Move Analysis of Research Article Abstracts: A Cross-Disciplinary Study

2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 125 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Mohammadi Darabad

<p>The present paper aims at investigating the formation of research article abstracts in terms of their rhetorical structure. To this end, three Applied Linguistics, Applied Mathematics, and Applied Chemistry journals have been selected. The main focus of the analysis was put on the rhetorical structure – the moves and steps employed in each specific abstract. The authors' self-mention, voice, and tense of the verbs included in each move were also inspected. Therefore, a total of 63 abstract (21 published abstracts from each field) from credited international journals were randomly selected and assigned for analysis. The Five-Move Model by Hyland (2000) was chosen as a basic model for the analysis. Accordingly, the constituent moves and steps were examined and recognized in the categories of selected abstracts. The obtained results were scrutinized and consequently the leading move patterns of each discipline, specific moves and steps, voice and tense of verbs hired in each move, and the authors' self-mention alternations were identified. Finally, the pedagogical implications for the expert teachers working in the fields of Discourse analysis (DA), English for Academic Purposes (EAP), and English for Specific Purposes (ESP) are presented.</p>

SAGE Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 215824402110407
Author(s):  
Hesham Suleiman Alyousef

The research article (RA) abstract is the first section researchers read to determine its relevance to their interests. Researchers need to possess an implicit knowledge of the rhetorical move structure and organization of this section. Unlike most scientific disciplines, political science RA abstracts are unstructured, that is, with no headings (or moves), which makes it more challenging. To the best of our knowledge, the rhetorical move structure in high readership political science RA abstracts has not been researched. This study investigated (a) the rhetorical move structure in 120 political science RA abstracts from six high-impact journals, (b) the most common move patterns, and (c) the move(s) occupying most textual space. The findings indicated the lack of obligatory moves. A move structure model for writing a political science RA abstract is proposed, comprising four conventional moves (Introduction [I]–Purpose [P]–Methods [M]–Results [R]) and two optional step/move, namely, Research Gap step and Discussion [D] move. The results also showed that the first most frequent move pattern is I-P-M-R-D, followed by I-P-M-R and the I-P-R-D. The fact that an RA abstract summarizes the whole RA results in move embedding, particularly in the four moves, I-P-M-R. The findings revealed the importance of the Results move as it occupied nearly one third of text space. The results may contribute to the fields of discourse and genre studies. They may provide invaluable insights for novice political science researchers attempting to publish their work in high-ranking journals. The proposed move structure model can act as a guide for English for Academic Purposes (EAP)/English for Specific Purposes (ESP) tutors and political science authors.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 9-25
Author(s):  
Yasir Bdaiwi Al-Shujairi

      The discussion section forms an integral part in the writing process of a research article (RA). Research authors find it difficult to write and produce a well-structured discussion for their findings. The reason could be due to the unawareness of the main components (rhetorical moves) that shape this section. Therefore, this paper aims to provide a review of the studies that have been done to analyze the discussion section of RAs over the last 36 years. Also, this review seeks to examine the discussion section of RAs across various scientific disciplines and different types of journals. The review showed that the rhetorical structure of RAs discussion section witnessed some changes over the course of time. New moves such as Research Implications and Research Limitations started to be parts of the discussion section of RAs. In addition, it was revealed that differences in writing the discussion section can be varied broadly across disciplines such as soft sciences (e.g., applied linguistics, sociology, psychology) and hard sciences (e.g., engineering, chemistry, biology) and slightly across types of journals such as ISI and local journals. In conclusion, this paper offered several suggestions for further research to be conducted in the area.  


RELC Journal ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 51 (3) ◽  
pp. 381-396
Author(s):  
Reza Khany ◽  
Bahareh Malmir

While a wealth of research is available on the frequent multi-word units in academic genres, studies that exclusively link lexical sequences to the rhetorical moves in research articles (RAs) are fairly limited. This study involved compiling a corpus of 8,500 RA abstracts sampled from five disciplines of economics, law, political sciences, psychology, and sociology in social and behavioural sciences. Three to nine-word ngrams were generated using AntConc 3.4.4, which is a freeware corpus analysis toolkit. All the ngrams were studied in their contexts through concordance analysis and classified based on the rhetorical moves in which they occurred using the move structure taxonomy suggested by Hatzitheodorou (2014). Eventually, ngrams were processed at multiple levels and synthesized into 84 move-marker structures. This study offers insights into the linguistic realizations of moves in RA abstracts and introduces the concept of move-marker structures. In so doing, the potentials of positionally variable move-marker structures in improving English for Academic Purposes (EAP)/English for Specific Purposes (ESP) learners’ phraseological competence are suggested.


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-24
Author(s):  
Chinwe Ezeifeka

This paper analyses selected research article introductions of doctoral seminars in the Department of English Language and Literature, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka, to determine how these academic writings follow specific formats characteristic of such genres. Specifically the work looks at the staged cognitive organisation of the selected samples in line with the requisite schematic or generic structure postulated in Bhatia (1993) and adopted by the University of Southern California (USC). Every genre is characterized by culture-bound unique structuring and communicative purposes that give it generic coherence. Research article introduction is an academic sub-genre with specified conventions characterising genres from the academic culture/community. A total of eighteen samples of research introductions were analysed, the aim being to determine whether the cognitive move structures in the samples conform with, or depart from, the conventionalized patterns of this academic sub-genre and how the pattern used in the samples enabled or militated against the writers’ achievement of the desired communicative purposes. A critical reading of doctoral seminars in the Department shows lack of knowledge of the unique formatting of introductions, making this work to be anchored on English for Specific Purposes (ESP) with particular emphasis on English for Academic Purposes (EAP). The baseline of the findings is to discover the present proficiency of these group of learners, enlighten budding academics on the move structure of article introductions in order to achieve generic coherence as well as target proficiency in that sub-genre of academic writing.


2007 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 80-83

07–142Bowles, Hugo (U Rome, Italy), Bridging the gap between conversation analysis and ESP – an applied study of the opening sequences of NS and NNS service telephone calls. English for Specific Purposes (Elsevier) 25.2 (2006), 332–357.07–143Charles, Maggie (U Oxford Language Centre, UK), Phraseological patterns in reporting clauses used in citation: A corpus-based study of theses in two disciplines. English for Specific Purposes (Elsevier) 25.2 (2006), 310–331.07–144Csomay, Eniko (San Diego State U, USA), Academic talk in American university classrooms: crossing the boundaries of oral-literate discourse?Journal of English for Academic Purposes (Elsevier) 5.2 (2006), 117–135.07–145Juola, Patrick, John Sofko & Patrick Brennan (Duquesne U, Pittsburgh, USA; [email protected]), A prototype for authorship attribution studies. Literary and Linguistic Computing (Oxford University Press) 21.2 (2006), 169–178.07–146Kleiber, Georges (UFR Philosophie, linguistique et informatique, 67084 Strasbourg, France; [email protected]) & Francine Gerhard-Krait, Quelque part: du spatial au non spatial en passant par l'indétermination et la partition [Quelque part: From the spatial to the non-spatial by way of indeterminacy and partition]. Journal of French Language Studies (Cambridge University Press) 16.2 (2006), 147–166.07–147Northcott, Jill & Gillian Brown (Institute for Applied Language Studies, Edinburgh, UK), Legal translator training: Partnership between teachers of English for legal purposes and legal specialists. English for Specific Purposes (Elsevier) 25.2 (2006), 358–375.07–148Palacios-Martínez, Ignacio & Ana Martínez-Insua (U de Santiago de Compostela, Spain; [email protected]), Connecting linguistic description and language teaching: Native and learner use of existential there. International Journal of Applied Linguistics (Blackwell) 16.2 (2006), 213–231.07–149Pilz, Thomas, Wolfram Luther & Norbert Fuhr (U Duisburg-Essen, Germany; [email protected]), Rule-based search in text databases with nonstandard orthography. Literary and Linguistic Computing (Oxford University Press) 21.2 (2006), 179–186.07–150Richter Lorentzen, Lise (U Trondheim, Norway; [email protected]), Le fonctionnement du pronom adverbial y et la concurrence entre y, là et là-bas en emploi spatial [The function of the adverbial pronoun y and the competition between y, là and là-bas in spatial use]. Journal of French Language Studies (Cambridge University Press) 16.2 (2006), 167–185.07–151Song, Jae Jung (U Otago, New Zealand; [email protected]), The translatability-universals connection in linguistic typology: much ado about something. Babel (John Benjamins) 51.4 (2005), 308–322.07–152Suárez, Octavio Santana, José Rafael Pérez Aguiar, Luis Losada García & Francisco Javier Carreras Riudavets (U Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain; [email protected]), Functional disambiguation based on syntactic structures. Literary and Linguistic Computing (Oxford University Press) 21.2 (2006), 187–197.07–153Yakhontova, Tatyana (Ivan Franko National U L'viv, Ukraine), Cultural and disciplinary variation in academic discourse: The issue of influencing factors. Journal of English for Academic Purposes (Elsevier) 5.2 (2006), 153–167. doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2006.03.002


2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 12
Author(s):  
Sultan H. Alharbi

This genre-based study investigates the move-step structure of two sets of English-medium research article introductions (RAIs) in the field of applied linguistics using Swales&rsquo; (1990, 2004) Create a Research Space (CARS) model of move/step analysis. A corpus of 30 RAIs from two English-medium research articles (15 International and 15 Local) was selected. The international research articles written for an international readership were selected from the journal English for Specific Purposes, while the local research articles, written for local readers, were selected from Arab World English Journal. The findings indicated that although the three moves suggested by the CARS (Swales, 1990, 2004) model appeared in the two subcorpora, some variation was observed with respect to the range of moves employed in each subcorpus. As expected, Move 2 was not always found in texts in the Local subcorpus. In terms of steps and sub-steps analysis, the findings showed the three steps and sub-steps of Move 1 are conventional in the International and Local applied linguistics RAIs. Further, while M2-S1B is conventional and M2-S1A is optional in the Local subcorpus, these two sub-steps of Move 2 are conventional in the International subcorpus. There were no striking differences between the two subcorpora with regard to the employment of the proposed steps of Move 3. Limitations and the implications of the findings, as well as recommendation of some suggestions for future research are provided.


2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 234-245
Author(s):  
Muhammad Luhfi ◽  
Ansor Putra ◽  
Arman Arman

This study is intended to analyze the form of Framing of Covid-19 vaccine new on CNN website based on Discourse Analysis perspective theory of Framing Analysis by Zhondang Pan & Gerald M. Kosicki. The objective of this research is “To describe how are the forms of framing of covid 19 vaccine news on CNN website”. This research used the descriptive qualitative method. The researcher used Zhondang Pan & Gerald M. Kosicki Framing Models to analyze the data. The source of the data in this research was taken from News on CNN Website. The data was collected through reading intensively, identifying and selecting, classifying, describing, and interpreting the data to get a complete conclusion of Framing Covid-19 Vaccine News on CNN Website by Zhondang Pan & Gerald M. Kosicki theory. The researcher analyzes six pieces of data or news from the CNN website. The result showed there are framing the researcher found based on four models of framing Pan & Kosicki namely: Syntactical Structure, Script Structure, Thematical Structure and Rhetorical Structure in six data or news from CNN website.  


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document