scholarly journals Replication of ecologically relevant hydrological indicators following a covariance approach to hydrological model parameterisation

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annie Visser ◽  
Lindsay Beevers ◽  
Sandhya Patidar
Keyword(s):  
Goodness Of Fit ◽  
Hydrological Model ◽  
Model Performance ◽  
Rate Of Change ◽  
Hydrological Models ◽  
Hydrologic Alteration ◽  
Output Time ◽  
Complex Indicators ◽  
The Impact

Abstract. Hydrological models can be used to assess the impact of hydrologic alteration on the river ecosystem. However, there are considerable limitations and uncertainties associated with the replication of the required, ecologically relevant hydrological indicators. Vogel and Sankarasubramanian's covariance approach to model parameterisation represents a shift away from the traditional calibration-validation goodness-of-fit paradigm. Using the covariance structures of the observed input and simulated output time-series, the region of parameter space which best captures (replicates) the characteristics of a hydrological indicator may be identified. Through a case study, a modified covariance approach is applied with a view to replicating a suite of seven ecologically relevant hydrological indicators. Model performance and consistency are assessed relative to four comparative studies. The ability of the approach to address the limitations associated with traditional calibration-validation is further considered. Benefits of the approach include an overall reduction in model uncertainty whilst also reducing overall time-demands. Difficulties in the replication of complex indicators, such as rate of change, are in line with prior work. Nonetheless, the study illustrates that consistency in the replication of hydrological indicators is achievable; additionally, the replication of magnitude indices is markedly improved upon.

scholarly journals Replication of ecologically relevant hydrological indicators following a modified covariance approach to hydrological model parameterization

2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (8) ◽  
pp. 3279-3303 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annie Visser-Quinn ◽  
Lindsay Beevers ◽  
Sandhya Patidar
Keyword(s):  
Parameter Space ◽  
Hydrological Model ◽  
Rate Of Change ◽  
Hydrological Models ◽  
Model Parameterization ◽  
Output Time ◽  
Algorithmic Model ◽  
Traditional Performance ◽  
The Impact

Abstract. Hydrological models can be used to assess the impact of hydrologic alteration on the river ecosystem. However, there are considerable limitations and uncertainties associated with the replication of ecologically relevant hydrological indicators. Vogel and Sankarasubramanian's 2003 (Water Resources Research) covariance approach to model evaluation and parameterization represents a shift away from algorithmic model calibration with traditional performance measures (objective functions). Using the covariance structures of the observed input and simulated output time series, it is possible to assess whether the selected hydrological model is able to capture the relevant underlying processes. From this plausible parameter space, the region of parameter space which best captures (replicates) the characteristics of a hydrological indicator may be identified. In this study, a modified covariance approach is applied to five hydrologically diverse case study catchments with a view to replicating a suite of ecologically relevant hydrological indicators identified through catchment-specific hydroecological models. The identification of the plausible parameter space (here n≈20) is based on the statistical importance of these indicators. Evaluation is with respect to performance and consistency across each catchment, parameter set, and the 40 ecologically relevant hydrological indicators considered. Timing and rate of change indicators are the best and worst replicated respectively. Relative to previous studies, an overall improvement in consistency is observed. This study represents an important advancement towards the robust application of hydrological models for ecological flow studies.

scholarly journals Evaluating the Effect of Numerical Schemes on Hydrological Simulations: HYMOD as A Case Study

Water ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 329
Author(s):  
Shiyan Zhang ◽  
Khalid Al-Asadi
Keyword(s):  
Hydrological Model ◽  
Optimal Parameter ◽  
Model Performance ◽  
Hydrological Models ◽  
Numerical Schemes ◽  
Order Of Accuracy ◽  
Explicit Schemes ◽  
Implicit Schemes ◽  
The Relationship

The importance of numerical schemes in hydrological models has been increasingly recognized in the hydrological community. However, the relationship between model performance and the properties of numerical schemes remains unclear. In this study, we employed two types of numerical schemes (i.e., explicit Runge-Kutta schemes with different orders of accuracy and partially implicit Euler schemes with different implicit factors) in the hydrological model (HYMOD) to simulate the flow hydrograph of the Leaf River basin from 1948 to 1988. Results computed by different numerical schemes were compared and the relationships between model performance and two scheme properties (i.e., the order of accuracy and the implicit factor) were discussed. Results showed that the more explicit schemes generally lead to the overestimation of flow hydrographs, whereas the more implicit schemes lead to underestimation. In addition, the numerical error tended to decrease with increasing orders of accuracy. As a result, the optimal parameter sets found by low-order schemes significantly deviated from those found by the analytical solution. The findings of this study can provide useful implications for designing suitable numerical schemes for hydrological models.

scholarly journals Comparison of hydrological model structures based on recession and low flow simulations

2011 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 6833-6866 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Staudinger ◽  
K. Stahl ◽  
J. Seibert ◽  
M. P. Clark ◽  
L. M. Tallaksen
Keyword(s):  
Hydrological Model ◽  
Lower Layer ◽  
Model Performance ◽  
Low Flow ◽  
Model Structure ◽  
Hydrological Models ◽  
Flow Simulations ◽  
Low Flows ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Model Structures

Abstract. Low flows are often poorly reproduced by commonly used hydrological models, which are traditionally designed to meet peak flow situations. Hence, there is a need to improve hydrological models for low flow prediction. This study assessed the impact of model structure on low flow simulations and recession behaviour using the Framework for Understanding Structural Errors (FUSE). FUSE identifies the set of subjective decisions made when building a hydrological model, and provides multiple options for each modeling decision. Altogether 79 models were created and applied to simulate stream flows in the snow dominated headwater catchment Narsjø in Norway (119 km2). All models were calibrated using an automatic optimisation method. The results showed that simulations of summer low flows were poorer than simulations of winter low flows, reflecting the importance of different hydrological processes. The model structure influencing winter low flow simulations is the lower layer architecture, whereas various model structures were identified to influence model performance during summer.

scholarly journals Comparison of hydrological model structures based on recession and low flow simulations

2011 ◽  
Vol 15 (11) ◽  
pp. 3447-3459 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Staudinger ◽  
K. Stahl ◽  
J. Seibert ◽  
M. P. Clark ◽  
L. M. Tallaksen
Keyword(s):  
Hydrological Model ◽  
Lower Layer ◽  
Model Performance ◽  
Low Flow ◽  
Model Structure ◽  
Hydrological Models ◽  
Flow Simulations ◽  
Low Flows ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Model Structures

Abstract. Low flows are often poorly reproduced by commonly used hydrological models, which are traditionally designed to meet peak flow situations. Hence, there is a need to improve hydrological models for low flow prediction. This study assessed the impact of model structure on low flow simulations and recession behaviour using the Framework for Understanding Structural Errors (FUSE). FUSE identifies the set of subjective decisions made when building a hydrological model and provides multiple options for each modeling decision. Altogether 79 models were created and applied to simulate stream flows in the snow dominated headwater catchment Narsjø in Norway (119 km2). All models were calibrated using an automatic optimisation method. The results showed that simulations of summer low flows were poorer than simulations of winter low flows, reflecting the importance of different hydrological processes. The model structure influencing winter low flow simulations is the lower layer architecture, whereas various model structures were identified to influence model performance during summer.

scholarly journals Development of dynamic system response curve method for estimating initial conditions of conceptual hydrological models

2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (6) ◽  
pp. 1387-1400
Author(s):  
Yiqun Sun ◽  
Weimin Bao ◽  
Peng Jiang ◽  
Xuying Wang ◽  
Chengmin He ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dynamic System ◽  
Response Curve ◽  
Initial Conditions ◽  
Model Performance ◽  
System Response ◽  
Hydrological Models ◽  
Flood Prediction ◽  
Ill Posed ◽  
Value Decomposition

Abstract The dynamic system response curve (DSRC) has its origin in correcting model variables of hydrologic models to improve the accuracy of flood prediction. The DSRC method can lead to unstable performance since the least squares (LS) method, employed by DSRC to estimate the errors, often breaks down for ill-posed problems. A previous study has shown that under certain assumptions the DSRC method can be regarded as a specific form of the numerical solution of the Fredholm equation of the first kind, which is a typical ill-posed problem. This paper introduces the truncated singular value decomposition (TSVD) to propose an improved version of the DSRC method (TSVD-DSRC). The proposed method is extended to correct the initial conditions of a conceptual hydrological model. The usefulness of the proposed method is first demonstrated via a synthetic case study where both the perturbed initial conditions, the true initial conditions, and the corrected initial conditions are precisely known. Then the proposed method is used in two real basins. The results measured by two different criteria clearly demonstrate that correcting the initial conditions of hydrological models has significantly improved the model performance. Similar good results are obtained for the real case study.

Hydrological modelling and anthropogenic water use

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ponnambalam Rameshwaran ◽  
Ali Rudd ◽  
Vicky Bell ◽  
Matt Brown ◽  
Helen Davies ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Climate Change ◽  
Water Use ◽  
Hydrological Model ◽  
Model Performance ◽  
River Flows ◽  
Discharge Data ◽  
New Approach ◽  
Water Demands ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Grid Based

<p>Despite Britain’s often-rainy maritime climate, anthropogenic water demands have a significant impact on river flows, particularly during dry summers. In future years, projected population growth and climate change are likely to increase the demand for water and lead to greater pressures on available freshwater resources.</p><p>Across England, abstraction (from groundwater, surface water or tidal sources) and discharge data along with ‘Hands off Flow’ conditions are available for thousands of individual locations; each with a licence for use, an amount, an indication of when abstraction can take place, and the actual amount of water abstracted (generally less than the licence amount). Here we demonstrate how these data can be used in combination to incorporate anthropogenic artificial influences into a grid-based hydrological model. Model simulations of both high and low river flows are generally improved when abstractions and discharges are included, though for some catchments model performance decreases. The new approach provides a methodological baseline for further work investigating the impact of anthropogenic water use and projected climate change on future river flows.</p>

scholarly journals Comparison of soil moisture fields estimated by catchment modelling and remote sensing: a case study in South Africa

2008 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 751-767 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Vischel ◽  
G. G. S. Pegram ◽  
S. Sinclair ◽  
W. Wagner ◽  
A. Bartsch
Keyword(s):  
South Africa ◽  
Remote Sensing ◽  
Soil Moisture ◽  
Hydrological Model ◽  
Regional Scale ◽  
Remotely Sensed ◽  
Hydrological Models ◽  
Good Correspondence ◽  
Physically Based

Abstract. The paper compares two independent approaches to estimate soil moisture at the regional scale over a 4625 km2 catchment (Liebenbergsvlei, South Africa). The first estimate is derived from a physically-based hydrological model (TOPKAPI). The second estimate is derived from the scatterometer on board the European Remote Sensing satellite (ERS). Results show a good correspondence between the modelled and remotely sensed soil moisture, particularly with respect to the soil moisture dynamic, illustrated over two selected seasons of 8 months, yielding regression R2 coefficients lying between 0.68 and 0.92. Such a close similarity between these two different, independent approaches is very promising for (i) remote sensing in general (ii) the use of hydrological models to back-calculate and disaggregate the satellite soil moisture estimate and (iii) for hydrological models to assimilate the remotely sensed soil moisture.

scholarly journals Scale effect challenges in urban hydrology highlighted with a distributed hydrological model

2018 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 331-350 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdellah Ichiba ◽  
Auguste Gires ◽  
Ioulia Tchiguirinskaia ◽  
Daniel Schertzer ◽  
Philippe Bompard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Scale Effect ◽  
Hydrological Model ◽  
Scale Effects ◽  
Model Performance ◽  
Scale Dependence ◽  
Urban Hydrology ◽  
Distributed Data ◽  
Hydrological Models ◽  
Multi Scale ◽  
Scale Modelling

Abstract. Hydrological models are extensively used in urban water management, development and evaluation of future scenarios and research activities. There is a growing interest in the development of fully distributed and grid-based models. However, some complex questions related to scale effects are not yet fully understood and still remain open issues in urban hydrology. In this paper we propose a two-step investigation framework to illustrate the extent of scale effects in urban hydrology. First, fractal tools are used to highlight the scale dependence observed within distributed data input into urban hydrological models. Then an intensive multi-scale modelling work is carried out to understand scale effects on hydrological model performance. Investigations are conducted using a fully distributed and physically based model, Multi-Hydro, developed at Ecole des Ponts ParisTech. The model is implemented at 17 spatial resolutions ranging from 100 to 5 m. Results clearly exhibit scale effect challenges in urban hydrology modelling. The applicability of fractal concepts highlights the scale dependence observed within distributed data. Patterns of geophysical data change when the size of the observation pixel changes. The multi-scale modelling investigation confirms scale effects on hydrological model performance. Results are analysed over three ranges of scales identified in the fractal analysis and confirmed through modelling. This work also discusses some remaining issues in urban hydrology modelling related to the availability of high-quality data at high resolutions, and model numerical instabilities as well as the computation time requirements. The main findings of this paper enable a replacement of traditional methods of “model calibration” by innovative methods of “model resolution alteration” based on the spatial data variability and scaling of flows in urban hydrology.

Multi-objective calibration of a distributed eco-hydrological model using several remotely sensed information

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Félix Francés ◽  
Carlos Echeverría ◽  
Maria Gonzalez-Sanchis ◽  
Fernando Rivas
Keyword(s):  
Remote Sensing ◽  
Model Calibration ◽  
Hydrological Model ◽  
Model Performance ◽  
Temporal Information ◽  
Temporal Data ◽  
Hydrological Models ◽  
Validation Period ◽  
Spatio Temporal ◽  
Calibration Approach

<p>Calibration of eco-hydrological models is difficult to carry on, even more if observed data sets are scarce. It is known that calibration using traditional trial-and-error approach depends strongly of the knowledge and the subjectivity of the hydrologist, and automatic calibration has a strong dependency of the objective-function and the initial values established to initialize the process.</p><p>The traditional calibration approach mainly focuses on the temporal variation of the discharge at the catchment outlet point, representing an integrated catchment response and provides thus only limited insight on the lumped behaviour of the catchment. It has been long demonstrated the limited capabilities of such an approach when models are validated at interior points of a river basin. The development of distributed eco-hydrological models and the burst of spatio-temporal data provided by remote sensing appear as key alternative to overcome those limitations. Indeed, remote sensing imagery provides not only temporal information but also valuable information on spatial patterns, which can facilitate a spatial-pattern-oriented model calibration.</p><p>However, there is still a lack of how to effectively handle spatio-temporal data when included in model calibration and how to evaluate the accuracy of the simulated spatial patterns. Moreover, it is still unclear whether including spatio-temporal data improves model performance in face to an unavoidable more complex and time-demanding calibration procedure. To elucidate in this sense, we performed three different multiobjective calibration configurations: (1) including only temporal information of discharges at the catchment outlet (2) including both temporal and spatio-temporal information and (3) only including spatio-temporal information. In the three approaches, we calibrated the same distributed eco-hydrological model (TETIS) in the same study area: Carraixet Basin, and used the same multi-objective algorithm: MOSCEM-UA. The spatio-temporal information obtained from satellite has been the surface soil moisture (from SMOS-BEC) and the leaf area index (from MODIS).</p><p>Even though the performance of the first calibration approach (only temporal information included) was slightly better than the others, all calibration approaches provided satisfactory and similar results within the calibration period. To put these results into test, we also validated the model performance by using historical data that was not used to calibrate the model (validation period). Within the validation period, the second calibration approach obtained better performance than the others, pointing out the higher reliability of the obtained parameter values when including spatio-temporal data (in this case, in combination with temporal data) in the model calibration. It is also reliable to mention that the approaches considering only spatio-temporal information provided interesting results in terms of discharges, considering that this variable was not used at all for calibration purposes.</p>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document