scholarly journals Seismic LAB or LID? The Baltic Shield case

2013 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 699-736
Author(s):  
M. Grad ◽  
T. Tiira ◽  
S. Olsson ◽  
K. Komminaho
Keyword(s):  
Baltic Shield ◽  
Barents Sea ◽  
Reference Model ◽  
Original Data ◽  
Moho Depth ◽  
Small Scale ◽  
Low Velocity ◽  
Low Velocity Layer ◽  
The Baltic ◽  
Velocity Layer

Abstract. The problem of the asthenosphere for old Precambrian cratons, including East European Craton and its part – the Baltic Shield, is still discussed. To study the seismic lithosphere-asthenosphere boundary (LAB) beneath the Baltic Shield we used records of 9 local events with magnitudes in the range 2.7–5.9. The relatively big number of seismic stations in the Baltic Shield with a station spacing of 30–100 km permits for relatively dense recordings, and is sufficient in lithospheric scale. For modelling of the lower lithosphere and asthenosphere, the original data were corrected for topography and the Moho depth for each event and each station location, using a reference model with a 46 km thick crust. Observed P and S arrivals are significantly earlier than those predicted by the iasp91 model, which clearly indicates that lithospheric P and S velocities beneath the Baltic Shield are higher than in the global iasp91 model. For two northern events at Spitsbergen and Novaya Zemlya we observe a low velocity layer, 60–70 km thick asthenosphere, and the LAB beneath Barents Sea was found at depth of about 200 km. Sections for other events show continous first arrivals of P waves with no evidence for "shadow zone" in the whole range of registration, which could be interpreted as absence of asthenosphere beneath the central part of the Baltic Shield, or that LAB in this area occurs deeper (>200 km). The relatively thin low velocity layer found beneath southern Sweden, 15 km below the Moho, could be interpreted as small scale lithospheric inhomogeneities, rather than asthenosphere. Differentiation of the lid velocity beneath the Baltic Shield could be interpreted as regional inhomogeneity. It could also be interpreted as anisotropy of the Baltic Shield lithosphere, with fast velocity close to the east-west direction, and slow velocity close to the south-north direction.

scholarly journals TWO‐DIMENSIONAL MODEL SEISMOLOGY

Geophysics ◽  
1954 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 202-219 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jack Oliver ◽  
Frank Press ◽  
Maurice Ewing
Keyword(s):  
High Velocity ◽  
Rayleigh Waves ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
Shear Velocity ◽  
Small Scale ◽  
Two Dimensional ◽  
Low Velocity ◽  
Low Velocity Layer ◽  
High Velocity Layer ◽  
Velocity Layer

The solutions of many problems in seismology may be obtained by means of ultrasonic pulses propagating in small scale models. Thin sheets, serving as two dimensional models, are particularly advantageous because of their low cost, availability, ease of fabrication into various configurations, lower energy requirements, and appropriate dilatational‐to‐shear‐velocity ratios. Four examples are presented: flexural waves in a sheet, Rayleigh waves in a low velocity layer overlying a semi‐infinite high velocity layer, Rayleigh waves in a high velocity layer overlying a semi‐infinite low velocity layer, and body and surface waves in a disk.

Simulation of scattered seismic surface waves on mountainous onshore areas: Understanding the “ground roll energy cone”

2021 ◽  
Vol 40 (8) ◽  
pp. 601-609
Author(s):  
Ivan Javier Sánchez-Galvis ◽  
Jheyston Serrano ◽  
Daniel A. Sierra ◽  
William Agudelo
Keyword(s):  
Surface Waves ◽  
Synthetic Data ◽  
Real Data ◽  
Small Scale ◽  
Low Velocity ◽  
Near Surface ◽  
Seismic Surface Waves ◽  
Ground Roll ◽  
Low Velocity Layer ◽  
Velocity Layer

The accurate simulation of seismic surface waves on complex land areas requires elastic models with realistic near-surface parameters. The SEAM Phase II Foothills model, proposed by the SEG Advanced Modeling (SEAM) Corporation, is one of the most comprehensive efforts undertaken by the geophysics community to understand complex seismic wave propagation in foothills areas. However, while this model includes a rough topography, alluvial sediments, and complex geologic structures, synthetic data from the SEAM consortium do not reproduce the qualitative characteristics of the scattering energy that is generally interpreted as the “ground roll energy cone” on shot records of real data. To simulate the scattering, a near-surface elastic model in mountainous areas ideally must include the following three elements: (1) rough topography and bedrock, (2) low-velocity layer, and (3) small-scale heterogeneities (size approximately Rayleigh wavelength). The SEAM Foothills model only includes element (1) and, to a lesser extent, element (2). We represent a heterogeneous near surface as a random medium with two parameters: the average size of the heterogeneities and fractional fluctuation. A parametric analysis shows the influence of each parameter on the synthetic data and how similar it is compared to real data acquired in a foothills area in Colombia. We perform the analysis in the shot gather panel and dispersion image. Our study shows that it is necessary to include the low-velocity layer and small-scale distributed heterogeneities in the shallow part of the SEAM model to get synthetic data with realistic scattered surface-wave energy.

scholarly journals Pervasive low-velocity layer atop the 410-km discontinuity beneath the northwest Pacific subduction zone: Implications for rheology and geodynamics

2021 ◽  
Vol 554 ◽  
pp. 116642
Author(s):  
Guangjie Han ◽  
Juan Li ◽  
Guangrui Guo ◽  
Walter D. Mooney ◽  
Shun-ichiro Karato ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Subduction Zone ◽  
Northwest Pacific ◽  
Low Velocity ◽  
Low Velocity Layer ◽  
Velocity Layer

Focal mechanisms of earthquakes related to the 29 November 1975 Kalapana, Hawaii, earthquake: The effect of structure models

1981 ◽  
Vol 71 (3) ◽  
pp. 713-729 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. S. Crosson ◽  
E. T. Endo
Keyword(s):  
Main Shock ◽  
Horizontal Layer ◽  
Focal Mechanisms ◽  
Local Network ◽  
The South ◽  
Low Velocity ◽  
Tectonic Model ◽  
Low Velocity Layer ◽  
Using Data ◽  
Velocity Layer

abstract Initial focal mechanism determinations for the 29 November 1975 Kalapana, Hawaii, earthquake indicated discrepancy between the mechanism determined from teleseismic data by Ando and the mechanism determined using data from the local U.S. Geological Survey network surrounding the epicenter region. The resolution of this difference is crucial to correctly understand this earthquake, as well as to understand the tectonics of the south flank of Kilauea volcano. When a model with a low-velocity layer at the base of the crust is used for projection back to the focal sphere for the local network mechanisms, the discrepancy vanishes. To further investigate this result, focal mechanisms were determined using several contrasting models for a set of well-recorded earthquakes. A large number of these earthquakes have mechanisms identical to the main shock when the low-velocity layer model is used. Dispersion of P and T axes is also minimized by use of this model. A low-angle slip direction, favored for the main shock and typical of most other solutions, exhibits remarkable stability normal to the east rift zone of Kilauea. Our results suggest a tectonic model, similar in nature to that proposed by Ando, in which the south flank of Kilauea consists of a mobile block of crust which is relatively free to move laterally on a low-strength zone at about 10 km depth. Forceful injection of magma along the rift zones provides the loading stress which is released by catastrophic failure in the weak, horizontal layer in a cycle of perhaps 100 yr.

Sea-floor evolution: rare-earth evidence

1971 ◽  
Vol 268 (1192) ◽  
pp. 663-706 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Rare Earth ◽  
Mantle Source ◽  
Upper Mantle ◽  
Gulf Of Aden ◽  
Low Velocity ◽  
East Pacific ◽  
Mid Ocean Ridge ◽  
Low Velocity Layer ◽  
Ocean Ridge ◽  
Velocity Layer

A systematic survey of rare-earth (r.e.) abundances in submarine tholeiitic basalts along mid-oceanic ridges has been made by neutron activation analysis. The r.e. fractionation patterns are remarkably uniform along each mid-oceanic ridge and from one ridge to another (Juan de Fuca Ridge, East Pacific and Chile Rise, Pacific-Antarctic, Mid-Indian and Carlsberg Ridge, Gulf of Aden, Red Sea Trough and Reykjanes Ridge). The patterns are all depleted in light r.e. except for three samples (Gulf of Aden and Mid-Indian Ridge) which are unfractionated relative to chondrites. They contrast markedly with tholeiitic plateau basalt which are shown to be related to the early volcanic phases associated with continental drift. Tholeiitic plateau basalts are light r.e. enriched as are most continental rocks. Mid-ocean ridge basalts are also distinguishable from spatially related oceanic shield volcanoes of tholeiitic composition (Red Sea Trough-Jebel Teir Is., East Pacific Rise-Culpepper Island). Thus on a r.e. basis there are tholeiites within tholeiites. The r.e. difference between mid-ocean ridge tholeiites and tholeiitic plateau basalts can be related to distinct thermal and tectonic régimes and consequently magmatic modes and rates of intrusions from the low velocity layer in the upper mantle. The difference between continental and oceanic volcanism appears to be triggered by: (1) presence or absence of a moving continental lithosphere over the low velocity layer, and (2) whether or not major rifts tap the low velocity layer through the lithosphere. Fractional crystallization during ascent of melts before eruption at the ridge crest does not affect appreciably the relative r.e. patterns. R.e. in mid-ocean ridge basalts appear to intrinsically reflect their distribution in the upper mantle source, i.e. the low velocity layer. Based on secondary order r.e. variation of mid-ocean ridge basalts: (1) If fractional crystallization is invoked for the small r.e. variations, up to approximately 50 % extraction of olivine and Ca-poor orthopyroxene in various combinations can be tolerated. However, only limited amount of plagioclase or Ca-rich clinopyroxene can be extracted, the former because of its effect on the abundance of Eu abundance and the latter because of its effect on the [La/Sm] e.f. ratio, alternatively. (2) If partial melting during ascent is invoked, and a minimum of 10% melting is assumed, the permissible degree of melting of originally a lherzolite upper mantle may vary between 10 and 30% . It is not possible to establish readily to what extent these two processes have been operative as they cannot be distinguished on the basis of r.e. data only. However, there is evidence indicating that both have been operative and are responsible for the small r.e. variations observed in mid-ocean ridge basalts. An attempt to correlate second order r.e. variations along or across mid-oceanic ridges with spreading rate, age, or distance from ridge crests has been made but the results are inconclusive. No r.e. secular variation of the oceanic crust is apparent. R.e. average ridge to ridge variations are attributed to small lateral inhomogeneities of the source of basalts in the low velocity layer, and to a certain extent, to its past history. The remarkable r.e. uniformity of mid-oceanic ridge tholeiites requires a unique and simple volcanic process to be operative. It calls for upward migration of melt or slush from a relatively homogeneous source in the mantle—the low velocity layer, followed by further partial melting during ascent. The model, although consistent with geophysics, may have to be reconciled with some evidence from experimental petrology. Models for r.e. composition of the upper mantle source of ridge basalt, formation of layers 2 and 3, and the moho-discontinuity, are also presented.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document