scholarly journals A grading matrix assessment approach to align student performance to Threshold Learning Outcomes (TLOs) in a large first year biology class

Author(s):  
Lesley Lluka ◽  
Prasad Chunduri
2010 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 473-481 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marin Moravec ◽  
Adrienne Williams ◽  
Nancy Aguilar-Roca ◽  
Diane K. O'Dowd

Actively engaging students in lecture has been shown to increase learning gains. To create time for active learning without displacing content we used two strategies for introducing material before class in a large introductory biology course. Four to five slides from 2007/8 were removed from each of three lectures in 2009 and the information introduced in preclass worksheets or narrated PowerPoint videos. In class, time created by shifting lecture material to learn before lecture (LBL) assignments was used to engage students in application of their new knowledge. Learning was evaluated by comparing student performance in 2009 versus 2007/8 on LBL-related question pairs, matched by level and format. The percentage of students who correctly answered five of six LBL-related exam questions was significantly higher (p < 0.001) in 2009 versus 2007/8. The mean increase in performance was 21% across the six LBL-related questions compared with <3% on all non-LBL exam questions. The worksheet and video LBL formats were equally effective based on a cross-over experimental design. These results demonstrate that LBLs combined with interactive exercises can be implemented incrementally and result in significant increases in learning gains in large introductory biology classes.


Author(s):  
Angie O'Neill ◽  
Gülnur Birol ◽  
Carol Pollock

The objectives of this study were to investigate the alignment of exam questions with course learning outcomes in a first year biology majors course, to examine gaps and overlaps in assessment of content amongst the sections of the course, and to use this information to provide feedback to the teaching team to further improve the course. Our ultimate goal was to provide students with learning outcomes that would clearly indicate the content and the level at which they would be expected to learn the content for this course, regardless of the section in which they were registered. We took an evidence-based approach to course evaluation and employed the Blooming Biology Tool to compare the learning outcomes and the exam questions of the course, investigating whether the cognitive skill level of each learning outcome as written matched the level at which it was assessed. We identified misalignments and recommended revising the learning outcomes to better reflect the intended level of learning for the course. We also investigated student performance on exam questions of different cognitive levels and found that students scored statistically significantly higher (p < .05) on questions in which learning outcomes were tested at the stated cognitive skill level compared to at a higher level. Les objectifs de cette étude étaient (1) d’examiner la correspondance entre les questions d’examen et les résultats en matière d’apprentissage pour un cours de première année d’une majeure en biologie, (2) d’étudier les écarts et les chevauchements en matière d’évaluation du contenu des sections du cours et (3) d’utiliser ces informations pour fournir de la rétroaction à l’équipe des enseignants afin d’améliorer le cours. Notre but ultime était de faire en sorte que les résultats de l’apprentissage des étudiants indiquent clairement le contenu à apprendre et le niveau cognitif qu’ils devraient avoir atteint, peu importe la section à laquelle ils s’étaient inscrits. Nous avons utilisé une approche basée sur les données probantes pour évaluer le cours ainsi que l’outil de taxonomie de Bloom appliqué à biologie pour comparer les résultats d’apprentissage et les questions d’examen du cours. Nous souhaitions ainsi vérifier si le niveau de compétences cognitives tel qu’il est écrit pour chaque résultat d’apprentissage correspondait au niveau auquel il était évalué. Nous avons découvert des correspondances inadéquates et avons recommandé de réviser les résultats d’apprentissage pour mieux refléter le niveau d’apprentissage souhaité dans le cours. Nous avons également étudié la performance des étudiants aux questions d’examens en fonction de différents niveaux cognitifs et avons découvert que les résultats des étudiants étaient significativement plus élevés sur le plan statistique (p < 0,05) pour les questions où les résultats d’apprentissage étaient vérifiés au niveau des compétences cognitives déclaré, plutôt qu’à un niveau plus élevé.


2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (6) ◽  
pp. 155-173
Author(s):  
Jonathon Headrick ◽  
◽  
Brooke Harris-Reeves ◽  
Talei Daly-Olm ◽  
◽  
...  

Collaborative testing is recognised as an effective assessment approach linked to positive student outcomes including enhanced test performance and reduced assessment anxiety. While collaborative testing approaches appear beneficial to university students in general, it is unclear whether students from different year levels benefit to the same extent. Therefore, the overarching aim of this study was to compare the perceptions and performances of first and third- year undergraduate students taking part in collaborative testing on multiple occasions during a semester. It was predicted that first-year students would perceive the collaborative testing opportunities as more beneficial than third-years given their limited formative experiences with university assessment. Further, it was expected that students would generally perform at a higher level on collaborative versus individual tests in line with previous work. Student performance and perceptions of collaborative testing were collected on two occasions within a semester over a period of two years in both a first-year and third-year course. Quantitative and qualitative results revealed that first-year students were more receptive and perceived more benefits relating to collaborative testing than third-years despite the fact both cohorts generally performed at a higher standard on the collaborative versus individual components. These findings suggest that while collaborative testing is considered beneficial to most, if not all, students, the benefits appear to be greater for first-year student cohorts.


2015 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 321-336 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adriel Sudhakar ◽  
Jonathan Tyler ◽  
James Wakefield

ABSTRACT This study examines the effectiveness of an online peer review forum (forum). The study allows comparisons to be made between different forum scenarios. The forum was introduced, over a series of semesters, in a first-year accounting screencast assignment: from no forum, to an optional forum, to a compulsory forum. Students indicated that the compulsory forum, underpinned by more structured guidelines for providing feedback, was more beneficial in facilitating improvement in their assignment quality and learning outcomes. We observed improved student performance where a forum was made available. This result is stronger where the use of the forum was optional relative to where it was compulsory. We surmise that this was caused by a higher proportion of exemplar screencasts being posted by more motivated and confident students in the optional forum, creating higher perceived expectations across the total student population. Our findings suggest that more structured feedback through the forum does not necessarily lead to higher performance, even though students value more structured constructive and critical comments as part of their learning experience. These findings highlight the importance of carefully considering forum design and assessment guidelines when embarking on peer review learning initiatives.


Author(s):  
Umar Iqbal ◽  
Deena Salem ◽  
David Strong

The objective of this paper is to document the experience of developing and implementing a second-year course in an engineering professional spine that was developed in a first-tier research university and relies on project-based core courses. The main objective of this spine is to develop the students’ cognitive and employability skills that will allow them to stand out from the crowd of other engineering graduates.The spine was developed and delivered for the first time in the academic year 2010-2011 for first-year general engineering students. In the year 2011-2012, those students joined different programs, and accordingly the second-year course was tailored to align with the different programs’ learning outcomes. This paper discusses the development and implementation of the course in the Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE) department.


2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 237
Author(s):  
Abdallah Namoun ◽  
Abdullah Alshanqiti

The prediction of student academic performance has drawn considerable attention in education. However, although the learning outcomes are believed to improve learning and teaching, prognosticating the attainment of student outcomes remains underexplored. A decade of research work conducted between 2010 and November 2020 was surveyed to present a fundamental understanding of the intelligent techniques used for the prediction of student performance, where academic success is strictly measured using student learning outcomes. The electronic bibliographic databases searched include ACM, IEEE Xplore, Google Scholar, Science Direct, Scopus, Springer, and Web of Science. Eventually, we synthesized and analyzed a total of 62 relevant papers with a focus on three perspectives, (1) the forms in which the learning outcomes are predicted, (2) the predictive analytics models developed to forecast student learning, and (3) the dominant factors impacting student outcomes. The best practices for conducting systematic literature reviews, e.g., PICO and PRISMA, were applied to synthesize and report the main results. The attainment of learning outcomes was measured mainly as performance class standings (i.e., ranks) and achievement scores (i.e., grades). Regression and supervised machine learning models were frequently employed to classify student performance. Finally, student online learning activities, term assessment grades, and student academic emotions were the most evident predictors of learning outcomes. We conclude the survey by highlighting some major research challenges and suggesting a summary of significant recommendations to motivate future works in this field.


1996 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-57
Author(s):  
J. A. Cilliers ◽  
P. Kruger ◽  
I. Basson ◽  
P. A. Kirschner

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document