Abstract
The object of this paper is to draw attention to the present unsatisfactory state of the hardness testing of vulcanized rubber and the need for standardization of this test, and also to present some results of an investigation into the theoretical basis of hardness testing and the practical significance of hardness measurements. In this paper the word “hardness” will be used in the sense generally accepted in the rubber industry, that is, to denote resistance to indentation. The most commonly used types of hardness tester measure hardness in terms of the depth of the indentation made by a rigid ball or blunt pin pressed into the rubber by either a dead weight or a spring. The reading given by such an instrument, usually termed the hardness number, must depend on several variable factors, namely (1) the dimensions of the ball or pin; (2) the weight used to press it into the rubber, or the compression characteristics of the spring in the case of spring-loaded instruments; (3) the direction of the scale of the instrument, i. e., whether the reading increases with the depth of indentation, as in the Pusey-Jones Plastometer, or in the reverse direction, as in the Durometer; (4) the units in which the indentation is measured, i. e., whether in 100ths of a millimeter, 1000ths of an inch, or arbitrary units. In addition to these factors relating to the instrument, the reading must also depend on the dimensions of the rubber test-piece, especially its thickness, the nature of the rubber surface, and the period for which the ball or plunger is pressed on to the rubber before the reading is taken.
