scholarly journals An intercomparison of approaches for improving predictability in operational seasonal streamflow forecasting

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pablo A. Mendoza ◽  
Andrew W. Wood ◽  
Elizabeth Clark ◽  
Eric Rothwell ◽  
Martyn P. Clark ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Water Supply ◽  
Pacific Northwest ◽  
Land Surface ◽  
Forecast Skill ◽  
Climate Indices ◽  
Statistical Regression ◽  
Climate Information ◽  
Streamflow Forecasting ◽  
Streamflow Prediction ◽  
Seasonal Streamflow

Abstract. For much of the last century, forecasting centers around the world have offered seasonal streamflow predictions to support water management. Recent work suggests that the two major avenues to advance seasonal predictability are improvements in the estimation of initial hydrologic conditions (IHCs) and the incorporation of climate information. This study investigates the marginal benefits of a variety of methods using IHC and/or climate information, focusing on seasonal water supply forecasts (WSFs) in five case study watersheds located in the U.S. Pacific Northwest region. We specify two benchmark methods that mimic standard operational approaches – statistical regression against IHCs, and model-based ensemble streamflow prediction (ESP) – and then systematically inter-compare WSFs across a range of lead times. Additional methods include: (i) statistical techniques using climate information either from standard indices or from climate reanalysis variables; and (ii) several hybrid/hierarchical approaches harnessing both land surface and climate predictability. In basins where atmospheric teleconnection signals are strong, and when watershed predictability is low, climate information alone provides considerable improvements. For those basins showing weak teleconnections, custom predictors from reanalysis fields were more effective in forecast skill than standard climate indices. ESP predictions tended to have high correlation skill but greater bias compared to other methods, and climate predictors failed to substantially improve these deficiencies within a trace weighting framework. Lower complexity techniques were competitive with more complex methods, and the hierarchical expert regression approach introduced here (HESP) provided a robust alternative for skillful and reliable water supply forecasts at all initialization times. Three key findings from this effort are: (1) objective approaches supporting methodologically consistent hindcasts open the door to a broad range of beneficial forecasting strategies; (2) the use of climate predictors can add to the seasonal forecast skill available from IHCs; and (3) sample size limitations must be handled rigorously to avoid over-trained forecast solutions. Overall, the results suggest that despite a rich, long heritage of operational use, there remain a number of compelling opportunities to improve the skill and value of seasonal streamflow predictions.

scholarly journals An intercomparison of approaches for improving operational seasonal streamflow forecasts

2017 ◽  
Vol 21 (7) ◽  
pp. 3915-3935 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pablo A. Mendoza ◽  
Andrew W. Wood ◽  
Elizabeth Clark ◽  
Eric Rothwell ◽  
Martyn P. Clark ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Water Supply ◽  
Pacific Northwest ◽  
Land Surface ◽  
Forecast Skill ◽  
Climate Indices ◽  
Statistical Regression ◽  
Climate Information ◽  
Streamflow Prediction ◽  
Ensemble Streamflow Prediction ◽  
Seasonal Streamflow

Abstract. For much of the last century, forecasting centers around the world have offered seasonal streamflow predictions to support water management. Recent work suggests that the two major avenues to advance seasonal predictability are improvements in the estimation of initial hydrologic conditions (IHCs) and the incorporation of climate information. This study investigates the marginal benefits of a variety of methods using IHCs and/or climate information, focusing on seasonal water supply forecasts (WSFs) in five case study watersheds located in the US Pacific Northwest region. We specify two benchmark methods that mimic standard operational approaches – statistical regression against IHCs and model-based ensemble streamflow prediction (ESP) – and then systematically intercompare WSFs across a range of lead times. Additional methods include (i) statistical techniques using climate information either from standard indices or from climate reanalysis variables and (ii) several hybrid/hierarchical approaches harnessing both land surface and climate predictability. In basins where atmospheric teleconnection signals are strong, and when watershed predictability is low, climate information alone provides considerable improvements. For those basins showing weak teleconnections, custom predictors from reanalysis fields were more effective in forecast skill than standard climate indices. ESP predictions tended to have high correlation skill but greater bias compared to other methods, and climate predictors failed to substantially improve these deficiencies within a trace weighting framework. Lower complexity techniques were competitive with more complex methods, and the hierarchical expert regression approach introduced here (hierarchical ensemble streamflow prediction – HESP) provided a robust alternative for skillful and reliable water supply forecasts at all initialization times. Three key findings from this effort are (1) objective approaches supporting methodologically consistent hindcasts open the door to a broad range of beneficial forecasting strategies; (2) the use of climate predictors can add to the seasonal forecast skill available from IHCs; and (3) sample size limitations must be handled rigorously to avoid over-trained forecast solutions. Overall, the results suggest that despite a rich, long heritage of operational use, there remain a number of compelling opportunities to improve the skill and value of seasonal streamflow predictions.

scholarly journals On the sources of global land surface hydrologic predictability

2013 ◽  
Vol 17 (7) ◽  
pp. 2781-2796 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Shukla ◽  
J. Sheffield ◽  
E. F. Wood ◽  
D. P. Lettenmaier
Keyword(s):  
Soil Moisture ◽  
Land Surface ◽  
Snow Water Equivalent ◽  
Forecast Skill ◽  
Streamflow Prediction ◽  
Infiltration Capacity ◽  
Forecast Period ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Model Based ◽  
Snow Water

Abstract. Global seasonal hydrologic prediction is crucial to mitigating the impacts of droughts and floods, especially in the developing world. Hydrologic predictability at seasonal lead times (i.e., 1–6 months) comes from knowledge of initial hydrologic conditions (IHCs) and seasonal climate forecast skill (FS). In this study we quantify the contributions of two primary components of IHCs – soil moisture and snow water content – and FS (of precipitation and temperature) to seasonal hydrologic predictability globally on a relative basis throughout the year. We do so by conducting two model-based experiments using the variable infiltration capacity (VIC) macroscale hydrology model, one based on ensemble streamflow prediction (ESP) and another based on Reverse-ESP (Rev-ESP), both for a 47 yr re-forecast period (1961–2007). We compare cumulative runoff (CR), soil moisture (SM) and snow water equivalent (SWE) forecasts from each experiment with a VIC model-based reference data set (generated using observed atmospheric forcings) and estimate the ratio of root mean square error (RMSE) of both experiments for each forecast initialization date and lead time, to determine the relative contribution of IHCs and FS to the seasonal hydrologic predictability. We find that in general, the contributions of IHCs to seasonal hydrologic predictability is highest in the arid and snow-dominated climate (high latitude) regions of the Northern Hemisphere during forecast periods starting on 1 January and 1 October. In mid-latitude regions, such as the Western US, the influence of IHCs is greatest during the forecast period starting on 1 April. In the arid and warm temperate dry winter regions of the Southern Hemisphere, the IHCs dominate during forecast periods starting on 1 April and 1 July. In equatorial humid and monsoonal climate regions, the contribution of FS is generally higher than IHCs through most of the year. Based on our findings, we argue that despite the limited FS (mainly for precipitation) better estimates of the IHCs could lead to improvement in the current level of seasonal hydrologic forecast skill over many regions of the globe at least during some parts of the year.

scholarly journals Correcting Errors in Streamflow Forecast Ensemble Mean and Spread

2008 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 132-148 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew W. Wood ◽  
John C. Schaake
Keyword(s):  
River Basin ◽  
Hydrological Models ◽  
Streamflow Forecasting ◽  
Streamflow Prediction ◽  
Summer Period ◽  
Streamflow Forecast ◽  
Ensemble Mean ◽  
Ensemble Streamflow Prediction ◽  
Deterministic Components ◽  
Seasonal Streamflow

Abstract When hydrological models are used for probabilistic streamflow forecasting in the Ensemble Streamflow Prediction (ESP) framework, the deterministic components of the approach can lead to errors in the estimation of forecast uncertainty, as represented by the spread of the forecast ensemble. One avenue for correcting the resulting forecast reliability errors is to calibrate the streamflow forecast ensemble to match observed error characteristics. This paper outlines and evaluates a method for forecast calibration as applied to seasonal streamflow prediction. The approach uses the correlation of forecast ensemble means with observations to generate a conditional forecast mean and spread that lie between the climatological mean and spread (when the forecast has no skill) and the raw forecast mean with zero spread (when the forecast is perfect). Retrospective forecasts of summer period runoff in the Feather River basin, California, are used to demonstrate that the approach improves upon the performance of traditional ESP forecasts by reducing errors in forecast mean and improving spread estimates, thereby increasing forecast reliability and skill.

scholarly journals Skilful seasonal forecasts of streamflow over Europe?

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louise Arnal ◽  
Hannah L. Cloke ◽  
Elisabeth Stephens ◽  
Fredrik Wetterhall ◽  
Christel Prudhomme ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lead Time ◽  
Climate Model ◽  
Streamflow Forecasting ◽  
Streamflow Prediction ◽  
Seasonal Forecasts ◽  
Seasonal Climate ◽  
Climate Forecasts ◽  
Streamflow Forecasts ◽  
Meteorological Observations ◽  
Seasonal Streamflow

Abstract. This paper presents a Europe-wide analysis of the skill of the newly operational EFAS (European Flood Awareness System) seasonal streamflow forecasts, benchmarked against the Ensemble Streamflow Prediction (ESP) forecasting approach. The results suggest that, on average, the System 4 seasonal climate forecasts improve the streamflow predictability over historical meteorological observations for the first month of lead time only. However, the predictability varies in space and time and is greater in winter and autumn. Parts of Europe additionally exhibit a longer predictability, up to seven months of lead time, for certain months within a season. The results also highlight the potential usefulness of the EFAS seasonal streamflow forecasts for decision-making. Although the ESP is the most potentially useful forecasting approach in Europe, the EFAS seasonal streamflow forecasts appear more potentially useful than the ESP in some regions and for certain seasons, especially in winter for most of Europe. Patterns in the EFAS seasonal streamflow hindcasts skill are however not mirrored in the System 4 seasonal climate hindcasts, hinting the need for a better understanding of the link between hydrological and meteorological variables on seasonal timescales, with the aim to improve climate-model based seasonal streamflow forecasting.

scholarly journals The benefit of using an ensemble of seasonal streamflow forecasts in water allocation decisions

2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (7) ◽  
pp. 3851-3870
Author(s):  
Alexander Kaune ◽  
Faysal Chowdhury ◽  
Micha Werner ◽  
James Bennett
Keyword(s):  
Water Allocation ◽  
Irrigation Season ◽  
Streamflow Forecasting ◽  
Streamflow Prediction ◽  
Additional Time ◽  
Available Water ◽  
Streamflow Forecasts ◽  
Reservoir Inflow ◽  
Seasonal Streamflow ◽  
Allocation Decisions

Abstract. The area to be cropped in irrigation districts needs to be planned according to the allocated water, which in turn is a function of the available water resource. Initially conservative estimates of future (in)flows in rivers and reservoirs may lead to unnecessary reduction of the water allocated. Though water allocations may be revised as the season progresses, inconsistency in allocation is undesirable to farmers as they may then not be able to use that water, leading to an opportunity cost in agricultural production. We assess the benefit of using reservoir inflow estimates derived from seasonal forecast datasets to improve water allocation decisions. A decision model is developed to emulate the feedback loop between simulated reservoir storage and water allocations to irrigated crops and is evaluated using inflow forecasts generated with the Forecast Guided Stochastic Scenarios (FoGSS) model, a 12-month ensemble streamflow forecasting system. Two forcings are used to generate the forecasts: ensemble streamflow prediction – ESP (historical rainfall) – and POAMA (calibrated rainfall forecasts from the POAMA climate prediction system). We evaluate the approach in the Murrumbidgee basin in Australia, comparing water allocations obtained with an expected reservoir inflow from FoGSS against the allocations obtained with the currently used conservative estimate based on climatology as well as against allocations obtained using observed inflows (perfect information). The inconsistency in allocated water is evaluated by determining the total changes in allocated water made every 15 d from the initial allocation at the start of the water year to the end of the irrigation season, including both downward and upward revisions of allocations. Results show that the inconsistency due to upward revisions in allocated water is lower when using the forecast datasets (POAMA and ESP) compared to the conservative inflow estimates (reference), which is beneficial to the planning of cropping areas by farmers. Overconfidence can, however, lead to an increase in undesirable downward revisions. This is more evident for dry years than for wet years. Over the 28 years for which allocation decisions are evaluated, we find that the accuracy of the available water estimates using the forecast ensemble improves progressively during the water year, especially 1.5 months before the start of the cropping season in November. This is significant as it provides farmers with additional time to make key decisions on planting. Our results show that seasonal streamflow forecasts can provide benefit in informing water allocation policies, particularly by earlier establishing final water allocations to farmers in the irrigation season. This allows them to plan better and use water allocated more efficiently.

scholarly journals On the sources of global land surface hydrologic predictability

2013 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 1987-2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Shukla ◽  
J. Sheffield ◽  
E. F. Wood ◽  
D. P. Lettenmaier
Keyword(s):  
Soil Moisture ◽  
Land Surface ◽  
Lead Time ◽  
Snow Water Equivalent ◽  
Forecast Skill ◽  
Prediction Skill ◽  
Streamflow Prediction ◽  
Infiltration Capacity ◽  
Forecast Period ◽  
Hydrologic Prediction

Abstract. Global seasonal hydrologic prediction is crucial to mitigating the impacts of droughts and floods, especially in the developing world. Hydrologic prediction skill at seasonal lead times (i.e. 1–6 months) comes from knowledge of initial hydrologic conditions (IHCs – primarily the state of initial soil moisture and snow) and seasonal climate forecast skill (FS). In this study we quantify the contributions of IHCs and FS to seasonal hydrologic prediction skill globally on a relative basis throughout the year. We do so by conducting two model-based experiments using the Variable Infiltration Capacity (VIC) macroscale hydrology model, one based on Ensemble Streamflow Prediction (ESP) and another based on Reverse-ESP (rESP), both for a 47 yr reforecast period (1961–2007). We compare cumulative runoff (CR), soil moisture (SM) and snow water equivalent (SWE) forecasts obtained from each experiment with a control simulation forced with observed atmospheric forcings over the reforecast period and estimate the ratio of Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of both experiments for each forecast initialization date and lead time. We find that in general, the contributions of IHCs are greater than the contribution of FS over the Northern (Southern) Hemisphere during the forecast period starting in October and January (April and July). Over snow dominated regions in the Northern Hemisphere the IHCs dominate the CR forecast skill for up to 6 months lead time during the forecast period starting in April. Based on our findings we argue that despite the limited FS (mainly for precipitation) better estimates of the IHCs could lead to improvement in the current level of seasonal hydrologic forecast skill over many regions of the globe at least during some parts of the year.

Does the application of multiple hydrological models improve seasonal streamflow forecasting skill?

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bastian Klein ◽  
Ilias Pechlivanidis ◽  
Louise Arnal ◽  
Louise Crochemore ◽  
Dennis Meissner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Central Europe ◽  
Bayesian Model Averaging ◽  
Forecast Skill ◽  
Hydrological Models ◽  
Streamflow Forecasting ◽  
Post Processing ◽  
Seasonal Forecasts ◽  
Streamflow Forecasts ◽  
Forecasting System ◽  
Seasonal Streamflow

<p>Many sectors, such as hydropower, agriculture, water supply and waterway transport, need information about the possible evolution of meteorological and hydrological conditions in the next weeks and months to optimize their decision processes on a long term. With increasing availability of meteorological seasonal forecasts, hydrological seasonal forecasting systems have been developed all over the world in the last years. Many of them are running in operational mode. On European scale the European Flood Awareness System EFAS and SMHI are operationally providing seasonal streamflow forecasts. In the context of the EU-Horizon2020 project IMPREX additionally a national scale forecasting system for German waterways operated by BfG was available for the analysis of seasonal forecasts from multiple hydrological models.</p><p>Statistical post processing tools could be used to estimate the predictive uncertainty of the forecasted variable from deterministic / ensemble forecasts of a single / multi-model forecasting system. Raw forecasts shouldn’t be used directly by users without statistical post-processing because of various biases. To assess the added potential benefit of the application of a hydrological multi-model ensemble, the forecasting systems from EFAS, SMHI and BfG were forced by re-forecasts of the ECMWF’s Seasonal Forecast System 4 and the resulting seasonal streamflow forecasts have been verified for 24 gauges across Central Europe. Additionally two statistical forecasting methods - Ensemble Model Output Statistics EMOS and Bayesian Model Averaging BMA - have been applied to post-process the forecasts.</p><p>Overall, seasonal flow forecast skill is limited in Central Europe before and after post-processing with a current predictability of 1-2 months. The results of the multi-model analysis indicate that post-processing of raw forecasts is necessary when observations are used as reference. Post-processing improves forecast skill significantly for all gauges, lead times and seasons. The multi-model combination of all models showed the highest skill compared to the skill of the raw forecasts and the skill of the post-processed results of the individual models, i.e. the application of several hydrological models for the same region improves skill, due to the different model strengths.</p>

scholarly journals ENSO-conditioned weather resampling method for seasonal ensemble streamflow prediction

2016 ◽  
Vol 20 (8) ◽  
pp. 3277-3287 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joost V. L. Beckers ◽  
Albrecht H. Weerts ◽  
Erik Tijdeman ◽  
Edwin Welles
Keyword(s):  
Pacific Northwest ◽  
Southern Oscillation ◽  
Forecast Skill ◽  
Streamflow Prediction ◽  
The Us ◽  
Resampling Method ◽  
Streamflow Regime ◽  
Ensemble Streamflow Prediction ◽  
Index Value ◽  
Climate Mode

Abstract. Oceanic–atmospheric climate modes, such as El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO), are known to affect the local streamflow regime in many rivers around the world. A new method is proposed to incorporate climate mode information into the well-known ensemble streamflow prediction (ESP) method for seasonal forecasting. The ESP is conditioned on an ENSO index in two steps. First, a number of original historical ESP traces are selected based on similarity between the index value in the historical year and the index value at the time of forecast. In the second step, additional ensemble traces are generated by a stochastic ENSO-conditioned weather resampler. These resampled traces compensate for the reduction of ensemble size in the first step and prevent degradation of skill at forecasting stations that are less affected by ENSO. The skill of the ENSO-conditioned ESP is evaluated over 50 years of seasonal hindcasts of streamflows at three test stations in the Columbia River basin in the US Pacific Northwest. An improvement in forecast skill of 5 to 10 % is found for two test stations. The streamflows at the third station are less affected by ENSO and no change in forecast skill is found here.

scholarly journals An Efficient Approach for Estimating Streamflow Forecast Skill Elasticity

2017 ◽  
Vol 18 (6) ◽  
pp. 1715-1729 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louise Arnal ◽  
Andrew W. Wood ◽  
Elisabeth Stephens ◽  
Hannah L. Cloke ◽  
Florian Pappenberger
Keyword(s):  
Sensitivity Analysis ◽  
Forecast Skill ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Streamflow Prediction ◽  
Streamflow Forecast ◽  
Analysis Technique ◽  
Climate Forecasts ◽  
Modeling And Forecasting ◽  
Streamflow Forecasts ◽  
Seasonal Streamflow

Abstract Seasonal streamflow prediction skill can derive from catchment initial hydrological conditions (IHCs) and from the future seasonal climate forecasts (SCFs) used to produce the hydrological forecasts. Although much effort has gone into producing state-of-the-art seasonal streamflow forecasts from improving IHCs and SCFs, these developments are expensive and time consuming and the forecasting skill is still limited in most parts of the world. Hence, sensitivity analyses are crucial to funnel the resources into useful modeling and forecasting developments. It is in this context that a sensitivity analysis technique, the variational ensemble streamflow prediction assessment (VESPA) approach, was recently introduced. VESPA can be used to quantify the expected improvements in seasonal streamflow forecast skill as a result of realistic improvements in its predictability sources (i.e., the IHCs and the SCFs)—termed “skill elasticity”—and to indicate where efforts should be targeted. The VESPA approach is, however, computationally expensive, relying on multiple hindcasts having varying levels of skill in IHCs and SCFs. This paper presents two approximations of the approach that are computationally inexpensive alternatives. These new methods were tested against the original VESPA results using 30 years of ensemble hindcasts for 18 catchments of the contiguous United States. The results suggest that one of the methods, end point blending, is an effective alternative for estimating the forecast skill elasticities yielded by the VESPA approach. The results also highlight the importance of the choice of verification score for a goal-oriented sensitivity analysis.

scholarly journals Seasonal streamflow forecasting in the upper Indus Basin of Pakistan: an assessment of methods

2018 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 3533-3549 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen P. Charles ◽  
Quan J. Wang ◽  
Mobin-ud-Din Ahmad ◽  
Danial Hashmi ◽  
Andrew Schepen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Southern Oscillation ◽  
Hybrid Approach ◽  
Indus Basin ◽  
Climate Index ◽  
Climate Indices ◽  
Streamflow Forecasting ◽  
Upper Indus Basin ◽  
Probabilistic Forecasts ◽  
Streamflow Forecasts ◽  
Seasonal Streamflow

Abstract. Timely and skilful seasonal streamflow forecasts are used by water managers in many regions of the world for seasonal water allocation outlooks for irrigators, reservoir operations, environmental flow management, water markets and drought response strategies. In Australia, the Bayesian joint probability (BJP) statistical approach has been deployed by the Australian Bureau of Meteorology to provide seasonal streamflow forecasts across the country since 2010. Here we assess the BJP approach, using antecedent conditions and climate indices as predictors, to produce Kharif season (April–September) streamflow forecasts for inflow to Pakistan's two largest upper Indus Basin (UIB) water supply dams, Tarbela (on the Indus) and Mangla (on the Jhelum). For Mangla, we compare these BJP forecasts to (i) ensemble streamflow predictions (ESPs) from the snowmelt runoff model (SRM) and (ii) a hybrid approach using the BJP with SRM–ESP forecast means as an additional predictor. For Tarbela, we only assess BJP forecasts using antecedent and climate predictors as we did not have access to SRM for this location. Cross validation of the streamflow forecasts shows that the BJP approach using two predictors (March flow and an El Niño Southern Oscillation, ENSO, climate index) provides skilful probabilistic forecasts that are reliable in uncertainty spread for both Mangla and Tarbela. For Mangla, the SRM approach leads to forecasts that exhibit some bias and are unreliable in uncertainty spread, and the hybrid approach does not result in better forecast skill. Skill levels for Kharif (April–September), early Kharif (April–June) and late Kharif (July–September) BJP forecasts vary between the two locations. Forecasts for Mangla show high skill for early Kharif and moderate skill for all Kharif and late Kharif, whereas forecasts for Tarbela also show moderate skill for all Kharif and late Kharif, but low skill for early Kharif. The BJP approach is simple to apply, with small input data requirements and automated calibration and forecast generation. It offers a tool for rapid deployment at many locations across the UIB to provide probabilistic seasonal streamflow forecasts that can inform Pakistan's basin water management.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document