Controls of the TCRE in Earth system models

Author(s):  
Ric Williams ◽  
Paulo Ceppi ◽  
Anna Katavouta

<p>The controls of a climate metric, the Transient Climate Response to cumulative carbon Emissions (TCRE), are assessed using a suite of Earth system models, 9 CMIP6 and 7 CMIP5, following an annual 1% rise in atmospheric CO2 over 140 years. The TCRE is interpreted in terms of a product of three dependences: (i) a thermal response involving the surface warming dependence on radiative forcing (including the effects of physical climate feedbacks and planetary heat uptake), (ii) a radiative response involving the radiative forcing dependence on changes in atmospheric carbon and (iii) a carbon response involving the airborne fraction (involving terrestrial and ocean carbon uptake). The near constancy of the TCRE is found to result primarily from a compensation between two factors: (i) the thermal response strengthens  in time from more surface warming per radiative forcing due to a strengthening in surface warming from short-wave cloud feedbacks and a declining effectiveness of ocean heat uptake, while  (ii) the radiative response weakens in time due to a saturation in the radiative forcing with increasing atmospheric carbon. This near constancy of the TCRE at least in complex Earth system models appears to be rather fortuitous given the competing effects of physical climate feedbacks, saturation in radiative forcing, changes in ocean heat uptake and changes in terrestrial and ocean carbon uptake.</p><p>Intermodel differences in the TCRE are mainly controlled by the thermal response, which arise through large differences in physical climate feedbacks that are only partly compensated by smaller differences in ocean heat uptake. The other contributions to the TCRE from the radiative and carbon responses are of comparable importance to the contribution from the thermal response on timescales of 50 years and longer for our subset of CMIP5 models, and 100 years and longer for our subset of CMIP6 models.</p><p> </p>

2017 ◽  
Vol 30 (23) ◽  
pp. 9343-9363 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard G. Williams ◽  
Vassil Roussenov ◽  
Philip Goodwin ◽  
Laure Resplandy ◽  
Laurent Bopp

Climate projections reveal global-mean surface warming increasing nearly linearly with cumulative carbon emissions. The sensitivity of surface warming to carbon emissions is interpreted in terms of a product of three terms: the dependence of surface warming on radiative forcing, the fractional radiative forcing from CO2, and the dependence of radiative forcing from CO2 on carbon emissions. Mechanistically each term varies, respectively, with climate sensitivity and ocean heat uptake, radiative forcing contributions, and ocean and terrestrial carbon uptake. The sensitivity of surface warming to fossil-fuel carbon emissions is examined using an ensemble of Earth system models, forced either by an annual increase in atmospheric CO2 or by RCPs until year 2100. The sensitivity of surface warming to carbon emissions is controlled by a temporal decrease in the dependence of radiative forcing from CO2 on carbon emissions, which is partly offset by a temporal increase in the dependence of surface warming on radiative forcing. The decrease in the dependence of radiative forcing from CO2 is due to a decline in the ratio of the global ocean carbon undersaturation to carbon emissions, while the increase in the dependence of surface warming is due to a decline in the ratio of ocean heat uptake to radiative forcing. At the present time, there are large intermodel differences in the sensitivity in surface warming to carbon emissions, which are mainly due to uncertainties in the climate sensitivity and ocean heat uptake. These uncertainties undermine the ability to predict how much carbon may be emitted before reaching a warming target.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ric Williams ◽  
Paulo Ceppi ◽  
Anna Katavouta

<p>The surface warming response to carbon emissions, defines a climate metric, the Transient Climate Response to cumulative carbon Emissions (TCRE), which is important in estimating how much carbon may be emitted to avoid dangerous climate. The TCRE is diagnosed from a suite of 9 CMIP6 Earth system models following an annual 1% rise in atmospheric CO2 over 140 years.   The TCRE   is nearly constant in time during emissions for these climate models, but its value   differs between individual models. The near constancy of this climate metric is due to a strengthening in the surface warming per unit radiative forcing, involving a weakening in both the climate feedback parameter and   fraction of radiative forcing warming the ocean interior, which are compensated by a weakening in the radiative forcing per unit carbon emission from the radiative forcing saturating with increasing atmospheric CO2. Inter-model differences in the TCRE are mainly controlled by the   surface warming response to radiative forcing with large inter-model differences in physical climate feedbacks dominating over smaller, partly compensating differences in ocean heat uptake. Inter-model differences in the radiative forcing per unit carbon emission   provide smaller inter-model differences in the TCRE, which are mainly due to differences in the ratio of the radiative forcing and change in atmospheric CO2 rather than from differences in the airborne fraction.     Hence, providing tighter constraints in the climate projections for the TCRE during emissions requires improving estimates of the physical climate feedbacks,   the rate of ocean   heat uptake, and how the radiative forcing saturates with atmospheric CO2.</p>


2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 3235-3292 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. L. Atchley ◽  
S. L. Painter ◽  
D. R. Harp ◽  
E. T. Coon ◽  
C. J. Wilson ◽  
...  

Abstract. Climate change is profoundly transforming the carbon-rich Arctic tundra landscape, potentially moving it from a carbon sink to a carbon source by increasing the thickness of soil that thaws on a seasonal basis. However, the modeling capability and precise parameterizations of the physical characteristics needed to estimate projected active layer thickness (ALT) are limited in Earth System Models (ESMs). In particular, discrepancies in spatial scale between field measurements and Earth System Models challenge validation and parameterization of hydrothermal models. A recently developed surface/subsurface model for permafrost thermal hydrology, the Advanced Terrestrial Simulator (ATS), is used in combination with field measurements to calibrate and identify fine scale controls of ALT in ice wedge polygon tundra in Barrow, Alaska. An iterative model refinement procedure that cycles between borehole temperature and snow cover measurements and simulations functions to evaluate and parameterize different model processes necessary to simulate freeze/thaw processes and ALT formation. After model refinement and calibration, reasonable matches between simulated and measured soil temperatures are obtained, with the largest errors occurring during early summer above ice wedges (e.g. troughs). The results suggest that properly constructed and calibrated one-dimensional thermal hydrology models have the potential to provide reasonable representation of the subsurface thermal response and can be used to infer model input parameters and process representations. The models for soil thermal conductivity and snow distribution were found to be the most sensitive process representations. However, information on lateral flow and snowpack evolution might be needed to constrain model representations of surface hydrology and snow depth.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
David I. Armstrong McKay ◽  
Sarah E. Cornell ◽  
Katherine Richardson ◽  
Johan Rockström

Abstract. The Earth’s oceans are one of the largest sinks in the Earth system for anthropogenic CO2 emissions, acting as a negative feedback on climate change. Earth system models predict, though, that climate change will lead to a weakening ocean carbon uptake rate as warm water holds less dissolved CO2 and biological productivity declines. However, most Earth system models do not incorporate the impact of warming on bacterial remineralisation and rely on simplified representations of plankton ecology that do not resolve the potential impact of climate change on ecosystem structure or elemental stoichiometry. Here we use a recently-developed extension of the cGEnIE Earth system model (ecoGEnIE) featuring a trait-based scheme for plankton ecology (ECOGEM), and also incorporate cGEnIE's temperature-dependent remineralisation (TDR) scheme. This enables evaluation of the impact of both ecological dynamics and temperature-dependent remineralisation on the soft-tissue biological pump in response to climate change. We find that including TDR strengthens the biological pump relative to default runs due to increased nutrient recycling, while ECOGEM weakens the biological pump by enabling a shift to smaller plankton classes. However, interactions with concurrent ocean acidification cause opposite sign responses for the carbon sink in both cases: TDR leads to a smaller sink relative to default runs whereas ECOGEM leads to a larger sink. Combining TDR and ECOGEM results in a net strengthening of the biological pump and a small net reduction in carbon sink relative to default. These results clearly illustrate the substantial degree to which ecological dynamics and biodiversity modulate the strength of climate-biosphere feedbacks, and demonstrate that Earth system models need to incorporate more ecological complexity in order to resolve carbon sink weakening.


2012 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 63-78 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Schmidt ◽  
K. Alterskjær ◽  
D. Bou Karam ◽  
O. Boucher ◽  
A. Jones ◽  
...  

Abstract. In this study we compare the response of four state-of-the-art Earth system models to climate engineering under scenario G1 of two model intercomparison projects: GeoMIP (Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project) and IMPLICC (EU project "Implications and risks of engineering solar radiation to limit climate change"). In G1, the radiative forcing from an instantaneous quadrupling of the CO2 concentration, starting from the preindustrial level, is balanced by a reduction of the solar constant. Model responses to the two counteracting forcings in G1 are compared to the preindustrial climate in terms of global means and regional patterns and their robustness. While the global mean surface air temperature in G1 remains almost unchanged compared to the control simulation, the meridional temperature gradient is reduced in all models. Another robust response is the global reduction of precipitation with strong effects in particular over North and South America and northern Eurasia. In comparison to the climate response to a quadrupling of CO2 alone, the temperature responses are small in experiment G1. Precipitation responses are, however, in many regions of comparable magnitude but globally of opposite sign.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Félix Pellerin ◽  
Philipp Porada ◽  
Inga Hense

Abstract. Terrestrial and marine ecosystems interact with other Earth system components through different biosphere-climate feedbacks that are very similar among ecosystem types. Despite these similarities, terrestrial and marine systems are often treated relatively separately in Earth System Models (ESM). In these ESM, the ecosystems are represented by a set of biological processes that are able to influence the climate system by affecting the chemical and physical properties of the environment. While most of the climate-relevant processes are shared between ecosystem types, model representations of terrestrial and marine ecosystems often differ. This raises the question whether inconsistencies between terrestrial and marine ecosystem models exist and potentially skew our perception of the relative influence of each ecosystem on climate. Here we compared the terrestrial and marine modules of 17 Earth System Models in order to identify inconsistencies between the two ecosystem types. We sorted out the biological processes included in ESM regarding their influence on climate into three types of biosphere-climate feedbacks (i.e. the biogeochemical pumps, the biogeophysical mechanisms and the gas and particle shuttles), and critically compare their representation in the different ecosystem modules. Overall, we found multiple evidences of unjustified differences in process representations between terrestrial and marine ecosystem models within ESM. These inconsistencies may lead to wrong predictions about the role of biosphere in the climate system. We believe that the present comparison can be used by the Earth system modeling community to increase consistency between ecosystem models. We further call for the development of a common framework allowing the uniform representation of climate-relevant processes in ecosystem modules of ESM.


Author(s):  
Donald P. Cummins ◽  
David B. Stephenson ◽  
Peter A. Stott

Abstract. Reliable estimates of historical effective radiative forcing (ERF) are important for understanding the causes of past climate change and for constraining predictions of future warming. This study proposes a new linear-filtering method for estimating historical radiative forcing from time series of global mean surface temperature (GMST), using energy-balance models (EBMs) fitted to GMST from CO2-quadrupling general circulation model (GCM) experiments. We show that the response of any k-box EBM can be represented as an ARMA(k, k−1) (autoregressive moving-average) filter. We show how, by inverting an EBM's ARMA filter representation, time series of surface temperature may be converted into radiative forcing. The method is illustrated using three-box EBM fits to two recent Earth system models from CMIP5 and CMIP6 (Coupled Model Intercomparison Project). A comparison with published results obtained using the established ERF_trans method, a purely GCM-based approach, shows that our new method gives an ERF time series that closely matches the GCM-based series (correlation of 0.83). Time series of estimated historical ERF are obtained by applying the method to a dataset of historical temperature observations. The results show that there is clear evidence of a significant increase over the historical period with an estimated forcing in 2018 of 1.45±0.504 W m−2 when derived using the two Earth system models. This method could be used in the future to attribute past climate changes to anthropogenic and natural factors and to help constrain estimates of climate sensitivity.


2013 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 18969-19004 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. E. O. Todd-Brown ◽  
J. T. Randerson ◽  
F. Hopkins ◽  
V. Arora ◽  
T. Hajima ◽  
...  

Abstract. Soil is currently thought to be a sink for carbon; however, the response of this sink to increasing levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide and climate change is uncertain. In this study, we analyzed soil organic carbon (SOC) changes from 11 Earth system models (ESMs) under the historical and high radiative forcing (RCP 8.5) scenarios between 1850 and 2100. We used a reduced complexity model based on temperature and moisture sensitivities to analyze the drivers of SOC losses. ESM estimates of SOC change over the 21st century (2090–2099 minus 1997–2006) ranged from a loss of 72 Pg C to a gain 253 Pg C with a multi-model mean gain of 63 Pg C. All ESMs showed cumulative increases in both NPP (15% to 59%) and decreases in SOC turnover times (15% to 28%) over the 21st century. Most of the model-to-model variation in SOC change was explained by initial SOC stocks combined with the relative changes in soil inputs and decomposition rates (R2 = 0.88, p<0.01). Between models, increases in decomposition rate were well explained by a combination of initial decomposition rate, ESM-specific Q10-factors, and changes in soil temperature (R2 = 0.80, p<0.01). All SOC changes depended on sustained increases in NPP with global change (primarily driven by increasing CO2) and conversion of additional plant inputs into SOC. Most ESMs omit potential constraints on SOC storage, such as priming effects, nutrient availability, mineral surface stabilization and aggregate formation. Future models that represent these constraints are likely to estimate smaller increases in SOC storage during the 21st century.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip Goodwin ◽  
B.B. Cael

&lt;p&gt;Projecting the global climate feedback and surface warming responses to anthropogenic forcing scenarios remains a key priority for climate science. Here, we explore possible roles for efficient climate model ensembles in contributing to quantitative projections of future global mean surface warming and climate feedback within model hierarchies. By comparing complex and efficient (sometimes termed &amp;#8216;simple&amp;#8217;) model output to data we: (1) explore potential Bayesian approaches to model ensemble generation; (2) ask what properties an efficient climate model should have to contribute to the generation of future warming and climate feedback projections; (3) present new projections from efficient model ensembles.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Climate processes relevant to global surface warming and climate feedback act over at least 14 orders of magnitude in space and time; from cloud droplet collisions and photosynthesis up to the global mean temperature and carbon storage over the 21&lt;sup&gt;st&lt;/sup&gt; century. Due to computational resources, even the most complex Earth system models only resolve around 3 orders of magnitude in horizontal space (from grid scale up to global scale) and 6 orders of magnitude in time (from a single timestep up to a century).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Complex Earth system models must therefore contain a great many parameterisations (including specified functional forms of equations and their coefficient values) representing sub grid-scale and sub time-scale processes. We know that these parameterisations affect the &lt;em&gt;quantitative&lt;/em&gt; model projections, because different complex models produce a range of historic and future projections. However, complex Earth system models are too computationally expensive to fully sample the plausible combinations of their own parameterisations, typically being able to realise only several tens of simulations.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In contrast, efficient climate models are able to utilise computational resources to resolve their own plausible combinations of parameterisations, through the construction of very large model ensembles. However, this parameterisation resolution occurs at the expense of a much-reduced resolution of relevant climate processes. Since the relative simplicity of efficient model representations may not capture the required complexity of the climate system, the &lt;em&gt;qualitative&lt;/em&gt; nature of their simulated projections may be too simplistic. For example, an efficient climate model may use a single climate feedback value for all time and for all sources of radiative forcing, when in complex models (and the real climate system) climate feedbacks may vary over time and may respond differently to, say, localised aerosol forcing than to well mixed greenhouse gases.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;By far the dominant quantitative projections of global mean surface warming in the scientific literature, as used in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Assessment Reports, derive from relatively small ensembles of complex climate model output. However, computational resources impose an inherent trade-off between model resolution of relevant climate processes (affecting the qualitative nature of the model framework) and model ensemble resolution of plausible parameterisations (affecting the quantitative exploration of projections within that model framework). This computationally imposed trade-off suggests there may be a significant role for efficient model output, within a hierarchy of model complexities, when generating future warming projections.&lt;/p&gt;


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document