Two months of measurements with an autonomous thermodynamic Raman lidar in Lindenberg

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diego Lange Vega ◽  
Andreas Behrendt ◽  
Volker Wulfmeyer
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Water Vapor ◽  
Inversion Layer ◽  
Measurement Range ◽  
High Accuracy ◽  
Free Troposphere ◽  
Raman Lidar ◽  
Backscatter Coefficient ◽  
Geophysical Research ◽  
Turbulence Scale

<p>Between 15 July 2020 and 19 September 2021, the Atmospheric Raman Temperature and Humidity Sounder (ARTHUS) collected data at the Lindenberg Observatory of the Deutscher Wetterdienst (DWD), including temperature and water vapor mixing ratio with a high temporal and range resolution.</p> <p>During the operation period, very stable 24/7 operation was achieved, and ARTHUS demonstrated that is capable to observe the atmospheric boundary layer and lower free troposphere during both daytime and nighttime up to the turbulence scale, with high accuracy and precision, and very short latency. During nighttime, the measurement range increases even up to the tropopause and lower stratosphere.</p> <p>ARTHUS measurements resolve the strength of the inversion layer at the planetary boundary layer top, elevated lids in the free troposphere, and turbulent fluctuations in water vapor and temperature, simultaneously (Lange et al., 2019, Wulfmeyer et al., 2015). In addition to thermodynamic variables, ARTHUS provides also independent profiles of the particle backscatter coefficient and the particle extinction coefficient from the rotational Raman signals at 355 nm with much better resolution than a conventional vibrational Raman lidar.</p> <p>At the conference, highlights of the measurements will be presented. Furthermore, the statistics of more than 150 comparisons with local radiosondes will be presented which confirm the high accuracy of the temperature and moisture measurements of ARTHUS.</p> <p><strong><em>Acknowledgements</em></strong></p> <p>The development of ARTHUS was supported by the Helmholtz Association of German Research Centers within the project Modular Observation Solutions for Earth Systems (MOSES). The measurements in Lindenberg were funded by DWD.</p> <p><strong><em>References </em></strong></p> <p>Lange, D., Behrendt, A., and Wulfmeyer, V. (2019). Compact operational tropospheric water vapor and temperature Raman lidar with turbulence resolution. <em>Geophysical Research Letters</em>, 46. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL085774</p> <p>Wulfmeyer, V., R. M. Hardesty, D. D. Turner, A. Behrendt, M. P. Cadeddu, P. Di Girolamo, P. Schlüssel, J. Van Baelen, and F. Zus (2015), A review of the remote sensing of lower tropospheric thermodynamic profiles and its indispensable role for the understanding and the simulation of water and energy cycles, <em>Rev. Geophys.</em>, 53,819–895, doi:10.1002/2014RG000476</p>

scholarly journals Compact Operational Tropospheric Water Vapor and Temperature Raman Lidar  with Turbulence Resolution

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diego Lange ◽  
Andreas Behrendt ◽  
Volker Wulfmeyer
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Water Vapor ◽  
Data Assimilation ◽  
Inversion Layer ◽  
Lower Troposphere ◽  
Statistical Uncertainty ◽  
Temperature Profiles ◽  
Free Troposphere ◽  
Earth System ◽  
Raman Lidar

<p>We present the Atmospheric Raman Temperature and Humidity Sounder (ARTHUS), a new tool for observations in the atmospheric boundary layer and lower free troposphere during daytime and nighttime with very high resolution up to the turbulence scale, high accuracy and precision, and very short latency and illustrate its performance with new measurements examples. ARTHUS measurements resolve the strength of the inversion layer at the planetary boundary layer top, elevated lids in the free troposphere, and turbulent fluctuations in water vapor and temperature, simultaneously (Lange et al., 2019). In addition to thermodynamic variables, ARTHUS provides also independent profiles of the particle backscatter coefficient and the particle extinction coefficient from the rotational Raman signals at 355 nm with much better resolution than a conventional vibrational Raman lidar.</p><p>The observation of atmospheric moisture and temperature profiles is essential for the understanding and prediction of earth system processes. These are fundamental components of the global and regional energy and water cycles, they determine the radiative transfer through the atmosphere, and are critical for the cloud formation and precipitation (Wulfmeyer, 2015). Also, as confirmed by case studies, the assimilation of high-quality, lower tropospheric WV and T profiles results in a considerable improvement of the skill of weather forecast models particularly with respect to extreme events.</p><p>Very stable and reliable performance was demonstrated during more than 3000 hours of operation experiencing a huge variety of weather conditions, including seaborne operation during the EUREC4A campaign (Bony et al., 2017, Stevens et al., 2020). ARTHUS provides temperature profiles with resolutions of 10-60 s and 7.5-100 m vertically in the lower free troposphere. During daytime, the statistical uncertainty of the WV mixing ratio is <2 % in the lower troposphere for resolutions of 5 minutes and 100 m. Temperature statistical uncertainty is <0.5 K even up to the middle troposphere. Consequently, ARTHUS fulfills the stringent WMO breakthrough requirements on nowcasting and very short-range forecasting (see www. wmo‐sat.info/oscar/observingrequirements).</p><p>This performance serves very well the next generation of very fast rapid-update-cycle data assimilation systems. Ground-based stations and networks can be set up or extended for climate monitoring, verification of weather, climate and earth system models, data assimilation for improving weather forecasts.</p><p><strong>References:</strong></p><p>Bony et al., 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-017-9428-0</p><p>Lange et al., 2019, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL085774</p><p>Stevens et al. 2020, submitted to ESSD</p><p>Wulfmeyer et al., 2015, doi:10.1002/2014RG000476</p>

scholarly journals Vertical profile observations of water vapor deuterium excess in the lower troposphere

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olivia E. Salmon ◽  
Lisa R. Welp ◽  
Michael Baldwin ◽  
Kristian Hajny ◽  
Brian H. Stirm ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Water Vapor ◽  
Case Studies ◽  
Vertical Profile ◽  
Inversion Layer ◽  
Vertical Profiles ◽  
Free Troposphere ◽  
Deuterium Excess ◽  
Airborne Measurements

Abstract. We use H2Ov isotopic vertical profile measurements and complementary meteorological observations to examine how boundary layer, cloud, and mixing processes influence the vertical structure of deuterium-excess (d-excess = δD – 8 × δ18O) in the boundary layer, inversion layer, and lower free troposphere. Airborne measurements of water vapor (H2Ov) stable isotopologues were conducted around two continental U.S. cities in February–March 2016. Nine research flights were designed to characterize the δD, δ18O, and d-excess vertical profiles extending from the surface to ≤ 2 km. We examine observations from three unique case study flights in detail. One case study shows H2Ov isotopologue vertical profiles that are consistent with Rayleigh isotopic distillation theory coinciding with clear skies, dry adiabatic lapse rates within the boundary layer, and relatively constant vertical profiles of wind speed and wind direction. The two remaining case studies show that H2Ov isotopic signatures above the boundary layer are sensitive to cloud processes and complex air mass mixing patterns. These two case studies indicate anomalies in the d-excess signature relative to Rayleigh theory, such as low d-excess values at the interface of the inversion layer and the free troposphere, which is possibly indicative of cloud evaporation. We discuss possible explanations for the observed d-excess anomalies, such as cloud evaporation, wind shear, and vertical mixing. In situ H2Ov stable isotope measurements, and d-excess in particular, could be useful for improving our understanding of moisture processing and transport mixing occurring between the boundary layer, inversion layer, and free troposphere.

scholarly journals Compact Operational Tropospheric Water Vapor and Temperature Raman Lidar with Turbulence Resolution

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diego Lange Vega ◽  
Andreas Behrendt ◽  
Volker Wulfmeyer
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Water Vapor ◽  
Data Assimilation ◽  
Inversion Layer ◽  
Lower Troposphere ◽  
Weather Conditions ◽  
Statistical Uncertainty ◽  
Temperature Profiles ◽  
Free Troposphere ◽  
Earth System

<p>Here we present the new Atmospheric Raman Temperature and Humidity Sounder (ARTHUS), an exceptional tool for observations in the atmospheric boundary layer during daytime and nighttime with a very short latency. ARTHUS measurements resolve the strength of the inversion layer at the planetary boundary layer top, elevated lids in the free troposphere during daytime and nighttime, and turbulent fluctuations in water vapor and temperature, simultaneously, also during daytime.</p><p>The observation of atmospheric moisture and temperature profiles is essential for the understanding and prediction of earth system processes. These are fundamental components of the global and regional energy and water cycles, they determine the radiative transfer through the atmosphere, and are critical for the clouds formation and precipitation. Also, it is expected that the assimilation of high-quality, lower tropospheric WV and T profiles will result in a considerable improvement of the skill of weather forecast models particularly with respect to extreme events.</p><p>Very stable and reliable performance was demonstrably achieved during more than 2500 hours of operations time experiencing a huge variety of weather conditions. ARTHUS provides temperature profiles with resolutions of 10-60 s and 7.5-100 m vertically in the lower free troposphere. During daytime, the statistical uncertainty of the WV mixing ratio is <2 % in the lower troposphere for resolutions of 5 minutes and 100 m. Temperature statistical uncertainty is <0.5 K even up to the middle troposphere. ARTHUS fulfills the stringent WMO breakthrough requirements on nowcasting and very short-range forecasting.</p><p>This performance serves very well the next generation of very fast rapid-update-cycle data assimilation systems. Ground-based stations and networks can be set up or extended for climate monitoring, verification of weather, climate and earth system models, data assimilation for improving weather forecasts.</p>

scholarly journals Vertical profile observations of water vapor deuterium excess in the lower troposphere

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (17) ◽  
pp. 11525-11543 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olivia E. Salmon ◽  
Lisa R. Welp ◽  
Michael E. Baldwin ◽  
Kristian D. Hajny ◽  
Brian H. Stirm ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Water Vapor ◽  
Inversion Layer ◽  
Lower Troposphere ◽  
Phase Changes ◽  
Vertical Profiles ◽  
Free Troposphere ◽  
Deuterium Excess ◽  
Airborne Measurements

Abstract. We use airborne measurements of water vapor (H2Ov) stable isotopologues and complementary meteorological observations to examine how boundary layer (BL) dynamics, cloud processing, and atmospheric mixing influence the vertical structure of δD, δ18O, and deuterium excess (d excess =δD–8×δ18O) in the BL, inversion layer (INV), and lower free troposphere (FT). Flights were conducted around two continental US cities in February–March 2016 and included vertical profiles extending from near the surface to ≤2 km. We examine observations from three unique case study flights in detail. One case study shows observations that are consistent with Rayleigh isotopic distillation theory coinciding with clear skies, dry adiabatic lapse rates within the boundary layer, and relatively constant vertical profiles of wind speed and wind direction. This suggests that the air mass retained the isotopic fingerprint of dehydration during moist adiabatic processes upwind of the study area. Also, observed d-excess values in the free troposphere were sometimes larger than Rayleigh theory predicts, which may indicate mixing of extremely dehydrated air from higher altitudes. The two remaining case studies show isotopic anomalies in the d-excess signature relative to Rayleigh theory and indicate cloud processes and complex boundary layer development. The most notable case study with stratocumulus clouds present had extremely low (negative) d-excess values at the interface of the inversion layer and the free troposphere, which is possibly indicative of cloud or rain droplet evaporation. We discuss how in situ H2Ov stable isotope measurements, and d excess in particular, could be useful for improving our understanding of water phase changes, transport, and mixing that occurs between the BL, INV, and FT.

scholarly journals A Lidar at Clermont-Ferrand—France to describe the boundary layer dynamics, aerosols, cirrus and tropospheric water vapor

2018 ◽  
Vol 176 ◽  
pp. 05047
Author(s):  
J.L. Baray ◽  
P. Fréville ◽  
N. Montoux ◽  
A. Chauvigné ◽  
D. Hadad ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Water Vapor ◽  
Vertical Profiles ◽  
Raman Lidar ◽  
Tropospheric Aerosols ◽  
Boundary Layer Dynamics

A Rayleigh-Mie-Raman LIDAR provides vertical profiles of tropospheric variables at Clermont-Ferrand (France) since 2008, in order to describe the boundary layer dynamics, tropospheric aerosols, cirrus and water vapor. It is included in the EARLINET network. We performed hardware/software developments in order to upgrade the quality, calibration and improve automation. We present an overview of the system and some examples of measurements and a preliminary geophysical analysis of the data.

scholarly journals Aircraft validation of Aura Tropospheric Emission Spectrometer retrievals of HDO / H<sub>2</sub>O

2014 ◽  
Vol 7 (9) ◽  
pp. 3127-3138 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. L. Herman ◽  
J. E. Cherry ◽  
J. Young ◽  
J. M. Welker ◽  
D. Noone ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Water Vapor ◽  
Standard Deviation ◽  
Lower Troposphere ◽  
Temporal Variations ◽  
Observation Error ◽  
Free Troposphere ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Airborne Measurements

Abstract. The EOS (Earth Observing System) Aura Tropospheric Emission Spectrometer (TES) retrieves the atmospheric HDO / H2O ratio in the mid-to-lower troposphere as well as the planetary boundary layer. TES observations of water vapor and the HDO isotopologue have been compared with nearly coincident in situ airborne measurements for direct validation of the TES products. The field measurements were made with a commercially available Picarro L1115-i isotopic water analyzer on aircraft over the Alaskan interior boreal forest during the three summers of 2011 to 2013. TES special observations were utilized in these comparisons. The TES averaging kernels and a priori constraints have been applied to the in situ data, using version 5 (V005) of the TES data. TES calculated errors are compared with the standard deviation (1σ) of scan-to-scan variability to check consistency with the TES observation error. Spatial and temporal variations are assessed from the in situ aircraft measurements. It is found that the standard deviation of scan-to-scan variability of TES δD is ±34.1‰ in the boundary layer and ± 26.5‰ in the free troposphere. This scan-to-scan variability is consistent with the TES estimated error (observation error) of 10–18‰ after accounting for the atmospheric variations along the TES track of ±16‰ in the boundary layer, increasing to ±30‰ in the free troposphere observed by the aircraft in situ measurements. We estimate that TES V005 δD is biased high by an amount that decreases with pressure: approximately +123‰ at 1000 hPa, +98‰ in the boundary layer and +37‰ in the free troposphere. The uncertainty in this bias estimate is ±20‰. A correction for this bias has been applied to the TES HDO Lite Product data set. After bias correction, we show that TES has accurate sensitivity to water vapor isotopologues in the boundary layer.

scholarly journals What is the benefit of ceilometers for aerosol remote sensing? An answer from EARLINET

2014 ◽  
Vol 7 (7) ◽  
pp. 1979-1997 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Wiegner ◽  
F. Madonna ◽  
I. Binietoglou ◽  
R. Forkel ◽  
J. Gasteiger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Water Vapor ◽  
Case Studies ◽  
Special Focus ◽  
Backscatter Coefficient ◽  
Water Vapor Absorption ◽  
Long Term Stability ◽  
Vapor Absorption ◽  
Lidar Ratio ◽  
Favorable Conditions

Abstract. With the establishment of ceilometer networks by national weather services, a discussion commenced to which extent these simple backscatter lidars can be used for aerosol research. Though primarily designed for the detection of clouds it was shown that at least observations of the vertical structure of the boundary layer might be possible. However, an assessment of the potential of ceilometers for the quantitative retrieval of aerosol properties is still missing. In this paper we discuss different retrieval methods to derive the aerosol backscatter coefficient βp, with special focus on the calibration of the ceilometers. Different options based on forward and backward integration methods are compared with respect to their accuracy and applicability. It is shown that advanced lidar systems such as those being operated in the framework of the European Aerosol Research Lidar Network (EARLINET) are excellent tools for the calibration, and thus βp retrievals based on forward integration can readily be implemented and used for real-time applications. Furthermore, we discuss uncertainties introduced by incomplete overlap, the unknown lidar ratio, and water vapor absorption. The latter is relevant for the very large number of ceilometers operating in the spectral range around λ = 905–910 nm. The accuracy of the retrieved βp mainly depends on the accuracy of the calibration and the long-term stability of the ceilometer. Under favorable conditions, a relative error of βp on the order of 10% seems feasible. In the case of water vapor absorption, corrections assuming a realistic water vapor distribution and laser spectrum are indispensable; otherwise errors on the order of 20% could occur. From case studies it is shown that ceilometers can be used for the reliable detection of elevated aerosol layers below 5 km, and can contribute to the validation of chemistry transport models, e.g., the height of the boundary layer. However, the exploitation of ceilometer measurements is still in its infancy, so more studies are urgently needed to consolidate the present state of knowledge, which is based on a limited number of case studies.

scholarly journals Temperature profiling of the atmospheric boundary layer with rotational Raman lidar during the HD(CP)<sup>2</sup> Observational Prototype Experiment

2015 ◽  
Vol 15 (5) ◽  
pp. 2867-2881 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Hammann ◽  
A. Behrendt ◽  
F. Le Mounier ◽  
V. Wulfmeyer
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Water Vapor ◽  
Temperature Gradient ◽  
Atmospheric Boundary Layer ◽  
Average Power ◽  
Mixing Ratio ◽  
Raman Lidar ◽  
Backscatter Signal ◽  
Low Background ◽  
Water Vapor Mixing Ratio

Abstract. The temperature measurements of the rotational Raman lidar of the University of Hohenheim (UHOH RRL) during the High Definition of Clouds and Precipitation for advancing Climate Prediction (HD(CP)2) Observation Prototype Experiment (HOPE) in April and May 2013 are discussed. The lidar consists of a frequency-tripled Nd:YAG laser at 355 nm with 10 W average power at 50 Hz, a two-mirror scanner, a 40 cm receiving telescope, and a highly efficient polychromator with cascading interference filters for separating four signals: the elastic backscatter signal, two rotational Raman signals with different temperature dependence, and the vibrational Raman signal of water vapor. The main measurement variable of the UHOH RRL is temperature. For the HOPE campaign, the lidar receiver was optimized for high and low background levels, with a novel switch for the passband of the second rotational Raman channel. The instrument delivers atmospheric profiles of water vapor mixing ratio as well as particle backscatter coefficient and particle extinction coefficient as further products. As examples for the measurement performance, measurements of the temperature gradient and water vapor mixing ratio revealing the development of the atmospheric boundary layer within 25 h are presented. As expected from simulations, a reduction of the measurement uncertainty of 70% during nighttime was achieved with the new low-background setting. A two-mirror scanner allows for measurements in different directions. When pointing the scanner to low elevation, measurements close to the ground become possible which are otherwise impossible due to the non-total overlap of laser beam and receiving telescope field of view in the near range. An example of a low-level temperature measurement is presented which resolves the temperature gradient at the top of the stable nighttime boundary layer 100 m above the ground.

scholarly journals A Raman Lidar with a Deep Ultraviolet Laser for Continuous Water Vapor Profiling in the Atmospheric Boundary Layer

2020 ◽  
Vol 237 ◽  
pp. 03001
Author(s):  
Masanori Yabuki ◽  
Yuya Kawano ◽  
Yusaku Tottori ◽  
Makoto Tsukamoto ◽  
Eiji Takeuchi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Water Vapor ◽  
Atmospheric Boundary Layer ◽  
Environmental Conditions ◽  
Raman Lidar ◽  
Backscatter Signal ◽  
Ultraviolet Laser ◽  
Deep Ultraviolet ◽  
Temperature Controlled

A Raman lidar with a deep ultraviolet laser was constructed to continuously monitor water vapor distributions in the atmospheric boundary layer for twenty-four hours. We employ a laser at a wavelength of 266 nm and detects the light separated into an elastic backscatter signal and vibrational Raman signals of oxygen, nitrogen, and water vapor. The lidar was encased in a temperature-controlled and vibration-isolated compact container, resistant to a variety of environmental conditions. Water vapor profile observations were made for twelve months from November 24, 2017, to November 29, 2018. These observations were compared with collocated radiosonde measurements for daytime and nighttime conditions.

scholarly journals Validation of aerosol backscatter profiles from Raman lidar and ceilometer using balloon-borne measurements

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simone Brunamonti ◽  
Giovanni Martucci ◽  
Gonzague Romanens ◽  
Yann Poltera ◽  
Frank G. Wienhold ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
In Situ Measurements ◽  
Spatial And Temporal Variability ◽  
Free Troposphere ◽  
Raman Lidar ◽  
Backscatter Coefficient ◽  
Custom Made ◽  
Standard Deviations ◽  
Aerosol Backscatter ◽  
Good Agreement

Abstract. Remote sensing measurements by light detection and ranging (lidar) instruments are fundamental for the monitoring of altitude-resolved aerosol optical properties. Here, we validate vertical profiles of aerosol backscatter coefficient (βaer) measured by two independent lidar systems using co-located balloon-borne measurements performed by Compact Optical Backscatter Aerosol Detector (COBALD) sondes. COBALD provides high-precision in-situ measurements of βaer at two wavelengths (455 and 940 nm). The two analyzed lidar systems are the research Raman Lidar for Meteorological Observations (RALMO) and the commercial CHM15K ceilometer (Lufft, Germany). We consider in total 17 RALMO and 31 CHM15K profiles, co-located with simultaneous COBALD soundings performed throughout the years 2014–2019 at the MeteoSwiss observatory of Payerne (Switzerland). The RALMO (355 nm) and CHM15K (1064 nm) measurements are converted to respectively 455 nm and 940 nm using the Angstrom exponent profiles retrieved from COBALD data. To account for the different receiver field of view (FOV) angles between the two lidars (0.01–0.02°) and COBALD (6°), we derive a custom-made correction using Mie-theory scattering simulations. Our analysis shows that both RALMO and CHM15K achieve a good agreement with COBALD measurements in the boundary layer and free troposphere, up to 6 km altitude, and including fine structures in the aerosol’s vertical distribution. For altitudes below 2 km, the mean ± standard deviation difference in βaer is + 6 % ± 40 % (+ 0.005 ± 0.319 Mm−1 sr−1) for RALMO – COBALD at 455 nm, and + 13 % ± 51 % (+ 0.038 ± 0.207 Mm−1 sr−1) for CHM15K – COBALD at 940 nm. The large standard deviations can be at least partly attributed to atmospheric variability effects, associated with the balloon’s horizontal drift with altitude (away from the lidar beam) and the different integration times of the two techniques. Combined with the high spatial and temporal variability of atmospheric aerosols, these effects often lead to a slight altitude displacement between aerosol backscatter features that are seen by both techniques. For altitudes between 2–6 km, the absolute standard deviations of both RALMO and CHM15K decrease (below 0.13 and 0.16 Mm−1sr−1, respectively), while their corresponding relative deviations increase (often exceeding 100 % COBALD of the signal). This is due to the low aerosol content (i.e. low absolute backscattered signal) in the free troposphere, and the vertically decreasing signal-to-noise ratio of the lidar measurements (especially CHM15K). Overall, we conclude that the βaer profiles measured by the RALMO and CHM15K lidar systems are in good agreement with in-situ measurements by COBALD sondes up to 6 km altitude.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document