scholarly journals Development of gluten-free non-yeasted dough structure as factor of bread quality formation

10.5219/1201 ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 971-983
Author(s):  
Olga Shanina ◽  
Ivan Galyasnyj ◽  
Tetyana Gavrysh ◽  
Kateryna Dugina ◽  
Yuriy Sukhenko ◽  
...  

The article is devoted to the study of the influence of hydrocolloids and animal protein concentrates on the formation of the foam-like structure of gluten-free non-yeast dough as the main factor for bread quality formation. The use of CMC in a concentration of 0.5% is found to be appropriate. The bread volume increases to 236 cm3.100g-1 in comparison with the control sample in water – 202 cm3.100g-1. It is proved that the suggested additives in the amounts of 0.5 ‒ 1.0% Helios-11 and 0.5% CMC solution cause 100% resistance of egg white foam. In this case, the foaming ability increases with the addition of Helios-11 only in amounts up to 1.0%, then decreases for higher amounts of Helios-11 or in the presence of CMC. This can be explained by the increase in density of the whipping mass and the ability of both additives to thicken solutions. In the presence of the additives, the foamy texture of the dough changes. The number of large pores (0.7 – 1.5 mm) decreases almost fourfold, and the number of small and very small pores (0.1 ‒ 0.5 mm) increases significantly. The index of form resistance of the control sample is 32, and in the presence of 0.5% CMC with 0.5 ‒ 1.0% APC is 20 ‒ 21, which indicates a decrease in the surface tension of the aqueous solutions with additives, to a large extent, in the case of joint use.

Entropy ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (12) ◽  
pp. 1337
Author(s):  
Xiangfeng Tian ◽  
Lemeng Wang ◽  
Pan Zhang ◽  
Dong Fu

The surface tension and viscosity values of N-methyldiethanolamine (MDEA) aqueous solutions promoted by tetramethylammonium arginate ([N1111][Arg]) were measured and modeled. The experimental temperatures were 303.2 to 323.2 K. The mass fractions of MDEA (wMDEA) and [N1111][Arg] (w[N1111][Arg]) were 0.300 to 0.500 and 0.025 to 0.075, respectively. The measured surface tension and viscosity values were satisfactorily fitted to thermodynamic models. With the aid of experimentally viscosity data, the activation energy (Ea) and H2S diffusion coefficient (DH2S) of MDEA-[N1111][Arg] aqueous solution were deduced. The surface entropy and surface enthalpy of the solutions were calculated using the fitted model of the surface tension. The quantitative relationship between the calculated values (surface tension, surface entropy, surface enthalpy, viscosity, activation energy, and H2S diffusion coefficient) and the operation conditions (mass fraction and temperature) was demonstrated.


1976 ◽  
Vol 55 (2) ◽  
pp. 738-743 ◽  
Author(s):  
F.E. Cunningham
Keyword(s):  

2007 ◽  
Vol 79 (3) ◽  
pp. 1033-1047 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Lazaridou ◽  
D. Duta ◽  
M. Papageorgiou ◽  
N. Belc ◽  
C.G. Biliaderis

2015 ◽  
Vol 50 (8) ◽  
pp. 1743-1749 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tae-Young Kang ◽  
Kee Hyuk Sohn ◽  
Mi-Ra Yoon ◽  
Jeom-Sig Lee ◽  
Sanghoon Ko

2015 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 109-116 ◽  
Author(s):  
RONE B. DE OLIVEIRA ◽  
ULISSES R. ANTUNIASSI ◽  
MARCO A. GANDOLFO

This study defined the main adjuvant characteristics that may influence or help to understand drift formation process in the agricultural spraying. It was evaluated 33 aqueous solutions from combinations of various adjuvants and concentrations. Then, drifting was quantified by means of wind tunnel; and variables such as percentage of droplets smaller than 50 μm (V50), 100 μm (V100), diameter of mean volume (DMV), droplet diameter composing 10% of the sprayed volume (DV0.1), viscosity, density and surface tension. Assays were performed in triplicate, using Teejet XR8003 flat fan nozzles at 200 kPa (medium size droplets). Spray solutions were stained with Brilliant Blue Dye at 0.6% (m/ v). DMV, V100, viscosity cause most influence on drift hazardous. Adjuvant characteristics and respective methods of evaluation have applicability in drift risk by agricultural spray adjuvants.


2015 ◽  
Vol 52 (10) ◽  
pp. 6323-6333 ◽  
Author(s):  
Camino M. Mancebo ◽  
Cristina Merino ◽  
Mario M. Martínez ◽  
Manuel Gómez

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document