Combined use of Epithelial Membrane Antigen and Nuclear Matrix Protein 52 as Sensitive Biomarkers for Detection of Bladder Cancer

2015 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 407-413 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdelfattah M. Attallah ◽  
Mohamed El-Far ◽  
Sanaa O. Abdallah ◽  
Ahmed M. El-Waseef ◽  
Mohamed M. Omran ◽  
...  

Background The advent of noninvasive urine-based markers as well as other novel modalities has yielded improved diagnostic accuracy. However, the new markers failed to reach higher sensitivity and specificity. We therefore evaluated the potential role of epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) and nuclear matrix protein 52 (NMP-52) singly and combined as noninvasive biomarkers for the detection of bladder cancer (BC). Methods A total of 160 individuals including 66 patients with BC, 54 patients with benign urologic disorders and 40 healthy volunteers were investigated. Urinary EMA at 130 kDa and NMP at 52 kDa were identified, purified and quantified by Western blot, electroelution and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The diagnostic performance of each biomarker and their combination were compared using area under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC). Results Mean urinary EMA, 2.42 µg/mL, and NMP-52, 17.85 µg/mL, were significantly elevated in patients with BC compared to controls, 1.18 and 3.44 µg/mL, respectively (p<0.0001). The combined use of these markers yielded values which were increased 4.4- and 13.7-fold in the benign and malignant disease groups, respectively, with respect to the normal group. The values of EMA and NMP-52 were significantly higher in patients with higher-grade tumors than those with lower-grade tumors (p<0.0001). Moreover, this combination could predict all BC stages and grades with 0.91 AUC, 94% sensitivity and 80% specificity. Conclusions EMA and NMP-52 in combination could be promising noninvasive biomarkers for BC detection.

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (10) ◽  
pp. 59-62
Author(s):  
Mohamed J. Saadh

Bladder cancer (BC) is the most important tumor problem of urologic cancer. Therefore, noninvasive urinary biomarkers were used for diagnosis of BC. However, the new biomarkers failed to reach higher accuracy. The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic efficacy of nuclear matrix protein-22 (NMP- 22), nuclear matrix protein-52 (NMP-52), urinary cytology and to investigate combinations of urine NMP-52 with urinary cytology as noninvasive biomarkers to increase diagnostic performance of bladder cancer at different grades and stages. Overall, there were 156 subjects (62 BC, 54 cystitis patients and 40 healthy volunteers). The NMP-22 and NMP-52 were quantified in urine samples by ELISA. The urinary cytology is used by some physicians routinely for diagnosis of BC. The sensitivity and specificity for NMP-52 were 94% and 82%, for NMP-22 69% and 80.8% and for cytology 56% and 94.6% respectively and also, both urinary NMP-22 and NMP-52 have extremely significant relation (p<0.0001) to BC vs. healthy individuals and cystitis patients. Moreover, the combination of NMP- 52 with urinary cytology could predict all BC stages and grade with 95.6% sensitivity and 94.3% specificity. In conclusion, NMP-52 and urinary cytology in combination improve diagnostic performance for BC detection in different pathological types.


2006 ◽  
Vol 175 (4S) ◽  
pp. 317-317
Author(s):  
Shahrokh F. Shariat ◽  
Michael Marberger ◽  
Yair Lotan ◽  
Marta Sanchez-Carbayo ◽  
Craig D. Zippe ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 96 (3) ◽  
pp. 334-339 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdelfattah M. Attallah ◽  
Hanem A. Sakr ◽  
Hisham Ismail ◽  
El-Sayed K. Abdel-Hady ◽  
Ibrahim El-Dosoky

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Chang-sheng Xia ◽  
Chun-hong Fan ◽  
Ming Su ◽  
Qing-song Wang ◽  
Hui-zhang Bao

Objective. To evaluate the performance of the nuclear matrix protein 22 (NMP22) BladderChek test in urothelial carcinoma (UC). Methods. We retrospectively analyzed 1318 patients who performed the NMP22 BladderChek tests. Of them, 103 were primary UC patients, 90 were surgical treatment UC patients, and 1125 were benign disease patients. The performance of the NMP22 BladderChek test for the diagnosis of primary and recurrent UC was evaluated. Moreover, the performance of urine cytology and the NMP22 BladderChek test for the diagnosis of primary UC was compared in 90 available subjects including 48 primary UC patients and 42 benign disease patients. Results. The sensitivity and specificity of the NMP22 BladderChek test were 37.9% and 95.8%, respectively, for the diagnosis of primary UC (n=1228). The corresponding parameters of the NMP22 BladderChek test were 31.0% and 88.5%, respectively, for the diagnosis of recurrent UC (n=90). The sensitivity and specificity of urine cytology were 54.2% and 97.6%, respectively, for the diagnosis of primary UC (n=90); the corresponding parameters of the NMP22 BladderChek test were 41.7% and 83.3%, respectively; the corresponding parameters of the two tests combination were 64.6% and 83.3%, respectively. There was a significant difference in the performance between the NMP22 BladderChek test and urine cytology or the combination of two tests (P=0.017 and 0.001, respectively). Conclusions. The NMP22 BladderChek test has a low sensitivity for detecting primary and recurrent UC. Urine cytology is superior to the NMP22 BladderChek test, and combined use of the two tests improves the sensitivity in the detection of primary UC.


2001 ◽  
Vol 66 (2) ◽  
pp. 72-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sven Lahme ◽  
Karl-Horst Bichler ◽  
Gerhard Feil ◽  
Steffen Krause

PLoS ONE ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 7 (7) ◽  
pp. e40305 ◽  
Author(s):  
John D. Kelly ◽  
Tim J. Dudderidge ◽  
Alex Wollenschlaeger ◽  
Odu Okoturo ◽  
Keith Burling ◽  
...  

1999 ◽  
pp. 120
Author(s):  
Julio Rodriguez-Villanueva ◽  
Joel W. Slaton ◽  
H. Barton Grossman ◽  
Herbert A. Fritsche ◽  
Colin P. N. Dinney

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document