Simulation studies on single-satellite space ties and their potential to achieve the Global Geodetic Observing System goals.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick Schreiner ◽  
Nicat Mammadaliyev ◽  
Susanne Glaser ◽  
Rolf Koenig ◽  
Karl Hans Neumayer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Reference Frame ◽  
Precise Orbit Determination ◽  
Terrestrial Reference Frame ◽  
German Research Foundation ◽  
Station Coordinates ◽  
Earth Rotation Parameters ◽  
German Research ◽  
Space Geodetic Techniques ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Space Ties

<p>The German Research Foundation (DFG) project GGOS-SIM-2, successor of project GGOS-SIM, is a collaboration between the Helmholtz Center Potsdam - German Research Center for Geosciences (GFZ) and the Technische Universität Berlin (TUB). The project aims at investigating the feasibility of meeting the requirements specified by the Global Geodetic Observing System (GGOS) for a global terrestrial reference frame (TRF) with the help of simulations. In GGOS-SIM-2 the potential of so-called space ties is examined in relation to the GGOS targets, 1 mm accuracy in position and 1 mm / decade long-term stability, which have not yet been achieved by the recent International Terrestrial Reference Frame (ITRF). Space ties are provided by a satellite that carries two, three or all the four main space-geodetic techniques, i.e. DORIS, GPS, SLR and VLBI. This allows for a quantification of the impact of systematic errors on the derived orbits and subsequent results of the dynamic method as the TRF. Proposed co-location in space missions such as GRASP and E-GRASP anticipate such a scenario. We therefor simulate the space-geodetic observations based on Precise Orbit Determination (POD) with real observations from various missions and evaluate their potential for determining a TRF. So far, we simulated DORIS and SLR observations to six orbit scenarios, including a GRASP-like and an E-GRASP-like one, and generated TRFs based on each scenario either technique-wise or combined via the space-ties or in combination with ground data. We quantify the effect on the TRF in terms of changes of origin and scale and of formal errors of the ground station coordinates and of the Earth rotation parameters.</p>

On the potential of single-satellite space ties to achieve the Global Geodetic Observing System goals

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick Schreiner ◽  
Nicat Mammadaliyev ◽  
Susanne Glaser ◽  
Rolf König ◽  
Karl Hans Neumayer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Earth Rotation ◽  
Research Collaboration ◽  
Precise Orbit Determination ◽  
Added Value ◽  
Station Coordinates ◽  
Earth Rotation Parameters ◽  
German Research ◽  
Rotation Parameters ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Space Ties

<p>GGOS-SIM-2, funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG), is a research collaboration project between the German Research Center for Geosciences (GFZ) and the Technische Universität Berlin (TUB). Simulations are utilized to examine the potential of co-location in space, called space ties, of the four main space geodetic techniques, i.e. DORIS, GNSS, SLR and VLBI to achieve the requirements of the Global Geodetic Observing System (GGOS) for a global terrestrial reference frame (TRF), 1 mm accuracy and 1 mm / decade long-term stability. The simulations are performed for six fictional orbit scenarios, including proposed missions GRASP (USA) and E-GRASP (EU), and expanded by a variation of the E-GRASP orbit with lower eccentricity as well as three higher orbiting circular orbits with different inclination over a time span of seven years. For most realistic simulations, we first evaluated real DORIS, GPS and SLR observations to the satellites LAGEOS 1 und 2, Ajisai, LARES, Starlette, Stella, ENVISAT, Jason 1 und 2, Sentinel 3A and B using Precise Orbit Determination (POD), to get detailed information about the individual station and receiver accuracy, availability and further technique-specific effects. Then, we generate simulated single-technique TRF solutions based on existing missions and add the co-location-in-space satellite in the six orbit scenarios. In order to quantify the effects of the different scenarios, we examine the added value w.r.t. the existing missions in terms of origin and scale and of formal errors of the station coordinates and Earth rotation parameters. We also investigate the impact of systematic errors on the derived orbits on the final TRF. The different techniques show individual advantages regarding the respective orbit parameters. For instance, a higher eccentricity of the orbit seems to lead to improved accuracy of length-of-day (LOD) from SLR. The results will help to find the best trade-off for a satellite that co-locates all four techniques in space towards a GGOS-compliant TRF and Earth rotation parameters.</p>

Simulations of VLBI observations to satellites enabling co-location in space

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicat Mammadaliyev ◽  
Patrick Schreiner ◽  
Susanne Glaser ◽  
Karl Hans Neumayer ◽  
Rolf Koenig ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Reference Frame ◽  
Orbit Determination ◽  
Precise Orbit Determination ◽  
Terrestrial Reference Frame ◽  
Observation Time ◽  
Measurement Noise ◽  
Potential Influence ◽  
Vlbi Observations ◽  
Space Geodetic Techniques ◽  
The Impact

<p>The exceptional situation of simultaneously observing a dedicated near-Earth orbiting satellite via the four main space geodetic techniques opens the unique opportunity to investigate the additional benefits on the realization of global terrestrial reference frame using co-location in space. Applying co-location in space requires a precise orbit determination (POD) of dedicated satellites for all techniques. In this regard, current VLBI infrastructure is extended by the observation to satellites and the impact of such observation concept on the VLBI estimates is assessed. Thus the main geodetic products including the terrestrial reference frame are investigated within the GGOS-SIM-II project. In this study, the potential influence of orbital errors on the estimates and capability of VLBI observations to satellites within the POD are investigated for different scenarios with varying networks, observation time and measurement noise.  </p>

scholarly journals Impact of network constraining on the terrestrial reference frame realization based on SLR observations to LAGEOS

2019 ◽  
Vol 93 (11) ◽  
pp. 2293-2313 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Zajdel ◽  
K. Sośnica ◽  
M. Drożdżewski ◽  
G. Bury ◽  
D. Strugarek
Keyword(s):  
Reference Frame ◽  
A Priori ◽  
Terrestrial Reference Frame ◽  
Laser Ranging ◽  
Potential Core ◽  
North East ◽  
The North ◽  
Station Coordinates ◽  
Earth Rotation Parameters ◽  
Variable List

Abstract The Satellite Laser Ranging (SLR) network struggles with some major limitations including an inhomogeneous global station distribution and uneven performance of SLR sites. The International Laser Ranging Service (ILRS) prepares the time-variable list of the most well-performing stations denoted as ‘core sites’ and recommends using them for the terrestrial reference frame (TRF) datum realization in SLR processing. Here, we check how different approaches of the TRF datum realization using minimum constraint conditions (MCs) and the selection of datum-defining stations affect the estimated SLR station coordinates, the terrestrial scale, Earth rotation parameters (ERPs), and geocenter coordinates (GCC). The analyses are based on the processing of the SLR observations to LAGEOS-1/-2 collected between 2010 and 2018. We show that it is essential to reject outlying stations from the reference frame realization to maintain a high quality of SLR-based products. We test station selection criteria based on the Helmert transformation of the network w.r.t. the a priori SLRF2014 coordinates to reject misbehaving stations from the list of datum-defining stations. The 25 mm threshold is optimal to eliminate the epoch-wise temporal deviations and to provide a proper number of datum-defining stations. According to the station selection algorithm, we found that some of the stations that are not included in the list of ILRS core sites could be taken into account as potential core stations in the TRF datum realization. When using a robust station selection for the datum definition, we can improve the station coordinate repeatability by 8%, 4%, and 6%, for the North, East and Up components, respectively. The global distribution of datum-defining stations is also crucial for the estimation of ERPs and GCC. When excluding just two core stations from the SLR network, the amplitude of the annual signal in the GCC estimates is changed by up to 2.2 mm, and the noise of the estimated pole coordinates is substantially increased.

GPS z-PCO and GNSS-based scale determined by integrated processing with LEOs and Galileo

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wen Huang ◽  
Benjamin Männel ◽  
Andreas Brack ◽  
Harald Schuh
Keyword(s):  
Reference Frame ◽  
A Priori ◽  
Terrestrial Reference Frame ◽  
International Gnss Service ◽  
Satellite Transmitter ◽  
Ground Station ◽  
Station Coordinates ◽  
Integrated Processing ◽  
Current Constellation ◽  
The Impact

<p>The Global Positioning System (GPS) satellite transmitter antenna phase center offsets (PCOs) in z-direction and the scale of the terrestrial reference frame are highly correlated when neither of them is constrained to an a priori value in a least-squares adjustment. The commonly used PCO values offered by the International GNSS Service (IGS) are estimated in a global adjustment by constraining the ground station coordinates to the current International Terrestrial Reference Frame (ITRF). As the scale of the ITRF is determined by other techniques, the estimated GPS z-PCOs are not independent. Consequently, the z-PCOs transfer the scale to any subsequent GNSS solution. To get a GNSS-based scale that can contribute to a future ITRF realization, two methods are proposed to determine scale-independent GPS z-PCOs. One method is based on the gravitational constraint on Low Earth Orbiters (LEOs) in an integrated processing of the GPS satellites and LEOs. The correlation coefficient between the GPS PCO-z and the scale is reduced from 0.85 to 0.3 by supplementing a 54-ground-station network with seven LEOs. The impact of individual LEOs on the estimation is discussed by including different subsets of the LEOs. The accuracy of the z-PCOs of the LEOs is very important for the accuracy of the solution. In another method, the GPS z-PCOs and the scale are determined in a GPS+Galileo processing where the PCOs of Galileo are fixed to the values calibrated on ground from the released metadata. The correlation between the GPS PCO-z and the scale is reduced to 0.13 by including the current constellation of Galileo with 24 satellites. We use the whole constellation of Galileo and the three LEOs of the Swarm mission to perform a direct comparison and cross-check of the two methods. The two methods provide mean GPS z-PCO corrections of -186±25 mm and -221±37 mm with respect to the IGS values, and +1.55±0.22 ppb (part per billion) and +1.72±0.31 ppb in the terrestrial scale with respect to the IGS14 reference frame. The results of both methods agree with each other with only small differences. Due to the larger number of Galileo observations, the Galileo-PCO-fixed method leads to more precise and stable results. In the joint processing of GPS+Galileo+Swarm in which both methods are applied, the constraint on Galileo dominates the results. We also discuss how fixing either the Galileo transmitter antenna z-PCO or the Swarm receiver antenna z-PCOs in the GPS+Galileo+Swarm processing propagates to the respective freely estimated z-PCOs of Swarm or Galileo.</p>

Combined IVS contribution to the ITRF2020

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hendrik Hellmers ◽  
Sabine Bachmann ◽  
Daniela Thaller ◽  
Mathis Bloßfeld ◽  
Manuela Seitz
Keyword(s):  
Time Series ◽  
Reference Frame ◽  
Terrestrial Reference Frame ◽  
Station Coordinates ◽  
Space Geodetic Techniques ◽  
International Vlbi Service ◽  
Combined Solution ◽  
Individual Contributions ◽  
The Individual ◽  
External Time

<p>The ITRF2020 will be the next official solution of the International Terrestrial Reference Frame and the successor of the currently used frame, i.e., ITRF2014. Based on an inter-technique combination of all four space geodetic techniques VLBI, GNSS, SLR and DORIS, contributions from different international institutions lead to the global ITRF2020 solution. In this context, the IVS Combination Centre operated by the Federal Agency for Cartography and Geodesy (BKG, Germany) in close cooperation with the Deutsches Geodätisches Forschungsinstitut (DGFI-TUM, Germany) generates the final contribution of the International VLBI Service for Geodesy and Astrometry (IVS). Thereby, an intra-technique combination utilizing the individual contributions of multiple Analysis Centres (AC) is applied.</p><p>For the contribution to the upcoming ITRF2020 solution, sessions containing 24h VLBI observations from 1979 until the end of 2020 are processed by 10 to 12 ACs and submitted to the IVS Combination Centre. The required SINEX format includes datum-free normal equations containing station coordinates and source positions as well as full sets of Earth Orientation Parameters (EOP). For ensuring a consistently combined solution, time series of EOPs, source positions and station coordinates as well as a VLBI-only Terrestrial Reference Frame (VTRF) and a Celestial Reference Frame (CRF) were generated and further investigated.</p><p>One possibility to assess the quality of the IVS contribution to the ITRF2020 solution is to carry out internal as well as external comparisons of the estimated EOP. Thereby, estimates of the individual ACs as well as external time series (e.g. IERS C04, Bulletin A, JPL-Comb2018) serve as a reference. The evaluation of the contributions by the ACs, the combination procedure and the results of the combined solution for station coordinates, source positions and EOPs will be presented.</p>

DPOD2008: A DORIS-Oriented Terrestrial Reference Frame for Precise Orbit Determination

2015 ◽  
pp. 175-181 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pascal Willis ◽  
Nikita P. Zelensky ◽  
John Ries ◽  
Laurent Soudarin ◽  
Luca Cerri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Reference Frame ◽  
Orbit Determination ◽  
Precise Orbit Determination ◽  
Terrestrial Reference Frame ◽  
Precise Orbit

Impact of low-degree gravity field estimation in the SLR data processing of spherical satellites at AIUB

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda Geisser ◽  
Ulrich Meyer ◽  
Daniel Arnold ◽  
Adrian Jäggi ◽  
Daniela Thaller
Keyword(s):  
Gravity Field ◽  
Lower Altitude ◽  
Earth’S Gravity Field ◽  
Low Degree ◽  
Station Coordinates ◽  
Earth Rotation Parameters ◽  
Field Estimation ◽  
University Of Bern ◽  
The University ◽  
The Impact

<p>The Astronomical Institute of the University of Bern (AIUB) collaborates with the Federal Agency for Cartography and Geodesy (BKG) in Germany to develop new procedures to generate products for the International Laser Ranging Service (ILRS). In this framework the SLR processing of the standard ILRS weekly solutions of spherical geodetic satellites at AIUB, where the orbits are determined in 7-day arcs together with station coordinates and other geodetic parameters, is extended from LAGEOS-1/2 and the Etalon-1/2 satellites to also include the LARES satellite orbiting the Earth at much lower altitude. Since a lower orbit experiences a more variable enviroment, e.g. it is more sensitive to time-variable Earth's gravity field, the orbit parametrization has to be adapted and also the low degree spherical harmonic coefficients of Earth's gravity field have to be co-estimated. The impact of the gravity field estimation is studied by validating the quality of other geodetic parameters such as geocenter coordinates, Earth Rotation Parameters (ERPs) and station coordinates. The analysis of the influence of LARES on the SLR solution shows that a good datum definition is important.</p>

Co-location of SLR and GNSS techniques onboard Galileo and GLONASS satellites

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Grzegorz Bury ◽  
Krzysztof Sośnica ◽  
Radosław Zajdel ◽  
Dariusz Strugarek ◽  
Urs Hugentobler
Keyword(s):  
Orbital Plane ◽  
Terrestrial Reference Frame ◽  
Global Navigation Satellite Systems ◽  
Navigation Systems ◽  
Local Ties ◽  
Satellite Systems ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Space Ties ◽  
Gnss Observations

<p>All satellites of the Galileo and GLONASS navigation systems are equipped with laser retroreflector arrays for Satellite Laser Ranging (SLR). SLR observations to Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) provide the co-location of two space geodetic techniques onboard navigation satellites.</p><p>SLR observations, which are typically used for the validation of the microwave-GNSS orbits, can now contribute to the determination of the combined SLR+GNSS orbits of the navigation satellites. SLR measurements are especially helpful for periods when the elevation of the Sun above the orbital plane (β angle) is the highest. The quality of Galileo-IOV orbits calculated using combined SLR+GNSS observations improves from 36 to 30 mm for β> 60° as compared to the microwave-only solution. </p><p>Co-location of two space techniques allows for the determination of the linkage between SLR and GNSS techniques in space. Based on the so-called space ties, it is possible to determine the 3D vector between the ground-based co-located SLR and GNSS stations and compare it with the local ties which are determined using the ground measurements. The agreement between local ties derived from co-location in space and ground measurements is at the level of 1 mm in terms of the long-term median values for the co-located station in Zimmerwald, Switzerland.</p><p>We also revise the approach for handling the SLR range biases which constitute one of the main error sources for the SLR measurements. The updated SLR range biases consider now the impact of not only of SLR-to-GNSS observations but also the SLR observations to LAGEOS and the microwave GNSS measurements. The updated SLR range biases improve the agreement between space ties and local ties from 34 mm to 23 mm for the co-located station in Wettzell, Germany.</p><p>Co-location of SLR and GNSS techniques onboard navigation satellites allows for the realization of the terrestrial reference frame in space, onboard Galileo and GLONASS satellites, independently from the ground measurements. It may also deliver independent information on the local tie values with full variance-covariance data for each day with common measurements or can contribute to the control of the ground measurements as long as both GNSS and SLR-to-GNSS observations are available.</p>

scholarly journals Realization of the Primary Terrestrial Reference Frame

1991 ◽  
Vol 127 ◽  
pp. 108-115
Author(s):  
W. Kosek ◽  
B. Kołaczek
Keyword(s):  
Reference Frame ◽  
Geographic Distribution ◽  
Terrestrial Reference Frame ◽  
Mean Square ◽  
Minimum Value ◽  
Collocation Points ◽  
Station Coordinates ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Transformation Parameters ◽  
Mean Square Errors

AbstractThe PTRF is based on 43 sites with 64 SSC collocation points with the optimum geographic distribution, which were selected from all stations of the ITRF89 according to the criterion of the minimum value of the errors of 7 parameters of transformation. The ITRF89 was computed by the IERS Terrestrial Frame Section in Institut Geographique National - IGN and contains 192 VLBI and SLR stations (points) with 119 collocation ones. The PTRF has been compared with the ITRF89. The errors of the 7 parameters of transformation between the PTRF and 18 individual SSC as well as the mean square errors of station coordinates are of the same order as those for the ITRF89. The transformation parameters between the ITRF89 and the PTRF are negligible and their errors are of the order of 3 mm.

scholarly journals Unconstrained Estimation of VLBI Global Observing System Station Coordinates

2021 ◽  
Vol 55 ◽  
pp. 23-31
Author(s):  
Markus Mikschi ◽  
Johannes Böhm ◽  
Matthias Schartner
Keyword(s):  
Reference Frame ◽  
Terrestrial Reference Frame ◽  
Baseline Length ◽  
Radio Telescopes ◽  
Earth Orientation Parameters ◽  
The Earth ◽  
Station Coordinates ◽  
International Vlbi Service ◽  
Orientation Parameters

Abstract. The International VLBI Service for Geodesy and Astrometry (IVS) is currently setting up a network of smaller and thus faster radio telescopes observing at broader bandwidths for improved determination of geodetic parameters. However, this new VLBI Global Observing System (VGOS) network is not yet strongly linked to the legacy S/X network and the International Terrestrial Reference Frame (ITRF) as only station WESTFORD has ITRF2014 coordinates. In this work, we calculated VGOS station coordinates based on publicly available VGOS sessions until the end of 2019 while defining the geodetic datum by fixing the Earth orientation parameters and the coordinates of the WESTFORD station in an unconstrained adjustment. This set of new coordinates allows the determination of geodetic parameters from the analysis of VGOS sessions, which would otherwise not be possible. As it is the concept of VGOS to use smaller, faster slewing antennas in order to increase the number of observations, shorter estimation intervals for the zenith wet delays and the tropospheric gradients along with different relative constraints were tested and the best performing parametrization, judged by the baseline length repeatability, was used for the estimation of the VGOS station coordinates.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document