scholarly journals Mirror mode waves in Venus's magnetosheath: solar minimum vs. solar maximum

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (11) ◽  
pp. 1099-1108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Volwerk ◽  
Daniel Schmid ◽  
Bruce T. Tsurutani ◽  
Magda Delva ◽  
Ferdinand Plaschke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solar Wind ◽  
Solar Minimum ◽  
Solar Wind Velocity ◽  
Solar Maximum ◽  
Flow Line ◽  
Bow Shock ◽  
Solar Wind Density ◽  
Solar Uv ◽  
Mirror Mode ◽  
Possible Cause

Abstract. The observational rate of mirror mode waves in Venus's magnetosheath for solar maximum conditions is studied and compared with previous results for solar minimum conditions. It is found that the number of mirror mode events is approximately 14 % higher for solar maximum than for solar minimum. A possible cause is the increase in solar UV radiation, ionizing more neutrals from Venus's exosphere and the outward displacement of the bow shock during solar maximum. Also, the solar wind properties (speed, density) differ for solar minimum and maximum. The maximum observational rate, however, over Venus's magnetosheath remains almost the same, with only differences in the distribution along the flow line. This may be caused by the interplay of a decreasing solar wind density and a slightly higher solar wind velocity for this solar maximum. The distribution of strengths of the mirror mode waves is shown to be exponentially falling off, with (almost) the same coefficient for solar maximum and minimum. The plasma conditions in Venus's magnetosheath are different for solar minimum as compared to solar maximum. For solar minimum, mirror mode waves are created directly behind where the bow shock will decay, whereas for solar maximum all created mirror modes can grow.

A neural network-based mid-term prognosis of geomagnetic storms that uses pre-storm effects related to current sheets and magnetic islands

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mikhail Fridman
Keyword(s):  
Solar Wind ◽  
Solar Minimum ◽  
High Speed ◽  
Geomagnetic Storms ◽  
Magnetic Islands ◽  
Solar Wind Density ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Storm Effects ◽  
Term Forecast ◽  
Advance Time

<p>Mid-term prognoses of geomagnetic storms require an improvement since theу are known to have rather low accuracy which does not exceed 40% in solar minimum. We claim that the problem lies in the approach. Current mid-term forecasts are typically built using the same paradigm as short-term ones and suggest an analysis of the solar wind conditions typical for geomagnetic storms. According to this approach, there is a 20-60 minute delay between the arrival of a geoeffective flow/stream to L1 and the arrival of the signal from the spacecraft to Earth, which gives a necessary advance time for a short-term prognosis. For the mid-term forecast with an advance time from 3 hours to 3 days, this is not enough. Therefore, we have suggested finding precursors of geomagnetic storms observed in the solar wind. Such precursors are variations in the solar wind density and the interplanetary magnetic field in the ULF range associated with crossings of magnetic cavities in front of the arriving geoeffective high-speed streams and flows (Khabarova et al., 2015, 2016, 2018; Adhikari et al., 2019). Despite some preliminary studies have shown that this might be a perspective way to create a mid-term prognosis (Khabarova 2007; Khabarova & Yermolaev, 2007), the problem of automatization of the prognosis remained unsolved.</p>

scholarly journals Variations and Effects of the Venusian Bow Shock from VEX Mission

2012 ◽  
Vol 8 (S293) ◽  
pp. 329-332
Author(s):  
Yansong Xue ◽  
Shuanggen Jin
Keyword(s):  
Solar Wind ◽  
Solar Maximum ◽  
Direct Interaction ◽  
Magnetic Pressure ◽  
Bow Shock ◽  
Bow Shocks ◽  
Venus Express ◽  
Inner Region ◽  
Planetary Magnetic Field ◽  
Atmosphere Of Venus

AbstractThe upper atmosphere of Venus is not shielded by planetary magnetic field from direct interaction with the solar wind. The interaction of shocked solar wind and the ionosphere results in ionopause. Magnetic barrier, the inner region of dayside magnetosheath with the dominated magnetic pressure deflects the solar wind instead of the ionopause at solar maximum. Therefore, the structure and interaction of venusian ionosphere is very complex. Although the Venus Express (VEX) arrived at Venus in April 2006 provides more knowledge on the Venusian ionosphere and plasma environment, compared to Pioneer Venus Orbiter (PVO) with about 14 years of observations, some important details are still unknown (e.g., long Venusian bow shock variations and effects). In this paper, the bow shock positions of Venus are determined and analyzed from magnetometer (MAG) and ASPERA-4 of the Venus Express mission from May 28, 2006 to August 17, 2010. Results show that the altitude of BS was mainly affected by SZA (solar zenith angle) and Venus bow shocks inbound and outbound are asymmetry.

Solar Wind Effects on the Transport of 3–10 MeV Cosmic‐Ray Electrons from Solar Minimum to Solar Maximum

2003 ◽  
Vol 594 (1) ◽  
pp. 552-560 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. E. S. Ferreira ◽  
M. S. Potgieter ◽  
D. M. Moeketsi ◽  
B. Heber ◽  
H. Fichtner
Keyword(s):  
Solar Wind ◽  
Solar Minimum ◽  
Solar Maximum ◽  
Cosmic Ray ◽  
Wind Effects

scholarly journals Solar Orbiter’s first Venus Flyby: MAG observations of structures and waves associated with the induced Venusian magnetosphere

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Volwerk ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Field ◽  
Solar Wind ◽  
High Frequency ◽  
Cyclotron Frequency ◽  
Plasma Waves ◽  
Bow Shock ◽  
High Frequency Plasma ◽  
Frequency Plasma ◽  
Mirror Mode ◽  
Proton Cyclotron

<p>The induced magnetosphere of Venus is created by the interaction of the solar wind and embedded interplanetary magnetic field with the exosphere and ionosphere of Venus. Solar Orbiter entered Venus’s magnetotail far downstream, > 70 Venus radii, of the planet and exited the magnetosphere over the north pole. This offered a unique view of the system over distances that were only flown through once by three other missions before, Mariner 10, Galileo and Bepi-Colombo. The large-scale structure and activity of the induced magnetosphere is studied as well as the high-frequency plasma waves both in the magnetosphere and in a limited region upstream of the planet where interaction with Venus’s exosphere is expected.  It is shown that Venus’s magnetotail is very active during the Solar Orbiter flyby. Structures such as flux ropes, and reconnection sites are encountered as well as a strongly overdraping of the magnetic field downstream of the bow shock and planet. High-frequency plasma waves (up to 6 times the local proton cyclotron frequency) are observed in the magnetotail, which are identified as Doppler-shifted proton cyclotron waves, whereas in the upstream solar wind these waves appear just below the proton cyclotron frequency (as expected) but are very patchy. The bow shock is quasi perpendicular, however, expected mirror mode activity is not found directly behind it; instead there is strong cyclotron wave power. This is most-likely caused by the relatively low plasma-beta  behind the bow shock. Much further downstream in the magnetosheath mirror mode of magnetic hole structures are identified. This presentation will take place after the second Venus flyby by Solar Orbiter and BepiColombo and Solar Orbiter on 9 and 10 August, respectively.</p>

scholarly journals Solar cycle effect on geomagnetic storms caused by interplanetary magnetic clouds

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (12) ◽  
pp. 3383-3389 ◽  
Author(s):  
C.-C. Wu ◽  
R. P. Lepping
Keyword(s):  
Solar Wind ◽  
Geomagnetic Storm ◽  
Solar Minimum ◽  
Geomagnetic Storms ◽  
Solar Maximum ◽  
Solar Wind Speed ◽  
Magnetic Clouds ◽  
Active Period ◽  
Quiet Period ◽  
Solar Wind Parameters

Abstract. We investigated geomagnetic activity which was induced by interplanetary magnetic clouds during the past four solar cycles, 1965–1998. We have found that the intensity of such geomagnetic storms is more severe in solar maximum than in solar minimum. In addition, we affirm that the average solar wind speed of magnetic clouds is faster in solar maximum than in solar minimum. In this study, we find that solar activity level plays a major role on the intensity of geomagnetic storms. In particular, some new statistical results are found and listed as follows. (1) The intensity of a geomagnetic storm in a solar active period is stronger than in a solar quiet period. (2) The magnitude of negative Bzmin is larger in a solar active period than in a quiet period. (3) Solar wind speed in an active period is faster than in a quiet period. (4) VBsmax in an active period is much larger than in a quiet period. (5) Solar wind parameters, Bzmin, Vmax and VBsmax are correlated well with geomagnetic storm intensity, Dstmin during a solar active period. (6) Solar wind parameters, Bzmin, and VBsmax are not correlated well (very poorly for Vmax) with geomagnetic storm intensity during a solar quiet period. (7) The speed of the solar wind plays a key role in the correlation of solar wind parameters vs. the intensity of a geomagnetic storm. (8) More severe storms with Dstmin≤−100 nT caused by MCs occurred in the solar active period than in the solar quiet period.

scholarly journals Invariability of relationship between the polar cap magnetic activity and geoeffective interplanetary electric field

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (8) ◽  
pp. 1479-1489 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. A. Troshichev ◽  
N. A. Podorozhkina ◽  
A. S. Janzhura
Keyword(s):  
Solar Wind ◽  
Solar Activity ◽  
Electric Field ◽  
Solar Minimum ◽  
Solar Maximum ◽  
Magnetic Activity ◽  
Polar Cap ◽  
Polar Caps ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Wind Energy Input

Abstract. The PC (polar cap) index characterizing the solar wind energy input into the magnetosphere is calculated with use of parameters α, β, and φ, determining the relationship between the interplanetary electric field (EKL) and the value of magnetic activity δF in the polar caps. These parameters were noted as valid for large and small EKL values, and as a result the suggestion was made (Troshichev et al., 2006) that the parameters should remain invariant irrespective of solar activity. To verify this suggestion, the independent sets of calibration parameters α, β, and φ were derived separately for the solar maximum (1998–2001) and solar minimum (1997, 2007–2009) epochs, with a proper choice of a quiet daily variation (QDC) as a level of reference for the polar cap magnetic activity value. The results presented in this paper demonstrate that parameters α, β, and φ, derived under conditions of solar maximum and solar minimum, are indeed in general conformity and provide consistent (within 10 % uncertainty) estimations of the PC index. It means that relationship between the geoeffective solar wind variations and the polar cap magnetic activity responding to these variations remains invariant irrespective of solar activity. The conclusion is made that parameters α, β, and φ derived in AARI#3 version for complete cycle of solar activity (1995–2005) can be regarded as forever valid.

The solar wind: from solar minimum to solar maximum

2001 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 471-479 ◽  
Author(s):  
John D. Richardson ◽  
Chi Wang ◽  
Karolen I. Paularena
Keyword(s):  
Solar Wind ◽  
Solar Minimum ◽  
Solar Maximum
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document