Solar radio burst interference index dedicated to GNSS single and double frequency users

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Marie Chevalier ◽  
Nicolas Bergeot ◽  
Pascale Defraigne ◽  
Christophe Marque ◽  
Elisa Pinat
Keyword(s):  
Real Time ◽  
Solar Radio ◽  
Global Navigation Satellite Systems ◽  
Civil Aviation ◽  
International Gnss Service ◽  
Satellite Systems ◽  
Double Frequency ◽  
Weather Events ◽  
Gnss Measurements ◽  
Global Navigation Satellite

<p>Intense solar radio bursts (SRBs) emitted at L-band frequencies are a source of radio frequency interference for Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) by inducing a noise increase in GNSS measurements, and hence degrading the carrier-to-noise density (C/N<sub>0</sub>). Such space weather events are critical for GNSS-based applications requiring real-time high-precision positioning.</p><p>Since 2015, the Royal Observatory of Belgium (ROB) monitors in near real-time the C/N<sub>0</sub> observations from the European Permanent Network (EPN). The monitoring allows to detect accurately the general fades of C/N<sub>0</sub> due to SRBs over Europe as from 1 dB-Hz. It provides in near real-time a quantification of the GNSS signal reception fade for the L1 C/A and L2 P(Y) signals and notifies civilian single and double frequency users with a 4-level index corresponding to the potential impact on their applications. This service is part of the real-time monitoring service of the PECASUS project of the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) which started end of 2019.</p><p>Results of this 5-year monitoring will be discussed, including the 3 SRBs of 2015 and 2017, together with the new developments toward a global index using the International GNSS Service (IGS) network. In addition, we will show how the SRB monitoring is sometimes interfered by GPS flex power campaigns on the satellites from blocks IIR-M and IIF, and how it is mitigated . The routine and transient GPS flex power campaigns will be presented in terms of C/N<sub>0</sub> variations for the EPN and IGS networks.</p>

scholarly journals Space weather: risk factors for Global Navigation Satellite Systems

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 28-47
Author(s):  
Vladislav Demyanov ◽  
Yury Yasyukevich
Keyword(s):  
Space Weather ◽  
Solar Radio ◽  
Global Navigation Satellite Systems ◽  
Navigation Satellite ◽  
Satellite Systems ◽  
Radio Navigation ◽  
Weather Events ◽  
Global Navigation Satellite ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Extreme Space Weather Events

Extreme space weather events affect the stability and quality of the global navigation satellite systems (GNSS) of the second generation (GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou/Compass) and GNSS augmentation. We review the theory about mechanisms behind the impact of geomagnetic storms, ionospheric irregularities, and powerful solar radio bursts on the GNSS user segment. We also summarize experimental observations of the space weather effects on GNSS performance in 2000–2020 to confirm the theory. We analyze the probability of failures in measurements of radio navigation parameters, decrease in positioning accuracy of GNSS users in dual-frequency mode and differential navigation mode (RTK), and in precise point positioning (PPP). Additionally, the review includes data on the occurrence of dangerous and extreme space weather phenomena and the possibility for predicting their im- pact on the GNSS user segment. The main conclusions of the review are as follows: 1) the positioning error in GNSS users may increase up to 10 times in various modes during extreme space weather events, as compared to the background level; 2) GNSS space and ground segments have been significantly modernized over the past decade, thus allowing a substantial in- crease in noise resistance of GNSS under powerful solar radio burst impacts; 3) there is a great possibility for increasing the tracking stability and accuracy of radio navigation parameters by introducing algorithms for adaptive lock loop tuning, taking into account the influence of space weather events; 4) at present, the urgent scientific and technical problem of modernizing GNSS by improving the scientific methodology, hardware and software for monitoring the system integrity and monitoring the availability of required navigation parameters, taking into account the impact of extreme space weather events, is still unresolved.

scholarly journals Space weather: risk factors for Global Navigation Satellite Systems

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 30-52
Author(s):  
Vladislav Demyanov ◽  
Yury Yasyukevich
Keyword(s):  
Space Weather ◽  
Solar Radio ◽  
Global Navigation Satellite Systems ◽  
Navigation Satellite ◽  
Satellite Systems ◽  
Radio Navigation ◽  
Weather Events ◽  
Global Navigation Satellite ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Extreme Space Weather Events

Extreme space weather events affect the stability and quality of the global navigation satellite systems (GNSS) of the second generation (GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou/Compass) and GNSS augmentation. We review the theory about mechanisms behind the impact of geomagnetic storms, ionospheric irregularities, and powerful solar radio bursts on the GNSS user segment. We also summarize experimental observations of the space weather effects on GNSS performance in 2000–2020 to confirm the theory. We analyze the probability of failures in measurements of radio navigation parameters, decrease in positioning accuracy of GNSS users in dual-frequency mode and differential navigation mode (RTK), and in precise point positioning (PPP). Additionally, the review includes data on the occurrence of dangerous and extreme space weather phenomena and the possibility for predicting their im- pact on the GNSS user segment. The main conclusions of the review are as follows: 1) the positioning error in GNSS users may increase up to 10 times in various modes during extreme space weather events, as compared to the background level; 2) GNSS space and ground segments have been significantly modernized over the past decade, thus allowing a substantial in- crease in noise resistance of GNSS under powerful solar radio burst impacts; 3) there is a great possibility for increasing the tracking stability and accuracy of radio navigation parameters by introducing algorithms for adaptive lock loop tuning, taking into account the influence of space weather events; 4) at present, the urgent scientific and technical problem of modernizing GNSS by improving the scientific methodology, hardware and software for monitoring the system integrity and monitoring the availability of required navigation parameters, taking into account the impact of extreme space weather events, is still unresolved.

scholarly journals Assessment of Empirical Troposphere Model GPT3 Based on NGL’s Global Troposphere Products

Sensors ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (13) ◽  
pp. 3631
Author(s):  
Junsheng Ding ◽  
Junping Chen
Keyword(s):  
Global Navigation Satellite Systems ◽  
Tropospheric Delay ◽  
Strongly Correlated ◽  
International Gnss Service ◽  
Total Delay ◽  
Average Deviation ◽  
Satellite Systems ◽  
Global Average ◽  
The North ◽  
Global Navigation Satellite

Tropospheric delay is one of the major error sources in GNSS (Global Navigation Satellite Systems) positioning. Over the years, many approaches have been devised which aim at accurately modeling tropospheric delays, so-called troposphere models. Using the troposphere data of over 16,000 global stations in the last 10 years, as calculated by the Nevada Geodetic Laboratory (NGL), this paper evaluates the performance of the empirical troposphere model GPT3, which is the latest version of the GPT (Global Pressure and Temperature) series model. Owing to the large station number, long time-span and diverse station distribution, the spatiotemporal properties of the empirical model were analyzed using the average deviation (BIAS) and root mean square (RMS) error as indicators. The experimental results demonstrate that: (1) the troposphere products of NGL have the same accuracy as the IGS (International GNSS Service) products and can be used as a reference for evaluating general troposphere models. (2) The global average BIAS of the ZTD (zenith total delay) estimated by GPT3 is −0.99 cm and the global average RMS is 4.41 cm. The accuracy of the model is strongly correlated with latitude and ellipsoidal height, showing obviously seasonal variations. (3) The global average RMS of the north gradient and east gradient estimated by GPT3 is 0.77 mm and 0.73 mm, respectively, which are strongly correlated with each other, with values increasing from the equator to lower latitudes and decreasing from lower to higher latitudes.

scholarly journals CODE IGS reference products including Galileo

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lars Prange ◽  
Arturo Villiger ◽  
Stefan Schaer ◽  
Rolf Dach ◽  
Dmitry Sidorov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rapid Analysis ◽  
Global Navigation Satellite Systems ◽  
Processing Strategy ◽  
International Gnss Service ◽  
Satellite Systems ◽  
The World ◽  
Product Generation ◽  
Clock Correction ◽  
Global Navigation Satellite ◽  
The Impact

<p>The International GNSS service (IGS) has been providing precise reference products for the Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) GPS and (starting later) GLONASS since more than 25 years. These orbit, clock correction, coordinate reference frame, troposphere, ionosphere, and bias products are freely distributed and widely used by scientific, administrative, and commercial users from all over the world. The IGS facilities needed for data collection, product generation, product combination, as well as data and product dissemination, are well established. The Center for Orbit Determination in Europe (CODE) is one of the Analysis Centers (AC) contributing to the IGS from the beginning. It generates IGS products using the Bernese GNSS Software.</p><p> </p><p>In the last decade new GNSS (European Galileo and Chinese BeiDou) and regional complementary systems to GPS (Japanese QZSS and Indian IRNSS/NAVIC) were deployed. The existing GNSS are constantly modernized, offering - among others - more stable satellite clocks and new signals. The exploitation of the new data and their integration into the existing IGS infrastructure was the goal of the Multi-GNSS EXtension (MGEX) when it was initiated in 2012. CODE has been participating in the MGEX with its own orbit and clock solution from the beginning. Since 2014 CODE’s MGEX (COM) contribution considers five GNSS, namely GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou2 (BDS2), and QZSS. We provide an overview of the latest developments of the COM solution with respect to processing strategy, orbit modelling, attitude modelling, antenna calibrations, handling of code and phase biases, and ambiguity resolution. The impact of these changes on the COM products will be discussed.</p><p> </p><p>Recent assessment showed that especially the Galileo analysis within the MGEX has reached a state of maturity, which is almost comparable to GPS and GLONASS. Based on this finding the IGS decided to consider Galileo in its third reprocessing campaign, which will contribute to the next ITRF. Recognizing the demands expressed by the GNSS community, CODE decided in 2019 to go a step further and consider Galileo also in its IGS RAPID and ULTRA-RAPID reference products. We summarize our experiences from the first months of triple-system (ULTRA)-RAPID analysis including GPS, GLONASS, and Galileo. Finally we provide an outlook of CODE’s IGS analysis with the focus on the new GNSS.</p>

scholarly journals Towards FAIR GNSS data: challenges and open problems

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Miglio ◽  
Carine Bruyninx ◽  
Andras Fabian ◽  
Juliette Legrand ◽  
Eric Pottiaux ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Research Policy ◽  
Global Navigation Satellite Systems ◽  
International Gnss Service ◽  
Open Problems ◽  
Data Repositories ◽  
Satellite Systems ◽  
Data Practices ◽  
Metadata Standards ◽  
Global Navigation Satellite ◽  
Gnss Data

<p>Nowadays, we measure positions on Earth’s surface thanks to Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) e.g. GPS, GLONASS, and Galileo. Activities such as navigation, mapping, and surveying rely on permanent GNSS tracking stations located all over the world.<br>The Royal Observatory of Belgium (ROB) maintains and operates a repository containing data from hundreds of GNSS stations belonging to the European GNSS networks (e.g. EUREF, Bruyninx et al., 2019). </p><p>ROB’s repository contains GNSS data that are openly available and rigorously curated. The curation data include detailed GNSS station descriptions (e.g. location, pictures, and data author) as well as quality indicators of the GNSS observations.</p><p>However, funders and research policy makers are progressively asking for data to be made <em>Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable (FAIR)</em> and therefore to increase data transparency, discoverability, interoperability, and accessibility.</p><p>In particular, within the GNSS community, there is no shared agreement yet on the need for making data <em>FAIR</em>. Therefore, turning GNSS data <em>FAIR</em> presents many challenges and, although <em>FAIR</em> data has been included in EUREF’s strategic plan, no practical roadmap has been implemented so far. We will illustrate the specific difficulties and the need for an open discussion including also other communities working on <em>FAIR</em> data.</p><p>For example, making GNSS data easily <em>findable</em> and <em>accessibl</em>e would require to attribute persistent identifiers to the data. It is worth noting that the International GNSS Service (IGS) is only now beginning to consider the attribution of DOIs (Digital Object Identifiers) to GNSS data, mainly to allow data citation and acknowledgement of data providers. Some individual GNSS data repositories are using DOIs (such as UNAVCO, USA).  Are DOIs the only available option or are there more suitable types of URIs (Uniform Resource Identifiers) to consider?</p><p>The GNSS community would greatly benefit from <em>FAIR</em> data practices, as at present, (almost) no licenses have been attributed to GNSS data, data duplication is still an issue, historical provenance information is not available because of data manipulations in data centres, citation of the data providers is far from the rule, etc.</p><p>To move further along the path towards <em>FAIR</em> GNSS data, one would need to implement standardised metadata models to ensure data <em>interoperability</em>, but, as several metadata standards are already in use in various scientific disciplines, which one to choose?</p><p>Then, to facilitate the <em>reuse</em> (and long-term preservation) of GNSS data, all metadata should be properly linked to the corresponding data and additional metadata, such as provenance and license information. The latter is a good example up for discussion: despite the fact that ‘CC BY’ license is already assigned to some of the GNSS data, other licenses might need to be enabled.</p><p> </p><p>Bruyninx C., Legrand J., Fabian A., Pottiaux E. (2019) “GNSS Metadata and Data Validation in the EUREF Permanent Network”. GPS Sol., 23(4), https://doi: 10.1007/s10291-019-0880-9           </p>

scholarly journals IMPLEMENTATION OF THE GLOBAL AERONAUTICAL DISTRESS AND SAFETY SYSTEM (GADSS)

Aviation ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 24-30
Author(s):  
Dimov Stojce Ilcev
Keyword(s):  
Communication Systems ◽  
Satellite Communication ◽  
Safety System ◽  
International Standards ◽  
Global Navigation Satellite Systems ◽  
Civil Aviation ◽  
Satellite Systems ◽  
Land Vehicles ◽  
Global Navigation Satellite ◽  
Global Communications

In this paper is introduced the first proposal for development of Global Aeronautical Distress and Safety System (GADSS) in 1999 by the author of this article. The GADSS is de facto the integration of space (radio and satellite) Communication, Navigation and Surveillance (CNS) with Tracking, Detecting and Search and Rescue (SAR) systems, which have to provide airmen with global communications and locating networks. The GPS, GLONASS and other Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) provide precise positioning data for vessels, land vehicles and aircraft, but modern CNS demands need for enhanced services and augmentation of GNSS networks. Both networks have to be integrated under an GADSS umbrella with elements capable of being operated by any individual onboard aircraft to ensure prompt distress alert for SAR procedure. The enhanced concept of GADSS is that SAR authorities ashore and ships in the immediate vicinity of the aircraft in distress have to be rapidly alerted via radio and satellite communication systems and to assist in a coordinated SAR operations with the minimum of delay. In 2016, 16 years in delay, the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) has begun its process to amend international standards and recommended practices to align with GADSS concept. This paper will also introduce the necessary networks and equipment, which has to ensure harmonized and enhanced maritime and aeronautical global SAR systems.

scholarly journals Asynchronous RTK Method for Detecting the Stability of the Reference Station in GNSS Deformation Monitoring

Sensors ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 1320
Author(s):  
Yuan Du ◽  
Guanwen Huang ◽  
Qin Zhang ◽  
Yang Gao ◽  
Yuting Gao
Keyword(s):  
Real Time ◽  
Reference Frame ◽  
Deformation Monitoring ◽  
Global Navigation Satellite Systems ◽  
Reference Station ◽  
Monitoring Station ◽  
Landslide Monitoring ◽  
Satellite Systems ◽  
Local Reference ◽  
Global Navigation Satellite

The real-time kinematic (RTK) positioning technique of global navigation satellite systems (GNSS) has been widely used for deformation monitoring in the past several decades. The RTK technique can provide relative displacements in a local reference frame defined by a highly stable reference station. However, the traditional RTK solution does not account for reference stations that experience displacement. This presents a challenge for establishing a near real-time GNSS monitoring system, as since the displacement of a reference station can be easily misinterpreted as a sign of rapid movement at the monitoring station. In this study, based on the reference observations in different time domains, asynchronous and synchronous RTK are proposed and applied together to address this issue, providing more reliable displacement information. Using the asynchronously generated time difference of a reference frame, the proposed approach can detect whether a measured displacement has occurred in the reference or the monitoring station in the current epoch. This allows for the separation of reference station movements from monitoring station movements. The results based on both simulated and landslide monitoring data demonstrate that the proposed method can provide reliable displacement determinations, which are critical in deformation monitoring applications, such as the early warning of landslides.

scholarly journals New GNSS tomography of the atmosphere method – proposal and testing

2012 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. 63-76 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michal Kačmařík ◽  
Lukáš Rapant
Keyword(s):  
Water Vapour ◽  
Theoretical Concept ◽  
Global Navigation Satellite Systems ◽  
Satellite Systems ◽  
Gnss Meteorology ◽  
Gnss Receivers ◽  
Tomography Method ◽  
Gnss Measurements ◽  
Global Navigation Satellite

Paper is focused on GNSS meteorology which is generally used for the determination of water vapour distribution in the atmosphere from GNSS measurements. Water vapour in the atmosphere is an important parameter which influences the state and development of the weather. At first, the paper presents basics of the GNSS meteorology and tomography of the atmosphere and subsequently introduces a new GNSS tomography method which doesn't require an extensive network of GNSS receivers, but uses only a few receivers situated in a line. After a theoretical concept describing this method and used mathematical background, the results from a real experiment are shown and discussed. Unfortunately the results indicate that presented method is not able to provide credible outputs. Possibly the main problem lies in an insufficient number of available signals from current global navigation satellite systems (GPS and GLONASS) where the improvement could be expected after the start of Galileo and Compass. Potential ways how to improve the results without increasing the number of satellites are outlined in the last section.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document