scholarly journals ANALISIS PELAYANAN INFORMASI OBAT (PIO) PADA PASIEN DI APOTEK X PERIODE MEI 2021

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 41
Author(s):  
Neneng Sri Purwaningsih ◽  
Ahmad Senjaya ◽  
Jeniar Ulfita Rukmana

Drug Information Service is an activity of providing and providing information, drug recommendations that are independent, accurate, unbiased, current and comprehensive carried out. The purpose of this study was to analyze the description of drug information services received by patients. This research method is descriptive with accidental sampling technique based on a survey with a sample of 62 respondents. The results of the questionnaire given to patients regarding drug information services were obtained regarding the provision of drug information through leaflets or brochures as much as 22.58% were always carried out; information related to drug names as much as 80.65% is always carried out; drug dosage forms (tabelts, capsules, syrups, creams, ointments, etc.) as much as 82.26% are always carried out; drug doses as much as 77.42% are always carried out; how to use drugs as much as 85.48% are always done; the method of storing drugs as much as 80.65% is always carried out; drug indications as much as 72.58% are always carried out; drug interactions as much as 75.81% are always carried out; prevention of drug interactions as much as 74.19% is always done; drug side effects as much as 79.03% are always carried out; the method of destroying drugs (throwing, burning, or burying) 9.68% is always done. It's just that in drug information services regarding the provision of leaflets or brochures the results are 22.58% and the method of destroying drugs is 9.68%, which means that pharmacists rarely provide information and education to patients at the pharmacy about giving leaflets or brochures and how to destroy drugs. ABSTRAKPelayanan Informasi Obat merupakan kegiatan penyediaan dan pemberian informasi, rekomendasi obat yang independen, akurat, tidak bias, terkini dan komprehensif. Tujuan penelitian ini menganalisis mengidentifikasi gambaran pelayanan informasi obat yang di terima oleh pasien di Apotek X. Metode penelitian ini yaitu deskriptif dengan teknik accidental sampling berdasarkan survei dengan sampel yang didapat yaitu 62 responden. Hasil penelitian dari kuisioner yang diberikan pada pasien mengenai pelayanan informasi obat didapatkan mengenai pemberian informasi obat melalui leaflet atau brosur sebanyak 22,58% selalu dilakukan; informasi terkait nama obat sebanyak 80,65% selalu dilakukan; bentuk sediaan obat (tabelt, kapsul, sirup, cream, salep, dll) sebanyak 82,26% selalu dilakukan; dosis obat sebanyak 77,42% selalu dilakukan; cara pemakaian obat sebanyak 85,48% selalu dilakukan; cara penyimpanan obat sebanyak 80,65% selalu dilakukan; indikasi obat sebanyak 72,58% selalu dilakukan; interaksi obat sebanyak 75,81% selalu dilakukan; pencegahan terhadap interaksi obat sebanyak 74,19% selalu dilakukan; efek samping obat sebanyak 79,03% selalu dilakukan; cara pemusnahan obat (dibuang, dibakar, atau dikubur) sebanyak 9,68% selalu dilakukan. Hanya saja pada pelayanan informasi obat mengenai pemberian leaflet atau brosur hasilnya 22,58% dan cara pemusnahan obat hasilnya 9,68% yang artinya masih jarang dilakukannya pemberian informasi dan edukasi oleh Apoteker kepada pasien di Apotek tersebut tentang pemberian leaflet atau brosur dan cara pemusnahan obat.

1979 ◽  
Vol 13 (10) ◽  
pp. 603-607
Author(s):  
Marianne F. Ivey ◽  
Gary H. Smith

Continuing education “mini-residencies” in drug information services were sponsored by the University of Washington School of Pharmacy's Division of Continuing Education and the University of Washington Drug Information Service (DIS) in August of 1976, 1977, and 1978. Each mini-residency covered a two-week period (a total of 80 hours) and was divided into didactic and experiential sessions. The university's DIS was the major resource for the residents. The two-week residency was designed to provide education and experience in the areas of drug information retrieval, analysis, and dissemination. The program was assessed through pre- and post-testing and a midcourse evaluation session. The residency format of the program allowed practicing pharmacists to return to the university to develop their skills in the area of drug information. The article presents a model for other drug information pharmacists who may want to offer similar training programs.


Author(s):  
Ann Varsha Peter ◽  
Anusha Murali ◽  
Tilu Tomy ◽  
Sushilkumar Prabhakar Londhe

ABSTRACTObjective: To assess the utilization of drug information services and create awareness for enhanced utilization of drug information centre in the hospital.Methodology: A retro-prospective observational study conducted from September 2015 to February 2016. The data obtained from DI request, documentation and feedback forms are analyzed for the parameters such as professional status of enquirer, mode of receipt of query, purpose of enquiry, time frame to reply and references used. Awareness about drug information services was created in the hospital by circulating brochures and interacting with healthcare professionals.Result: A total of 943 queries were retrospectively analysed. Most of the queries obtained from PG/intern (50.27%), during ward rounds (57.48%) and asked for updating knowledge (76.35%). Frequently asked questions were about indications of drugs (18.60%). Mostly answers given as printed (66.70%), replied within a day (46.45%) by using Micromedex (54.72%). Majority of the enquirers rated the DI services as good (54.93%).A total of 394 queries were prospectively analysed. Most of the queries obtained from physicians (42.23%), during ward rounds (59.89%) and asked for updating knowledge (49.49%). Frequently asked questions were about ADRs (21.28%). The mode of reply for the queries given mostly in printed format (41.14%), replied within 2-4hrs (33.75%) by using Micromedex (40.56%). Majority of the enquirers rated the DI services as good (46.98%).Conclusion: The drug information services provided were useful to various healthcare professionals to maintain rational drug therapy by giving unbiased and well-reviewed information.Keywords: Drug information centre, Drug information service, DI query, Micromedex.


2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 375
Author(s):  
Septi Anggraini ◽  
Elida Zairina ◽  
Wahyu Utami

ABSTRACTThe use of medication during pregnancy and breastfeeding cannot be avoided, particularly for those with chronic diseases. The use of medication for these patients require special attention, especially by pharmacists as they have the responsibility to provide medications and appropriate services to achieve optimal therapeutic goals. The drug information service actively provided by pharmacists is a display of their commitment in preventing drug therapy problems and improving the quality of life of pregnant and breastfeeding women. This study aimed to analyze the relationship between pharmacists' beliefs based on the Health Belief Model (HBM) approach and the practice of active drug information service for pregnant and breastfeeding women with chronic diseases. This study was an observational study with a cross-sectional design and used a self-administered questionnaire. 62 pharmacists in Primary Healthcare Centers in Surabaya agreed to participate in this study. The Spearman correlation analysis was used and showed that perceived self-efficacy had the strongest relationship (rs = 0.357) with the practice of providing active drug information. Thus, it can be concluded that perceived self-efficacy is a factor that is directly related to the practice of providing active drug information.Keywords: Active Drug Information Services, Health Belief Model, Pharmacists


2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 497-503
Author(s):  
Yousef Ahmed Alomi ◽  
Saeed Jamaan Alghamdi ◽  
Radi Abdullah Alattyh

Objective: To explore the National Survey of Drug Information Centers practice in Saudi Arabia: Leadership and Practice management at Ministry of Health hospital. Method: It is a cross-sectional four months national survey of Drug Information Services at Ministry of Health hospital. It contained ten domains with 181 questions designed by the authors. It was derived from Internal Pharmaceutical Federation, American Society of Health-System Pharmacists best practice guidelines. This survey was distributed to forty hospital pharmacies that run drug information services. In this study, domain of Drug Monitoring and Patient Counselling System explored and analyzed. It consisted of eight questions about the written policy and procedure and application methods for Leadership and Practice management in the drug information centers. All analysis was done through survey monkey system. Results: The survey distributed to 45 of hospitals, the response rate, was 40 (88.88%) hospitals. The highest score of the DIC had policy and procedures with a clear mission, vision, and values were Evidence of valid Saudi Council of Health Specialties license to practice in Saudi Arabia did not exist in 3 (7.5%) hospitals while 30 (75%) of hospitals 100% applied the elements. The highest score of the Drug information centers had a space, adequate furniture, hours of operation were determined and announced as well as there was a qualified and licensed staffing. All Drug Information Centers staff had valid licenses from Saudi Commission for Health Specialties to practice in Saudi Arabia, did not exist in 6 (15%) hospitals while 30 (75%) of hospitals 100% applied the elements. The highest score of the Drug Information Centers Supervisor, reports workload statistics to the appropriate and leadership number of Full Time Employee staff and actual workload published was the answering question depends on the priority of the question did not exist in 6 (15%) hospitals while only 22 (55%) of hospitals 100% applied the elements. The highest score of the Drug Information Centers showed evidence of Quality Improvement, and the process for Drug Information Centers Networking. The reporting any questionable drug quality to Pharmacy director, did not exist in 4 (10 %) hospitals while only 25 (62.5%) of hospitals 100% applied the elements. Conclusion: There were an acceptable implementation leadership and practice management in drug information centers practice. The drug information centers workload analysis and quality management should improve. Drug information centers network indication required an implementation to improve the services at Ministry of Health hospital in Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.


1999 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 171-176 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Judith M Bingham ◽  
Helen Matthews ◽  
Alan Saunders ◽  
Graeme Vernon ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 62 (23) ◽  
pp. 2514-2516 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy Friedman Wilson ◽  
Kevin G. Moores ◽  
Cathy L. Bartels ◽  
Linda K. Ohri ◽  
Patrick M. Malone

Author(s):  
Krishnaveni K. ◽  
Kameswaran R. ◽  
Sumitha S. K. ◽  
Achsah Susan Sajan

Background: To evaluate the performance of Drug Information Centre (DIC) in providing quality drug information services to the health care professionals.Methods: It was a prospective study carried out for a period of six months (June-November 2017). The drug information services provided by the pharmacist at the DIC during ward rounds, direct access, telephone and mail were documented in the drug information request and documentation forms. The quality of drug information provided was assessed with the help of feedback questionnaire which was filled by receivers.Results: A total of 283 queries were received, with a maximum from ward rounds 140(49.47%). On evaluation, it was found that most of the queries were from physicians 207 (73.14%) followed by nurses 33(11.66%), pharmacists 26 (9.18%), patients 17 (6.07%). Among that 178 (62.89%) queries were received from department of general medicine. Most of the queries were intended to update knowledge 110 (38.86%) and for the purpose of better patient care 90 (31.81%). The time frame for an authentic reply ranged from minutes to 24 hours, where a maximum of 110 (38.86%) queries had sent a 24 hours deadline. The majority of the queries were for adverse drug reactions [ADR-60 (21.20%)] and most preferred resources were primary 188 (66.43%).Conclusions: The DIC has always presented and offered itself to be an impressive resource, which is used routinely as an information source by all levels of professionals involved in the health system, in addition to the patients themselves.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document