scholarly journals Ionospheric signatures during a magnetospheric flux rope event

2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (12) ◽  
pp. 3967-3977 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Juusola ◽  
O. Amm ◽  
H. U. Frey ◽  
K. Kauristie ◽  
R. Nakamura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Flux Rope ◽  
Recovery Phase ◽  
Expansion Phase ◽  
Northern Fennoscandia ◽  
Ionospheric Region ◽  
Image Satellite ◽  
Imaging Camera ◽  
Flux Ropes ◽  
Field Aligned Current ◽  
Upward Current

Abstract. On 13 August 2002, during a substorm, Cluster encountered two earthward moving flux ropes (FR) in the central magnetotail. The first FR was observed during the expansion phase of the substorm, and the second FR during the recovery phase. In the conjugate ionospheric region in Northern Fennoscandia, the ionospheric equivalent currents were observed by the MIRACLE network and the auroral evolution was monitored by the Wideband Imaging Camera (WIC) on-board the IMAGE satellite. Extending the study of Amm et al. (2006), we examine and compare the possible ionospheric signatures associated with the two FRs. Amm et al. studied the first event in detail and found that the ionospheric footprint of Cluster coincided with a region of downward field-aligned current. They suggested that this region of downward current, together with a trailing region of upward current further southwestward, might correspond to the ends of the FR. Unlike during the first FR, however, we do not see any clear ionospheric features associated with the second one. In the GSM xy-plane, the first flux rope axis was tilted with respect to the y-direction by 29°, while the second flux rope axis was almost aligned in the y-direction, with an angle of 4° only. It is possible that due to the length and orientation of the second FR, any ionospheric signatures were simply mapped outside the region covered by the ground-based instruments. We suggest that the ground signatures of a FR depend on the orientation and the length of the structure.

scholarly journals An auroral westward flow channel (AWFC) and its relationship to field-aligned current, ring current, and plasmapause location determined using multiple spacecraft observations

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-76 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. L. Parkinson ◽  
J. A. Wild ◽  
C. L. Waters ◽  
M. Lester ◽  
E. A. Lucek ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Plasma Sheet ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Ring Current ◽  
Narrow Channel ◽  
Recovery Phase ◽  
Global Scale ◽  
Auroral Oval ◽  
Flow Channel ◽  
Expansion Phase ◽  
Field Aligned Current

Abstract. An auroral westward flow channel (AWFC) is a latitudinally narrow channel of unstable F-region plasma with intense westward drift in the dusk-to-midnight sector ionosphere. AWFCs tend to overlap the equatorward edge of the auroral oval, and their life cycle is often synchronised to that of substorms: they commence close to substorm expansion phase onset, intensify during the expansion phase, and then decay during the recovery phase. Here we define for the first time the relationship between an AWFC, large-scale field-aligned current (FAC), the ring current, and plasmapause location. The Tasman International Geospace Environment Radar (TIGER), a Southern Hemisphere HF SuperDARN radar, observed a jet-like AWFC during ~08:35 to 13:28 UT on 7 April 2001. The initiation of the AWFC was preceded by a band of equatorward expanding ionospheric scatter (BEES) which conveyed an intense poleward electric field through the inner plasma sheet. Unlike previous AWFCs, this event was not associated with a distinct substorm surge; rather it occurred during an interval of persistent, moderate magnetic activity characterised by AL~−200 nT. The four Cluster spacecraft had perigees within the dusk sector plasmasphere, and their trajectories were magnetically conjugate to the radar observations. The Waves of High frequency and Sounder for Probing Electron density by Relaxation (WHISPER) instruments on board Cluster were used to identify the plasmapause location. The Imager for Magnetopause-to-Aurora Global Exploration (IMAGE) EUV experiment also provided global-scale observations of the plasmapause. The Cluster fluxgate magnetometers (FGM) provided successive measurements specifying the relative location of the ring current and filamentary plasma sheet current. An analysis of Iridium spacecraft magnetometer measurements provided estimates of large-scale ionospheric FAC in relation to the AWFC evolution. Peak flows in the AWFC were located close to the peak of a Region 2 downward FAC, located just poleward of the plasmapause. DMSP satellite observations confirmed the AWFC was located equatorward of the nightside plasmasheet, sometimes associated with ~10 keV ion precipitation.

scholarly journals Observations of an auroral streamer in a double oval configuration

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 701-716 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. Amm ◽  
R. Nakamura ◽  
T. Takada ◽  
K. Kauristie ◽  
H. U. Frey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Southern Hemisphere ◽  
Recovery Phase ◽  
Auroral Oval ◽  
Expansion Phase ◽  
Optical Instruments ◽  
Image Satellite ◽  
Bursty Bulk Flow ◽  
Polarization Electric Field ◽  
Late Evening ◽  
Eiscat Radar

Abstract. During the late evening and night of 14 September 2004, the nightside auroral oval shows a distinct double oval configuration for several hours after a substorm onset at ~18:45 UT. This structure is observed both by the IMAGE satellite optical instruments focusing on the Southern Hemisphere, and by the MIRACLE ground-based instrument network in Scandinavia. At ~21:17 UT during the recovery phase of the substorm, an auroral streamer is detected by these instruments and the EISCAT radar, while simultaneously the Cluster satellites observe a bursty bulk flow in the conjugate portion of the plasma sheet in the magnetotail. Our combined data analysis reveals significant differences between the ionospheric equivalent current signature of this streamer within a double oval configuration, as compared to previously studied streamer events without such a configuration. We attribute these differences to the presence of an additional poleward polarization electric field between the poleward and the equatorward portions of the double oval, and show with a simple model that such an assumption can conceptually explain the observations. Further, we estimate the total current transferred in meridional direction by this recovery phase streamer to ~80 kA, significantly less than for previously analysed expansion phase streamer events. Both results indicate that the development of auroral streamers is dependent on the ambient background conditions in the magnetosphere-ionosphere system. The auroral streamer event studied was simultaneously observed in the conjugate Northern and Southern Hemisphere ionosphere.

scholarly journals IMF effect on the polar cap contraction and expansion during a period of substorms

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (6) ◽  
pp. 1021-1034 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. T. Aikio ◽  
T. Pitkänen ◽  
I. Honkonen ◽  
M. Palmroth ◽  
O. Amm
Keyword(s):  
Recovery Phase ◽  
Bow Shock ◽  
Polar Cap ◽  
Reconnection Rate ◽  
Early Recovery ◽  
Mhd Simulation ◽  
Expansion Phase ◽  
Contraction And Expansion ◽  
Good Agreement ◽  
The Imf

Abstract. The polar cap boundary (PCB) location and motion in the nightside ionosphere has been studied by using measurements from the EISCAT radars and the MIRACLE magnetometers during a period of four substorms on 18 February 2004. The OMNI database has been used for observations of the solar wind and the Geotail satellite for magnetospheric measurements. In addition, the event was modelled by the GUMICS-4 MHD simulation. The simulation of the PCB location was in a rather good agreement with the experimental estimates at the EISCAT longitude. During the first three substorm expansion phases, neither the local observations nor the global simulation showed any poleward motions of the PCB, even though the electrojets intensified. Rapid poleward motions of the PCB took place only in the early recovery phases of the substorms. Hence, in these cases the nightside reconnection rate was locally higher in the recovery phase than in the expansion phase. In addition, we suggest that the IMF Bz component correlated with the nightside tail inclination angle and the PCB location with about a 17-min delay from the bow shock. By taking the delay into account, the IMF northward turnings were associated with dipolarizations of the magnetotail and poleward motions of the PCB in the recovery phase. The mechanism behind this effect should be studied further.

scholarly journals Correspondence between the ULF wave power spatial distribution and auroral oval boundaries

2016 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 46-65 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ольга Козырева ◽  
Olga Kozyreva ◽  
Вячеслав Пилипенко ◽  
Vyacheslav Pilipenko ◽  
Марк Энгебретсон ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Distribution ◽  
Spectral Power ◽  
Recovery Phase ◽  
Temporal Variations ◽  
Auroral Oval ◽  
Wave Power ◽  
Observational Result ◽  
Equatorward Boundary ◽  
Image Satellite ◽  
Magnetospheric Field

The world-wide spatial distribution of the wave power in the Pc5 band during magnetic storms has been compared with auroral oval boundaries. The poleward and equatorward auroral oval boundaries are estimated using either the British Antarctic Survey database containing IMAGE satellite UV observations of the aurora or the OVATION model based on the DMSP particle data. The “epicenter” of the spectral power of broadband Pc5 fluctuations during the storm growth phase is mapped inside the auroral oval. During the storm recovery phase, the spectral power of narrowband Pc5 waves, both in the dawn and dusk sectors, is mapped inside the auroral oval or around its equatorward boundary. This observational result confirms previously reported effects: the spatial/temporal variations of the Pc5 wave power in the morning/pre-noon sector are closely related to the dynamics of the auroral electrojet and magnetospheric field-aligned currents. At the same time, narrowband Pc5 waves demonstrate typical resonant features in the amplitude-phase latitudinal structure. Thus, the location of the auroral oval or its equatorward boundary is the preferred latitude for magnetospheric field-line Alfven resonator excitation. This effect is not taken into account by modern theories of ULF Pc5 waves, but it could be significant for the development of more adequate models.

scholarly journals Observations of flux rope formation prior to coronal mass ejections

2013 ◽  
Vol 8 (S300) ◽  
pp. 209-214 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucie M. Green ◽  
Bernhard Kliem
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Flux ◽  
Magnetic Structure ◽  
Solar Atmosphere ◽  
Coronal Mass Ejections ◽  
Flux Rope ◽  
Active Regions ◽  
Magnetic Configuration ◽  
Magnetic Flux Rope ◽  
Source Regions ◽  
Flux Ropes

AbstractUnderstanding the magnetic configuration of the source regions of coronal mass ejections (CMEs) is vital in order to determine the trigger and driver of these events. Observations of four CME productive active regions are presented here, which indicate that the pre-eruption magnetic configuration is that of a magnetic flux rope. The flux ropes are formed in the solar atmosphere by the process known as flux cancellation and are stable for several hours before the eruption. The observations also indicate that the magnetic structure that erupts is not the entire flux rope as initially formed, raising the question of whether the flux rope is able to undergo a partial eruption or whether it undergoes a transition in specific flux rope configuration shortly before the CME.

Dayside Magnetopause Reconnection and Flux Transfer Events: BepiColombo Earth-Flyby

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei-Jie Sun ◽  
James Slavin ◽  
Rumi Nakamura ◽  
Daniel Heyner ◽  
Johannes Mieth
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Field ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
European Space Agency ◽  
Flux Rope ◽  
Transfer Event ◽  
Flux Transfer Events ◽  
Space Agency ◽  
Flux Ropes ◽  
Flux Transfer ◽  
Magnetospheric Multiscale Mission

<p>BepiColombo is a joint mission of the European Space Agency (ESA) and the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) to the planet Mercury. The BepiColombo mission consists of two spacecraft, which are the Mercury Planetary Orbiter (MPO) and Mercury Magnetospheric Orbiter (Mio). The mission made its first planetary flyby, which is the only Earth flyby, on 10 April 2020, during which several instruments collected measurements. In this study, we analyze MPO magnetometer (MAG) observations of Flux Transfer Events (FTEs) in the magnetosheath and the structure of the subsolar magnetopause near the  flow stagnation point. The magnetosheath plasma beta was high with a value of ~ 8 and the interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) was southward with a clock angle that decreased from ~ 100 degrees to ~ 150 degrees.  As the draped IMF became increasingly southward several of the flux transfer event (FTE)-type flux ropes were observed. These FTEs traveled southward indicating that the magnetopause X-line was located northward of the spacecraft, which is consistent with a dawnward tilt of the IMF. Most of the FTE-type flux ropes were in ion-scale, <10 s duration, suggesting that they were newly formed. Only one large-scale FTE-type flux rope, ~ 20 s, was observed. It was made up of two successive bipolar signatures in the normal magnetic field component, which is evidence of coalescence at a secondary reconnection site. Further analysis demonstrated that the dimensionless reconnection rate of the re-reconnection associated with the coalescence site was ~ 0.14. While this investigation was limited to the MPO MAG observations, it strongly supports a key feature of dayside reconnection discovered in the Magnetospheric Multiscale mission, the growth of FTE-type flux ropes through coalescence at secondary reconnection sites.</p>

Deformation of plasma bubbles and the associated field aligned current system during substorm recovery phase

2012 ◽  
Vol 117 (A9) ◽  
pp. n/a-n/a ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Pang ◽  
M. H. Lin ◽  
X. H. Deng ◽  
M. Zhou ◽  
S. Y. Huang
Keyword(s):  
Current System ◽  
Recovery Phase ◽  
Plasma Bubbles ◽  
Field Aligned Current

A Survey of Interplanetary Small Flux Ropes at Mercury

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Réka Winslow ◽  
Amy Murphy ◽  
Nathan Schwadron ◽  
Noé Lugaz ◽  
Wenyuan Yu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Field ◽  
Solar Wind ◽  
Current Sheet ◽  
Heliocentric Distance ◽  
Free Field ◽  
Flux Rope ◽  
Solar Wind Plasma ◽  
The Sun ◽  
Superposed Epoch Analysis ◽  
Flux Ropes

<p>Small flux ropes (SFRs) are interplanetary magnetic flux ropes with durations from a few minutes to a few hours. We have built a comprehensive catalog of SFRs at Mercury using magnetometer data from the orbital phase of the MESSENGER mission (2011-2015). In the absence of solar wind plasma measurements, we developed strict identification criteria for SFRs in the magnetometer observations, including conducting force-free field fits for each flux rope. We identified a total of 48 events that met our strict criteria, with events ranging in duration from 2.5 minutes to 4 hours. Using superposed epoch analysis, we obtained the generic SFR magnetic field profile at Mercury. Due to the large variation in Mercury's heliocentric distance (0.31-0.47 AU), we split the data into two distance bins. We found that the average SFR profile is more symmetric "farther from the Sun", in line with the idea that SFRs form closer to the Sun and undergo a relaxation process in the solar wind. Based on this result, as well as the SFR durations and the magnetic field strength fall-off with heliocentric distance, we infer that the SFRs observed at Mercury are expanding as they propagate with the solar wind. We also determined that the SFR occurrence frequency is nearly four times as high at Mercury as for similarly detected events at 1 AU. Most interestingly, we found two SFR populations in our dataset, one likely generated in a quasi-periodic formation process near the heliospheric current sheet, and the other formed away from the current sheet in isolated events.</p>

scholarly journals The relationship between the magnetosphere and magnetospheric/auroral substorms

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 387-394 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.-I. Akasofu
Keyword(s):  
Electric Field ◽  
Growth Phase ◽  
Magnetic Energy ◽  
Dissipative System ◽  
Satellite Observation ◽  
Recovery Phase ◽  
Release Process ◽  
Expansion Phase ◽  
Auroral Substorms ◽  
The Relationship

Abstract. On the basis of auroral and polar magnetic substorm studies, the relationship between the solar wind-magnetosphere dynamo (the DD dynamo) current and the substorm dynamo (the UL dynamo) current is studied. The characteristics of both the DD and UL currents reveal why auroral substorms consist of the three distinct phases after the input power ε is increased above 1018 erg s−1. (a) The growth phase; the magnetosphere can accumulate magnetic energy for auroral substorms, when the ionosphere cannot dissipate the power before the expansion phase. (b) The expansion phase; the magnetosphere releases the accumulated magnetic energy during the growth phase in a pulse-like manner in a few hours, because it tries to stabilize itself when the accumulated energy reaches to about 1023 erg s−1. (c) The recovery phase; the magnetosphere becomes an ordinary dissipative system after the expansion phase, because the ionosphere becomes capable of dissipating the power with the rate of 1018 ~ 1019 erg s−1. On the basis of the above conclusion, it is suggested that the magnetosphere accomplishes the pulse-like release process (resulting in spectacular auroral activities) by producing plasma instabilities in the current sheet, thus reducing the current. The resulting contraction of the magnetic field lines (expending the accumulated magnetic energy), together with break down of the "frozen-in" field condition at distances of less than 10 RE, establishes the substorm dynamo that generates an earthward electric field (Lui and Kamide, 2003; Akasofu, 2011). It is this electric field which manifests as the expansion phase. A recent satellite observation at a distance of as close as 8.1 RE by Lui (2011) seems to support strongly the occurrence of the chain of processes suggested in the above. It is hoped that although the concept presented here is very crude, it will serve in providing one way of studying the three phases of auroral substorms. In turn, a better understanding of auroral substorms will also be useful in studying the magnetosphere, because various auroral activities can be the visible guide for this endeavor.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document