This study highlights the main criticisms of unconstitutionality that have been introduced
so far for the framework regulation applicable to the procedure for the
enforcement of judgments regarding minors, the solutions pronounced by the
Constitutional Court of Romania and the considerations that were based on, in
order to contribute to the awareness of certain issues to which a legal and
institutional solution must be found, in order to achieve the desire of the best
interests of the child. The existence of the applications based on the legal
provisions mentioned, the solutions pronounced by the courts notified, the
dysfunctions found, but also bringing to public attention certain situations that
revealed the need to give pre-eminence, in the settlement of these cases, the
psychological side, not only counselling minors, but also their parents, are
elements that may require a rethinking of the procedure for enforcing
judgments regarding minors, but also of the way in which these provisions are
implemented.