scholarly journals Pengaruh Pengungkapan Corporate Social Responsibility, Karakter Eksekutif, Profitabilitas Dan Corporate Governance Terhadap Agresivitas Pajak Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 144-154
Author(s):  
Ika Irmawati ◽  
Fadliah Nasaruddin ◽  
Asriani Junaid
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Emotional Intelligence ◽  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Audit Quality ◽  
Personal Characteristics ◽  
The Public ◽  
Negative Effect ◽  
Corporate Social ◽  
Public Accountant

Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk Menguji pengaruh kecerdasar emosional dan pengaruh karakteristik personal seseorang, dalam hal ini auditor terhadap kualitas audit yang dihasilkan oleh auditor di Kantor Akuntan Publik di Makassar. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian adalah survei, yaitu meode pengumpulan data premier dengan memberikan pernyataan-pernyataan kepada responden, sehingga informasi akan dikumpulkan dari sebagian populasi untuk mewakili seluruh populasi untuk memperoleh bukti empiris atas pengaruh kecerdasan emosional dan karakteristik personal auditor terhadap kualitas audit. Berdasarkan hasil pengujian hipotesis, ditemukan bahwa kecerdasan emosional berpengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap kualitas audit, sedangkan karakteristik personal auditor berpengaruh negati dan tidak signifikan terhadap kualitas audit. The purpose of this study is to examine the influence of emotional intelligence and the influence of a person's personal characteristics, in this case the auditor on the quality of audits produced by the auditor at the Public Accountant Office in Makassar. The method used in this study is a survey, which is the method of collecting premier data by giving statements to respondents, so that information will be collected from a portion of the population to represent the entire population to obtain empirical evidence of the influence of emotional intelligence and auditor's personal characteristics on audit quality. Based on the results of hypothesis testing, it was found that emotional intelligence has a positive and significant effect on audit quality, while the personal characteristics of the auditor have a negative effect and are not significant on audit quality.

scholarly journals Pengaruh Kecerdasan Emosional Dan Karakteristik Personal Auditor Terhadap Kualitas Audit Pada Kantor Akuntan Publik Di Makassar

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 102-114
Author(s):  
Ade Octaviany ◽  
Masdar Mas'ud ◽  
Fadliah Nasaruddin
Keyword(s):  
Emotional Intelligence ◽  
Hypothesis Testing ◽  
Empirical Evidence ◽  
Audit Quality ◽  
Personal Characteristics ◽  
Entire Population ◽  
The Public ◽  
Negative Effect ◽  
Public Accountant

Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk Menguji pengaruh kecerdasar emosional dan pengaruh karakteristik personal seseorang, dalam hal ini auditor terhadap kualitas audit yang dihasilkan oleh auditor di Kantor Akuntan Publik di Makassar. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian adalah survei, yaitu meode pengumpulan data premier dengan memberikan pernyataan-pernyataan kepada responden, sehingga informasi akan dikumpulkan dari sebagian populasi untuk mewakili seluruh populasi untuk memperoleh bukti empiris atas pengaruh kecerdasan emosional dan karakteristik personal auditor terhadap kualitas audit. Berdasarkan hasil pengujian hipotesis, ditemukan bahwa kecerdasan emosional berpengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap kualitas audit, sedangkan karakteristik personal auditor berpengaruh negati dan tidak signifikan terhadap kualitas audit. The purpose of this study is to examine the influence of emotional intelligence and the influence of a person's personal characteristics, in this case the auditor on the quality of audits produced by the auditor at the Public Accountant Office in Makassar. The method used in this study is a survey, which is the method of collecting premier data by giving statements to respondents, so that information will be collected from a portion of the population to represent the entire population to obtain empirical evidence of the influence of emotional intelligence and auditor's personal characteristics on audit quality. Based on the results of hypothesis testing, it was found that emotional intelligence has a positive and significant effect on audit quality, while the personal characteristics of the auditor have a negative effect and are not significant on audit quality.

scholarly journals ANALISIS PENGARUH CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY TERHADAP TAX AVOIDANCE DENGAN DIMODERASI GOOD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (02) ◽  
pp. 211-234
Author(s):  
Levi Martantina ◽  
R. Soerjatno
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Tax Avoidance ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
The Board Of Directors ◽  
Negative Effect ◽  
Independent Variable ◽  
Corporate Social

This study aims to examine the effect  of Corporate Social Responsibility on Tax Avoidance in which Good Corporate Governance is moderating variable. Corporate Social Responsibility is independent variable whereas dependent variable is Tax Avoidance. The result of testing the first hyphothesis found that Corporate Social Responsibility has a negative effect on Tax Avoidance. In other words, the company that does extensive disclosure, the company does not practice Tax Avoidance. The result of testing the second hypothesis found that the exixtence of Good Corporate Governance in the board of directors mediate the influence of Corporate Social Responsibility with Tax Avoidance. So that the existence of the board of directors is able to contribute in making extensive disclosure towards Corporate Social Responsibility and practice of Tax Avoidance.

Is corporate governance relevant to the quality of corporate social responsibility disclosure in large European companies?

2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 301-332 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine Adel ◽  
Mostaq M. Hussain ◽  
Ehab K.A. Mohamed ◽  
Mohamed A.K. Basuony
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
European Countries ◽  
Social Implications ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Csr Reporting ◽  
Csr Disclosure ◽  
Corporate Social

Purpose This paper aims to report on the quality of corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure in S&P Europe 350 companies. The paper also examines the impact of corporate governance structure and other firm-specific characteristics on the quality of CSR disclosure in European companies. Design/methodology/approach The paper uses a disclosure index adopted from Jizi et al. (2014). Moreover, the paper contributes to the CSR disclosure literature by developing a new index that includes all the aspects introduced by the Global Reporting Initiative version 4.The data of CSR reporting are manually collected from the firms’ reports. The population and sample of this study are related to 350 companies operating in 16 European countries. Tobit regression analysis is used to test the hypotheses. Findings The results reveal that directors’ ownership, the presence of a CSR committee and firm size positively affect the quality of CSR reporting. Further testing of the independent variables on each CSR sub-category is made. The CSR sub-categories used are, namely, community involvement, employees, environment, social product and service quality, supply chain sustainability and business ethics. The presence of a sustainability committee inside the company is the only factor that shows a strong positive effect on the disclosure of every CSR sub-category and the CSR inclusive index. Research limitations/implications The limitations of this research are that it focuses exclusively on the effect of the internal corporate mechanisms on the quality of CSR reporting; disregarding the economic, institutional, political and cultural factors that can play a role in influencing sustainability reporting of the companies. Practical implications Better CSR disclosure leads to the firm having a better image in the society; this, in turn, has implications on firm performance, attracting funds, as well as recruiting and retaining high profile employees. Stakeholders are placing cumulative significance to corporate transparency particularly in the area of CSR. Managers should exert more efforts into not only improving the disclosure of the various facts of CSR but also into using the various media available for disclosure. Companies should take the initiative of establishing a CSR committee to ensure effective formation and implementation of CSR policies and disclosure of CSR activities. Social implications The CRS research itself bears the merit of social implications. Moreover, the findings of this research pave the way for future researches to examine the effect of the adoption of global CSR initiatives and frameworks on the quality of CSR reporting. Originality/value This paper contributes to the CSR disclosure literature by developing a new index that includes all the aspects of CSR and exploring the relation between the rarely explored “presence of sustainability committee” and CSR disclosure, as well as testing a vast number of CSR sub-categories that is not extensively covered in previous studies. Moreover, the paper covers a large sample of companies across 16 European countries, in terms of their stand-alone sustainability reports, dedicated chapters of CSR in annual reports, integrated reports, website CSR information and any attachments/links provided on the websites for further CSR documents, brochures or data sheets.

scholarly journals The roles of cost of capital, corporate governance, and corporate social responsibility in improving firm value: evidence from Indonesia

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 28-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kartika Hendra Titisari ◽  
M. Moeljadi ◽  
Kusuma Ratnawati ◽  
Nur Khusniyah Indrawati
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Firm Value ◽  
Cost Of Capital ◽  
Corporate Sustainability ◽  
Corporate Image ◽  
Negative Effect ◽  
Corporate Social ◽  
The Impact

Corporate governance (CG) and corporate social responsibility (CSR) are important subjects for corporate sustainability that affect firm value (FV). At the same time research results in several countries provide diverse empirical evidence. This study analyzes the impact of corporate governance (CG) and corporate social responsibility (CSR) on firm value (FV) through the cost of capital (CoC) in public companies of Indonesia. The research sample includes 27 companies that publish sustainability reports and corporate governance reports, with an observation period from 2010 till 2016. This study presents the analysis of three firm value proxies (Tobin’s q (TQ), Price Earnings Ratio (PER), and Price to Book Value (PBV)). Results of hypotheses testing using Partial Least Squares (PLS) show that CG and CSR have both direct and indirect effects on FV. These findings are consistent for all three firm value assessments. According to direct testing, CG has a negative effect on FV, while CSR has a positive effect. The CoC acts as a mediating variable in this relationship. The CG and CSR have a negative effect on CoC, while CoC has a negative effect on FV. The findings show that CG and CSR can improve the company performance and corporate image internally and externally, thereby increasing the investors` confidence, and companies have the opportunity to obtain inexpensive funding sources that can reduce CoC. A decrease in CoC can increase profitability and have an impact on FV increasing.

scholarly journals PENGARUH CORPORATE GOVERNANCE, CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY, DAN KEPEMILIKAN MAYORITAS TERHADAP AGRESIVITAS PAJAK

Paradigma ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 57-68
Author(s):  
Puput Putrianika
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Multiple Regression ◽  
Sampling Method ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Corporate Tax ◽  
Tax Aggressiveness ◽  
Negative Effect ◽  
Corporate Social

This study aims to examine the effect of corporate governance (CG), corporate social responsibility (CSR), and majority ownership on corporate tax aggressiveness. The method used is descriptive with a quantitative approach. The data used in this research is secondary data obtained from www.idx.co.id and IICG. Data were analyzed using multiple regression with SPSS 22.0 software. The research sample was taken using purposive sampling method. The sample of this study used 9 companies that were included in the CGPI ranking during the years 2012-2015. The results showed that corporate governance and majority ownership had no effect on tax aggressiveness. Meanwhile, corporate social responsibility has a significant negative effect on tax aggressiveness. For further research, it is expected to use other variables that can influence tax aggressiveness and to use other proxies to measure the level of tax aggressiveness.

Corporate social responsibility disclosures (CSRD), corporate governance and the degree of multinational activities

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 106-123 ◽  
Author(s):  
William Coffie ◽  
Francis Aboagye-Otchere ◽  
Alhassan Musah
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Developing Country ◽  
Theoretical Perspective ◽  
Positive Association ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Corporate Social

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine the effect of corporate governance and degree of multinational activities (DMAs) on corporate social responsibility disclosures (CSRD) within the context of a developing country. Design/methodology/approach Using the annual report of 33 listed firms spanning from 2008 to 2013, the authors employed content analysis based on an adapted index score of CSRD developed by Hackston and Milne (1996) as applied in similar studies (e.g. Deegan et al., 2002; Hassan, 2014). Guided by the authors’ hypotheses, the authors model quantity and quality of CSRD (two separate econometric models) as functions of multinational activity and corporate governance. Findings The results show that the DMA has a positive association with both quality and quality of CSRD. The results also show that certain corporate governance characteristics such as board size (quality and quantity) as well as the presence of a social responsibility sub-committee of the board (quality) have a positive relationship with CSRD. However, increasing the number of non-executive directors (NEDs) may not necessarily improve the quantity or quality of disclosure. Research limitations/implications The study is limited by theory and geography. Theoretically, the study is based on the legitimacy theory and feels compelled to reiterate the importance of considering alternative theoretical perspective in future research. Again the study is limited geographically as the investigation is based on Ghana only and the authors suggest that future research be extended to other countries. Practical implications This study is important as it demonstrates the importance of providing quality of CSRD to stakeholders when the board of a firm has a sub-committee responsible for corporate social responsibility. Originality/value The results of the study extend the literature on CSRD by demonstrating a new evidence on how the degree of firm’s multinational activities together with corporate government mechanism affects both quantity and quality of CSRD in the context of unchartered developing country. The results support the theoretical view that companies engage in CSRD in attempt to legitimize their operations based on the pressure exerted on them and the mechanism put in place to respond to those pressures.

scholarly journals Pengaruh Kualitas Pengungkapan Corporate Social Responsibility, Dewan Direksi Wanita Dan Dewan Komisaris Wanita Terhadap Tax Aggressive

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 2942-2955
Author(s):  
Beni Rahman ◽  
Charoline Cheisviyanny
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Analysis Technique ◽  
Negative Effect ◽  
Sustainability Reports ◽  
Csr Disclosure ◽  
Corporate Social

The objective of this study is to examine the effect of quality of corporate social responsibility disclosures, female board of directors and female board of commissionerss on tax aggressive. The analysis technique used multiple regression analysis methods. The sample for this study consisted of 19 companies listed on the Indonesia stock exchange (BEI) and reported sustainability reports for 2015-2018, so that 76 observations were obtained. The results found that quality of CSR disclosure has no effect on tax aggressive, the female board of directors has no effect on tax aggressive. While the female board of commissioners has negative effect on tax aggressive. Future researches are sugested to focus on each  company to get better results.

scholarly journals INTENSITAS PENGHINDARAN PAJAK PADA PERUSAHAAN: DAMPAK CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY DAN CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 65
Author(s):  
Arwaly Haifa Salsabila ◽  
Dianwicaksih Arieftiara ◽  
Ni Putu Eka Widiastuti
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Sampling Method ◽  
Audit Quality ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Linear Regression Analysis ◽  
Tax Avoidance ◽  
Multiple Linear Regression Analysis ◽  
Corporate Social

<p><em>The purpose of this study is examine the influence<strong> </strong>of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and Corporate Governance (CG) with proxy institusional ownership and audit quality. In this research leverage and sales growth used as variabele control. The population of this research is sub-sector trade, service and investastation firms that listed in Indonesian Stock Exchange period 2016-2018. Sample selected by purposive sampling method with certain criteria and collected 172 data samples.  Testing the hypothesis in this study used Multiple Linear Regression Analysis. The result of these test indicate that: there is no significant influence of corporate social responsibility on tax avoidance, institusional ownesrship there is a positive significant on tax avoidance, audit quality there is no significant on tax avoidance.</em></p>

scholarly journals Corporate Social Responsibility, Good Corporate Governance, and Management Compensation against Tax Avoidance

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 2612-2625
Author(s):  
Yeyet Rohyati ◽  
Suripto Suripto
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Tax Avoidance ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Management Compensation ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
Negative Effect ◽  
Corporate Social

This study aims to obtain empirical evidence regarding the influence of Corporate Social Responsibility, Good Corporate Governance, and Management Compensation on Tax Avoidance. The population in this study are mining companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2016-2018. Determination of the sample using purposive sampling technique, obtained a sample of 8 companies with 40 observational data. The analysis technique and hypothesis testing are carried out by using panel data regression analysis through Eviews-9. The results show that Corporate Social Responsibility has a positive effect on Tax Avoidance, Good Corporate Governance has no effect on Tax Avoidance, and Management Compensation has a negative effect on Tax Avoidance.

scholarly journals The Analysis of Good Corporate Governance, Corporate Social Responsibility and, Firm Size Toward Firm Value

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 97-101
Author(s):  
Volta Diyanto ◽  
Riska Natariasari
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Firm Size ◽  
Firm Value ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Company Value ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
Negative Effect ◽  
Corporate Social

This research aims to analyze the effect of good corporate governance, corporate social responsibility, and the firm size towards the firm value. The population was banking firms listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange period 2015-2018. Samples used were 28 firms. The analysis method used multiple linear regression. The research results show that managerial ownership does not have effect towards the firm value. Institutional ownership and firm size have positive effect towards the firm value. Corporate social responsibility has negative effect towards the company value.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document