  
Turbulence Scale

&lt;p&gt;Between 15 July 2020 and 19 September 2021, the Atmospheric Raman Temperature and Humidity Sounder (ARTHUS) collected data at the Lindenberg Observatory of the Deutscher Wetterdienst (DWD), including temperature and water vapor mixing ratio with a high temporal and range resolution.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;During the operation period, very stable 24/7 operation was achieved, and ARTHUS demonstrated that is capable to observe the atmospheric boundary layer and lower free troposphere during both daytime and nighttime up to the turbulence scale, with high accuracy and precision, and very short latency. During nighttime, the measurement range increases even up to the tropopause and lower stratosphere.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;ARTHUS measurements resolve the strength of the inversion layer at the planetary boundary layer top, elevated lids in the free troposphere, and turbulent fluctuations in water vapor and temperature, simultaneously (Lange et al., 2019, Wulfmeyer et al., 2015). In addition to thermodynamic variables, ARTHUS provides also independent profiles of the particle backscatter coefficient and the particle extinction coefficient from the rotational Raman signals at 355 nm with much better resolution than a conventional vibrational Raman lidar.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;At the conference, highlights of the measurements will be presented. Furthermore, the statistics of more than 150 comparisons with local radiosondes will be presented which confirm the high accuracy of the temperature and moisture measurements of ARTHUS.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;Acknowledgements&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The development of ARTHUS was supported by the Helmholtz Association of German Research Centers within the project Modular Observation Solutions for Earth Systems (MOSES). The measurements in Lindenberg were funded by DWD.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;References &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Lange, D., Behrendt, A., and Wulfmeyer, V. (2019). Compact operational tropospheric water vapor and temperature Raman lidar with turbulence resolution. &lt;em&gt;Geophysical Research Letters&lt;/em&gt;, 46. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL085774&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Wulfmeyer, V., R. M. Hardesty, D. D. Turner, A. Behrendt, M. P. Cadeddu, P. Di Girolamo, P. Schl&amp;#252;ssel, J. Van Baelen, and F. Zus (2015), A review of the remote sensing of lower tropospheric thermodynamic profiles and its indispensable role for the understanding and the simulation of water and energy cycles, &lt;em&gt;Rev. Geophys.&lt;/em&gt;, 53,819&amp;#8211;895, doi:10.1002/2014RG000476&lt;/p&gt;

scholarly journals EARLINET evaluation of the CATS L2 aerosol backscatter coefficient product

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emmanouil Proestakis ◽  
Vassilis Amiridis ◽  
Eleni Marinou ◽  
Ioannis Binietoglou ◽  
Albert Ansmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Space Station ◽  
Backscatter Coefficient ◽  
Backscatter Signal ◽  
Evaluation Activity ◽  
Ground Station ◽  
Free Relative ◽  
Climate Studies ◽  
Aerosol Backscatter ◽  
Level 2 ◽  
Good Agreement

Abstract. We present the evaluation activity of the European Aerosol Research Lidar Network (EARLINET) for the quantitative assessment of the Level 2 aerosol backscatter coefficient product derived by the Cloud-Aerosol Transport System (CATS) onboard the International Space Station (ISS). The study employs correlative CATS and EARLINET backscatter measurements within 50 km distance between the ground station and the ISS overpass and as close in time as possible, typically within 90 min, from February 2015 to September 2016. The results demonstrate the good agreement of CATS Level 2 backscatter coefficient and EARLINET. Three ISS overpasses close to the EARLINET stations of Leipzig-Germany, Évora-Portugal and Dushanbe-Tajikistan are analysed here to demonstrate the performance of CATS lidar system under different conditions. The results show that under cloud-free, relative homogeneous aerosol conditions CATS is in good agreement with EARLINET, independently of daytime/nighttime conditions. CATS low negative biases, partially attributed to the deficiency of lidar systems to detect tenuous aerosol layers of backscatter signal below the minimum detection thresholds, may lead to systematic deviations and slight underestimations of the total Aerosol Optical Depth (AOD) in climate studies. In addition, CATS misclassification of aerosol layers as clouds, and vice versa, in cases of coexistent and/or adjacent aerosol and cloud features, may lead to non-representative, unrealistic and cloud contaminated aerosol profiles. The distributions of backscatter coefficient biases show the relatively good agreement between the CATS and EARLINET measurements, although on average underestimations are observed, 22.3 % during daytime and 6.1 % during nighttime.

scholarly journals Helicopter-borne observations of the continental background aerosol in combination with remote sensing and ground-based measurements

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sebastian Düsing ◽  
Birgit Wehner ◽  
Patric Seifert ◽  
Albert Ansmann ◽  
Holger Baars ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Optical Properties ◽  
Aerosol Particle ◽  
Extinction Coefficient ◽  
Cloud Condensation Nuclei ◽  
In Situ Measurements ◽  
Light Extinction ◽  
Backscatter Coefficient ◽  
Light Extinction Coefficient ◽  
Lidar Measurements

Abstract. This study presents vertical profiles up to a height of 2300 m a.s.l. of aerosol microphysical and optical properties and cloud condensation nuclei (CCN). Corresponding data have been measured during a field campaign as part of the High-Definition Clouds and Precipitation for Advancing Climate Prediction (HD(CP)2) Observational Prototype Experiments (HOPE), which took place at Melpitz, Germany from September 9 to 29, 2013. The helicopter-borne payload ACTOS (Airborne Cloud and Turbulence Observation System) was used to determine the aerosol particle number size distribution (PNSD), the number concentrations of aerosol particles (PNC) and cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) (CCN-NC), the ambient relative humidity (RH), and temperature (T). Simultaneous measurements on ground provided a holistic view on aerosol microphysical properties such as the PNSD, the chemical composition and the CCN-NC. Additional measurements of a 3 + 2 wavelength polarization lidar system (PollyXT) provided profiles of the aerosol particle light backscatter coefficient (σbsc) for three wavelengths (355, 532 and 1064 nm). From profiles of σbsc profiles of the aerosol particle light extinction coefficient (σext) were determined using the extinction-to-backscatter ratio. Furthermore, CCN-NC profiles were estimated on basis of the lidar-measurements. Ambient state optical properties of aerosol particles were derived on the basis of airborne in situ measurements of ACTOS (PNSD) and in situ measurements on ground (chemical aerosol characterization) using Mie-theory. On the basis of ground-based and airborne measurements, this work investigates the representativeness of ground-based aerosol microphysical properties for the boundary layer for two case-studies. The PNSD measurements on ground showed a good agreement with the measurements provided with ACTOS for lower altitudes. The ground-based measurements of PNC and CCN-NC are representative for the PBL when the PBL is well mixed. Locally isolated new particle formation events on ground or at the top of the PBL led to vertical variability in the here presented cases and ground-based measurements are not representative for the PBL. Furthermore, the lidar-based estimates of CCN-NC profiles were compared with the airborne in situ measurements of ACTOS. This comparison showed good agreements within the uncertainty range. Finally, this work provides a closure study between the optical aerosol particle properties in ambient state based on the airborne ACTOS measurements and derived with the lidar measurements. The investigation of the optical properties shows for 14 measurement-points that the airborne-based particle light backscatter coefficient is for 1064 nm 50 % smaller than the measurements of the lidar system, 27.6 % smaller for 532 nm and 29.9 % smaller for 355 nm. These results are quite promising, since in-situ measurement based Mie-calculations of the particle light backscattering are scarce and the modelling is quite challenging. In contradiction for the particle light extinction coefficient retrieved from the airborne in situ measurements were found a good agreement. The airborne-based particle light extinction coefficient was just 7.9 % larger for 532 nm and 3.5 % smaller for 355 nm, for an assumed lidar ratio (LR) of 55 sr. The particle light extinction coefficient for 1064 nm was derived with a LR of 30 sr. For this wavelength, the airborne-based particle light extinction coefficient is 5.2 % smaller than the lidar-measurements. Also, the correlation for the particle light extinction coefficient in combination with Mie-based LR's are in agreement for typical LR's of European background aerosol.

scholarly journals Towards continuous monitoring of aerosol hygroscopicity by Raman lidar measurements at the EARLINET station of Payerne

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francisco Navas Guzmán ◽  
Giovanni Martucci ◽  
Martine Collaud Coen ◽  
María José Granados Muñoz ◽  
Maxime Hervo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Continuous Monitoring ◽  
Raman Lidar ◽  
Backscatter Coefficient ◽  
Lidar System ◽  
Remote Sensing Technique ◽  
Accuracy And Precision ◽  
Lidar Measurements ◽  
Constant Altitude ◽  
Aerosol Backscatter ◽  
Aerosol Hygroscopicity

Abstract. This study focuses on the analysis of aerosol hygroscopicity using remote sensing technique. Continuous observations of aerosol backscatter coefficient, temperature and water vapour mixing ratio are performed by means of a Raman lidar system at the aerological station of MeteoSwiss at Payerne (Switzerland) since 2008. These measurements allow us to monitor in a continuous way any change of aerosol properties as a function of the relative humidity (RH). These changes can be observed either in time at constant altitude or in altitude at a constant time. The accuracy and precision of RH measurements from the lidar have been evaluated using the radiosonde (RS) technique as reference. A total of 172 RSs were used in this intercomparison which revealed a small bias (

scholarly journals Helicopter-borne observations of the continental background aerosol in combination with remote sensing and ground-based measurements

2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 1263-1290 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sebastian Düsing ◽  
Birgit Wehner ◽  
Patric Seifert ◽  
Albert Ansmann ◽  
Holger Baars ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aerosol Particle ◽  
Extinction Coefficient ◽  
In Situ Measurements ◽  
Light Extinction ◽  
Backscatter Coefficient ◽  
New Approach ◽  
Light Extinction Coefficient ◽  
Lidar Measurements ◽  
Lidar Ratio

Abstract. This paper examines the representativeness of ground-based in situ measurements for the planetary boundary layer (PBL) and conducts a closure study between airborne in situ and ground-based lidar measurements up to an altitude of 2300 m. The related measurements were carried out in a field campaign within the framework of the High-Definition Clouds and Precipitation for Advancing Climate Prediction (HD(CP)2) Observational Prototype Experiment (HOPE) in September 2013 in a rural background area of central Europe.The helicopter-borne probe ACTOS (Airborne Cloud and Turbulence Observation System) provided measurements of the aerosol particle number size distribution (PNSD), the aerosol particle number concentration (PNC), the number concentration of cloud condensation nuclei (CCN-NC), and meteorological atmospheric parameters (e.g., temperature and relative humidity). These measurements were supported by the ground-based 3+2 wavelength polarization lidar system PollyXT, which provided profiles of the particle backscatter coefficient (σbsc) for three wavelengths (355, 532, and 1064 nm). Particle extinction coefficient (σext) profiles were obtained by using a fixed backscatter-to-extinction ratio (also lidar ratio, LR). A new approach was used to determine profiles of CCN-NC for continental aerosol. The results of this new approach were consistent with the airborne in situ measurements within the uncertainties.In terms of representativeness, the PNSD measurements on the ground showed a good agreement with the measurements provided with ACTOS for lower altitudes. The ground-based measurements of PNC and CCN-NC are representative of the PBL when the PBL is well mixed. Locally isolated new particle formation events on the ground or at the top of the PBL led to vertical variability in the cases presented here and ground-based measurements are not entirely representative of the PBL. Based on Mie theory (Mie, 1908), optical aerosol properties under ambient conditions for different altitudes were determined using the airborne in situ measurements and were compared with the lidar measurements. The investigation of the optical properties shows that on average the airborne-based particle light backscatter coefficient is 50.1 % smaller for 1064 nm, 27.4 % smaller for 532 nm, and 29.5 % smaller for 355 nm than the measurements of the lidar system. These results are quite promising, since in situ measurement-based Mie calculations of the particle light backscattering are scarce and the modeling is quite challenging. In contrast, for the particle light extinction coefficient we found a good agreement. The airborne-based particle light extinction coefficient was just 8.2 % larger for 532 nm and 3 % smaller for 355 nm, for an assumed LR of 55 sr. The particle light extinction coefficient for 1064 nm was derived with a LR of 30 sr. For this wavelength, the airborne-based particle light extinction coefficient is 5.2 % smaller than the lidar measurements. For the first time, the lidar ratio of 30 sr for 1064 nm was determined on the basis of in situ measurements and the LR of 55 sr for 355 and 532 nm wavelength was reproduced for European continental aerosol on the basis of this comparison. Lidar observations and the in situ based aerosol optical properties agree within the uncertainties. However, our observations indicate that a determination of the PNSD for a large size range is important for a reliable modeling of aerosol particle backscattering.

scholarly journals Retrieval of aerosol complex refractive index from a synergy between lidar, sunphotometer and in situ measurements during LISAIR experiment

2007 ◽  
Vol 7 (11) ◽  
pp. 2797-2815 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.-C. Raut ◽  
P. Chazette
Keyword(s):  
Complex Refractive Index ◽  
Single Scattering ◽  
In Situ Measurements ◽  
Refractive Indices ◽  
Urban Aerosol ◽  
Remote Sensors ◽  
Radiative Impact ◽  
532 Nm ◽  
Good Agreement

Abstract. Particulate pollutant exchanges between the streets and the Planetary Boundary Layer (PBL), and their daily evolution linked to human activity were studied in the framework of the LIdar pour la Surveillance de l'AIR (LISAIR) experiment. This program lasted from 10 to 30 May 2005. A synergetic approach combining dedicated active (lidar) and passive (sunphotometer) remote sensors as well as ground based in situ instrumentation (nephelometer, aethalometer and particle sizers) was used to investigate urban aerosol optical properties within Paris. Aerosol complex refractive indices were assessed to be 1.56–0.034 i at 355 nm and 1.59–0.040 i at 532 nm, thus leading to single-scattering albedo values between 0.80 and 0.88. These retrievals are consistent with soot components in the aerosol arising from traffic exhausts indicating that these pollutants have a radiative impact on climate. We also discussed the influence of relative humidity on aerosol properties. A good agreement was found between vertical extinction profile derived from lidar backscattering signal and retrieved from the coupling between radiosounding and ground in situ measurements.

scholarly journals Comparisons of Satellite and Modeled Surface Temperature and Chlorophyll Concentrations in the Baltic Sea with In Situ Data

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (15) ◽  
pp. 3049
Author(s):  
Malgorzata Stramska ◽  
Marta Konik ◽  
Paulina Aniskiewicz ◽  
Jaromir Jakacki ◽  
Miroslaw Darecki
Keyword(s):  
Baltic Sea ◽  
Satellite Data ◽  
In Situ Measurements ◽  
Data Sets ◽  
The Baltic Sea ◽  
Data Set ◽  
In Situ Data ◽  
The Baltic ◽  
Good Agreement

Among the most frequently used satellite data are surface chlorophyll concentration (Chl) and temperature (SST). These data can be degraded in some coastal areas, for example, in the Baltic Sea. Other popular sources of data are reanalysis models. Before satellite or model data can be used effectively, they should be extensively compared with in situ measurements. Herein, we present results of such comparisons. We used SST and Chl from model reanalysis and satellites, and in situ data measured at eight open Baltic Sea stations. The data cover time interval from 1 January 1998 to 31 December 2019, but some satellite data were not always available. Both the model and the satellite SST data had good agreement with in situ measurements. In contrast, satellite and model estimates of Chl concentrations presented large errors. Modeled Chl presented the lowest bias and the best correlation with in situ data from all Chl data sets evaluated. Chl estimates from a regionally tuned algorithm (SatBaltic) had smaller errors in comparison with other satellite data sets and good agreement with in situ data in summer. Statistics were not as good for the full data set. High uncertainties found in chlorophyll satellite algorithms for the Baltic Sea highlight the importance of continuous regional validation of such algorithms with in situ data.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document