Pressure Profiles in the Magnetosheath under Different Solar Wind Conditions 

Author(s):  
Gilbert Pi ◽  
Zdeněk Němeček ◽  
Jana Šafránková

<p>Magnetosheath is a major interface region between the solar wind and magnetosphere. The changes of solar wind parameters after the bow shock crossing and the phenomena near the magnetopause are intensively studied. However, spatial profiles of different pressure components across the magnetosheath are not comprehensively studied yet, especially in observations. The highly fluctuating sheath, variations of upstream conditions, and permanent motion of the magnetopause and bow shock complicate observational studies. In the present contribution, we use two different methods to obtain a typical magnetosheath profile under specific upstream conditions. One is the superposed epoch analysis of complete crossing events observed by the THEMIS mission. The second method is relocated the THEMIS observations into a normalized magnetosheath coordinate. By contrast to the result of MHD modeling, we found only a very weak difference between pressure profiles for southward and northward IMF. Our results show that the thermal pressure exhibits a peak near the magnetopause that is more pronounced under southward than under northward IMF. The magnetic pressures have a similar trend for both IMF polarities but the magnetic pressure increases faster toward the magnetopause for northward IMF than it does for southward IMF.</p>

2020 ◽  
Vol 58 (6) ◽  
pp. 478-486
Author(s):  
L. S. Rakhmanova ◽  
M. O. Riazantseva ◽  
G. N. Zastenker ◽  
Yu. I. Yermolaev ◽  
I. G. Lodkina

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 287-296
Author(s):  
Ferdinand Plaschke ◽  
Maria Jernej ◽  
Heli Hietala ◽  
Laura Vuorinen

Abstract. Jets in the subsolar magnetosheath are localized enhancements in dynamic pressure that are able to propagate all the way from the bow shock to the magnetopause. Due to their excess velocity with respect to their environment, they push slower ambient plasma out of their way, creating a vortical plasma motion in and around them. Simulations and case study results suggest that jets also modify the magnetic field in the magnetosheath on their passage, aligning it more with their velocity. Based on Magnetospheric Multiscale (MMS) jet observations and corresponding superposed epoch analyses of the angles ϕ between the velocity and magnetic fields, we can confirm that this suggestion is correct. However, while the alignment is more significant for faster than for slower jets, and for jets observed close to the bow shock, the overall effect is small: typically, reductions in ϕ of around 10∘ are observed at jet core regions, where the jets' velocities are largest. Furthermore, time series of ϕ pertaining to individual jets significantly deviate from the superposed epoch analysis results. They usually exhibit large variations over the entire range of ϕ: 0 to 90∘. This variability is commonly somewhat larger within jets than outside them, masking the systematic decrease in ϕ at core regions of individual jets.


2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (11) ◽  
pp. 4281-4291 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Partamies ◽  
T. I. Pulkkinen ◽  
R. L. McPherron ◽  
K. McWilliams ◽  
C. R. Bryant ◽  
...  

Abstract. This study describes a systematic statistical comparison of isolated non-storm substorms, steady magnetospheric convection (SMC) intervals and sawtooth events. The number of events is approximately the same in each group and the data are taken from about the same years to avoid biasing by different solar cycle phase. The very same superposed epoch analysis is performed for each event group to show the characteristics of ground-based indices (AL, PCN, PC potential), particle injection at the geostationary orbit and the solar wind and IMF parameters. We show that the monthly occurrence of sawtooth events and isolated non-stormtime substorms closely follows maxima of the geomagnetic activity at (or close to) the equinoxes. The most strongly solar wind driven event type, sawtooth events, is the least efficient in coupling the solar wind energy to the auroral ionosphere, while SMC periods are associated with the highest coupling ratio (AL/EY). Furthermore, solar wind speed seems to play a key role in determining the type of activity in the magnetosphere. Slow solar wind is capable of maintaining steady convection. During fast solar wind streams the magnetosphere responds with loading–unloading cycles, represented by substorms during moderately active conditions and sawtooth events (or other storm-time activations) during geomagnetically active conditions.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhi-Yang Liu ◽  
Qiu-Gang Zong ◽  
Hong Zou

<p>Drifting electron holes (DEHs), manifesting as sudden but mild dropout in electron flux, are a common phenomenon seen in the Earth's magnetosphere. It manifests the change of the state of the magnetosphere. However, previous studies primarily focus on DEHs during geomagnetically active time (e.g., substorm). Not until recently have quiet time DEHs been reported. In this paper, we present a systematic study on the quiet time DEHs. BeiDa Imaging Electron Spectrometer (BD-IES) measurements from 2015 to 2017 are investigated. Twenty-two DEH events are identified. The DEHs cover the whole energy range of BD-IES (50–600 keV). Generally, the DEHs are positively dispersive with respect to energy. Time-of-flight analysis suggests the dispersion results from electron drift motion and gives the location where the DEHs originated from. Statistics reveal the DEHs primarily originated from the postmidnight magnetosphere. In addition, superposed epoch analysis applied to geomagnetic indices and solar wind parameters indicates these DEH events occurred during geomagnetically quiet time. No storm or substorm activity could be identified. However, an investigation into nightside midlatitude ground magnetic records suggests these quiet time DEHs were accompanied by Pi2 pulsations. The DEH-Pi2 connection indicates a possible DEH-bursty bulk flow (BBF) connection, since nightside midlatitude Pi2 activity is generally attributed to magnetotail BBFs. This connection is also supported by a case study of coordinated magnetotail observations from Magnetospheric Multiscale spacecraft. Therefore, we suggest the quiet time DEHs could be caused by magnetotail BBFs, similar to the substorm time DEHs.</p>


2011 ◽  
Vol 116 (A7) ◽  
pp. n/a-n/a ◽  
Author(s):  
D. R. Went ◽  
G. B. Hospodarsky ◽  
A. Masters ◽  
K. C. Hansen ◽  
M. K. Dougherty

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 419-437 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Nabert ◽  
K.-H. Glassmeier ◽  
F. Plaschke

Abstract. We present a new analytical method to derive steady-state magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) solutions of the magnetosheath in different levels of approximation. With this method, we calculate the magnetosheath's density, velocity, and magnetic field distribution as well as its geometry. Thereby, the solution depends on the geomagnetic dipole moment and solar wind conditions only. To simplify the representation, we restrict our model to northward IMF with the solar wind flow along the stagnation streamline. The sheath's geometry, with its boundaries, bow shock and magnetopause, is determined self-consistently. Our model is stationary and time relaxation has not to be considered as in global MHD simulations. Our method uses series expansion to transfer the MHD equations into a new set of ordinary differential equations. The number of equations is related to the level of approximation considered including different physical processes. These equations can be solved numerically; however, an analytical approach for the lowest-order approximation is also presented. This yields explicit expressions, not only for the flow and field variations but also for the magnetosheath thickness, depending on the solar wind parameters. Results are compared to THEMIS data and offer a detailed explanation of, e.g., the pile-up process and the corresponding plasma depletion layer, the bow shock and magnetopause geometry, the magnetosheath thickness, and the flow deceleration.


2015 ◽  
Vol 120 (9) ◽  
pp. 7094-7106 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu. I. Yermolaev ◽  
I. G. Lodkina ◽  
N. S. Nikolaeva ◽  
M. Yu. Yermolaev

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document