scholarly journals A new end-to-end workflow for the Community Earth System Model (version 2.0) for the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6)

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (11) ◽  
pp. 5567-5581
Author(s):  
Sheri Mickelson ◽  
Alice Bertini ◽  
Gary Strand ◽  
Kevin Paul ◽  
Eric Nienhouse ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Coupled Model ◽  
Model Intercomparison ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Previous Generation ◽  
Data Volume ◽  
Community Earth System Model ◽  
Intercomparison Project ◽  
Version 2.0 ◽  
New Generation ◽  
Compressed Data

Abstract. The complexity of each Coupled Model Intercomparison Project grows with every new generation. The Phase 5 effort saw a dramatic increase in the number of experiments that were performed and the number of variables that were requested compared to its previous generation, Phase 3. The large increase in data volume stressed the resources of several centers including at the National Center for Atmospheric Research. During Phase 5, we missed several deadlines and we struggled to get the data out to the community for analysis. In preparation for the current generation, Phase 6, we examined the weaknesses in our workflow and addressed the performance issues with new software tools. Through this investment, we were able to publish approximately 565 TB of compressed data to the community, with another 30 TB yet to be published. When compared to the volumes we produced in the previous generation, 165 TB of uncompressed data, we were able to provide 6 times the amount of data and we accomplish this within one-third of the time. This provided us with an approximate 18 times faster speedup. While this paper discusses the improvements we have made to our own workflow for the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6), we hope to encourage other centers to evaluate and invest in their own workflows in order to be successful in these types of modeling campaigns.

scholarly journals A New End-to-End Workflow for the Community Earth System Model (version 2.0) for CMIP6

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sheri Mickelson ◽  
Alice Bertini ◽  
Gary Strand ◽  
Kevin Paul ◽  
Eric Nienhouse ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Coupled Model ◽  
System Model ◽  
Model Intercomparison ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Atmospheric Research ◽  
Previous Generation ◽  
Community Earth System Model ◽  
Intercomparison Project ◽  
Version 2.0 ◽  
New Generation

Abstract. The complexity of each Coupled Model Intercomparison Project grows with every new generation. The Phase 5 effort saw a large increase in the number of experiments that were performed and the number of variables that were requested compared to its previous generation, Phase 3. Many centers were not prepared for the large demand and this stressed the resources of several centers including at the National Center for Atmospheric Research. During Phase 5, we missed several deadlines and we struggled to get the data out to the community for analysis. In preparation for the current generation, Phase 6, we examined the weaknesses in our workflow and addressed the performance issues with new software tools. Through this investment, we were able to publish approximately six times the amount of data to the community compared to the volumes we produced in the previous generation and we were able to accomplish this within one-third of the time, providing an 18 times speedup. This paper discusses the improvements we have made to accomplish this success for Phase 6 and further improvements we hope to make for the next generation.

scholarly journals Atmospheric and Surface Contributions to Planetary Albedo

2011 ◽  
Vol 24 (16) ◽  
pp. 4402-4418 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aaron Donohoe ◽  
David S. Battisti
Keyword(s):  
Surface Albedo ◽  
Coupled Model ◽  
Small Contribution ◽  
Model Intercomparison ◽  
Radiation Model ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Surface Reflection ◽  
Global Average ◽  
Intercomparison Project ◽  
Planetary Albedo

Abstract The planetary albedo is partitioned into a component due to atmospheric reflection and a component due to surface reflection by using shortwave fluxes at the surface and top of the atmosphere in conjunction with a simple radiation model. The vast majority of the observed global average planetary albedo (88%) is due to atmospheric reflection. Surface reflection makes a relatively small contribution to planetary albedo because the atmosphere attenuates the surface contribution to planetary albedo by a factor of approximately 3. The global average planetary albedo in the ensemble average of phase 3 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP3) preindustrial simulations is also primarily (87%) due to atmospheric albedo. The intermodel spread in planetary albedo is relatively large and is found to be predominantly a consequence of intermodel differences in atmospheric albedo, with surface processes playing a much smaller role despite significant intermodel differences in surface albedo. The CMIP3 models show a decrease in planetary albedo under a doubling of carbon dioxide—also primarily due to changes in atmospheric reflection (which explains more than 90% of the intermodel spread). All models show a decrease in planetary albedo due to the lowered surface albedo associated with a contraction of the cryosphere in a warmer world, but this effect is small compared to the spread in planetary albedo due to model differences in the change in clouds.

scholarly journals Global exposure to flooding from the new CMIP6 climate model projections

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yukiko Hirabayashi ◽  
Masahiro Tanoue ◽  
Orie Sasaki ◽  
Xudong Zhou ◽  
Dai Yamazaki
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Patterns ◽  
Flood Risk ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Climate Model ◽  
Model Development ◽  
Coupled Model ◽  
Model Intercomparison ◽  
Internal Climate Variability ◽  
Intercomparison Project ◽  
New Generation

AbstractEstimates of future flood risk rely on projections from climate models. The relatively few climate models used to analyze future flood risk cannot easily quantify of their associated uncertainties. In this study, we demonstrated that the projected fluvial flood changes estimated by a new generation of climate models, the collectively known as Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6), are similar to those estimated by CMIP5. The spatial patterns of the multi-model median signs of change (+ or −) were also very consistent, implying greater confidence in the projections. The model spread changed little over the course of model development, suggesting irreducibility of the model spread due to internal climate variability, and the consistent projections of models from the same institute suggest the potential to reduce uncertainties caused by model differences. Potential global exposure to flooding is projected to be proportional to the degree of warming, and a greater threat is anticipated as populations increase, demonstrating the need for immediate decisions.

scholarly journals Understanding the CMIP3 Multimodel Ensemble

2011 ◽  
Vol 24 (16) ◽  
pp. 4529-4538 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. D. Annan ◽  
J. C. Hargreaves
Keyword(s):  
Coupled Model ◽  
Model Intercomparison ◽  
Ensemble Size ◽  
Multimodel Ensemble ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Climate Research ◽  
Intercomparison Project ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Main Factors ◽  
And Behavior

Abstract The Coupled Model Intercomparison Project phase 3 (CMIP3) multimodel ensemble has been widely utilized for climate research and prediction, but the properties and behavior of the ensemble are not yet fully understood. Here, some investigations are undertaken into various aspects of the ensemble’s behavior, in particular focusing on the performance of the multimodel mean. This study presents an explanation of this phenomenon in the context of the statistically indistinguishable paradigm and also provides a quantitative analysis of the main factors that control how likely the mean is to outperform the models in the ensemble, both individually and collectively. The analyses lend further support to the usage of the paradigm of a statistically indistinguishable ensemble and indicate that the current ensemble size is too small to adequately sample the space from which the models are drawn.

scholarly journals The CMIP6 Data Request (DREQ, version 01.00.31)

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 201-224 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Juckes ◽  
Karl E. Taylor ◽  
Paul J. Durack ◽  
Bryan Lawrence ◽  
Matthew S. Mizielinski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Coupled Model ◽  
Building Blocks ◽  
General Interest ◽  
Model Intercomparison ◽  
Information Base ◽  
Data Volume ◽  
Intercomparison Project ◽  
Technical Specifications ◽  
Data Request

Abstract. The data request of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) defines all the quantities from CMIP6 simulations that should be archived. This includes both quantities of general interest needed from most of the CMIP6-endorsed model intercomparison projects (MIPs) and quantities that are more specialized and only of interest to a single endorsed MIP. The complexity of the data request has increased from the early days of model intercomparisons, as has the data volume. In contrast with CMIP5, CMIP6 requires distinct sets of highly tailored variables to be saved from each of the more than 200 experiments. This places new demands on the data request information base and leads to a new requirement for development of software that facilitates automated interrogation of the request and retrieval of its technical specifications. The building blocks and structure of the CMIP6 Data Request (DREQ), which have been constructed to meet these challenges, are described in this paper.

scholarly journals The Interannual Relationship between the Latitude of the Eddy-Driven Jet and the Edge of the Hadley Cell

2011 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 563-568 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah M. Kang ◽  
Lorenzo M. Polvani
Keyword(s):  
Coupled Model ◽  
Austral Summer ◽  
Hadley Cell ◽  
Model Intercomparison ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Long Term Trends ◽  
Intercomparison Project ◽  
Highly Correlated ◽  
Universal Ratio

Abstract A strong correlation between the latitudes of the eddy-driven jet and of the Hadley cell edge, on interannual time scales, is found to exist during austral summer, in both the NCEP–NCAR reanalysis and the models participating in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project, phase 3 (CMIP3). In addition, a universal ratio close to 1:2 characterizes the robust connection between these two latitudes on a year-to-year basis: for a 2° shift of the eddy-driven jet, the edge of the Hadley cell shifts by 1°. This 1:2 interannual ratio remains the same in response to climate change, even though the values of the two latitudes increase. The corresponding trends are also highly correlated; in the CMIP3 scenario integrations, however, no universal ratio appears to exist connecting these long-term trends. In austral winter and in the Northern Hemisphere, no strong interannual correlations are found.

scholarly journals The CMIP6 Data Request (version 01.00.31)

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Juckes ◽  
Karl E. Taylor ◽  
Paul Durack ◽  
Bryan Lawrence ◽  
Matthew Mizielinski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Coupled Model ◽  
Building Blocks ◽  
General Interest ◽  
Model Intercomparison ◽  
Information Base ◽  
Data Volume ◽  
Intercomparison Project ◽  
Technical Specifications ◽  
Data Request

Abstract. The data request of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) defines all the quantities from CMIP6 simulations that should be archived. This includes both quantities of general interest needed from most of the CMIP6-endorsed Model Intercomparison Projects (MIPs) and quantities that are more specialised and only of interest to a single endorsed MIP. The complexity of the data request has increased from the early days of model intercomparisons, as has the data volume. In contrast with CMIP5, CMIP6 requires distinct sets of highly tailored variables to be saved from each of the more than 200 experiments. This places new demands on the data request information base and results in a new requirement for development of software that facilitates automated interrogation of the request and retrieval of its technical specifications. The building blocks and structure of the CMIP6 Data Request (DREQ) which has been constructed to meet these challenges is described in this paper.

scholarly journals Future Changes in Simulated Evapotranspiration across Continental Africa Based on CMIP6 CNRM-CM6

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (13) ◽  
pp. 6760
Author(s):  
Isaac Kwesi Nooni ◽  
Daniel Fiifi T. Hagan ◽  
Guojie Wang ◽  
Waheed Ullah ◽  
Jiao Lu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Extreme Events ◽  
Coupled Model ◽  
Baseline Period ◽  
Model Intercomparison ◽  
Additional Information ◽  
Intercomparison Project ◽  
Key Drivers ◽  
Model Ensembles ◽  
Projected Changes ◽  
Near Future

The main goal of this study was to assess the interannual variations and spatial patterns of projected changes in simulated evapotranspiration (ET) in the 21st century over continental Africa based on the latest Shared Socioeconomic Pathways and the Representative Concentration Pathways (SSP1-2.6, SSP2-4.5, SSP3-7.0, and SSP5-8.5) provided by the France Centre National de Recherches Météorologiques (CNRM-CM) model in the Sixth Phase of Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6) framework. The projected spatial and temporal changes were computed for three time slices: 2020–2039 (near future), 2040–2069 (mid-century), and 2080–2099 (end-of-the-century), relative to the baseline period (1995–2014). The results show that the spatial pattern of the projected ET was not uniform and varied across the climate region and under the SSP-RCPs scenarios. Although the trends varied, they were statistically significant for all SSP-RCPs. The SSP5-8.5 and SSP3-7.0 projected higher ET seasonality than SSP1-2.6 and SSP2-4.5. In general, we suggest the need for modelers and forecasters to pay more attention to changes in the simulated ET and their impact on extreme events. The findings provide useful information for water resources managers to develop specific measures to mitigate extreme events in the regions most affected by possible changes in the region’s climate. However, readers are advised to treat the results with caution as they are based on a single GCM model. Further research on multi-model ensembles (as more models’ outputs become available) and possible key drivers may provide additional information on CMIP6 ET projections in the region.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document